World braces for battery of Trump tariffs on Wednesday
Social Sharing
After spending more than two years teasing tariffs, tomorrow is the big reveal: the moment U.S. President Donald Trump unveils the full scope of his protectionist trade policy.
He's calling it Liberation Day and he's planning to celebrate it Wednesday afternoon in a splashy 4 p.m. ET event in the White House Rose Garden.
"[This] will go down as one of the most important days in modern American history," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said.
To skeptics, it's making history for all the wrong reasons.
The global economy, already jittery, will be on a knife's edge awaiting specifics of this plan, which could impose broader U.S. tariffs than anytime since the Great Depression.
The White House boldly insists these tariffs will achieve several simultaneous goals: raise revenues, pay for tax cuts and force companies to build in the U.S.
WATCH | Trump tariff plan 'defies logic':
Why experts think Trump's new auto tariff plan 'defies logic' | About That
1 day ago
Duration 25:38
The stock market isn't convinced — it's lost all its gains since the election. Consumer sentiment has plunged. And Capitol Hill is getting anxious.
Here's one reason for the consternation: The most elemental details of Trump's plan are still in flux. On the very eve of the announcement, there were contradictory leaks in U.S. media.
Will this be a global tariff of 20 per cent? Or will it be several smaller tariffs that penalize specific actions of different countries? Members of Trump's team were still debating the details this week.
Then there's the question of what happens to previously announced tariffs — will they disappear, or be stacked onto these, meaning a tariff atop a tariff?
Whatever happens, the auto industry already faces a crisis, according to one representative. Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association, Canada's main auto-parts lobby group, says the industry's profit margins would be wiped out, several times over, by tariffs already scheduled to take effect Wednesday, apart from any new ones Trump plans to announce.
WATCH | 'Rebirth' of a nation, Trump says:
Trump says April 2 tariffs will be 'rebirth' of a country | Hanomansing Tonight
18 hours ago
Duration 5:13
Auto industry warns of crisis
"It will shut down the industry within a week. On both sides of the border," said Volpe.
"The math doesn't work. That's why it's all going to shut down.… We may need to prove that the math doesn't work, for the White House to reverse course."
For those keeping score, Trump has already imposed duties of 25 per cent on many Canadian and Mexican products; of 10 per cent on energy; 25 per cent on steel and aluminum — used by manufacturers, including car companies — and now a 25 per cent duty on vehicles assembled outside the U.S., plus duties on some parts, with the threat of more parts being added later.
In the face of this, Democrats are looking to deliver a political black eye for Trump's big day. They will force several hours of debate, followed by a vote, on Senate Resolution 37.
That motion would terminate Trump's national-security justification for the tariffs on Canada, specifically for the initial 25 per cent duty imposed supposedly because of Canada's role in the fentanyl trade.
It would be mainly symbolic. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Tim Kaine, says he's close to locking up the necessary votes to pass it, and already has support from three Republicans: Rand Paul, Susan Collins and Thom Tillis.
"Our constituents are hopping mad about this," the Virginia Democrat told CBC News. "My… constituents are furious about this. They're pro-Canada, they're pro-trade with Canada, and they are anti-higher prices on building supplies, groceries, fertilizer, aluminum and steel."
WATCH | 'Fake' emergency, says Kaine:
Trump's tariffs based on 'fake Canadian emergency,' says U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine
6 hours ago
Duration 12:22
The U.S. Senate is set to vote Tuesday on a resolution from Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia to challenge U.S. President Donald Trump's use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, to declare an emergency at the northern border in order to hit Canada with tariffs.
If the resolution gets "a good, solid bipartisan vote in the Senate, that's going to be a powerful message to Donald Trump and his economic advisers: 'You are playing with fire. Don't raise taxes on Americans on their groceries and building supplies at a time when the economy is softening,'" Kaine said.
If it passes, it would be an embarrassing message for Trump on his big tariff day — a rejection from the Senate, which his party controls.
However, substantively, it might mean very little. The bill will almost certainly not be brought for a vote in the House. Even if it did somehow pass the House, Trump could still veto it anyway.
In any case, this would only undo one set of tariffs, the ones supposedly about fentanyl. Still, it's an early test of the politics of Trump tariffs.
