logo
New Look to shut popular branch in WEEKS after already closing 32 branches – is your local going?

New Look to shut popular branch in WEEKS after already closing 32 branches – is your local going?

The Sun4 hours ago

NEW Look will shut a popular branch in weeks after 32 stores have already closed across the UK and Ireland.
The British clothing chain will close down a branch in Neath, Wales on August 6.
1
Locals shared a snap of the closing down sign on social media, prompting shoppers to share their heartbreak.
One punter blamed online shopping for the closure, claiming it has "killed the high street".
While another resident said they "couldn't believe it".
And a third moaned there would be "nothing" in Neath soon.
New Look previously warned it would shut nearly 100 stores ahead of National Insurance hikes which came into place in April.
Approximately a quarter of the retailer's 364 stores are at risk when their leases expire.
This equates to about 91 stores, with a significant impact on its 8,000-strong workforce.
News of the closure comes just days after New Look pulled the shutters on its branch in Birmingham's Northfield shopping centre.
The popular store closed on Sunday, June 8.
Earlier this month, the fashion retailer closed its two-storey shop in the Willow Place shopping centre .
Beloved high street chain with 24 Irish locations confirms Dublin city centre store closing down in 10 days in huge blow
In May, it closed branches in St Austell and Gateshead, Tyne and Wear.
The chain has previously closed locations in Porth, Rhondda Cynon Taf and Wickford, Essex.
In February, New Look also exited the Republic of Ireland which resulted in the closure of 26 stores.
At the time, the company said: "New Look's Irish operation has struggled for some years, impacted by a range of factors including supply-chain and in-market costs, and squeezed consumer spending".
TROUBLE ON THE HIGH STREET
New Look is not the only fashion brand facing a hard time.
River Island revealed plans to shut 33 of its 230 stores, pending approval.
A further 70 stores are also at risk, with its future depending on agreements being reached with landlords to cut rent agreements.
Just weeks ago the British retailer drafted in advisers from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to come up with money saving solutions for the business.
Poundland will close 68 stores following its £1 sale to US investmet firm Gordron Brothers.
But even before this announcement, the bargain chain had already planned to close 18 stores,
RETAIL PAIN IN 2025
The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion.
Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April.
A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024.
Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure.
The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year.
Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025."
Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector.
"By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leicester neighbourhood to get new permit parking rules
Leicester neighbourhood to get new permit parking rules

BBC News

time18 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Leicester neighbourhood to get new permit parking rules

A new residents' parking scheme is to come into force in part of Leicester next City Council says the new rules will apply in certain streets in the Woodgate and Fosse Road North area from 1 will be asked to pay £35 a year for a permit to park on the streets in mainly terraced authority said the move was in response to complaints about the streets, on the outskirts of the city centre, filling up with vehicles belonging to commuters and businesses. The council said the scheme would include some short stay pay-and-display bays for customers going to local businesses. Businesses will be asked to pay £100 for annual permits to park in the streets or £150 for a transferable are more than 700 homes in the affected streets which can apply, the council city mayor Geoff Whittle said: "We've seen in other parts of the city how the introduction of residents' parking schemes can be an effective way of tackling parking problems in local neighbourhoods and freeing up spaces for the people who live there."By introducing permit only parking, we can help make it easier for residents to find available parking close to their homes, and new customer parking bays will also mean local businesses don't suffer." Streets in the scheme Balfour StreetMarshall StreetBassett StreetDunton StreetRugby Street Repton StreetCentral RoadBonchurch StreetPart of Fosse Road North, between Bonchurch Street and the Fiveways junctionWoodgate, between its junctions with Balfour Street and Dunton Street

How many funds should you hold in your pension or Isa? ANDREW OXLADE
How many funds should you hold in your pension or Isa? ANDREW OXLADE

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How many funds should you hold in your pension or Isa? ANDREW OXLADE

