logo
This Suuuper Common Hotel Customer Practice Is Now Being Deemed Pointless, But I Refuse To Stop

This Suuuper Common Hotel Customer Practice Is Now Being Deemed Pointless, But I Refuse To Stop

Yahoo19-05-2025

It seems whenever I hop onto the internet, I learn that something I view as a standard practice isn't actually as common as I would've thought. From unique hygiene rituals to dating 101, nothing is what it seems.
But one thing I truly believed to be a universal rule was hotel checkout — as in, when you're done with your stay, you return to the hotel's main lobby to return your key, pay any outstanding balances, and check out.
So, imagine my surprise when I realized some people literally just leave the hotel without doing so. In fact, the act of checking out is now being deemed a "boomer" activity, according to this X (formerly known as Twitter) user — "Boomers will literally wait in a hotel line to tell someone at the front desk that they are 'checking out' instead of just going home."
The responses to that tweet were split, with some people saying checking out of hotels is a courtesy, while others considered it a waste of time:
Editor's Note: While we can't endorse what X has become, we can bring you the worthwhile moments that still exist there, curated and free of the surrounding chaos.
"lol I am shocked every time I learn people still 'check out.'"
"Checking out of a hotel is a litmus test of character, like returning a shopping cart. It's a 5 second task that makes someone else's life easier. I'm team Boomer here idk."
"I work at a hotel, lol just leave man."
"This is basic courtesy. Return your key cards, and confirm checkout. This way they know the room's available to be cleaned etc."
"OMG my mom.. we were just in Costa Rica.. she said 'we gotta take these cards downstairs,' I was like 'girl, let's go"
Some argued that checking out helps avoid any unnecessary or incorrect charges that may have been applied to your room:
While others mentioned checking out not only helps the staff, but it also helps patrons who are checking in:
"You know why there are rarely rooms available for early check-in? Because Millenials don't let the hotel know they've already gone home, so the room isn't refreshed."
"Honestly, it's kind of rude not to check out. People are always looking to check in early, and that is harder when people don't check out. Also, we recently [got] charged a $400 smoking fee (and we don't smoke). If we didn't check out, that may have gone unnoticed."
"It's courtesy to at least give the front desk your key. They update the housekeeping list to reflect checkouts so they can clean. My daughter was a regional manager of a hotel chain."
Despite the online discourse, I will proudly continue to check out of any and every hotel I stay at. Now, I want to know where you stand on this debate. Let me know your opinion on checking out below in the comments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A look at Trump's travel ban timeline throughout his first presidency
A look at Trump's travel ban timeline throughout his first presidency

USA Today

time2 days ago

  • USA Today

A look at Trump's travel ban timeline throughout his first presidency

A look at Trump's travel ban timeline throughout his first presidency Show Caption Hide Caption What to know about travel bans and who they could affect Immigration law allows presidents to restrict travel into the U.S., but President Donald Trump's bans have been more sweeping than past presidents. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday banning or restricting travel of foreign nationals from several countries, reminiscent of his first administration when he banned travelers from seven majority-Muslim countries in 2017. The ban, which goes into effect on June 9, affects Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, will be partially restricted. The travel restrictions were first reported by CBS News. "We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,"Trump said in a video posted on X, formerly Twitter. He said the list could be revised and new countries could be added. Since returning to the White House for his second term, the president has vowed to replicate the impact of his original travel bans, which stirred several legal battles with courts that blocked the mandate. Here's a timeline of what ensued then. See events of Trump's first travel ban Jan. 27, 2017: Trump issues an executive order entitled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States." It suspends travel from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen for 90 days, blocks refugees for 120 days, and suspends travel from Syria indefinitely. Jan. 28: Chaos reigns at U.S. airports as Department of Homeland Security agents block travelers from entering the country, leading to protests and legal action. Feb. 3: Federal District Court Judge James Robart in Seattle issues a nationwide restraining order that blocks the travel ban from being implemented. Feb. 9: TheU.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, based in San Francisco, refuses to reinstate the ban, ruling that it violates due process rights without a sufficient national security justification. March 6: Trump issues a revised travel ban targeting only six countries and exempting visa- and green card-holders in an effort to reverse his fortunes in the courts. March 15: Federal District Judge Derrick Watson in Hawaii issues a nationwide halt to the revised travel ban on immigrants and refugees. March 16: Federal District Judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland blocks part of the travel ban that applies to travelers from six predominantly Muslim nations. May 25: TheU.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, based in Richmond, upholds the ruling from Maryland on the basis of religious discrimination against Muslims. June 12: The 9th Circuit appeals court upholds the ruling from Hawaii, saying the ban discriminates based on nationality. But it clears the way for a review of screening practices. June 26: The Supreme Court upholds parts of the ban and schedules oral arguments for October. In the meantime, travelers in a wide range of visa categories must prove their connection to a U.S. organization or individual in order to avoid the ban. Sept. 24: Trump issues his third version of the ban following what the administration says was a deep dive into international vetting procedures. Included indefinitely: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Chad, North Korea and Venezuela. Chad was recently dropped from the list. Oct. 17: Judge Watson in Hawaii blocks the third version nationwide, writing that it "suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor" and "plainly discriminates based on nationality." Oct. 18: Judge Chuang in Maryland says much the same thing, ruling that it still constitutes a "Muslim ban" that violates the Constitution's protections against religious discrimination. Dec. 4: The Supreme Court rules that the ban can take full effect while legal challenges continue in federal appeals courts. The justices urge those courts to render decisions "with appropriate dispatch." Dec. 22: A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit appeals court rules against the ban in part, contending that Trump exceeded his authority under federal law. Jan. 19, 2018: The Supreme Court agrees to hear the Justice Department's appeal of the 9th Circuit ruling, leading to oral arguments. Feb. 15: The full 4th Circuit appeals court again declares the ban unconstitutional based on its discrimination against Muslims. April 25: The Supreme Court hears oral arguments on the appeal of the 9th Circuit ruling. Conservative justices appear sympathetic to the administration's stance. June 26: The Supreme Court reverses the 9th Circuit's ruling, handing a major victory to Trump. June 31, 2020: Trump adds visa restrictions to six more countries including Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania. The White House said those nations failed to "comply with basic national security" requirements or to conduct "proper identity management" procedures. USA TODAY's Joey Garrison and Reuters contributed to the reporting of this story

