Fact Check: Clip shows 2015 China explosions, not 2025 Iranian attacks on Israel
Israel began attacking Iran on June 13, saying it aimed to prevent the country from developing nuclear weapons. Iran has since retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel, and says its nuclear programme is peaceful.
"BREAKING: The blast at Haifa Port is set to be remembered in history as one of Iran's most lethal and strategically devastating strikes," a June 14 X post, opens new tab with 1.6 million views captioned the 48-second clip, which shows a large fireball followed by two explosions. On the night of June 15 an Iranian missile barrage struck a residential street in Haifa, which the national emergency services said injured nine people.
On June 16, Israel's Haifa-based Bazan Group said it closed its power station in Haifa Bay after it was significantly damaged by an Iranian attack on June 15, opens new tab, resulting in the death of three employees.
Some Facebook posts, opens new tab falsely described the video as showing Tel Aviv, which has also been hit by Iranian strikes since June 13.
However, the video was filmed in 2015 and shows explosions in Tianjin's industrial zone.
The BBC posted the same video to YouTube, opens new tab and its website, opens new tab on August 14, 2015.
Reuters reported that two enormous explosions on August 12, 2015, ripped through an industrial area in the port city where toxic gas and chemicals were stored, killing 173 people, opens new tab.
Miscaptioned. The clip shows explosions in an industrial area of China's northeastern city of Tianjin in 2015.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israel in talks to resettle Gaza Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say
NAIROBI, Aug 15 (Reuters) - South Sudan and Israel are discussing a deal to resettle Palestinians from war-torn Gaza in the troubled African nation, three sources told Reuters - a plan quickly dismissed as unacceptable by Palestinian leaders. The sources, who have knowledge of the matter but spoke on condition of anonymity, said no agreement had been reached but talks between South Sudan and Israel were ongoing. The plan, if carried further, would envisage people moving from an enclave shattered by almost two years of war with Israel to a nation in the heart of Africa riven by years of political and ethnically-driven violence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this month he intends to extend military control in Gaza, and this week repeated suggestions that Palestinians should leave the territory voluntarily. Arab and world leaders have rejected the idea of moving Gaza's population to any country. Palestinians say that would be like another "Nakba" (catastrophe) when hundreds of thousands fled or were forced out during the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. The three sources said the prospect of resettling Palestinians in South Sudan was raised during meetings between Israeli officials and South Sudanese Foreign Minister Monday Semaya Kumba when he visited the country last month. Their account appeared to contradict South Sudan's foreign ministry which on Wednesday dismissed earlier reports on the plan as "baseless". The ministry was not immediately available to respond to the sources' assertions on Friday. News of the discussions was first reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday, citing six people with knowledge of the matter. Wasel Abu Youssef, a member of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, said the Palestinian leadership and people "reject any plan or idea to displace any of our people to South Sudan or to any other place". His statement echoed a statement from the office of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. Hamas, which is fighting Israel in Gaza, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, who visited the South Sudanese capital Juba this week, told Reuters that those discussions had not focussed on relocation. "This is not what the discussions were about," she said when asked if any such plan had been discussed. "The discussions were about foreign policy, about multilateral organisations, about the humanitarian crisis, the real humanitarian crisis happening in South Sudan, and about the war," she said, referring to her talks with Juba officials. Netanyahu, who met Kumba last month, has said Israel is in touch with a few countries to find a destination for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. He has consistently declined to provide further details. Netanyahu's office and Israel's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the information given by the three sources on Friday.
Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Chinese state media calls U.S. a 'surveillance empire' over trackers in chip shipments
BEIJING, Aug 15 (Reuters) - The United States' practice of installing location trackers in chip shipments at risk of diversion to China reflects the "instincts of a surveillance empire," China's state-run media outlet Xinhua said in a commentary published on Friday. Reuters reported earlier this week that U.S. authorities had secretly placed location tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips to detect diversions to China, which is under U.S. curbs for advanced chip exports. The Xinhua commentary, titled "America turns chip trade into a surveillance game," cited "reports" that Washington had embedded such trackers, accusing the United States of running "the world's most sprawling intelligence apparatus". The U.S. government has in the past few years tightened restrictions on the exports of advanced chips as well as related technology and equipments to China, as the two superpowers vie for technological dominance. The Chinese commentary follows longstanding accusations from Washington and its Western allies that China could use some exported products, from telecommunications equipment to vehicles, for surveillance, posing potential security risks. In 2022, the Biden administration banned the sale and import of new telecommunications equipment from several Chinese firms, including Huawei, citing national security concerns. In January, it intensified scrutiny by targeting China-made cars and trucks. In its commentary, Xinhua accused the U.S. government of seeing its trading partners as "rivals to be tripped up or taken down," adding that "if U.S. chips are seen as Trojan horses for surveillance, customers will look elsewhere." China's cyberspace watchdog last month said it had asked U.S. chipmaker Nvidia to explain whether its H20 chips had any backdoor security risks - a hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. Chinese authorities have also cautioned domestic tech firms over their use of H20 chips, Reuters recently reported.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Post and boast' laws aim to stop young Australians glorifying crimes. Will they drive them deeper into ‘a failing justice system'?
