
Labour ‘underestimated' impact of VAT raid on private schools as fees surge
Labour has been accused of having 'underestimated' the impact of its VAT policy on private schools as fees surged by almost a quarter this year.
The Independent Schools Council (ISC), which represents about half of private schools across the UK, said fees were 22.6 per cent higher on average in January compared with a year ago.
It comes after the Government hit private schools with 20 per cent VAT on fees for the first time from Jan 1, in the middle of an academic year.
Private schools have also been grappling with recent National Insurance changes, while those in England with charitable status were stripped of their 80 per cent business rates relief last month.
This year's average fee hike of nearly a quarter, revealed in the ISC's latest annual census and shared with the BBC, compares with an 8.4 per cent rise in 2024 and a 6.4 per cent increase in 2023.
Julie Robinson, the chief executive of the ISC, said it is 'clear to us that the Government has underestimated the effect ' of its 'triple whammy' on private schools.
Ministers have repeatedly insisted that their VAT policy on private schools would only result in fee rises of around 10 to 15 per cent.
A Treasury impact assessment published last October also said that 'on average, the Government expects private school fees to go up by around 10 per cent as a result of the introduction of VAT'.
The document, published alongside Rachel Reeves' inaugural Budget, insisted that private schools would likely choose to absorb much of the VAT rise and that some had 'already said publicly that they are going to cap fee increases at 5 per cent'.
However, many of the UK's most prestigious schools have raised fees by the maximum 20 per cent, while smaller private schools have suggested their lack of reserves has prevented them from absorbing much of the levy.
At Eton College, boarding fees increased from £17,583 to £21,100 per term this year. Meanwhile, Harrow and Marlborough have passed on 15 per cent to parents, putting both schools' annualised fees at around £60,000.
Ms Robinson suggested the Government's forecasts had missed the mark and that the true impact of the VAT raid would likely emerge in years to come, as families reconsider private education altogether.
'We know parents have already left the sector because of the threat of VAT coming in so we do expect the reality of this to lead to further decreases, but the full effects will only become apparent over the next few years,' the ISC chief said.
In the run-up to the general election, Labour also relied on analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) suggesting that 15 per cent fee rises on average would result in a modest movement of private school pupils to the state sector.
The IFS report, published in July 2023, said that an 'effective VAT rate of 15 per cent would lead to a 3 to 7 per cent reduction in private school attendance'.
The ISC said data from its latest annual census, due to be published next week, showed some of its members reported a 4.6 per cent fall in Year 7 pupils in September 2024.
However, others have pointed to a declining birth rate and broader financial concerns to explain the drop.
The Treasury also rejected suggestions the VAT raid was solely to blame for fee rises this year and said it followed large increases over the past few decades.
A Treasury spokesman said: 'This data misrepresents reality – the increases in fees are not only down to VAT. Average fees have risen by 75 per cent in real terms in the past 25 years and pupil numbers have remained steady.
'Ending tax breaks for private schools will raise £1.8 billion a year by 2029/30 to help deliver 6,500 new teachers and raise school standards, supporting the 94 per cent of children in state schools to achieve and thrive.'
More than a dozen private schools have directly blamed the VAT raid for causing them to close so far, while many others have announced they are shuttering because of financial constraints.
Ministers have repeatedly brushed off attempts to link the closures to the VAT raid and insisted around 80 private schools shut across the UK in an average year.
However, High Court documents obtained by The Telegraph last month revealed that Ms Reeves was warned Labour's tax levy could cause many more to shut – something the Government has never admitted in public.
Internal government documents show Treasury officials informed the Chancellor last July that 'around 100 additional independent schools may close over the next three years directly as a result of the new VAT charge'.
Court documents obtained by The Telegraph also revealed that Labour deliberately chose the 'most disruptive' start date for the VAT raid on private schools after being presented with a range of options.
Ministers ultimately decided to go with the course of action labelled by civil servants as 'the most disruptive' for schools and pupils in order to 'maximise revenue', The Telegraph disclosed.
It comes as the Government is currently embroiled in a High Court battle over its VAT policy after parent groups argued the tax raid is discriminatory.
Parent groups are seeking a 'declaration of incompatibility' under human rights laws. Although this would not overturn the VAT policy in itself, it could force the Government to take a second look at the tax raid or hand out exemptions.
