Britain's migrant hotel ‘king' becomes BILLIONAIRE after fortune soared by £265m, as Sunday Times Rich List released
Graham King has amassed a £1.015 billion from his asylum empire it has been revealed.
Advertisement
5
Essex tycoon Graham King, 58, has amassed a £1.015 billion from his asylum empire
5
Migrant hotel tycoon Graham King is a keen amateur racing driver.
Credit: Tim Stewart
5
King's business started off when he purchased a caravan site
Credit: Tim Stewart
The tycoon's wealth skyrocketed this year with a massive £265m increase pushing him over the line to become a billionaire.
He is now among The Sunday Times Rich List's newest billionaires after only making it onto the list last year.
King, 58, is an Essex asylum
The company is paid by the home office to provide accommodation for asylum seekers.
Advertisement
Read more News
It has a massive £1.7 billion turnover with King's firm raking in almost £4.8 million a day.
King now uses his wealth to fund a lavish lifestyle for him and his girlfriend and pursues his passion of amateur racing.
His fortune reached record highs alongside record high numbers of people claiming asylum in the UK.
The number of people claiming asylum climbed from 91,811 in 2023 to 108,138 last year, a record high.
Advertisement
Most read in The Sun
The news comes just after PM Kier Starmer announced a crack down on immigration.
King once owned a
Clearsprings recent contracts include one with the home office that runs until September 2029.
Fury as hotel firm housing asylum seekers in 'all-inclusive resort' paid £700m a year of YOUR money
The most recent contract is estimated to be worth a massive £7.3 billion.
Advertisement
The huge success of King's company has seen his
He is now officially a billionaire according to The Sunday Times Rich List.
Graham King first made it onto rich list last year, owning 99% of Clearsprings' shares.
His wealth has exploded since, catapulting him from the 221st spot on the list to the 154th.
Advertisement
Home Office contracts to house asylum seekers have been awarded mostly to three companies.
King's Clearsprings Ready Homes, Mears Group and Serco.
Clearsprings provides accommodation mostly in old military barracks, flats and hotels.
King, now officially a
Advertisement
He has made the news for the condition of his properties before with inspectors finding "failures of leadership and planning" in his operations.
Asylum seekers were housed by King's company in "decrepit" and "run down" barracks in Kent and
King's already massive wealth rose 35% this year which and now sits at £1.015 billion.
For the fourth year in a row, Goji Hinduja and family have topped the Sunday Times Rich list, with the investors sharing a net worth of £35.304 billion.
Advertisement
They suffered a fall of £1.892 billion from last year's survey.
The minimum entry level for the list flatlines at £350 million.
This year's list marks the largest drop in billionaires in the guide's 37-year history, with just 156 making
Advertisement
Other celebrities who made the list include Ellen Degeneres, Charlotte Tilbury, Ed Sheeran and Brewdog Founder James Watt.
5
King and his girlfriend frequently holiday together
Credit: Tim Stewart
5
Penally Camp in Wales.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Where does Ireland really rank in the international rich list?
Influential international magazine the Economist produces a 'rich list' of countries each year – a league table of how income levels in different countries compare. This year Ireland was excluded, as the authors said its data was 'polluted by tax arbitrage'. This is, of course, correct. Gross domestic product (GDP) is the general measure of comparison used for such studies, and Ireland's data is completely messed up by the tax planning activities of the multinationals, which generally use intellectual property assets to declare as much profit as they can here. This is – generally - legal, but it hugely inflates Irish GDP and makes us look richer than we are. So where do we actually rank in terms of incomes compared to other countries? 1. The GDP dilemma The Economist – along with most other bodies including EU agency Eurostat, the IMF and private forecasters – take GDP as the basis for their calculation and divide it by the population to get a measure of income per head. A calculation is then generally made to adjust for different price levels in various countries. These GDP per capita figures – published by Eurostat – show Ireland in second place to Luxembourg in the EU and at about third place in the world, with Singapore also ahead. (Small territories such as Macau and Monaco also feature high up on some lists.) In cash terms, EU GDP per capita was estimated at €33,550 in 2024, while Irish GDP per capita was put at €88,600. This is before adjustment for different price levels, used in the international comparisons. READ MORE [ Ireland not a 'truly rich' country, according to The Economist Opens in new window ] This is plainly not a reflection of the actual income levels here compared to other countries. In fact, with GDP per capita here more than twice the EU average, even after adjusting for different price levels, the figures here are off the charts and best ignored. 2. Making the adjustment So how can we do better? Well, the Central Statistics Office (CSO), in consultation with other experts, developed a measure called modified gross national income (GNI) a few years ago. This factors out the impact of a few things – the intellectual property factor, aircraft leasing activity and the impact of companies which redomicile their headquarters here. If we do a rough calculation and use this figure for Ireland and GDP per head for elsewhere (in most countries there would not be much difference), then Ireland falls down the list. We move from second place, with a figure 211 per cent of the EU average, to fourth, with a figure about 24 per cent above the EU average, having been overtaken by the Netherlands and Denmark. Interestingly, when former Central Bank governor Patrick Honohan made a similar calculation in his landmark piece on the issue in 2021 – relating to 2019 data – Ireland was in eighth place (This article broadly follows the path which he set in terms of looking at this issue). The figures suggest some relative improvement in the