National pharmacy company sues Arkansas over law eliminating PBM pharmacy ownership
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – A lawsuit was filed in Little Rock federal court on Thursday to overturn an Arkansas law preventing pharmacy benefit managers from operating pharmacies in the state.
The suit filed by the pharmacy benefit management firm Express Scripts by Evernorth claims that violates the Constitution and federal law. It requests that the court prevent Act 624 from going into effect.
Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signs bill blocking PBM ownership of pharmacies into law
St. Louis-based Express Scripts is the pharmacy benefit management arm of The Cigna Group, a multinational health care and insurance company. Pharmacy benefits managers act as intermediaries between pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies to set rates, including the compensation amounts paid to pharmacies.
Act 624 prohibits pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) from owning pharmacies in Arkansas.
The lawsuit claims that Act 624 violates the Constitution's Commerce Clause and the Privileges & Immunities Clause. It also states the law violates the Constitution's Attainder Clause, which prevents laws from being passed that punish individuals or groups without a trial.
The lawsuit continues to claim that it interferes with federal law since the act would prevent Express Scripts from honoring its TRICARE contract with the Department of Defense. TRICARE is the health plan, including pharmacy support, for active duty National Guard, reserve, and retired military members and their families.
The suit has multiple plaintiffs under the Express Scripts umbrella and is filed against the state pharmacy board and its members.
CVS shares statement after Arkansas bill restricting PBMs from owning pharmacies is signed into law
Evernorth Health Services Vice President of Pharmacy Practice and pharmacist Susan Peppers said the suit was filed to ensure continued access to care.
'Our family of pharmacies—including Express Scripts Pharmacy, Accredo Specialty Pharmacy and Freedom Fertility Pharmacy—are proud to serve Arkansans, and this law will disrupt their access to the care we provide,' Peppers said. 'If this law takes effect in January, hundreds of thousands of Arkansans will be left scrambling to navigate the forced closure of pharmacies and finding new ways to get their medicines and critical clinical support.'
Peppers continued that Evernorth was doing 'everything we can' to protect Arkansas patients.
Arkansas Attorney General Griffin signs letter asking for federal law to prohibit Pharmacy Benefit Managers from owning pharmacies
Attorney General Tim Griffin, whose office will defend against the case, stated that PBMs hinder access and quality.
'Pharmacy benefit managers wield outsized power to reap massive profits at the expense of consumers,' Griffin said. 'The rise of PBMs as middlemen in the prescription drug market has resulted in patients facing fewer choices, lower quality care, and higher prices.'
Griffin added that PBMs 'leverage their affiliated pharmacies to manipulate prices, corrupt the market, and destroy competition. Through Act 624, Arkansas is standing up to PBMs on behalf of consumers, and I will vigorously defend our law.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
CT teacher put on leave for refusing to remove crucifix has still not settled lawsuit
A Connecticut teacher put in a 'rubber room' for refusing to remove a cross from her desk says she is still being crucified. Marisol Arroyo-Castro's case is being closely watched by both advocates of religious freedom and those seeking strict separation of church and state. On Wednesday, the grade-school educator and her lawyers participated in a three-hour mediation with the New Britain district's lawyers, superintendent and a judge, but weren't able to come to an agreement. Advertisement Her fate now rests in the hands of a judge, and Castro fears she could be fired or remain in a rubber room when the school year begins on Aug. 19. 'It's a little bit nerve-wracking, especially when school is starting again soon,' Castro, 62, told The Post on Thursday. 6 Marisol Arroyo-Castro has been teaching at DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School since 2003. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro Advertisement The 33-year veteran teacher was taken out of her seventh-grade classroom at DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School in mid-December for refusing to remove the 12-inch wooden crucifix on a classroom wall by the side of her desk. Castro, a devout Catholic, had the cross displayed there for a decade. 'I had it for 10 years and never a problem . . . And then one day I got a message [from the vice principal] saying that I needed to take it down,' Castro said. 'He said that it was against the Constitution when I asked why.' Advertisement 6 Castro, a devout Catholic, had the cross displayed in her classroom for a decade. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro The vice principal said he got a complaint from two people — never revealing who — and she was asked to move the crucifix to a new location under her desk. She did this for one day. 'I went home and cried for the whole night. And then I came back in the morning and I moved it' back to the classroom wall, she recalled. Advertisement The principal then told her she had until the end of the day to put it back under the desk, but she refused. 