Former U.S. Congressman and House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry Joins Lazard as Senior Advisor
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr 18, 2025--
Lazard, Inc. (NYSE: LAZ), the preeminent global financial advisory and asset management firm, announced today that Patrick McHenry has joined as Senior Advisor, effective April 23, 2025. McHenry brings over 20 years of experience as an elected official and leading voice on U.S. economic and financial policy. His appointment underscores Lazard's commitment to expanding its capacity to help clients navigate the increasingly complex intersection of business, politics, and global markets.
'In today's evolving landscape, geopolitical dynamics and their broader implications undeniably factor into business decision-making,' said Peter Orszag, CEO and Chairman of Lazard. 'Patrick's deep policy expertise and distinguished tenure in Washington will be invaluable to our clients, and we are excited to welcome Patrick to Lazard as one of our world-class Senior Advisors.'
'It is an honor to join a firm as well respected and prestigious as Lazard. Their reputation for delivering prescient insights with global perspective is unparalleled,' said Patrick McHenry, former U.S. Congressman. 'I look forward to helping advise clients and to supporting the firm's long-term goals.'
Based in Washington, D.C., Mr. McHenry advises on public policy, financial services, FinTech, and AI-related matters. He served for twenty years across ten terms in the United States Congress as the representative for North Carolina's 10th Congressional District. In the 118th Congress, Mr. McHenry was elected as the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, a committee he has served on since he was elected to Congress. His previous Congressional roles include Chief Deputy Whip of the House of Representatives and Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee's Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. In 2023, he also served as Speaker pro tempore of the House of Representatives. Mr. McHenry holds a bachelor's degree in history from Belmont Abbey College and currently serves as a Distinguished Fellow at the Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business.
About Lazard
Founded in 1848, Lazard is the preeminent financial advisory and asset management firm, with operations in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia. Lazard provides advice on mergers and acquisitions, capital markets and capital solutions, restructuring and liability management, geopolitics, and other strategic matters, as well as asset management and investment solutions to institutions, corporations, governments, partnerships, family offices, and high net worth individuals. For more information, please visit Lazard.com and follow Lazard on LinkedIn.
LAZ-CPE
View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250418019791/en/
CONTACT: Media RelationsShannon Houston, +1 212-632-6880
[email protected] Francisco, +1 212-632-6571
[email protected] RelationsAlexandra Deignan, +1 212-632-6886
[email protected]
KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA NEW YORK
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CONSULTING ASSET MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE
SOURCE: Lazard, Inc.
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 04/18/2025 08:30 AM/DISC: 04/18/2025 08:32 AM
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250418019791/en
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: President to announce 'Trump savings accounts' for parents, guardians
The accounts are part of Trump's megabill. 1:40 As the Trump administration continues to ramp up its focus on Los Angeles and threatens to send troops to the city amid anti-ICE protests, the fallout from President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud continues. This comes as Republicans in Congress continue to work on agreeing on language for Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." Meanwhile, U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs. President Donald Trump will host a roundtable Monday to formally announce the provision in his massive funding bill called the "Trump savings accounts," which will allow parents and guardians to invest funds in the financial markets on behalf of children, a White House official confirms to ABC News. The savings account would be applicable to children born between January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2029. The government would deposit $1,000 into a tax-deferred, low-cost index fund account that will track the overall stock market for each newborn. Additional contributions can go up to $5,000 annually. When the children reach adulthood, they are able to take out the money to cover things like college or a down payment on a home. "The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill will literally change the lives of working, middle class families across America by delivering the largest tax cuts in history, increasing the child tax credit, AND by creating this incredible new "Trump Account" program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to ABC News. Multiple CEO's from companies, such as Dell Technologies, will appear with Trump to announce billions of dollars in collective investments into "Trump Accounts" for the children of their employees, according to the official. The event comes as the White House works to highlight Trump's so-called "One, Big, Beautiful Bill," as the Senate works through attempting to pass the budget bill and amid explosive criticism from Elon Musk last week. --ABC News' Lalee Ibssa
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These Presidential Breakups From History Have a Lesson for Elon Musk