intervening years, when economic growth here has exceeded that elsewhere in the EU, even if using statistics other than GDP. However, given the approximate nature of such calculations, it is worth noting that the four other countries that were just ahead of us in 2019 – Germany, Austria, Netherlands and Sweden – are now, on this measure, just behind us, bunched with GDP per capita between 13 and 16 per cent above the average. Does this still overstate Ireland's position? Possibly yes, as we will see below. And it is difficult to see Ireland as better-off on average than traditionally high-income states such as Germany and Sweden. It is also worth noting that what we are looking at are average figures which make no allowance for the spread of income. We know, for example, that Ireland has a group of high-income earners working for the multinational sector and for professional service firms largely reliant on that sector. This will pull up the average here. The Economist also excluded Luxembourg because of the high number of workers who travel to work in highly paid financial sector jobs there each day from surrounding states. All countries have their peculiarities, but some are more peculiar than others. 3. What we consume Another commonly used measure is to look at what people consume. As well as consumer spending – for which figures are regularly reported in Ireland – comparisons use figures which estimate the amount of money spent by the State in directly supporting households, through measures such as welfare or providing education and childcare. This is known as 'actual individual consumption', or AIC. Eurostat calculates (see map) that Ireland's AIC per capita is about the EU average - 99 per cent, to be precise. This has risen from 94 per cent since 2019. Again, this is adjusting for different price levels in different countries. Illustrating how the basis of comparison can affect the outcome in this area, the Dutch national statistics office has done its own calculation of AIC across the EU, which puts Ireland in fifth place. In cash terms it estimates the AIC here at €30,900 versus the EU average of €26,200, having made its own adjustment for different price levels. It is not clear why its result is different; the generally used figures are those from Eurostat, which were published in June. A point worth noting is the high level of savings in Irish households here, which depresses consumption figures a bit – and thus moves us down the league – but may help to support consumption in future. Over-consumption is also possible. Before the financial crash in 2008, Irish AIC surged well above the EU norm. But this was built on unsustainable borrowing and spending, fuelled by State spending based on what turned out to be transient tax revenues. 4. The conclusions What do we make of all this? A few points are clear. One is that Ireland's GDP data has become progressively more detached from reality as of the middle of the last decade. The first real indication of this was the 'Leprechaun economics' saga of 2015, when Irish GDP was adjusted upwards by more than 26 per cent, catching the attention of US economist Paul Krugman. There was another surge upwards in 2022. Ireland's 'real' economy has grown for sure, but the GDP figures have overstated this consistently. And so the actual level of GDP has got further and further detached from reality. It is now more than 40 per cent higher than modified GNI, according to the latest CSO estimates. This messes up international comparisons, affects our contributions to the EU budget and brings some unwelcome international attention here. Second, when we make adjustments, Ireland moves closer to reality, but exactly where we stand remains open to some debate. In common-sense terms, Ireland does not feel better-off than some of the higher-ranking EU countries such as Germany, Austria and Sweden. Perhaps we are in line with or just behind these countries, but ahead of Southern Europe? If we took a midpoint between the modified GNI per head and the AIC, that is where we would be left. Third, on any criteria, Ireland has made progress over the longer term and has made some relative gains since 2019. This is not to gainsay the problems, of course. The average figures make no allowance, for example, for intergenerational inequality or the problems of younger people getting on to the housing ladder. But on any of the averages measure Ireland's relative position has improved over the last five years. And finally, income is only one measure of national wellbeing. There are a lot of other factors which affect standards of living. One is wealth – the amount of property, investments and cash in the bank held by households. Others are the efficiency with which services are delivered to the public, the environment in which they live and even the weather. There are hosts of other indices which attempt to measure some of these factors – but while national income is hard to compare across countries, doing the same with wellbeing is next to impossible.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Cormac O'Keeffe: Tension mounts in Ireland's real-life spy drama
It has all the ingredients of Netflix spy drama, but the 'Agent Cobalt' story concerns real investigations, real threats, and real people. Trying to figure out what actually happened, weighing up differing accounts and perspectives, and trying to present a clear and accurate picture is quite a challenge. Interested observers would be advised to bear that in mind. It is also worth stressing there are few areas where gathering and analysing information is more difficult than in the shadowy and secretive world of national security and intelligence. This is particularly so in Ireland, with its long, and embedded, culture of secrecy. Cobalt Revealed Back in October, The Sunday Times ran a dramatic front-page headline: 'Revealed: Putin has an agent in the Oireachtas'. The story, by their experienced security correspondent John Mooney, sent shockwaves through the Oireachtas and dominated the airwaves for some time. The report said: 'The Irish military and security services have identified a politician in the Oireachtas who has been recruited by Russian intelligence as an agent of influence and whose clandestine connections to Moscow remain intact.' The story, and