'When I came back the next day, somebody else removed it and put it in a box, and they told me not to return to the classroom,' she said. 'A representative from the union escorted me out of the building.' 6 Castro was asked to move the cross to a location below her desk. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro In March, after over two months of being on paid administrative leave, she was sent to an administrative office, where she is assigned demeaning clerical tasks under the title 'curriculum information teacher.' 'They assigned me some work related to developing curriculum, which I'm not trained in. They gave me a computer and a cubicle and told me to sit down. They didn't introduce me to anybody or anything. No one talked to me,' she said. Castro has been working at DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School since 2003 — and has seen gay pride flags proudly displayed in the building, as well as personal items around other teachers' desks, including a photo of the Virgin Mary and a mug decorated with a Bible quote. 'They have pictures of their family, and to me, Jesus is my father,' she said. 'Pictures of their dogs. The Patriots sign. The Yankees sign. They even have Christmas trees. 'Somebody had a Baby Yoda. I think there's a Wonder Woman somewhere. All kinds of things,' added attorney Keisha Russell of the nonprofit First Liberty Institute, who is representing Castro. Advertisement 6 In Castro's complaint, she cites the Virgin Mary photo displayed by another teacher at the school. Obtained by the New York Post Russell cited the case Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Washington high school football coach Joe Kennedy praying on the field after games, as precedent for free religious expression in schools. Castro got emotional when she spoke about the support she's received from other teachers at the school as well as her former students. 6 Even if reinstated to her old job, the veteran teacher will have mixed feelings about it. 'Part of me is happy to go back and be with the students. Part of me is sad because those seventh graders didn't have me that year,' Castro said. Courtesy of Marisol Arroyo-Castro Advertisement 'I have had a lot of teachers get in touch with me secretly because they were told not to. And they have just said that they're praying for me. And even students have contacted me in church. They say they're praying for me.' She hopes President Trump weighs in on the situation. 'That would be wonderful because we know that our president is fully committed to religious liberty,' Russell added. Advertisement 6 DiLoreto Elementary and Middle School in New Britain, CT, serves grades K through 8. DiLoreto Elementary & Middle School/ Facebook The New Britain School District says it's just following laws separating church and state. 'Since last fall, the district has attempted to reach an accommodation with Ms. Castro that respects her personal religious faith, the diverse religious beliefs of our many middle-school students, and the commands of the Constitution,' Dr. Tony Gasper, district superintendent, said. 'From the start, this teacher has insisted on displaying a crucifix on a classroom wall, visible to children in class, during instructional time. 'While we regret the spectacle that this situation has caused, we look forward to a ruling from the court. Meanwhile, the district will continue to focus on providing an effective learning environment in which all students and staff feel respected and valued.'
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Willing to be complicit': Booker yells at fellow Dems on Senate floor
WASHINGTON – New Jersey Democrat Sen. Cory Booker yelled at his colleagues in a rare occurrence on the Senate floor this week, arguing they were 'complicit' with President Donald Trump and that his party 'needs a wake-up call.' The exchange occurred on July 29 as Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nevada, sought to swiftly move a package of bipartisan bills that would increase resources and funding to police departments and officers. Booker objected to the package and offered an amendment that would require the administration to allocate public safety grants without political bias. That ignited Cortez Masto's ire, who complained that Booker hadn't raised his concerns when the bills passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he sits on, weeks ago. 'This is ridiculous. This is an attempt to kill all of these bills,' she said. Booker responded, 'This, to me, is the problem with Democrats in America right now is we're willing to be complicit to Donald Trump to let this pass through when we have all the leverage right now.' He also got into a heated back-and-forth with Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, who told him that he couldn't just stop bills that come out of a committee and then "allow for other bills that fund other parts of your budget in your state." Booker said he it was wrong to imply that the police bills were not vital to his state. 'What I am tired of is when the president of the United States of America violates the Constitution, trashes our norms and traditions, and what does the Democratic party do?' he thundered on the Senate floor. 'Comply? Allow him? Beg for scraps?' "The Democratic party needs a wake-up call," he said. Democrats have been divided about how to organize an effective resistance against Trump and break through the cracks of MAGA populism as the party is still recovering after a bruising 2024 election loss. Booker and other progressive Democrats have been urging their colleagues to be more vocal against the administration. 'If we don't stand as Democrats, we deserve to lose. But if we stand united, if we stand strong, if we stand with other people, if we tell, with a chorus of conviction that, 'America, what this president is doing is wrong,' if we stand up and speak that way, dear God, we will win,' Booker said. In April, Booker delivered a marathon 25-hour and five-minute speech on the Senate floor, railing against the Trump administration's policies and actions. 'These are not normal times in America, and they should not be treated as such,' Booker said at the time. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Complicit': Cory Booker yells at Dems on Senate floor