Democrats play up Canada tariffs
Democrats increasingly see tariffs as a winner for them and a loser for Trump — especially those on Canada. Some of the biggest figures in the party joined Kaine for a news conference outside the Capitol on Tuesday.
They previewed a message they're likely to carry into the midterms: that Trump is effectively taxing ordinary Americans, collecting duties on goods they use, in order to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
They've been assisted in that messaging from Trump himself — who just said he doesn't care if prices go up for goods in the short term.
"The Republicans are squirming," said the Democrats' Senate leader, Chuck Schumer.
Trump is now working to stiffen their spines. He's promising a new golden age of American manufacturing, if the party can tough out the initial storm.
In danger of being repudiated by Congress, in that vote expected Wednesday, Trump has issued a warning to his party: Support my Canada tariffs.
"Don't let the Democrats have a Victory," Trump posted, referring to the Senate vote. "It would be devastating for the Republican Party and, far more importantly, for the United States. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"
Now Washington watches the White House.
Not only Washington, but also Wall Street's traders, and Windsor, Ont.'s auto workers, and anyone else with a stake in trade with the U.S.
The biggest unknown is whether Trump will announce one flat global tariff, or a bunch of tit-for-tat so-called reciprocal measures.
The White House isn't saying. Media reports suggest it's still being debated internally — despite Trump having spent two years campaigning on this idea.
Each approach comes with challenges.
The first idea, the global tariff, is a blunt instrument that could more easily clobber the U.S. into a recession. The latter is painfully complex; trade experts have been saying for weeks that there's no way Trump's team could create this system by April.
At an event in February, at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, one trade-policy expert said unflinchingly that April 2 would be a mess. There's just no way, he said, to properly design country-by-country reciprocal tariffs this fast.
"They won't get close," Derek Scissors said, over a month ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
5 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump's tariffs on Canada, world to stay in place during case, court rules
A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs will remain in place while a case is heard — extending an emergency stay granted after a lower court found the devastating duties unlawful. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found 'a stay is warranted under the circumstances.' It provides a temporary victory for the Trump administration as it hits its first legal barriers for realigning global trade. 'The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country's national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai in an emailed statement Tuesday. 'The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court.' Story continues below advertisement The U.S. Court of International Trade last month said Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. The ruling from the three-judge panel at the New York-based federal court in May said 'any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.' It said 'the challenged tariff orders will be vacated,' representing a nationwide injunction against any further imposition of the duties. The Trump administration quickly was granted an emergency motion, essentially freezing the decision by the trade court that blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. The appeals court upheld that stay but noted the need for an expedited hearing, saying 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration.' A proposed schedule says arguments are expected in court by July 31. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties, for now. 5:32 Economist says counter-tariffs on the United States would hurt Canada George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin called it an 'unfortunate decision.' Somin, along with the Liberty Justice Center, represents five American small businesses pushing against the tariffs. Story continues below advertisement He noted that the court did go out of its way to indicate this is not a ruling on the merits, and ordered an expedited schedule for consideration of the case. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We have a strong case, and I remain guardedly optimistic that the appellate court will ultimately see that the president's claim of virtually unlimited power to impose tariffs is blatantly illegal — which is what every court to have considered the issue so far has concluded,' Somin said in an email to The Canadian Press. Stock markets have been in turmoil and supply chains have been upended as Trump used unprecedented presidential power to enact his tariffs. Up until Trump's return to the White House, IEEPA had never been used by a president to impose tariffs. Trump hit Canada with economywide duties in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every country saying America's trade deficits amounted to a national emergency. The president walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries. Story continues below advertisement Trump said the 90-day pause would give countries time to negotiate a deal. The president said if countries didn't comply he would simply set tariff rates himself. 2:41 U.S. trade court 'brazenly abused' judicial powers to block Trump tariffs, WH says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' The appeal ruling will consider two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One included the five American small businesses against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other stemmed from 12 states arguing against both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the tariffs. Lawyers for the businesses say IEEPA does not mention tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. They say Trump is misusing the statute. Story continues below advertisement Lawyers for Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont argued that tariffs make U.S. trade policy dependent on Trump's whims. Thirty-three senators also filed an amicus brief — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — in the case, saying the duties would cause harm to small- and medium-sized businesses while also grabbing powers that should be assigned to Congress. 'Small businesses do not have cash-on-hand or capital reserves to pay the increased tariffs, nor can they quickly adapt to them by modifying supply chains,' it said. 'If they cannot pass on the tariff costs to consumers — which would create additional harms for… constituents — many face letting employees go or filing for bankruptcy. Even a few weeks of additional tariffs means small businesses will suffer irreparable harm.' Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.


