
Chhetri's omission: A question of answers
The media release from the All India Football Federation (AIFF) listing the 22 who had joined the preparatory camp in Bengaluru was posted in the journalists' WhatsApp group late on Friday. It had to be read with an earlier social media post from AIFF that named the 13 who were yet to report to understand that Jamil is looking beyond the talisman who turned 41 on August 3.
In the absence of any kind of announcement regarding Chhetri's unavailability, it will have to be assumed that the India captain has been dropped. Which would be a rare thing in the 20-year international career of a player who has the most international goals (95) after Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi among active players.
Bengaluru FC, where Chhetri's contract has a year to run, have not started training and suspended salaries of the first team and staff in the absence of clarity on the 2025-26 season. Yet, Jamil has included six players from the club. On Friday, they and Jamil had their first training session. On the same day, after a back injury while on holiday, Chhetri trained on his own.
Manolo Marquez had persuaded Chhetri to come out of international retirement. It was announced with some razzmatazz on social media on March 6, but Chhetri could not reproduce his Indian Super League form of 14 goals and two assists – his best returns in seven seasons. In four matches for India, he has one goal and no assist.
'It was risky, yes,' Marquez told HT last month after leaving his post as India head coach. 'But we had problems finding goals and he was scoring in ISL…Now, everyone can say that it was a mistake and I need to accept that. But I think that was not a mistake. He is a top professional and I was very satisfied to be able to count on him.'
There could be a number of reasons for Chhetri's contrasting form for club and country: the quality of players at Bengaluru FC, the difference in the level of opponents in ISL and international football are but two. But if last season is the benchmark, Chhetri is fit and retains game smarts necessary for international football.
But just as it is Chhetri's decision to be available, it is Jamil's to look ahead. He has a two-year contract with the option for a third. Chhetri is unlikely to continue in club football beyond 2025-26 so Jamil seeking forwards who will play beyond that is a fair call.
But in the absence of an official statement, all of this is speculation. Could AIFF have got Jamil to explain his selections and omissions in the media release? Should AIFF change its ways and get head coaches to do that always? Could Jamil and Chhetri have got on the phone with the coach telling the player why he was being left out? Could that have been mentioned in the media release? The answer to all of the above is: yes.
After a rousing send-off in June 2024, Chhetri would have needed some persuasion, possibly ignored advice from his family, to pull on an India shirt again. He has chosen not to speak about it. What does Jamil's decision mean for his international future? If this is it, if the low of a defeat to Hong Kong is how it ends, does Chhetri, and the rest of India, not deserve to know that?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Lionel Messi included in Argentina squad for FIFA World Cup 2026 CONMEBOL qualifiers
Argentina, on Monday, released a 26-man squad list for its FIFA World Cup 2026 CONMEBOL qualifiers in September. The defending champion, which has already booked a place for the showpiece event next year, will play Venezuela and Ecuador in its last two qualifiers. Lionel Messi has been included in the 26-man squad list. #SelecciónMayor 🇦🇷 Prelista de convocados para la próxima doble fecha de Eliminatorias Sudamericanas 🏆 — 🇦🇷 Selección Argentina ⭐⭐⭐ (@Argentina) August 18, 2025 Argentina tops the standings with 35 points from 16 matches. Related Topics Argentina / Lionel Messi
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mohun Bagan refuses player release, calls for better AIFF player welfare
Mohun Bagan, the reigning Indian Super League champions, has refused to release players for India's national camp, deeming it 'not mandatory' outside of FIFA-recognized windows. Even after their elimination from the Durand Cup in a quarterfinal defeat, the club remains firm in its decision, citing their crucial upcoming AFC Champions League Two commitments starting September, highlighting the tension between club and country priorities. Player Welfare Concerns: Club Calls for AIFF Accountability A Mohun Bagan official raised concerns over AIFF's approach to injuries involving released players. They pointed to captain Subhasish Bose, who remains sidelined following an injury during an Asian Cup qualifier back in March. The official lamented, 'We've heard nothing from the federation… not even a check-in', calling the AIFF negligent toward player health and support. What the AIFF Says? Mixed Signals on Player Release Balancing Act: Clubs Must Support National Team While Managing Player Fatigue Clubs play a pivotal role in the success of both domestic competitions and international commitments. The Caretaker clash underscores broader concerns around player workload and calendar congestion, a challenge echoed globally. Notably, Chelsea manager Thomas Tuchel advocated for moderation in international windows, citing the physical toll on players forced to balance overlapping club and national