Time Business News
16 hours ago
- Time Business News
ITUC's New Report Spotights Prison Slavery in the United States
In a chilling revelation that has reignited national debate, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) has released a new report exposing the systemic use of prison labor in the United States — a practice the organization likens to modern-day slavery. The report, titled 'Prison Labor in the United States: The Business of Punishment' , details how incarcerated individuals are being exploited under forced labor conditions, often for pennies an hour, with little to no choice in the matter. The United States is home to less than 5% of the world's population — yet it holds nearly 25% of the world's prison population. With over 1.2 million people currently serving time in state and federal prisons, the U.S. correctional system has long been criticized for its mass incarceration rates. But what the ITUC's report brings into sharper focus is how that system is being monetized through what many call 'prison slavery.' The report outlines how incarcerated workers are often compelled to work in unsafe conditions, without proper training or labor rights, for shockingly low wages — sometimes as low as $0.13 an hour. In some states, prisoners aren't paid at all. Refusing to work can result in punishments such as solitary confinement, loss of visitation rights, or denial of parole eligibility. At the center of this issue lies a clause in the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. While the amendment abolished slavery in 1865, it included a significant exception: slavery and involuntary servitude are still legal as punishment for a crime. 'Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.' This clause has paved the way for what critics describe as a legalized form of slavery inside America's prisons — disproportionately affecting Black and brown communities. According to the Sentencing Project, Black Americans are incarcerated at nearly five times the rate of white Americans. The ITUC's findings suggest a complex web of beneficiaries — including private corporations, state governments, and correctional institutions. Prison labor is often used to manufacture everything from furniture to military equipment, and to provide services such as food preparation, laundry, and even customer service for government agencies. Some of the corporations linked to prison labor — either directly or indirectly — include major household names. While many of these companies have stated that they are unaware of or do not directly manage prison labor programs, the opacity of the supply chain often leaves room for unethical practices to go unchecked. Beyond the economics, the human cost of this system is enormous. Incarcerated individuals working in these conditions often lack basic labor protections: no right to unionize, no worker's compensation if injured, and no pathway to upward mobility. These jobs rarely provide the kind of training or education that would help with rehabilitation or re-entry into society after release. Furthermore, the emotional toll is immense. Many inmates describe their labor as coercive and dehumanizing, where the daily routine mimics slavery more than rehabilitation. Families of prisoners have also spoken out, saying their loved ones are being punished twice — once by incarceration, and again through exploitative work. The ITUC is not alone in sounding the alarm. Human rights organizations, lawmakers, and advocacy groups have been pushing for reform — calling for the removal of the 13th Amendment's exception clause and the implementation of fair labor standards within the prison system. States like California and Colorado have already taken steps to address these issues. In 2020, Colorado voters approved a ballot measure that removed the exception for slavery from the state constitution. In California, a similar measure failed to pass in 2022, but the push continues. Representative Nikema Williams of Georgia and Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon have introduced federal legislation — the Abolition Amendment — which seeks to end the 13th Amendment loophole. While support is growing, the road to constitutional change remains steep and politically charged. The ITUC's report serves as a critical reminder that reforming America's criminal justice system isn't just about reducing prison populations — it's also about protecting human rights within prison walls. Ending exploitative prison labor will require more than just public outcry. It demands legislative action, corporate accountability, and a cultural shift in how we view incarceration. Rehabilitation, not exploitation, must be the cornerstone of any just and humane correctional system. Until then, the voices of those inside — working against their will for next to nothing — will continue to echo the old abolitionist cry: 'Am I not a man and a brother?' TIME BUSINESS NEWS