related articles, described the politician as a person who could influence policy and political narratives, using his own networks and outlets. The most serious of allegations against the politician related to him allegedly offering services, such as making introductions, including, it was reported, to loyalist paramilitaries. The Sunday Times detailed how Garda security and intelligence and military intelligence both came across the politician during counter-intelligence surveillance they were conducting on suspected Russian intelligence officers in Ireland, including the military attache to the Russian Embassy — Sergey Prokopiev. It is also thought British intelligence were aware. The Sunday Times had details on travels the politician took and of alleged meetings with Russian agents, in Ireland and abroad. Most of the meetings and contacts appear to relate to the period 2019 and 2020, but the Garda and Military monitoring continued. After the stories, there was intense speculation as to who was 'Agent Cobalt' and there was widespread commentary on social media. Government leaders, including the Taoiseach and the Justice Minister were briefed about the politician, who has never commented. No Agent Cobalt Last Tuesday The Journal ran a story, headlined: 'There is no Agent Cobalt'. It added: 'Garda investigation clears Irish politician of being a Russian Agent.' The story, by Niall O'Connor, an experienced security journalist and former garda, said the investigation had 'exonerated' the politician. It said: 'The politician has been sent confirmation from the detectives investigating the case that nothing has been found to suggest that he ever spied for Russia or worked with Russian agents.' The report said sources spoken to said that, while Russian agents tried to approach the politician, 'nothing came of it'. The story said the first approach was in Eastern Europe when the politician was on a work trip and that his drink was spiked by a female agent. It said the politician contacted gardaí on his return about the incident. The second approach was by a purported 'trade attaché' at the Russian Embassy, apparently a reference to Prokopiev. The Journal referred to a meeting between detectives from the Special Detective Unit and the politician, accompanied by his legal representatives — held after the October Sunday Times articles. It said detectives told the politician that 'nothing untoward had been found' to suggest he had given information to Russia. The article said it was understood that the politician was 'sent confirmation of this in writing'. Garda HQ Intervenes On publication of the story, media sought a comment from the Garda Press Office. In the meantime, inquiries by the Irish Examiner among security sources found that they were adamant that no such letter was issued and that no statements would be given to a suspect that they were in the clear or that the case was closed. Later, Garda HQ issued a statement, stating the investigation was not finished. It said: 'An Garda Síochána is continuing an ongoing active criminal investigation into this matter. An Garda Síochána has no further comment.' The Irish Examiner understands that the message sent out was coming from the very top layers of the organisation. Next episode The Garda statement, and inquiries conducted by the Irish Examiner, indicate that all sides in this case are absolutely certain of their positions and the integrity of their work. It is expected that The Sunday Times will publish more details this weekend and that The Journal may too, either before or after, with additional information to support their respective accounts. It seems clear that this matter could gather momentum. The issue of the existence of a 'document' or 'letter' may come more to the fore, sparking pressures for publication. Then there is the meeting in question and the position of the multiple witnesses at that. Is it possible that it is all down to a misinterpretation or misrepresentation of what was said? If the politician and/or his legal representatives decide to speak, it may well become a political issue, even with the Oireachtas on holidays. That might put pressure on Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan and Taoiseach Micheál Martin to comment. That is unlikely to be something the outgoing commissioner — departing at the end of next week — or the new commissioner — staring on 1 September — would want. Expect more twists and turns.
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Gardaí exonerate politician in 'active criminal probe' into alleged Russian agent
Garda Headquarters has said an active criminal investigation is 'ongoing' into allegations that a national politician has links with Russian intelligence services. The statement followed a report in The Journal on Tuesday, which said the investigation had finished and that it had 'exonerated' the Oireachtas member. The article said an officer of the Special Detective Unit had sent confirmation to the politician that, according to the report, 'nothing had been found to suggest he had ever spied for Russia' or had worked for Russian agents. Asked about the status of the investigation, a Garda HQ statement said: 'An Garda Síochána is continuing an ongoing active criminal investigation into this matter. An Garda Síochána has no further comment.' The original allegation was published in The Sunday Times last October, with headlines stating that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'has an agent' in the Oireachtas. Articles alleged it was the first known case of 'infiltration' by a hostile intelligence service. The articles alleged that the politician was an 'agent of influence' of Russia - describing a person in a position to potentially influence policy or political narratives and/or make introductions – as opposed to an active spy. The Sunday Times articles detailed cases of alleged attempts by Russian intelligence to approach and meet the politician, and appear to relate to 2019 and 2020. The Garda National Crime and Security Intelligence Service has been co-ordinating an investigation into the matter, which long precede the media reports. The SDU – which is the operational arm of the service – is leading the investigation. The politician at the centre of the allegations had no comment to make.
