logo
World-first blood cancer therapy to be given on NHS

World-first blood cancer therapy to be given on NHS

Yahoo21 hours ago

A "Trojan horse" therapy that sneaks toxic drugs inside cancer cells is being made available on the NHS in England in a world first.
It can halt the blood cancer myeloma for nearly three times longer than current therapies.
The drug is an advanced form of chemotherapy that hits cancer with a bigger dose, while reducing side-effects.
Paul Silvester, one of the first people to get it, says the therapy has been "life-changing" and he's now planning history-themed adventures.
Myeloma – also known as multiple myeloma – affects part of the immune system called plasma cells. These are made in the spongey bone marrow in the centre of our bones.
Paul, who is 60 and from Sheffield, was diagnosed nearly two years ago after the cancer led to broken bones in his back.
He had a bone marrow transplant last year, but relapsed around Christmas. He has since been on the new therapy – called belantamab mafodotin – as part of an early access scheme.
Within weeks he was in remission.
Other treatments could have left him isolating in his bedroom for months, so Paul says the therapy "is absolutely life-changing" and was "creating that opportunity to enjoy" life.
Visiting Hadrian's Wall is next on the agenda for history buff Paul; and he's looking forward to one of his daughters graduating later this year.
"Most people say 'you look really really well'... I have a good normal life," he told the BBC.
Paul's therapy - belantamab mafodotin – is a lethal chemotherapy drug that has been bound to an antibody, similar to the ones the body uses to fight infection.
However, these antibodies have been designed to spot markings on the outside of plasma cells.
So they travel to cancerous cells, stick to the surface and are then absorbed. Once inside they release their toxic payload, to kill the cancer.
The therapy is named Trojan horse therapy after the siege of the city of Troy in Greek mythology, when a giant wooden horse was used to smuggle soldiers into the city.
Myeloma cannot be cured, but clinical trials last year showed the Trojan horse therapy halted the cancer for three years, compared to 13 months with current therapies.
Prof Peter Johnson, the national clinical director for cancer at NHS England, said the difference was "life-changing".
He told me: "This is a really important development for people with myeloma, because although we may not be able to cure the illness, giving them time free of the disease and free of the symptoms is really important.
"We've seen in the last few years that using antibodies to deliver chemotherapy drugs directly into cells can make a big difference for a variety of different types of cancer."
Around 33,000 people are living with myeloma in the UK. The new drug will be used when the first-choice therapy fails, so around 1,500 patients a year could benefit.
The decision comes after a review by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) concluded the drug was cost-effective for NHS use. NICE recommendations are normally adopted in England, Wales and Northern Ireland while Scotland has its own process.
The therapy is kinder than other cancer treatments, but is not free from side-effects.
After a cancer cell has been destroyed, the remaining chemotherapy drug will leak into the body. This can cause dry eyes and blurred vision.
The technical name for these drugs is an antibody-drug-conjugate.
This therapy was developed by GSK in the UK with early research taking place in Stevenage and the first clinical trials in London.
Prof Martin Kaiser, team leader in myeloma molecular therapy at the Institute of Cancer Research, said these "are very smart drugs" and the difference in side effects compared to other drugs "is really remarkable".
While myeloma is still considered an incurable cancer, Prof Kaiser says drugs like this are "an important step towards a functional cure" and he thinks long-term remission will go "above 50% in the next five years".
Antibody drug conjugates are being developed for a range of cancers. The limitation is being able to design an antibody that can target the cancer alone. There is one that can target some types of breast cancer. Research is already taking place on stomach and bowel cancer.
Shelagh McKinlay, from the charity Myeloma UK, said the approval would "transform the lives of thousands" and it was "fantastic to see the UK at the forefront of myeloma treatment".
Health Minister Karin Smyth, said: "This ground-breaking therapy puts the NHS at the forefront of cancer innovation."
Exercise improves colon cancer survival, major study shows
Breakthrough cancer drug doubles survival in trial

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global experts met in East London to try and fix the mental health crisis — their solutions will surprise you
Global experts met in East London to try and fix the mental health crisis — their solutions will surprise you

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Global experts met in East London to try and fix the mental health crisis — their solutions will surprise you

