‘That rhetoric is deadly': Autistic individuals, family members express mixed feelings about RFK Jr.'s comments on autism
Their opposing perspectives reflect a rift within the community as the nation's top health official, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,
Some said his remarks were dangerous and offensive, while others
felt heard.
'It's wonderful that he's doing this, and [Kennedy] was right: the future is very bleak for people with autism,' said Hitsos, an alumna of Gordon College in Wenham who now attends graduate school in Texas.
Advertisement
But Trainor sees a future bright with promise despite his diagnosis. At 15, he works in the kitchen at his school, produces music on the side, and hopes to have a career working with animals.
'So many on the spectrum end up getting jobs,' said Trainor, who has a moderate form of autism that requires substantial support on communication issues. The condition has no cure and doesn't require one, he believes.
His 16-year-old brother, John, also has autism, but a milder form that requires less support. He said Kennedy
fails to acknowledge that many people with the syndrome are on the lower end of the spectrum and can have full lives.
'I have seen a lot of people treat ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder] as some sort of disease that needs to be 'cured,' which is very offensive towards people like me,' John Trainor, a student at Bristol Plymouth Technical High School, said in a statement. 'We are normal people who have a much harder time socially.'
Advertisement
Autism is a developmental disorder that research has linked with genetics and certain conditions before and during birth, such as prenatal exposure to pollution or pesticides and
Kennedy has long promoted controversial theories that external factors, such as vaccines, are
to blame, and pledged his new research effort would determine the cause of the 'autism epidemic' by September.
'These are kids that, this is a preventable disease. We know it's an environmental exposure,' Kennedy
Those remarks came after a report from the US
Advocates and experts
say the higher prevalence is explained by
better detection methods and awareness of the disorder. Indeed, the CDC
Several of the nation's leading autism organizations condemned Kennedy's words and actions, describing them as hurtful and untrue.
Advertisement
'His comments were incorrect, but more to the point, they were eugenic,' said Colin Killick, executive director of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, which advocates for disability rights. 'Talking about autistic people as themselves being destroyed but also having destroyed their families is a horrific argument.'
While disagreeing with Kennedy, Killick said the autism community would welcome additional research, such as why people with autism have a higher incidence
He added that most new cases involve higher functioning people who need less support and
disputed the notion
they needed to be cured.
'Autism is a way of thinking, it is fundamentally ingrained into how a person interacts with the world,' Killick said. 'The idea that you would give someone a pill and magically make them non-autistic — you would essentially be making them an entirely different person.'
Julie DeFilippo, a social worker who works with autistic individuals and their families and has an autistic son, said some families were already wary of receiving an official diagnosis. She worries Kennedy's rhetoric will create additional stigma that will discourage some from seeking out support.
'I could say as a parent of an autistic kid, I get hundreds of moments of joy every day. That's the easy part — being at home and supporting him,' she said. 'The hard part is the world outside and putting him out there and the experiences of him being misunderstood.'
Hitsos, on the other hand, said that while she understands many people on the spectrum are 'happy' with being autistic, she is not.
Advertisement
'Every day is a struggle with the littlest of things,' she said. 'I don't want other people to go through it, especially those with profound autism.'
Now studying to become a music teacher, Hitsos said she has tried to get a job for years, but suspects her efforts failed because of her openness online about having the disorder.
She also expressed concern the autism community has given up on finding a cause and cure and settled for 'acceptance and inclusion.'
'Acceptance is good, I've been a self-advocate for years, but this is an epidemic, and until they find a cause for it, this is only gonna get worse,' she said.
But Killick wants Kennedy to be more aware of the effects of his words on the autism community. Every year, his organization participates in a
'That rhetoric is deadly,' he said, 'and hearing our nation's highest health official telling the world that autistic people destroy their families and implying that autistic people's lives aren't worth living is frightening, and it's going to have consequences.'