What is the right number of funds to hold in your pension or stocks and shares Isa? It's a question many DIY investors ask ourselves, especially after a buying spree. It is, after all, easy to get carried away, enticed by a racy growth story or an investment that has foundered and may bounce back. Picking investments is a fascinating hobby, fellow hobbyists would probably agree. It is the art of understanding the world better than the next investor - the trends, the risks, the growth opportunities - and then making better returns as a result. But dangers lurk. We all have biases in our decision making that can lead to questionable investment choices. And those decisions can build up into an accumulation of decisions that manifest themselves in holding lots and lots of funds. So, what is the right amount to hold? For my part, I have five funds per £100,000 of money in my pension. But perhaps it's more beneficial to use a bigger pool of data. Fidelity has more than 550,000 DIY investors in the UK, offering a huge pool, and its average numbers for various tiers of wealth offer a benchmark. How many is too many? Those with portfolios of between £100,000 and £200,000 have an average of eight fund holdings, as the chart above shows. Those with larger portfolios seem to resist the opportunity to keep buying more, with the number plateauing at 17 from £500,000 portfolio sizes. Is that too many funds or too few? It's difficult to give a firm answer. So much depends on what you want to achieve and the risks you are willing to stomach. These factors will dictate the investment mix included in a portfolio. For example, someone investing for at least 10 years and comfortable with volatility might want to go 100 per cent into stock market funds; someone retiring in five years and planning to withdraw money may want a portion of the portfolio in bonds, which tend to move counter to stock markets, although not always. Investors may also want other diversifying assets such as real estate or commodities. A financial adviser can help work out what you need. Even within stock markets, investors may want a bent towards a particular region or country. So rather than following the typical allocation that a global tracker fund would give (67 per cent US, 13 per cent European and 4 per cent UK for the Legal & General Global Equity Index, for example) they may want more, or less, in each. An investor may want more technology exposure, or to back renewable energy. This can be achieved by buying regional funds and specialist funds - and this is when excessive fund buying can happen. Here, I've set out four questions to ask yourself. 1: How many investments can you safely monitor? Selecting your own shares requires some homework. With funds, a manager does that for you. But the fund investor must also keep an eye on each fund, especially for the exit of a star manager. And managers can also have fallow spells. It then requires a call on whether to hold until their mojo returns, or to sell. Either way, holding actively managed funds requires more monitoring. Do you have the time to do that with 20 active funds? Of course, funds that aim to track an index - so-called passive funds - require less attention. Many of the investment platforms offer deeply researched lists on funds, which can be helpful. For ours - the Select 50 - the research and selections are undertaken by Fundhouse, an independent funds rating agency. 2: Do you have hidden overlaps? Commonly, an investor may have a core holding of a global stock market tracker fund, with other funds that add a flavour of particular countries or regions they want to back. And within that part of the portfolio, it's just possible that the engaged investor has had their head turned by funds of a similar ilk - perhaps two high income funds that might both hold British American Tobacco. This may not be a problem but it is good to know where you do hold overlaps. Some investment platforms have 'X-ray' tools that enable you to see these overlaps. They can show you the percentage of your portfolio you have in each company. I was alarmed earlier this year by my exposure to Nvidia across many funds. This included index tracking funds in the core and active funds on the periphery. 3: Is it more expensive to be a multiple fund holder? DIY investors face two primary costs - the charges on the fund and the charges applied by the fund platform for holding it for you. An actively managed fund will commonly cost around 0.75% or £75 a year per £1,000 of investment; passive funds cost a lot less. Platform percentages vary considerably and so do pricing structures. This is important to the thinking on the number of funds to hold. Some platforms charge a dealing fee to buy and sell funds, normally as a pay-off for lower ongoing costs. However, this can rack up if you hold a lot of funds and like to tinker. And with investment trusts, the cousins of funds that trade as listed companies, there is nearly always a fee for buying and selling. It is worth applying this lens to your thinking. Small allocations to many funds may not significantly influence overall portfolio performance and may add unnecessary costs. 4: Would you be better with a 'simple life' option? It kind of defeats the point of being a DIY investor, but you could stick with a single fund that is a ready-made portfolio. DIY-ing isn't for everyone, after all. Such funds can offer some diversification, which is key, by holding a mix of assets. If one flags, another may pick up the baton: when share prices fall, bond prices should rise, or that's the theory. A popular allocation is to divide 60% in shares and 40% in bonds, or 80/20 for those willing to take more risk. You can do this cheaply and easily with a single fund. The Vanguard LifeStrategy fund range is an example, with 80/20 and 60/40 funds among others. The simplicity of such funds, which track markets rather than actively selecting investments, has made them popular in recent years. There are also lots of actively managed funds that aim to do this and beat the index. Will I reduce my fund holdings? In short, yes. Or at the very least I'll be mindful of the very questions I've raised and that will help limit expansion from where I'm at. But ultimately, managing a DIY portfolio is an enjoyable hobby – and that enjoyment is something I wouldn't want to diminish.

Skellig Michael boat trips dispute resolved in High Court
Skellig Michael boat trips dispute resolved in High Court

BreakingNews.ie

time29 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Skellig Michael boat trips dispute resolved in High Court

The High Court dispute over boat trips to Skellig Michael has been resolved. Mr Justice Garrett Simons was told on Tuesday that the parties had reached a settlement and a hearing date for the main case in the dispute next month could be vacated. Advertisement Earlier this month, the judge granted an application by the Office of Public Works (OPW) to lift an automatic suspension on landing at the Unesco heritage site and former monastic island which was also used as a film location for the Star Wars movies, The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi. It meant that boat trips to the island off the Kerry coast could begin for the summer 2025 season immediately. Annual landing permits issued by the OPW for mid-May to September were automatically suspended when two unsuccessful bidders for the licences brought a High Court challenge to the decision. The OPW then had to apply to the court asking that the stay be lifted pending hearing of the substantive challenge. Advertisement The unsuccessful bidders, Atlantic Endeavour Ltd and SMBT Ltd trading as Skellig Michael Boat Trips, disagreed with the OPW interpretation of the legal effect of the automatic suspension. They contended that there are a number of mechanisms open whereby landing permits might legitimately be granted to the successful tenderers for the balance of the 2025 season, while preserving their own right to challenge the allocation of landing permits for the 2026 and subsequent seasons. Mr Justice Simons, following a hearing, ordered the stay be lifted. He said his judgment entailed no finding whatsoever on whether the outcome of the tender process allows the OPW to confine the right to land passengers to the 15 successful tenderers for a five year period. Advertisement Ireland 90 arrests made during Donegal International Rally... Read More The proper interpretation of the request for tender and associated documentation, and the legal consequences of the tender process, remain open for debate at the trial of the action, he said. On Tuesday, David Dodd BL, for Atlantic and SMBT, said the matter had been resolved and a hearing date for July could be vacated. He said his clients were very happy with the outcome especially in light of the judge's decision earlier this month. The OPW had agreed to pay his side's costs. The judge struck out the case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store