Winnipeg Free Press
11 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — James McDonough served in the U.S. Army for 27 years, fighting in Vietnam and delivering humanitarian aid to Rwanda. For him, Saturday's military parade in Washington for the Army's 250th anniversary — coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday — is about the resilience of a vital institution and the nation it serves. 'The soldiers marching that day represent all of that history,' said McDonough, 78, of Crofton, Maryland. 'They don't represent a single day. They don't represent a single person. It's the American Army still standing straight, walking tall, ready to defend our country.' Christopher Purdy, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, called the parade a facade that paints over some of the Republican president's policies that have targeted military veterans and current service members, including cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs and a ban on transgender troops. Purdy said the parade, long sought by Trump, will needlessly display U.S. military might on the president's 79th birthday. 'It's embarrassing,' said Purdy, 40, of Atlanta. 'It's expensive. And whatever his reasons are for doing it, I think it's entirely unnecessary.' Until recently, the Army's long-planned birthday celebration did not include a big parade. Added under the Trump administration, the event, featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, has divided veterans. Some liken it to the military chest-pounding commonly seen in North Korea, a step toward authoritarianism or a perverse birthday party for Trump. Others see it as a once-in-a-lifetime accounting of the Army's achievements and the military service of millions of soldiers over centuries. The parade is not about Trump, they say, but the public seeing the faces of soldiers when so few Americans serve. The Army expects up to 200,000 people could attend and says the parade will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg this week, said Saturday would be 'a big day' and noted 'we want to show off a little bit.' 'We're going to celebrate our greatness and our achievements,' he said. 'This week, we honor 250 years of valor and glory and triumph by the greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth: the United States Army.' 'Divisive politics have ruined it' For Edmundo Eugenio Martinez Jr., an Army veteran who fought in Iraq, the parade is a missed opportunity to honor generations of veterans, many of whom paid a steep price and came home to little fanfare. 'Sadly, the timing and the optics and divisive politics have ruined it,' said Martinez, 48, of Katy, Texas. 'And I'm not picking one side or the other. Both sides are guilty.' 'It's just suspicious' Joe Plenzler, a retired Marine who fought in Iraq, said Trump wants to see troops saluting him on his birthday as tanks roll past. 'It's just suspicious,' the 53-year-old from Middletown, Virginia, said of the timing. 'I absolutely love the Army from the bottom of my cold black Marine heart,' he said. 'But if the Army's birthday was a day later, we probably wouldn't be doing it. I'd rather see that $50 million take care of the men and women who went off to war and came back with missing arms, legs and eyeballs, and with damaged brains.' 'Part of American culture' Joe Kmiech, who served in the Army and Minnesota National Guard from 1989 to 1998, supports the parade because the Army is 'part of American culture and our fabric.' He notes the Army's pioneering contributions to engineering and medicine, from dams to new surgical techniques. Like many veterans, he has a strong familial connection: His father served in the Army, and so did his maternal grandfather, who fought in World War II. 'I didn't vote for President Trump, but the commander in chief is going to be part of that celebration,' said Kmiech, 54, of Roberts, Wisconsin. 'The distinction needs to be made that the parade is a celebration of our Army, not of a person.' 'Stroking Trump's ego' For Gulf War Army veteran Paul Sullivan, Trump and the parade are inextricably linked. 'This Trump tank travesty is all about stroking Trump's ego,' said Sullivan, 62, who lives outside Charlottesville, Virginia. 'If Trump truly cared about our service members, he would sit down with them quietly and say, 'What can we do with $50 million or $100 million to make your lives better?' He's not.' 'We are a great nation' McDonough, the veteran from Crofton, Maryland, disagrees that the parade is about Trump or too costly. He said the U.S. held a grand celebration in New York after World War II when the nation was deeply in debt. 'We certainly need to bring our debt down, and we certainly need to take care of our veterans,' he said. 'But it's a false dichotomy. It's like saying if we bought two less aircraft carriers, we could do so much better to take care of our poor.' And McDonough said soldiers' oath is to the Constitution, not to Trump. The president 'understands the importance of doing this, not only for the Army, but for the nation,' McDonough said. 'A real dark turn' Purdy, the veteran from Atlanta, said the parade's brazen flex of military strength is not an American tradition, particularly absent a recent victory. 'I'm not saying we shouldn't celebrate the country,' he said. 'But for us to be projecting this type of hard power, in such a real in-your-face way, that's just not who we are.' Trump is brushing aside old alliances and foreign aid that have helped maintain peace for decades, Purdy asserted. 'It signals a real dark turn if we're just going to roll out the tanks,' Purdy said. 'People are the Army' Michael Nardotti, an Army veteran who served in Vietnam, said military hardware has long been in American parades, which can help recruitment. More important, he said, is the tremendous value in the public seeing soldiers' faces in a parade when active-duty troops make up less than 1% of the population. ''People are the Army,'' said Nardotti, 78, of Aldie, Virginia, quoting a former Army chief of staff. Nardotti said he'll listen carefully to Trump's speech. 'I hope it sends the right message,' he said.