This week, the vaunted political marriage between President Donald Trump and multipreneur Elon Musk blew up in spectacular fashion, as both men — once a seemingly unstoppable force — traded barbs on their respective social media platforms. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk posted on X. 'Elon was wearing thin, I asked him to leave,' Trump retorted on Truth Social. The blowup devolved into Musk saying Trump is in the Epstein files and the president's minions calling on him to deport Musk, a South African immigrant and naturalized citizen of the United States. Not since the Bennifer breakup — the first or second one, reader's choice — has a relationship's demise attracted such rapturous attention, especially in politics. But we have been here before. Presidents have long enjoyed symbiotic relationships with captains of industry and media. This isn't the first time such a relationship came to a bitter end. If history offers any insight, it's that these breakups always end better for the president than the mogul. Elon Musk is the richest man in the world, but the presidency comes with greater power and prestige. Just ask Nicholas Biddle. Biddle was a wealthy and influential Philadelphia financier who served as president of the Second Bank of the United States from 1823 until its closure in the 1830s. Born into a prominent family, he parlayed inherited wealth and social connections to become a central figure in America's early financial system. Under his leadership, the bank became a powerful and stabilizing force in the national economy, controlling credit and regulating state banks. Most historians today regard it as a successful precursor to the national banking system that emerged many decades later. Biddle was also the perfect embodiment of the nation's monied class. He viewed 'men with no property to assess and no character to lose' as social inferiors — so it was no surprise that he would eventually come to blows with President Andrew Jackson, an avowed populist. But for the better part of 1830 and 1831, Biddle put on a charm offensive. Even as he lined up support in Congress for the bank's re-charter, he attempted to ingratiate himself with the president, who in turn fired off vague smoke signals indicating that he was open to a dialogue. Jackson met with Biddle repeatedly and expressed no strong opposition to the bank — at least not publicly. Biddle, in turn, wrote flattering letters to and about the president and attempted to work closely with Jackson's key allies, including Senator Thomas Hart Benton and Vice President Martin Van Buren. More than a few people in the know were surprised that the bank president and populist chief executive seemed to have struck up a decent rapport. Until things inevitably turned sideways. When Jackson ultimately stuck to his populist guns and vetoed the bank's re-charter, Biddle, who was genuinely surprised by the move, undertook a furious and public effort to overturn the decision. He told Senator Henry Clay, an ally, that Jackson's message announcing the veto was 'really a manifesto of anarchy, such as Marat or Robespierre might have issued to the mob of Faubourg.' Jackson escalated the conflict in 1833 when he ordered that all federal government deposits be removed from the bank and placed in selected state banks. His goal was to drain the bank of its influence and effectively dismantle it before its charter expired in 1836. The ensuing debate was public and polarizing. Jackson announced his policy in a series of fiery public statements and annual messages to Congress, framing it as a defense of the common people against a 'monied aristocracy.' Biddle, meanwhile, defended the bank in editorials, letters and congressional testimony. Newspapers across the country took sides, and the issue became a litmus test of political loyalty: You were either with Jackson and democratic populism or with Biddle and financial conservatism. Biddle, who boasted that he had 'been for years in the daily exercise of more personal authority than any President habitually enjoys,' soon found his life in a downward spiral. His reputation, once that of a brilliant financial statesman and intellectual, was left in ruins as the bank's closure generated financial problems for its shareholders. Although he had long enjoyed the status of a cultured gentleman — financial engineer, patron to artists and writers — he grew politically toxic and isolated. After the bank's collapse, Biddle was sued for fraud and mismanagement. He was arrested on related charges in 1841 but never convicted. Still, the litigation and disgrace consumed his remaining years. Although he had once been wealthy, his fortune dwindled, and he died in 1844 at the age of 58, a broken man — largely forgotten and discredited in the eyes of the public. Jackson, of course, went on to serve two terms in office. His decision to kill the bank and remove the reserves threw the country into a massive financial panic — but that problem, as well as the blame for it, fell to his successor, Van Buren. Another case in point: William Randolph Hearst, the newspaper publisher, early movie mogul and two-term member of Congress. In the late 1890s and early 1900s, Theodore Roosevelt and Hearst shared a mutually beneficial, if uneasy, relationship. Hearst's newspapers, particularly the New York Journal, were strong proponents of the Spanish-American War, and through its sensationalist accounts of that conflict — critics derided it as 'Yellow Journalism' — his media empire made a national hero of TR, whose famous charge at San Juan Hill might never have been famous at all if not for Hearst. Though they overlapped ideologically on issues like trust-busting and anti-corruption — and, of course, a muscular foreign policy — their alliance was more tactical than personal. Roosevelt reportedly found Hearst vulgar and untrustworthy, while Hearst saw Roosevelt as an ambitious politician, lacking gravitas. Their mutually beneficial relationship crumbled when Hearst grew too big for his britches. The media mogul, who served two terms in Congress and made unsuccessful runs for mayor of New York City and governor of New York, complained that Roosevelt was 'a creation of newspaper notoriety.' He had made Roosevelt a famous man and assumed he could use that power to replace him in the White House. A bumbled run for the presidency in 1904 disabused Hearst of that illusion, but his acid relationship with Roosevelt only grew worse. The split became unmistakable after Hearst published inflammatory articles and editorials suggesting that President William McKinley's assassination was the inevitable result of capitalist corruption — a line of rhetoric that Roosevelt, deeply loyal to McKinley's legacy, found abhorrent. 'Wide and equitable distribution of wealth is essential to a nation's prosperous growth and intellectual development,' Hearst argued. 