Think you're allergic to penicillin? Pharmacist explains why there's a good chance you're not
But here's the kicker: There's a good chance you're not actually allergic to penicillin. About 10% to 20% of Americans report that they have a penicillin allergy, yet fewer than 1% actually do.
I'm a clinical associate professor of pharmacy specializing in infectious disease. I study antibiotics and drug allergies, including ways to determine whether people have penicillin allergies.
I know from my research that incorrectly being labeled as allergic to penicillin can prevent you from getting the most appropriate, safest treatment for an infection. It can also put you at an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, which is when an antibiotic no longer works against bacteria.
The good news? It's gotten a lot easier in recent years to pin down the truth of the matter. More and more clinicians now recognize that many penicillin allergy labels are incorrect – and there are safe, simple ways to find out your actual allergy status.
A steadfast lifesaver
Penicillin, the first antibiotic drug, was discovered in 1928 when a physician named Alexander Fleming extracted it from a type of mold called penicillium. It became widely used to treat infections in the 1940s. Penicillin and closely related antibiotics such as amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate, which goes by the brand name Augmentin, are frequently prescribed to treat common infections such as ear infections, strep throat, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and dental infections.
Penicillin antibiotics are a class of narrow-spectrum antibiotics, which means they target specific types of bacteria. People who report having a penicillin allergy are more likely to receive broad-spectrum antibiotics. Broad-spectrum antibiotics kill many types of bacteria, including helpful ones, making it easier for resistant bacteria to survive and spread. This overuse speeds up the development of antibiotic resistance. Broad-spectrum antibiotics can also be less effective and are often costlier.
Why the mismatch?
People often get labeled as allergic to antibiotics as children when they have a reaction such as a rash after taking one. But skin rashes frequently occur alongside infections in childhood, with many viruses and infections actually causing rashes. If a child is taking an antibiotic at the time, they may be labeled as allergic even though the rash may have been caused by the illness itself.
Some side effects such as nausea, diarrhea or headaches can happen with antibiotics, but they don't always mean you are allergic. These common reactions usually go away on their own or can be managed. A doctor or pharmacist can talk to you about ways to reduce these side effects.
People also often assume penicillin allergies run in families, but having a relative with an allergy doesn't mean you're allergic – it's not hereditary.
Finally, about 80% of patients with a true penicillin allergy will lose the allergy after about 10 years. That means even if you used to be allergic to this antibiotic, you might not be anymore, depending on the timing of your reaction.
Why does it matter if I have a penicillin allergy?
Believing you're allergic to penicillin when you're not can negatively affect your health.
For one thing, you are more likely to receive stronger, broad-spectrum antibiotics that aren't always the best fit and can have more side effects. You may also be more likely to get an infection after surgery and to spend longer in the hospital when hospitalized for an infection. What's more, your medical bills could end up higher due to using more expensive drugs.
Penicillin and its close cousins are often the best tools doctors have to treat many infections. If you're not truly allergic, figuring that out can open the door to safer, more effective and more affordable treatment options.
How can I tell if I am really allergic to penicillin?
Start by talking to a health care professional such as a doctor or pharmacist. Allergy symptoms can range from a mild, self-limiting rash to severe facial swelling and trouble breathing. A health care professional may ask you several questions about your allergies, such as what happened, how soon after starting the antibiotic did the reaction occur, whether treatment was needed, and whether you've taken similar medications since then.
These questions can help distinguish between a true allergy and a nonallergic reaction. In many cases, this interview is enough to determine you aren't allergic. But sometimes, further testing may be recommended.
One way to find out whether you're really allergic to penicillin is through penicillin skin testing, which includes tiny skin pricks and small injections under the skin. These tests use components related to penicillin to safely check for a true allergy. If skin testing doesn't cause a reaction, the next step is usually to take a small dose of amoxicillin while being monitored at your doctor's office, just to be sure it's safe.
A study published in 2023 showed that in many cases, skipping the skin test and going straight to the small test dose can also be a safe way to check for a true allergy. In this method, patients take a low dose of amoxicillin and are observed for about 30 minutes to see whether any reaction occurs.
With the right questions, testing and expertise, many people can safely reclaim penicillin as an option for treating common infections.