PUBLIC NOTICE - LaSalle Causeway: Temporary closures for marine openings
PUBLIC NOTICE - LaSalle Causeway: Temporary closures for marine openings

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

PUBLIC NOTICE - LaSalle Causeway: Temporary closures for marine openings

KINGSTON, ON, June 4, 2025 /CNW/ - Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) wishes to advise the public that the LaSalle Causeway will be fully closed to vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians to allow for the temporary opening of the main marine navigation channel during the following periods: Sunday, June 8, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, June 15, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, June 22, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, June 29, from 6 am to 10 pm Tuesday, July 1, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, July 6, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, July 13, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, July 20, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, July 27, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, August 3, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, August 10, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, August 17, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, August 24, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, August 31, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, September 7, from 6 am to 10 pm Sunday, September 21, from 6 am to 8 pm Sunday, October 5, from 6 am to 8 pm Tuesday, October 14, from 6 am to 8 pm Sunday, October 19, from 6 am to 8 pm Sunday, November 2, from 6 am to 8 pm Sunday, November 16, from 6 am to 8 pm During these periods, the removal of the modular bridge will begin at 6 am, with the marine channel expected to be open by 9 am. From June 8 to September 7, the marine channel will be closed at 7 pm to reinstall the bridge, with the causeway expected to reopen to vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians by 10 pm. From September 21 to November 16, the marine channel will be closed at 5 pm to reinstall the bridge, while the causeway is expected to reopen by 8 pm. The marine opening schedule for 2025 has been approved by Transport Canada under the Canadian Navigable Waters Act and is available on PSPC's LaSalle Causeway page. We encourage users to consult our public notices and X (Twitter) account for updates, along with the LaSalle Causeway page for any schedule changes after business hours. Contact Real Property Services Follow us on X (Twitter)Follow us on Facebook SOURCE Public Services and Procurement Canada View original content: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Swifties Can't Get Enough of Taylor Swift's Via Carota Visit in NYC
Swifties Can't Get Enough of Taylor Swift's Via Carota Visit in NYC

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Swifties Can't Get Enough of Taylor Swift's Via Carota Visit in NYC

's hiatus hasn't been easy on the Swifties, and a video showed how her recent Via Carota visit proved to be their consolation. A viral clip on X (formerly Twitter) shared a brief look at Swift's stylish outing in New York City on Thursday night. Spectators' reactions clearly proved they couldn't get enough of it. A swarm of fans and paparazzi gathered outside the establishment – one of her favorite dining spots – to catch a rare glimpse. However, the clip only captured her walking out of the door and into her SUV, leaving everybody wanting more. A solo date in the Big Apple doesn't sound like a bad idea, especially when you're a pop icon. This viral video on X (formerly Twitter) showed Taylor Swift's recent outing in NYC as she exited Via Carota with a flock of fans and paps greeting her at the entrance. The singer's dress, which is only visible in the flashes in the clip, appeared to be a gorgeous black piece with multicoloured prints throughout. In addition, Swift was sporting her signature bangs, and her hair remained tied in a neat ponytail. She paired a handbag that one could barely notice, hanging on her arm. More interestingly, the video captured the stunned reactions of fans besides documenting the Grammy winner's rare outing. One can notice people with their mouths wide open in the background because it's not every day one encounters a celebrity like her walking by. A second clip showed a fellow diner's jaw-dropping reaction to seeing Swift entering the restaurant. The text over the post read, 'That face when you're having dinner and Taylor Swift shows up,' with a geotag of the location. Before videos of her solo dinner date in NYC's Via Carota went viral, Taylor Swift enjoyed a cozy date with Travis Kelce in Florida. Her NFL star boyfriend has reportedly been staying in Florida, turning his $20 million mansion into his 'base of operations' to train during the off-season. Swift reportedly pays him frequent visits, including once last week, when they enjoyed a dinner outing at the Harry's Bar & Restaurant in West Palm Beach. Originally reported by Nikita Mahato on Reality Tea. The post Swifties Can't Get Enough of Taylor Swift's Via Carota Visit in NYC appeared first on Mandatory.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store