duties. A recent study on the Africa Cup of Nations found that players' club workloads decline significantly after international tournaments, underscoring the long-term impact on performance and health. Mohun Bagan's stance reflects a growing concern among clubs about player welfare, contractual rights, and fixture congestion. While releasing players can benefit the national team, it also raises risks of injury and fatigue, especially when compensation or support is unclear outside FIFA windows. A collaborative dialogue between clubs and the AIFF, with shared planning around player release, medical coordination, and fixture scheduling, is vital to ensure sustainability and performance at all levels. Mohun Bagan's refusal to release players for national duty spotlights the delicate balance between club obligations and national priorities, emphasizing the need for structured player welfare measures and calendar cooperation.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC to hear plea in AIFF-FSDL dispute over ISL clubs' contract renewals
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on August 22 a matter involving a row between the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and FSDL over the fate of 11 Indian Super League (ISL) clubs due to the non-renewal of their contracts with the national federation and the tournament's organisers. The 11 ISL clubs have warned the AIFF that they "face the real possibility of shutting down entirely" if the ongoing impasse regarding the future of the top-tier domestic competition is not resolved soon. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar agreed to hear the plea after amicus curiae and senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan submitted that during the tenure of the contract, Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL) has to honour it by conducting the ISL. "If it does not, the AIFF should be directed to terminate the contract and float a tender. Otherwise the players suffer and after repeated non-payment, we can be sanctioned by the FIFA," Sankaranarayanan said. The bench said it would hear the matter on Friday. The clubs wrote a letter to AIFF President Kalyan Chaubey last week, saying the crisis arising out of the non-renewal of the Master Rights Agreement (MRA) between the national federation and the ISL organisers, FSDL, has "paralysed professional football in India". "Over the past 11 years, through sustained investment and coordinated effort, clubs have built youth development systems, training infrastructure, community outreach programmes and professional teams that have elevated India's footballing credibility both domestically and internationally," the clubs wrote in the letter. "This progress is now in imminent danger of collapse. The current standstill has created immediate and severe consequences. With operations suspended and no certainty on league continuity, several clubs face the real possibility of shutting down entirely," they said. The crisis surfaced after FSDL, the ISL organisers as well as the AIFF's commercial partner, put the 2025-26 season "on hold" on July 11 due to uncertainty over the renewal of the MRA, prompting at least three clubs to either pause first-team operations or suspend player and staff salaries. "The 2025-26 ISL season is at risk of not taking place at all. This is not merely an administrative deadlock -- it is an existential crisis for Indian football. We write to you in the gravest of circumstances," the clubs wrote. The letter was signed by Bengaluru FC, Hyderabad FC, Odisha FC, Chennaiyin FC, Jamshedpur FC, FC Goa, Kerala Blasters FC, Punjab FC, NorthEast United FC, Mumbai City FC and Mohammedan Sporting. Kolkata heavyweights Mohun Bagan Super Giant and East Bengal did not sign the letter. The clubs said the impasse will also impact India's readiness for international matches, adding that "without a functioning league, our national team will be severely disadvantaged in upcoming AFC and FIFA tournaments". They also said that without the ISL, they will not be able to play a minimum number of competitive matches for participating in continental competitions, thereby risking the suspension of Indian clubs from Asian Football Confederation (AFC) tournaments. On April 30, the top court reserved its verdict on the issue of finalisation of the AIFF draft constitution prepared by former apex court judge L Nageswara Rao. The draft constitution, prepared by Justice Rao on the top court's directions, proposed some radical changes, including a person holding the office for a maximum period of 12 years during his lifetime, subject to serving a maximum of two successive terms of four years each. While it said a four-year cooling-off period had to be observed after eight years as an office-bearer of the AIFF, it also mentioned that a person cannot remain a member of the sports body after attaining 70 years of age. According to the draft constitution, the executive committee of the AIFF would have 14 members who would be under the age and tenure restrictions. There will be one president, two vice-presidents (a man and a woman), one treasurer and 10 other members, the draft said. Of the 10 other members, five would be eminent players, including two women. The draft constitution also has provisions for the removal of the office-bearers, including the president, through a no-confidence motion, which the existing constitution of the AIFF does not have.