Elizabeth W. Covington is an Associate Clinical Professor of Pharmacy at Auburn University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Illinois becomes third state to restrict use of artificial intelligence in mental health industry as experts warn about ‘AI psychosis'
Illinois passed a bill banning therapists from employing artificial intelligence chatbots for assistance with mental health therapy, as experts countrywide warn against people's ever-growing reliance on the machines. The 'Therapy Resources Oversight' legislation prohibits licensed mental health professionals in Illinois from using AI for treatment decisions or communication with clients. It also bans companies from recommending chatbot therapy tools as a be-all alternative to traditional therapy. 5 Illinois became the third state to pass a bill banning therapists from relying on artificial intelligence. terovesalainen – Advertisement Enforcement of the bill will rely on complaints from the public that the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation will investigate. Anyone determined to be violating the ban could face a civil penalty of up to $10,000, according to the legislation text. Utah and Nevada, two Republican-run states, previously passed similar laws limiting AI's capacity in mental health services in May and late June, respectively. Unregulated chatbots can take harmless conversations in any direction, sometimes incidentally leading people into divulging sensitive information or pushing people who are already in vulnerable situations to do something drastic, like take their own life, experts have warned. Advertisement A Stanford University study released in June found that many chatbots, which are programmed to respond enthusiastically to users, fail to sidestep concerning prompts — including requests for high bridges in specific locations to jump off of. 5 Utah and Nevada previously passed similar bans limiting AI. AnnaStills – Whereas chatbots affirm unequivocally regardless of the circumstance, therapists provide support and the means to help their patients improve, Vaile Wright, senior director for the office of health care innovation at the American Psychological Association, told the Washington Post. 'Therapists are validating, but it's also our job to point out when somebody is engaging in unhealthy thoughts, feelings, behaviors and then help somebody challenge those and find better options,' Wright told the outlet. Advertisement 5 Experts warn that overreliance on AI is creating 'psychosis' for heavy users. Ascannio – The bans, though, are difficult to effectively enforce — and can't prevent everyday people from turning to AI for mental health assistance on their own. New research released in early August found that many bots like ChatGPT are inducing 'AI psychosis' in unwitting users with no history of mental illnesses. 5 Some chatbots have allegedly contributed to users' suicide attempts. PhotoGranary – Advertisement Roughly 75% of Americans have used some form of AI in the last six months, with 33% reporting daily usage for anything from help on homework to desperate romantic connections. This deep engagement is breeding psychological distress in heavy users, according to the digital marketing study. Many youth, in particular, are falling down the chatbot rabbit hole and turning to machines to supplement human interaction. 5 Roughly 75% of Americans have used AI in some capacity over the last six months, according to one study. Vane Nunes – a popular platform where users can create and share chatbots usually based on fictional characters, had to place a warning clarifying that anything the bots say 'should not be relied upon as fact or advice' after a Florida teen fell in love with his 'Game of Thrones' AI character and took his own life. The platform is still dealing with a lawsuit filed against the company for the teen's death. Despite repeated attempts to dismiss it on First Amendment grounds, a federal judge ruled that the suit could move forward in August. Another Texas family sued after a chatbot on the app named 'Shonie' encouraged their autistic son to cut himself.


USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
FDA may revoke Pfizer COVID-19 shot for young, healthy children.
Parents won't be able to vaccinate their healthy children 6 months to 5 years old if the FDA pulls Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine authorization. The Food and Drug Administration may revoke authorization for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children under age 5, the pharmaceutical company confirmed, which would limit parents' vaccine options ahead of the winter respiratory virus season. The possibility comes several months after President Donald Trump's Department of Health and Human Services began placing limits on COVID-19 vaccines. For the last four years, updated COVID-19 vaccines have been made available in the fall for most Americans before the cold sets in. The federal agency told Pfizer that it might not renew the emergency use authorization, or EUA, for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty for children ages 6 months through 4 years, according to a statement sent to USA TODAY. 'We are currently in discussions with the agency on potential paths forward and have requested that the EUA for this age group remain in place for the 2025-2026 season,' a company spokesperson said. 'It is important to note that these deliberations are not related to the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, which continues to demonstrate a favorable profile.' HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon declined to predict what the agency might do. 'We do not comment on potential, future regulatory changes,' Nixon said. 'Unless officially announced by HHS, discussion about future agency action should be regarded as pure speculation.' In July, Moderna received full FDA approval for its COVID-19 vaccine for children 6 months to 11 years old who are at increased risk of contracting COVID-19. The vaccine, Spikevax, is expected to be available for eligible populations in the 2025-26 respiratory virus season. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still recommends older patients get vaccinated against COVID-19, as well as people whose immune systems have been weakened by illness or medical treatments such as chemotherapy. But if Pfizer loses its EUA, parents won't have the option to vaccinate their healthy young children. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long sown doubt about a wide range of vaccines, while saying parents should be able to choose which vaccines their children should get. In late May, he announced that the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women was removed from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's immunization schedule. 'There's no evidence healthy kids need it today," Dr. Marty Makary, FDA commissioner, said in the May 27 video announcement posted to X. The American Academy of Pediatrics pushed back, saying at the time that the removal 'ignores independent medical experts and leaves children at risk.' Ending access to vaccination for healthy young children would strip families of choice, said Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the academy's committee on infectious diseases, in a May statement. 'Those who want to vaccinate may no longer be able to, as the implications for insurance coverage and access remain unclear," he said.


USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Wegmans recalls cheese sold across 10 US states over listeria risk
Grocery store chain Wegmans is recalling its Medium Camembert Soft Ripened Cheese, as well as products that contain it, due to a potential listeria contamination, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said in a notice. In the FDA alert posted on Wednesday, Aug. 13, Wegmans said the items affected by the recall were sold between July 1 and Aug. 12 in stores located in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington, D.C. The company said the cheese was supplied to the store by Estancia Holdings from Cumming, Georgia. As of now, no illnesses have been reported in connection with the cheese recall, according to the alert. The FDA said Wegmans has placed automated phone calls to customers who purchased the cheese using their Shoppers Club card. Customers who bought the affected cheese can return it to the store's service desk for a full refund, per the notice. What products are being recalled? The FDA provided a list of products affected by the recall: Listeria poisoning symptoms Listeriosis, or listeria poisoning, is a foodborne bacterial infection most commonly caused by the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It is considered a serious condition and can be dangerous or life-threatening, especially to older adults, people with weak immune systems and pregnant women. Listeria is the third leading cause of death from foodborne illness in the U.S., according to the CDC. The agency estimates that the disease impacts 1,600 Americans each year, with approximately 260 people dying from those infections. Per the CDC, symptoms include: USA TODAY's Saman Shafiq and Natalie Neysa Alund contributed to this report. Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.