'And that distribution is brought about by the labor union more than any other agency of our civilization.' Roosevelt, in turn, called Hearst a 'swollen-headed liar' and accused his newspapers of fueling anarchist violence. Though Hearst's newspaper empire once dominated American public discourse, its credibility and power began to erode in the years after his split with Roosevelt, as yellow journalism fell into public disrepute. Moreover, his strident opposition to U.S. entry into World War I and later sympathy for fascist regimes in the 1930s cost him public and political goodwill. The 1930s saw his business empire drowning in debt. While he didn't exactly die in penury or obscurity, he spent his remaining years relatively quietly, in sharply diminished material circumstances. Finally, there is the case of Joseph Kennedy. Born to a well-connected Irish-American family in Boston, Kennedy parlayed early success in banking into lucrative ventures in shipbuilding, real estate, Hollywood film production and the stock market, where he made (and managed to preserve) a fortune by anticipating the 1929 crash. By the early 1930s, Kennedy was one of the richest men in America and increasingly influential in Democratic politics. He supported Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1932 campaign and was rewarded with a series of key appointments, ironically, as the first chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1934. FDR saw Kennedy as the ideal regulator — someone who knew Wall Street's tricks and could, therefore, police it. Their relationship, cordial but pragmatic, reflected a mutual recognition of each other's political instincts and usefulness. When FDR appointed Kennedy to serve as U.S. ambassador to Britain — the first Irish Catholic to occupy the position — Kennedy began to envision himself as FDR's successor in the White House. That, of course, was not to be. While stationed in London, Kennedy grew deeply pessimistic about Britain's chances against Nazi Germany and became a leading voice for American isolationism, repeatedly breaking with the administration and warning against U.S. entry into another European war. His public statements, including a notorious comment in 1940 that 'democracy is finished in England,' outraged British officials and embarrassed the Roosevelt administration. FDR, who was moving steadily toward intervention and aid to the Allies, saw Kennedy's defeatism and political freelancing as liabilities. So, too, was Kennedy's virulent antisemitism, which placed him out of step with the increasingly liberal Democratic party. Their relationship collapsed entirely in 1940, when the White House compelled Kennedy to resign. FDR, who had once valued Kennedy's political acumen and fundraising prowess, now viewed him as a demagogue with alarming wealth and influence. As the American public rallied behind the president after the Japanese attack on Pearl Habor, Kennedy's future in public life dimmed. He turned his ambitions toward helping his oldest son, Joe Jr., achieve what he no longer could: the presidency. And when Joe Jr. perished in the war, his focus turned to another son, John F. Kennedy. To be sure, Musk has a lot going for him. He owns one of the most powerful media platforms in the country. He is the wealthiest man in the world. His companies have been singularly successful and provide him clout with foreign governments in need of anything from satellite capabilities to fight a war, to rockets able to reach space. But he's not the president — particularly this president, who has arrogated to himself unprecedented powers. Much like the rich men who came before him, Musk may soon learn that there is no breaking with the White House and coming out whole. It hasn't worked before, and if history is any guide, it seems unlikely to work today.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Corporation for Public Broadcasting can keep board members despite judge's ruling
By Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) -A federal judge said that three board members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting can keep their seats, even as he denied the nonprofit a preliminary injunction to block U.S. President Donald Trump from removing them. In a decision on Sunday, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, D.C. said the nonprofit recently used indirect authority it obtained from Congress to protect its independence, by changing its bylaws to make it harder to remove directors at will, including by Trump. "The President is not free to remove directors and then unilaterally to appoint their replacements, thereby using his power to remove as an effective tool for altering board policy," Moss wrote. "Rather, the President's appointment authority is tempered by the requirement that he proceed only with the advice and consent of the Senate." Moss nonetheless said the CPB was unlikely to prevail on the merits, and could not show irreparable harm because it could still function and "in all likelihood" has blocked Trump from exercising unilateral authority to remove board members. Created by Congress in 1967, the CPB provides financial support for the Public Broadcasting Service, National Public Radio and more than 1,500 locally managed public radio and TV stations. It sued after Trump fired three of its five directors -- Diane Kaplan, Laura Ross and Thomas Rothman - ostensibly without providing a reason. PBS and NPR are also suing to block the Trump administration from canceling their federal funding. "We are very pleased that the court recognized CPB is an independent, non-profit corporation, free from governmental control or influence," CPB President Patricia Harrison said in a statement. Harrison said the nonprofit looks forward to continuing its work "to ensure accurate, unbiased and nonpartisan public media is available for all Americans." CPB received $535 million of federal funding for its current fiscal year. The White House and many Republicans have argued that the government should not provide funding to support programming that they consider too liberal. A White House spokesperson on Monday said CPB is "creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime. Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS." The case is Corporation for Public Broadcasting et al v Trump et al, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 25-01305.
