Trump picks federal judge three years after failed nomination
President Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Chad Meredith for a federal judgeship in Kentucky, a move that could reignite a contentious battle with Senator Rand Paul, who previously opposed the appointment.
Meredith, a former state solicitor general, was at the centre of a judicial nominations controversy during the Biden administration.
Then-President Joe Biden had reportedly agreed to nominate Meredith, who was enthusiastically supported by Senator Mitch McConnell.
The prospect was met with significant concern, given Meredith's track record of defending Kentucky's anti-abortion laws, particularly in the immediate aftermath of the 2022 Supreme Court decision that eliminated the constitutional right to abortion.
However, Senator Paul signalled to the Biden White House that he would block Meredith's confirmation proceedings, leading the then-President to never formally put forward his name.
Biden's decision to withdraw from the nomination was a relief to Democrats and abortion rights groups, who had expressed outrage at the idea of an anti-abortion lawyer securing a lifetime judiciary seat.
Mr. Trump's renewed push for Meredith sets the stage for a potential repeat of the earlier confirmation dispute, with Senator Paul's past opposition looming large.
In a social media post announcing the nomination, Trump called Meredith 'highly experienced and well qualified.'
'Chad is a courageous Patriot who knows what is required to uphold the Rule of Law, and protect our Constitution,' Trump wrote on Truth Social Wednesday night.
McConnell said in a statement Wednesday that Trump made an 'outstanding choice' in choosing Meredith, who also served as chief deputy general counsel for former Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin.
'His demonstrated devotion to the rule of law and the Constitution will serve the people of Kentucky well on the federal bench,' McConnell said. 'I look forward to the Senate confirming his nomination.'
Paul's office did not immediately return a request for comment Wednesday night on the nomination. Three years ago, Paul accused McConnell of cutting a 'secret deal' with the White House as a reason why Meredith's nomination never moved forward under Biden.
'Unfortunately, instead of communicating and lining up support for him, Senator McConnell chose to cut a secret deal with the White House that fell apart,' Paul said at the time.
Paul never made any substantive objections about Meredith himself. It's unclear whether Paul would hold similar process concerns with Meredith's formal nomination under Trump.
But Paul had effective veto power over a judicial pick in his home state because the Senate continues to honor the so-called blue slip rule, a decades-old custom that says a judicial nominee won't move forward if there is opposition from his or her home-state senator.
The Biden White House also deferred to that custom, which is why Biden never ended up nominating Meredith.
Though the rule has been eroded in part, namely for appellate court judges whose seat spans several states, the custom has remained intact for district court nominees who are more closely tied to their home states. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, has so far made no indication that he would deviate from that longstanding custom.
Lena Zwarensteyn, senior director of the fair courts program and an adviser at The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, criticized Trump's selection of Meredith given his 'disturbing anti-abortion record."
'The nomination of Chad Meredith to a lifetime judgeship should trouble everyone,' Zwarensteyn said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer warns of ‘real risk' in Middle East as Trump mulls bombing Iran
Sir Keir Starmer has urged Donald Trump to step back from military action against Iran which could deepen the crisis in the Middle East. The Prime Minister said there is a 'real risk of escalation' in the conflict as he urged all sides to seek a diplomatic outcome. He said there had previously been 'several rounds of discussions with the US' and 'that, to me, is the way to resolve this issue'. His comments came as Foreign Secretary David Lammy is taking the UK's plea for de-escalation to Washington, where he will meet Mr Trump's top diplomat Marco Rubio. Mr Lammy and US Secretary of State Mr Rubio will discuss the situation in the Middle East on Thursday evening. Iran and Israel continued striking each other's territory overnight as the crisis deepens. A hospital in southern Israel was hit by a missile, while a heavy water facility in Iran was targeted in the latest blow against Tehran's nuclear programme. The hospital attack led defence minister Israel Katz to say Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'absolutely should not continue to exist' – in a sign that plans to kill him could be revived after previously being vetoed by Mr Trump. Mr Lammy's meeting in Washington comes amid speculation US involvement could require using the UK-controlled Diego Garcia base in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. UK Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, something which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Sir Keir said: 'There's a real risk of escalation here that will impact the region, possibly beyond the region, akin to Gaza, and obviously it's already having an impact on the economy.' In relation to Lord Hermer, the Prime Minister said: 'The Attorney's advice is never disclosed by any government, but I can tell you the principle, the driving intent, which is that de-escalation. 'It's very clear: yes, we need to deal with the nuclear programme, there's no doubt about that in my mind, but it is better dealt with as a negotiated outcome. 'De-escalate and get to that point. 'There have been several rounds of discussions with the US. That, to me, is the way to resolve this issue.' Mr Lammy will be taking that message to Washington but UK officials do not know which way the unpredictable US president will go. Reports have suggested he has already approved a plan for an attack but has so far not decided whether to launch it. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called on the Government to publish Lord Hermer's advice, saying: 'The last thing we need is for the UK to be dragged into another illegal war in the Middle East by the US.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said: 'I don't think we can hide behind legal advice at a time of crisis and national security when we have to work alongside our biggest ally in the world, the United States, when they look to us for potentially… setting out operational activities through our own military bases.' She said the Conservative Party would support British involvement in military action against Iran if it was deemed necessary. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% and far in excess of the levels required for power stations. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We have been very clear that Iran's nuclear programme has never been as advanced as it is today, it is a clear threat to international security. 'But we are urging all parties to show restraint and return to diplomacy. We are clear that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon and we will use all diplomatic means available to deliver this.' The Government is also under pressure to step-up support for Britons stranded in Israel after the airspace was closed, a measure Benjamin Netanyahu's administration is under pressure to lift from countries eager to get their citizens home. The Foreign Office has evacuated family members of embassy staff from Israel based on a specific assessment of the risks they face, but has not provided similar transport out of Israel to other Britons. Britons have already been advised against all travel to Israel and those already in the country have been urged to register their presence with the embassy. US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said officials are working to get 'military, commercial, charter flights and cruise ships' for an evacuation of Americans. Asked about the difference between the US support and the UK approach, the No 10 spokesman said: 'There's a huge amount of work being done in the background on contingency planning. It is a fast-moving situation and we keep all our advice and planning under constant review.'