It is 1.30am in the New South Wales town of Moree, and a 16-year-old passenger in a stolen Audi is using his phone to film the speedometer as the needle climbs towards 150km/h. He shares the video with his friends on the social media app Snapchat, a court later hearing he thought it was a 'cool thing to do'. But in NSW – and increasingly across the country – such posts are illegal. This week, the Victorian and Western Australian parliaments became the latest to consider so-called 'post and boast' laws, as almost every jurisdiction in the country makes it illegal for offenders to publish footage of their crimes on social media. The laws passed in Victoria on Thursday, but will be considered by a parliamentary committee in WA before being put to a vote there. The introduction of such reforms has come despite legal and human rights groups repeatedly arguing the laws are both harmful and pointless, as they create a further mechanism for locking up young people under the false pretence of addressing a problem already handled under existing law. 'We're seeing a troubling race to the bottom across the country, with governments in multiple states competing to be the toughest on children in the justice system,' Dr Mindy Sotiri, executive director of the Justice Reform Initiative, says. ''Post and boast' laws sound catchy and might work for political point-scoring in the short term but are ultimately just a headline-grabbing distraction. The reality is these laws will be completely ineffective. 'They won't deter offending, they won't shift the way children and young people are using social media, and they won't address the drivers of crime. What these laws will do is drive more and more children deeper into a failing justice system.' The Moree case referred to a youth offender known by the pseudonym Nadj. His case is one of few publicly available court decisions about someone charged under the laws. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The children's magistrate in his case found that there was no evidence Nadj was motivated by 'posting and boasting' when the car was stolen, that there was no information about how many people saw the Snapchat post, and that there was nothing in the post that would give others information about how to steal cars. 'The public policy rationale for this offence is that boasting has the capacity to encourage others to engage in criminal behaviour,' children's magistrate Paul Hayes found in his decision from March this year. 'It might send the message to impressionable young people that criminal acts are socially acceptable. It may make others think it is desirable to commit crimes. It might influence people to commit offences to circulate on social media. It may also provide people with information or ideas about how to commit criminal offences. Posting and boasting glorifies crime. 'Nadj says that the posting is a 'cool thing to do' but isolates this to his peer group … in this case the seriousness is the dissemination – not so much the effect.' Nadj could have been penalised with a maximum two years' imprisonment under the laws, but Hayes found the post would not greatly contribute to his aggregate sentence for other offences. A month earlier, Hayes dismissed similar charges involving a boy known by the pseudonym Harry, who was 13 when he was also allegedly involved in stealing a car and 'disseminated material' about this theft, leading to a 'post and boast' offence. The first state to implement the laws was Queensland, when the then Labor government, facing intense criticism over its response to crime, passed them in early 2023. The Minns government in NSW followed suit, passing similar laws in March 2024, and the Northern Territory government also implemented post-and-boast offences with two-year maximums in October last year after sweeping to power on a tough-on-crime mandate. South Australian laws were next, after they were introduced by an independent upper house MP, Frank Pangallo, who wanted a presumption against bail for youth offenders who posted and boasted about their crimes. That measure did not pass parliament, but another version of the laws – which also had two-year maximum penalties – did. 'Criminals can seek to gain notoriety by posting and boasting which could potentially incite or encourage others, and further embolden their own illegal acts,' the attorney general, Kyam Maher, said in a statement in May. 'This legislation is an important step forward in protecting the community from offenders who seek to glorify illicit activities.' The rhetoric used by Maher is common when governments trumpet these changes in media releases. There are repeated references to 'crimfluencer', a pun on social media influencers, and wordplay such as 'no likes for lawbreakers'. The Tasmanian government promised it would introduce similar laws last year, while the ACT government has no plans to introduce them. Peter Dutton even promised federal post-and-boast laws had the Coalition won the May election. The laws generally only apply to certain offences, and in some cases include carve-outs to ensure that media coverage or awareness campaigns are not endangered. Sonya Kilkenny, the Victorian attorney general, said in her second reading speech that the bill now meant a person who posted online about a home invasion faced a maximum penalty of 27 years in prison: 25 for the home invasion, and two for the post. 'One of the challenges confronting our community today is the rise of 'posting and boasting' about criminal offending,' Kilkenny told parliament in June. 'The performative nature of these offences introduces a new layer of harm: it glorifies criminal behaviour, encourages others to emulate it, exacerbates community concerns and fear, and erodes public confidence in the justice system. It may also publicly identify and retraumatise victims.' Performative is exactly how critics of the laws describe the governments who are passing them. Judges and magistrates could already consider the fact a person posted about their crimes on social media as an aggravating factor when it comes to sentencing, regardless of whether post and boast laws existed. Offenders who champion their offending on social media were already likely to cop harsher sentences, especially considering such posts often feature in police briefs of evidence. The proposed Western Australian laws are considered particularly problematic, because of the possibility they could be used to outlaw peaceful protest. In a letter sent to the attorney general, Tony Buti, earlier this month, the Conservation Council of WA executive director, Matt Roberts, urged the government to make a carve-out in the laws protecting protest and satire. 'We understand the legislation is intended to deter the glorification of illegal activity on social media. We share the concerns of youth justice advocates and legal professionals who say the laws may have a disproportionate impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, particularly young people,' Roberts said in the letter. 'We are also concerned the legislation may unintentionally lead to the repression of peaceful, nonviolent protest, including for environmental causes.' WA Justice Association co-founder Tom Penglis told the West Australian there was no evidence such laws reduced crime, saying 'they're based on 'vibes' not evidence'. Sotiri, from the Justice Reform Initiative, agrees. 'It is a total fantasy to believe that threatening harsher penalties will deter children from offending … every jurisdiction that has taken this 'tough on crime' approach has seen the same result: higher incarceration rates, more children cycling in and out of harmful remand, and no long-term benefit to community safety.'