East London was even buzzier than usual last week. Thousands packed into venues around Shoreditch for the inaugural South by Southwest (SXSW) London, a music, tech and film festival which started life in sunny Austin, Texas. It was a broad church: Tony Blair argued we should have AI doctors and nurses to relieve pressure on the NHS, while rapper Tinie Tempah backed a scheme to get young people away from their screens and onto the dancefloor. Many of the talks led back to the mental health crisis, which has overtaken cancer and obesity to become the biggest global health concern. Industry leaders laid out their visions for alleviating the crisis, with solutions spanning tech, psychedelics and prescribed laughter. At a talk simply named 'The Mental Health Crisis', one of the leading child psychiatrists in the US, Dr Harold S Koplewicz, was unequivocal about the prime suspect. 'What happened between 2014 and 2018? We didn't change the water supply. We didn't change the telephone lines. We had social media.' Youth mental health has deteriorated with alarming speed in recent years. Analysis of NHS data by the charity Mind shows that more than 600,000 under-18s are on mental health waiting lists, with a quarter having waited for over two years for 'meaningful' care such as an appointment with a psychiatrist. Yet the challenges persist even when they get to the appointment. 'One of the few things that psychiatry doesn't have is an objective test,' said Koplewicz. 'We have lots of people who are inattentive, but they don't all have ADHD. Someone might be anxious, someone might be bored, someone might be gifted.' To that end, he and his team have invested millions of dollars in developing comprehensive evaluations for children. Tech may be the bogeyman of mental health, but Koplewicz also thinks it can be harnessed for good. He has tapped into Gen Z's obsession with journalling to develop an app called Mirror, which uses AI to summarise how users are feeling and to recognise behaviour patterns, as well as monitoring the entries. 'So far, 270 young people have been taken to the Crisis Text Line through the app, while five of them called 911,' said Koplewicz, who was keen to stress that an app like Mirror (currently only available in the US) is not a replacement for therapy, nor does he think the rising trend of AI therapy is 'the safe way to go'. Much of the attention in the mental health crisis is paid towards young people, and rightly so. But the problem spans generations. In the UK, poor mental health is now the leading cause of workplace absence, according to the Health and Safety Executive. Meanwhile, antidepressants were taken by 8.7 million people in England in 2023, with the amount of prescriptions having almost doubled since 2011. As a psychiatrist, Professor David Nutt has prescribed many patients with traditional SSRI antidepressants like Prozac. 'That's all I've got,' he told me. 'We know that they work, but they don't work very well.' While SSRIs have helped many people out of depression, experts estimate almost 30 per cent of major depressive disorders are treatment resistant. Yet Nutt insists there is a treatment: psilocybin, the compound found in magic mushrooms which is classified as a Class A drug and illegal to administer outside of clinical trials. 'A quarter, maybe a third, of people would definitely do better with psychedelics than they would with SSRIs,' he said. Nutt was fresh off a panel at SXSW London about the future of mental health and psychedelics, where he railed against the establishment view of drugs like psilocybin and LSD. 'The banning of psychedelics is the worst censorship of research and clinical therapy in the history of the world,' he said. 'There is no other example where there has been a global blockade of understanding.' Yet the results from clinical trials have been remarkable. A King's College London trial found that a 25mg dose of psilocybin had a significant impact in reducing symptoms of depression in participants with treatment-resistant depression. In 2023, Australia became the first country in the world to legalise the use of psychedelics to treat mental health conditions. Nutt hopes that the UK will follow suit. 'We should liberate them for utility, and we should do it soon please, because I'm getting old and I really want to celebrate,' he told the audience. 'If we don't, many, many, people will be condemned to a life of misery.' For those who prefer the drug-free route, another panel talk offered something more analogue: a dose of laughter. Lu Jackson founded Craic Health with the aim of providing 'comedy on prescription'. Alongside Labour MP Dr Simon Opher, Jackson is working to integrate prescribed lols into NHS policy. 'It's not the one cure, but it adds to the toolbox of things that we can look at to improve our mental ill health,' she said. Many studies have established the therapeutic benefits of laughter, so why not harness this natural serotonin booster? Jackson wants to set up workshops everywhere from GP clinics to retirement homes, where amusing folk would come along to cheer up the individual or a crowd. 'It doesn't have to be a comedian, it could be a writer, it could be a clown.' Plus, it would help jobbing comedians gain an extra income stream in an increasingly precarious industry. But what if the jokes are really bad — wouldn't that be even more depressing? Comedian and co-panellist Jonathan Pie thought not: 'I always think a bad stand-up gig is some of the best theatre.'

Should people be paid to donate blood? Yahoo readers have their say
Should people be paid to donate blood? Yahoo readers have their say

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Should people be paid to donate blood? Yahoo readers have their say

Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers. The NHS is urging people to come forward as blood donors, saying there is a "critical" need for certain blood types. On Monday this week, officials said 200,000 more donors were needed in England to maintain the blood supply. Low blood stocks prompted officials to issue an 'amber alert' over supply for hospitals last year and NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) said more must be done to avoid a 'red alert'. The blood type most in demand is the so-called universal blood type — O negative blood — needed for treatment in emergencies. There is also a need for more Black donors, who are more likely to have specific blood types that can help treat people with sickle cell disease. In our poll earlier this week, we asked Yahoo readers if they thought an incentive could attract more donors and posed the question: Should people be paid for donating blood? Two thirds of respondents to our poll (66%) thought no, blood donations should be voluntary. Some 29% thought yes, people should be paid, while a further 5% were undecided. We also asked, 'How much would prompt you to donate blood?' The vast majority of respondents (70%) said they were happy to do it for free. Of those who stated an amount, the most popular options were smaller sums, 8% said a value up to £20 would tempt them, while a further 8% cited a payment between £21 and £40. Only 5% said an amount of £100 or more would prompt them to donate. The poll's Have Your Say feature attracted some passionate comments, with a number of readers citing safety concerns as one of the reasons they didn't agree with payment for donations. Stephen A from Westbury, said: "I don't think it is a good idea to pay people for blood donations because we could have a similar situation to the blood scandal in the seventies. People who had all sorts of illnesses and drug-related problems sold their blood and created an unnecessary health problem for otherwise healthy individuals." Richard S from the Highlands agreed, saying: "Payment for blood will attract many short of money because they have taken drugs." Some readers even said payment would prevent them from donating. "I decided to become a blood donor when my wife was admitted to hospital in the last month of pregnancy," said Ian H from Hinckley. "I have now completed 104 donations … If I was told at that first donation that I would be paid, I would not have continued." However, some including Lenny T from Kent, said they agreed with payments for donation. "If it means more people will donate blood, it will help hospitals and doctors," they explained. Others said there were better ways to attract more donors, such as making the opening times and locations of donor centres more convenient, as well as increasing the age limit for giving blood, which currently stands at 65. "Those who donate do so for the best of reasons, to help others. it is a privilege to be able to help those in desperate need, and I was glad to be able to do so," said HMW from the Scottish Highlands. "I wish they would take blood from older folk – I'm late 60s – even if they have some health issues. If their iron is okay and you are not on life-saving meds, and are a universal donor – group O – it would help in crisis situations. I would love to be able to do something so useful beyond retirement." Denise D who lives in Italy said that convenience was an issue. "My daughter tried to give blood, she's donated for a long time. She tried to get another appointment, the first available appointment was three months later and 30 miles away," she said. "There need to be more collection points and nearer city centres." N Anderson from Worcestershire agreed saying: "Maybe the service should come to local villages, as they used to, asking people to travel to main towns with transport and parking charges is not on." Read more of Yahoo UK's Poll of the Week articles

NHS England Extends Cervical Screening to 5 Years for Many
NHS England Extends Cervical Screening to 5 Years for Many

Medscape

time7 hours ago

  • Medscape

NHS England Extends Cervical Screening to 5 Years for Many

From July, women in England aged 25 to 49 who test negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will be invited for cervical screening every 5 years instead of every 3 years. NHS England said the updated screening schedule would provide women with a more personalised approach based on individual risk. The change follows a recommendation from the UK National Screening Committee and aligns with the current schedule for women aged 50 to 64 in England, as well as screening programmes in Scotland and Wales. Evidence Supports Longer Interval NHS England highlighted that studies have shown that people who test negative for HPV are extremely unlikely to develop cervical cancer within the next decade. Research led by King's College London and published in The BMJ in 2022 found that 5-yearly screening for HPV-negative women was as safe as 3-yearly screening. The study reported no difference in the number of cancers detected and confirmed that less frequent testing was needed. Women who test positive for HPV, with or without abnormal cell changes, will continue on shorter recall. Those with no cell changes will be invited for re-screening in one year, while HPV-positive women with cell changes will be referred for colposcopy. Women will continue to follow the recall schedule advised at their last screening. Only those screened on or after 1 July and meeting the criteria will move to the 5-year interval. Screening Based on Personal Risk Cervical screening was first launched in the UK in 1964. Since 2019, all cervical screening samples collected in England have been tested for high-risk HPV, which is more accurate than the previous method of cytology testing. Cervical cancer is the 14th most common cancer in the UK, with around 3300 new cases each year – nearly all of which are caused by HPV. Since 2008, girls in school year 8 have been offered a vaccine against certain strains of HPV. The programme was extended to boys in 2019. Evidence shows that the vaccine has reduced cervical cancer rates by 90% in England. In Scotland, there have been no recorded cases among vaccinated women since the schools' programme was introduced for girls in 2008. Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'Screening, alongside the roll-out of the HPV vaccine, has seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s.' Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need.' Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of The Eve Appeal, said: 'This new guidance is good news for those at low risk, because they will no longer need to go for cervical screening as often.' Digital Reminders Aim to Boost Uptake The NHS has introduced digital invitations and reminders for cervical screening through the NHS App, as part of a new 'ping and book' service to boost uptake. Eligible women will first receive a notification through the app to alert them to book a screening appointment. If not opened, a follow-up text message will be sent. Paper letters will still be used for those who need them. The 2023-2024 NHS Cervical Screening Programme annual report for England found that 68.8% of women aged 25 to 64 were screened within the recommended timeframe, a slight increase from 68.7% the year before. Coverage was highest among women aged 50 to 64 (74.3%) and lowest among those aged 25 to 49 (66.1%). Louise Ansari, chief executive of Healthwatch England, welcomed the move to digital invites. 'Nearly half of the women we polled last year said the ability to book screenings via the app would make them more likely to attend future appointments,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store