Daily Mirror
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside Iran's secret nuclear bunker that's 260ft deep underground
The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Tehran. It was first made public in 2009, according to officials The world is nervously awaiting Donald Trump's decision whether to strike Iran's secretive nuclear bunker hidden in the mountains. The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Tehran. It is believed to have started around 2006, but was first made public in 2009, according to officials. It is a staggering 260ft under rock and soil, with the site said to be protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. However, those air defences have likely already been struck by Israel during the conflict. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordow was part of that plan. 'This entire operation ... really has to be completed with the elimination of Fordo,' Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the US, said last Friday. Why is the Fordow nuclear bunker being targeted? Fordow is Iran's second nuclear enrichment facility after Natanz, its main facility, which has already been targeted by Israeli airstrikes. The International Atomic Energy Agency believes the strikes have had 'direct impacts' on the facility's underground centrifuge halls. Fordo is smaller than Natanz, and is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom. Construction is believed to have started around 2006 and it became first operational in 2009 — the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In addition to being an estimated 260 feet under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. Those air defences, however, likely have already been struck in the Israeli campaign. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordo was part of that plan. Why is Donald Trump waiting? Reports claim Donald Trump has approved plans for a US attack on nuclear sites in Iran. However, the president is holding off on plans for now in case Iran agrees to give up its nuclear programme, which it claims it is maintained for peaceful purposes. Despite this, Iran also enriches uranium up to 60%, a short step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich at that level. Israel is the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but does not acknowledge having such weapons. US officials said this week that President Donald Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei. Trump later said there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now.' The strikes came a day after Iran's supreme leader rejected US calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them.' Does the US need to be involved? At the moment, only the US has configured and programmed its B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to deliver the bomb, according to the Air Force. The B-2 is only flown by the Air Force, and is produced by Northrop Grumman. According to the manufacturer, the B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 pounds but the US Air Force has said it has successfully tested the B-2 loaded with two GBU-57 A/B bunker busters — a total weight of some 60,000 pounds. The strategic long-range heavy bomber has a range of about 7,000 miles without refueling and 11,500 miles with one refueling, and can reach any point in the world within hours, according to Northrop Grumman.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JD Vance suspended from Bluesky for bizarre reason after posting transgender views
Vice President was briefly kicked off of Bluesky – the social media site that emerged as the left-leaning alternative to X. Vance posted to the site for the first time on Wednesday to open a discussion about the Supreme Court 's decision to uphold a Tennessee law banning minors from being prescribed hormones or receiving transgender surgeries or treatments. 'Hello Bluesky,' Vance wrote. 'I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you.' He shared images of the 6-3 majority opinion where the conservative justices questioned the authority of so-called 'experts' on the matter of transgenderism in children and said it should be left up to the states to decide their laws one way or the other. The vice president's account was suspended after the three-post thread went live. A spokesperson for the platform said Vance was briefly removed because the Bluesky system flagged the account as a potential imposter. Vance posted for the first time to the left-leaning alternative to X to open a discussion about the Supreme Court's decision to uphold rulings letting stand a Tennessee law that bans minors from receiving transgender treatments and surgeries They said the account was reinstated within 20 minutes of the automated system removing it and a verified badge was added to help authenticate the profile. 'Vice President Vance's account was briefly flagged by our automated systems that try to detect impersonation attempts which have targeted public figures like him in the past,' Bluesky said in its statement. 'The account was quickly restored and verified so people can easily confirm its authenticity,' the company added. 'We welcome the Vice President to join the conversation on Bluesky.' Vance posted images of his Bluesky thread on X writing: 'Just set up my page on @bluesky, hope to see you guys there!' He wrote in the three-part post about his consensus with the conservative majority's opinion handed down on Wednesday. The decision is likely to extend to bans or restrictions in 25 other states where similar laws were put into place or proposed to stop minors from receiving irreversible gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments. 'The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' of [the Tennessee law], but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees. It does not,' Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. He added: 'Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.' Vance's first activity on Bluesky was a three-part post about the Supreme Court ruling Vance posted on Bluesky: 'I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating.' 'He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth,' the vice president wrote. 'I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids. What do you think?' Vance said he wanted to have open conversation on the social media site that emerged as the liberal alternative to X as it became increasingly right wing – especially after billionaire Elon Musk's purchase of the platform.