Emily Spatz can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
Vaccine board purge stokes talk of CDC alternatives
By gutting the expert panel that's advised the government on vaccine policy for more than 60 years, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. earned the condemnation of virtually every medical society, as well as former public health officials and local practitioners. What became immediately clear is that no outside group can immediately step in and fill the vacuum if the public won't trust the reconstituted Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The big picture: The distress and lack of organization apparent in health circles on Tuesday was a sign that a new independent body that could act as a "shadow CDC" to truth-squad the Trump administration isn't close to materializing. "We are clearly working on it and we think it's very important, but I don't think anyone has an answer yet," said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, who's behind one ad hoc effort. "Right now, we're in such uncharted territory." The medical establishment has floated ideas such as state-appointed boards or medical specialty associations serving as clearinghouses for information on vaccine safety and efficacy for clinicians. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) during the pandemic created a state entity to review the safety of federally approved COVID-19 vaccines before distributing them to the public. But it would be difficult to replicate the professional clout of ACIP, whose recommendations can influence whether insurers cover vaccines. That would leave Kennedy's handpicked successors controlling the narrative — a prospect many researchers and physicians think will bring a radical departure from ACIP's evidence-based deliberations on safety and efficacy. Friction point: Kennedy and other Trump health officials' assertions that ACIP has been a rubber stamp for vaccines have infuriated public health officials, who say the physicians, infectious disease experts and researchers constituted a vital body of nongovernmental health leaders who took their jobs seriously. Panel members were carefully vetted for conflicts and had their professional credentials scrutinized. Discussions took place in a high-profile public forum that would be difficult, if not impossible, to replicate. "Many of us can provide a read of the science, and we can convene formally or informally to create consensus around vaccine recommendations," said Megan Ranney, dean of the Yale School of Public Health. "But I suspect that it won't be sufficient for insurers, for Medicaid, for the Vaccines for Children program, and it's unclear how pediatricians and primary care physicians and pharmacies across the country are going to be able to respond," she said. The other side: Kennedy wrote on X Tuesday night that he would announce new ACIP members in the coming days. "None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers. They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists," Kennedy wrote. He added he would detail instances of "historical corruption at ACIP to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary. "Kennedy cited the panel's "stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children" as the most "outrageous example." What to watch: All eyes are on the new appointees for the board, including their scientific backgrounds, track records when it comes to defending vaccines and any potential conflicts of interest. HHS has indicated it has every intention of moving forward with ACIP's next meeting, scheduled for June 25-27. The agenda includes recommendation votes for COVID–19, HPV, influenza, meningococcal and RSV vaccines. "If nothing else, I think [the committee] may have trouble functioning because you've just lost a whole lot of institutional memory," said Adam Ratner, a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Infectious Diseases. "That agenda has the committee voting on real things that matter to real people, and I don't know how they're possibly going to do that in any kind of way that is based on science or evidence," he said.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul
Former White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha, who served under former President Biden, criticized the decision by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to fire all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel. Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal on Monday, saying, 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' But in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Jha pushed back against Kennedy's reasoning. 'Look, what he said in his op-ed was a series of nonsense about a group of individuals, experts …who shape what vaccines, if any, are going to be available to the American people,' Jha said in the interview. 'So obviously this is very concerning,' he continued. 'We'll have to see who he appoints next. But this is a step in the wrong direction.' Jha said he is concerned about what the move foretells about the secretary's agenda on vaccines. Jha pointed to what he characterized as a lackluster response from the secretary to 'the worst measles outbreak of the last 25 years.' He also expressed concern regarding Kennedy's raising questions about vaccines causing autism, which Jha dismissed and said was 'settled science.' 'Then you put this in the middle of all of that,' Jha said, referring to the vaccine panel sweep, 'and what you have is a pretty clear picture that what Secretary Kennedy is trying to do is make sure that vaccines are not readily available to Americans, not just for kids, for the elderly.' 'He could go pretty far with this move, and I really am worried about where we're headed,' Jha continued. He said he's particularly concerned about the effect Kennedy's move will have on kids and whether they will continue having access to certain vaccines in the future. 'Kids rely on vaccines. I'm worried about whether the next generation of kids are going to have access to polio vaccines and measles vaccines. That's where we're heading. That's what we have to push back against.' Kennedy said in his op-ed that he was removing every member of the panel to give the Trump administration an opportunity to appoint its own members. Kennedy has long accused members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of having conflicts of interest, sparking concern among vaccine advocates that he would seek to install members who are far more skeptical of approving new vaccines. But Jha pushed back against criticism that the panel was all Biden-appointed experts, saying, 'When the Biden administration came in, almost all of the appointees had come from the first Trump administration.' 'That was fine because they were good people,' he said. 'They were experts. Right now, it's the same thing. The people he is firing are experts — like a nurse in Illinois who spent her entire career getting kids vaccinated, cancer doctors from Memorial Sloan Kettering — like these are really good people.' 'And generally, CDC has not worried about when were they appointed. The question is, are they good and are they conflict free.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chicago-based American Medical Association to ask Senate to investigate RFK Jr.'s firing of vaccine committee members
The Chicago-based American Medical Association plans to ask a U.S. Senate committee to investigate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to overhaul a key vaccine advisory group, the medical association said in an emergency resolution passed Tuesday. The House of Delegates of the AMA, which is the nation's premier doctors group, adopted the emergency resolution at its annual meeting in Chicago. The adoption came just one day after Kennedy, who is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, announced that he had removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. That advisory committee is tasked with making recommendations on the use of vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which then sets U.S. adult and childhood immunization schedules. Kennedy said he planned to replace the 17 members with new members. 'Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' Kennedy said in a news release Monday. 'The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies.' It's a move, however, that has met with sharp criticism, including from the American Medical Association. Kennedy has long been a vaccine skeptic, putting him at odds with doctors and scientists who tout vaccines as lifesaving. The AMA's emergency resolution also says that it will send an open letter to Kennedy asking him to reverse his recent changes to the committee. And the association will 'identify and evaluate alternative evidence-based vaccine advisory structures,' according to the resolution. On Monday, outgoing American Medical Association President Dr. Bruce Scott said in a statement that the advisory committee has long been a trusted source of science and data-driven guidance on vaccines. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Scott said. 'With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses.'