The judicial review was heard by three High Court judges, who are expected to issue a single written judgement in the next few weeks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
32 minutes ago
- Sky News
'It's simply not safe': A thousand doctors write to MPs urging them to vote against assisted dying bill
More than 1,000 doctors have written to MPs urging them to vote against the assisted dying bill, calling it a "real threat to both patients and the medical workforce". The bill - which is due to be voted on by MPs for a final time on 20 June - would allow terminally ill patients from England and Wales to end their lives "on their own terms", providing they have a life expectancy of six months or less. A separate bill is currently passing through the Scottish parliament. But doctors from across the NHS have written to MPs, warning them of their "serious concerns". Notable signatories include Sir John Burn, a geneticist who has led decades of cancer research, Sir Shakeel Qureshi, who was knighted for his work in paediatric cardiology, Professor Aileen Keel, the former deputy chief medical officer for Scotland, and Baroness Finlay, a Welsh doctor, professor of palliative medicine and member of the House of Lords. The letter is signed by four doctors who hold OBEs, two who have MBEs, and one CBE. The letter says that while a debate is needed on end of life care, "this bill is not the answer". It raises concerns that not enough evidence has been heard from doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. "This bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe," it goes on to say, calling it a "deeply flawed bill". 1:40 Professor Colin Rees, a member of the Royal College of Physicians working group on assisted dying, said it was the "single most important piece of healthcare legislation in 50 or 60 years". "It will have very profound consequences for the future and many doctors are really concerned that members of parliament are not hearing the views of the medical profession." He said many doctors who remain neutral, or who even support the principle of assisted dying, remain concerned about the bill. "We don't think it's a bill that is safe, that protects patients, protects families, and protects the medical workforce." What stage are the two assisted dying bills at now? The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed the House of Commons with a majority of 55 in November. Scotland's Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland Bill) pass with a 14 majority in May. But the legislation has not been without controversy, with 150 amendments made to get it through the first stage. The bill will return to the House of Commons for a third reading this Friday. If voted through by MPs it will then proceed to the House of Lords. 'No safeguards against coercion' One of the areas of concern raised by the medics was the inability to properly identify patients at risk of coercive control. "Vulnerable patients are at risk of coercion with women, victims of domestic abuse, and the elderly at particular risk," the letter says. It also warned it would widen social inequalities, with patients who do not have the resources for a comfortable death more likely to opt for assisted dying. "People who struggle to pay for heating or care or wish to preserve their assets for their children are at high risk of choosing to die if the option is available and the alternative is more difficult." Data from the Annual Report of Dying With Dignity from Oregon in 2024 found 9.3% of those people who choose assisted deaths do so for financial reasons. Concerns have also been raised around the inaccuracies of medical prognosis. "Research demonstrates that doctors get prognosis wrong around 40% of the time," the letter says. "As such, patients may end up choosing an assisted death and losing what could have been happy and fulfilling months or years of life." 1:50 The bill is also a risk to families, the letter says, as it does not require doctors to speak with family members. "A close relative may know nothing until they get a call to arrange collection of their relative's body," it says, adding that there is no mechanism for a family member to raise concerns about a request. The letter also addressed the potential impact on the medical workforce. Evidence from the Netherlands suggests "doctors feel pressurised when dealing with patient requests for assisted deaths, meaning that doctors may end up having involvement despite it being against their principles, because they want to help their patients".


Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Tesla Just Bucked An EV Trend In Europe, And It's A Huge Problem For The Company
Tesla will use its Model Y as a launching platform for its robotaxi tech Sales of EVs are up in Europe, but Tesla's numbers are dropping fast Sales of EVs are up in Europe, but Tesla's numbers are dropping fast Tesla's reputation has taken a significant hit since January, when CEO Elon Musk created the DOGE task force, billed as a means to decrease spending across the United States government. In doing so, Musk damaged his standing with the public, which has carried over to Tesla. New data shows that Tesla's reputational hit is not limited to the United States, as sales in Europe are down for Tesla amid a surging electric vehicle market. 2025 Ford Maverick: 4 reasons to love it, 2 reasons to think twice Watch More According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, sales of battery electric vehicles across the European Union (EU) increased by 26.4 percent in 2025 compared to 2024, year-to-date. Tesla registrations in the EU have declined by 46.1 percent through April 2025, with a 52.6 percent year-over-year decrease in April alone. Tesla store in Austin, Texas — Source: Tesla Tesla by the numbers For 2025 (January through April; all figures are year-over-year comparisons), Tesla has sold 41,677 units. In the same period in 2024, Tesla registrations (sales) were 77,314 units. If this downward trend continues, Tesla will be one of the five worst-selling brands in the EU by mid-2025. In April alone, Tesla only sold 5,475 vehicles in the EU. Though the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association didn't break out its data by month, it's easy to conclude Tesla sales have been in decline since the beginning of the year. If April were a 'normal' month, Tesla would have sold about 22,000 vehicles in the EU. Expanding the scope doesn't help much. In the EU, the UK, and across the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), which includes Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland, Tesla sold 61,320 vehicles compared to 100,255 in the same timeframe in 2024, representing a 38.8 percent decline. In April, Tesla sold 7,261 vehicles, down from 14,228 last year, signaling a 49 percent drop. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. EV sales in the EU are up Battery-electric vehicle sales in the EU from January through April 2025 are up 26.4 percent, which is the same percentage decline for ICE vehicles, suggesting that Europe is embracing the concept of replacing combustion engine vehicles with EVs. France and Estonia were the only countries to experience a decline in EV registrations year over year. EVs account for only 15.3 percent of the market in the EU, trailing behind petrol vehicles (28.6 percent) and hybrids (35.3 percent). Though total car sales dipped 1.2 percent year to date, EV sales were up 3.3 percent. Diesel and petrol sales have dropped over ten percent year over year. Tesla Model 3 Performance — Source: Tesla Final thoughts As Elon Musk quietly slips away from his work in government, the damage done to Tesla may be irreversible. Less than ten percent of overall Tesla sales occurred in one out of four months in 2025, which is an indicator that Tesla is a brand non grata in Europe and sales are declining sharply every month. Upstart Chinese automaker BYD, a brand some consider Tesla's main existential threat, outsold Tesla in the EU in April by about 60 cars, according to data from analyst firm JATO. BYD doesn't have a vehicle in the top 10, according to JATO, but both of Tesla's main vehicles – the Model Y and Model 3 – saw sales decline 49 percent and 41 percent, respectively. About the Author Nate Swanner View Profile


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's bravado has totally backfired. China has the President right where it wants him - for one devastating reason: DOMINIC LAWSON
'Ladies and gentlemen, Britain is back on the world stage.' This, preposterously, was how Sir Keir Starmer addressed European leaders at an event in London to mark his dismal deal with Brussels last month. But today our capital really will be the stage on which global attention is focused: representatives of the governments of China and the US – including Donald Trump 's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent – have flown in for negotiations designed to defuse the trade war between the world's two mightiest economic powers.