Cision Canada
12 minutes ago
- Cision Canada
Summer Plans? Stay Local, Spend Local: Majority of Canadians Intend to Support Small Businesses While Travelling Domestically this Summer Français
Almost three-quarters (73%) of Canadians will consider travelling to a destination to visit a unique business or attraction , June 11, 2025 /CNW/ - In this season of economic uncertainty, there's one thing Canadian businesses can undoubtedly look forward to: summer is coming and tourism is trending up. A recent survey by TD Bank Group found 89% of Canadians feel it's important to support small businesses this summer, with 64% of Canadians planning to travel within Canada in the coming months. The biggest economic boon to small business? The survey found 63% of Canadians will research shops, restaurants, and attractions ahead of time, with 73% considering travel to a destination to visit a unique business or attraction they researched. TD Economics also projects tourism to outperform other industries in Canada with the boost being fueled by Canadians looking to spend more of their travel dollars at home, and international tourists looking to Canada and other regions for summer vacation. "It's encouraging to hear that Canadians are planning to support local small businesses as part of their vacation plans this summer, as it helps both entrepreneurs and our local economies," says Julia Kelly, Vice President, Small Business Banking at TD. "It's particularly welcome news, as many of our small business customers have been concerned about consumer spending slowing down." The survey also showed that Canadians are keen on cottage country, with 46% of Gen Z and 42% of Millennials planning on visiting cottages during their summer vacation. Of those visiting cottages, 96% say they plan to check out local businesses, including restaurants, shops, and marinas. "We know how important small businesses are to communities across Canada," says Kelly. "At TD, we continue to be inspired by their strength and resilience and we are here to help small business owners with advice and support along their journey." To learn more about Small Business Banking services provided by TD please visit: About the survey The survey was undertaken by The Harris Poll Canada and it ran overnight on May 22 nd, 2025, with 1,531 randomly selected Canadian adults who are Maru Voice Canada online panellists. The results have been weighted by age, gender, region, and education (and in Quebec, language) to match the population, according to Census data. This is to ensure the sample is representative of the entire adult population of Canada. For comparison purposes, a probability sample of this size has an estimated margin of error (which measures sampling variability) of ±2.5%, 19 times out of 20. Discrepancies in or between totals when compared to the data tables are due to rounding. About TD Bank Group The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its subsidiaries are collectively known as TD Bank Group ("TD" or the "Bank"). TD is the sixth largest bank in North America by assets and serves over 27.9 million customers in four key businesses operating in a number of locations in financial centres around the globe: Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, including TD Canada Trust and TD Auto Finance Canada; U.S. Retail, including TD Bank, America's Most Convenient Bank®, TD Auto Finance U.S., and TD Wealth (U.S.); Wealth Management and Insurance, including TD Wealth (Canada), TD Direct Investing, and TD Insurance; and Wholesale Banking, including TD Securities and TD Cowen. TD also ranks among the world's leading online financial services firms, with more than 18 million active online and mobile customers. TD had $2.1 trillion in assets on April 30, 2025. The Toronto-Dominion Bank trades under the symbol "TD" on the Toronto Stock Exchange and New York Stock Exchange.