logo
No third-party intervention in Indo-Pak ceasefire: Jaishankar in Rajya Sabha

No third-party intervention in Indo-Pak ceasefire: Jaishankar in Rajya Sabha

The Hindu21 hours ago
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Mr. Jaishankar said Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the U.S. President did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.
The Opposition has been attacking the government on claims made by Mr. Trump on mediation in halting hostilities between India and Pakistan by using the threat of trade.
He said India will not tolerate any cross-border terrorism and has responded to Pakistan by carrying out Operation Sindoor and will continue to do so.
Noting that the Pahalgam terror attack was absolutely unacceptable, he said a red line was crossed by Pakistan, and there had to be accountability and justice.
'Blood and water will not flow together,' he said, providing reasons for India's decision to suspend the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan.
Mr. Jaishankar said the Modi Government has corrected the wrongs of Nehru's policies by suspending the Treaty. The Treaty signed by then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru was not to buy peace, but for appeasement, he added.
The External Affairs Minister said terrorism is now on the global agenda only because of the efforts of the Modi government.
He said India exerted huge pressure on Pakistan through the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) process and also despite not being a member of the U.N. Security Council, India was able to get U.N. recognition that The Resistance Front (TRF) is a proxy of Pakistan-based LeT.
The TRF had claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack.
'When the Pahalgam attack happened on April 22, it was a shocking attack for a variety of reasons...The manner in which people were killed in front of their families, the fact that their faith was asked before killing them, the intent of destroying the economy of Jammu and Kashmir, which had returned to normalcy and prosperity after the end of Article 370. All of this angered the country,' he said.
The Minister said there was grief and shock across the world. There was solidarity and sympathy.
'But the question was, what after that? And the answers were two. One, such an attack was absolutely unacceptable. It crossed our red line. There had to be severe consequences.
'And two, there had to be accountability and justice. There had to be accountability of the perpetrators, and they and their supporters had to be brought to justice. Now, the first clear message, of India's anger, of our resolve, of our determination, was the decision taken by the Cabinet Committee on Security immediately the day after, from April 23,' he said.
In his nearly hour-long speech, Mr. Jaishankar informed that on May 9, U.S. Vice-President J.D. Vance informed Prime Minister Modi that Pakistan was planning a huge attack on India.
To this, Prime Minister Modi told Mr. Vance that India's response would be appropriate, he said.
Pakistan attacked, and India gave a fitting and appropriate response, Mr. Jaishankar told the House.
The Minister also India sent a clear message that it is not open to any mediation and will not be deterred by nuclear blackmail.
Mr. Jaishankar said Operation Sindoor also did a global service as India reduced to dust terror infrastructure in Pakistan, including in Bahawalpur and Muridke.
He also chided certain opposition party leaders for mocking India's military action against Pakistan, if they have any doubts, they should watch videos of funerals of terrorists in Pakistan and destruction of airfields in the neighbouring country.
He said Opposition Sindoor was a well-considered and thoughtful response to the barbaric Pahalgam attack and it has now become the basis of a new policy.
He emphasised India will keep responding to each terror attack in the same way.
Certain opposition party members had raised the issue of Mr. Jaishankar's recent visit to China.
To this, the Minister said he visited China to discuss terrorism, de-escalation, and trade restrictions.
'I had no secret meeting,' he said, in a veiled attack on senior Congress party leadership.
Relations with China will be developed on mutual interest, mutual sensitivity and mutual respect, he added.
The Minister also thanked the multi-party parliamentary delegation to various countries post Operation Sindoor, delegations to various countries, says they have done great national service.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RS adjourned till 2 pm as Opposition parties press for discussion on SIR
RS adjourned till 2 pm as Opposition parties press for discussion on SIR

Business Standard

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

RS adjourned till 2 pm as Opposition parties press for discussion on SIR

Proceedings of the Rajya Sabha were adjourned till 2 pm on Thursday after Opposition MPs created uproar over the issue of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls. The House was adjourned twice during the pre-lunch session over the SIR issue. Soon after the House met at 12 noon after one adjournment in the morning, Opposition MPs were on their feet raising slogans in support of their demand for a discussion on SIR of Bihar's electoral rolls. The MPs demanded that the special revision of electoral rolls should be discussed in the House. The Opposition has been demanding a roll back of the SIR in Bihar till the after the Assembly polls, which are due later this year. Ghanshyam Tiwari who was in the Chair urged the potesting MPs to maintain decorum in the House and allow the Question Hour to function. Unrelenting Opposition members, however, continued to raise slogans. Some of the TMC members also trooped into the Well and continued with their sloganeering. Amid the din the Chair adjourned the House till 2 pm. Earlier when the House met, Deputy Chairman Harivansh cited loss of time in disruptions since the start of the monsoon session and asked MPs to allow listed business to be taken up. But the Opposition parties continued to press for a time and date for holding a discussion on SIR. Harivansh said the Opposition and Treasury benches must sit together and decide on the issue. But this did not cut much ice as Opposition MPs started raising slogans against SIR. The Deputy Chairman called for taking up of the listed Zero Hour mentions but adjourned the proceedings till 12 noon as the Opposition MPs refused to relent. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

2008 Malegaon blast: After acquittal due to lack of evidence, look back at charges against Pragya Thakur, others
2008 Malegaon blast: After acquittal due to lack of evidence, look back at charges against Pragya Thakur, others

Hindustan Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

2008 Malegaon blast: After acquittal due to lack of evidence, look back at charges against Pragya Thakur, others

A special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court on Thursday acquitted all the seven accused, including former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, in the September 2008 Malegaon blast case in which six persons were killed and nearly 100 were injured. Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur in court in 2018.(HT File) The other five accused were retired army officer Ramesh Shivaji Upadhyay (73), Pune-based businessman Samir Sharad Kulkarni (53), Purohit's close associates Ajay Eknath Rahirkar (56) and Sudhakar Omkarnath Chaturvedi (53), and Sudharkar Dhar Dwivedi, also known as Swami Amrutanand Devtirth (56), a self-proclaimed Shankaracharya, all of whom were arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). Special judge AK Lahoti said that the overall evidence doesn't inspire confidence to prove a case against the accused and said the accused persons deserve the benefit of doubt. The blast took place near a mosque in Malegaon, about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008. What probe said, why Pragya Thakur was arrested Around a month after the incident, the state government handed the case over to the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which eventually arrested Pragya Thakur, a native of Lahar in the Bhind district of Madhya Pradesh, and two of her alleged accomplices, after finding that a motorcycle used in the blast allegedly belonged to her. The ATS also said the blast was the handiwork of an extreme right-wing group led by Purohit, Upadhyay and Dwivedi. In its charge sheet, the agency claimed that Purohit, who at the time served in the Indian Army's Military Intelligence unit, had in February 2007 formed Abhinav Bharat, an organisation with an intention to convert India into a 'Hindu rashtra named Aryawart' — meaning, a nation only for Hindus. The organisation had allegedly held several meetings across the country in which they discussed increasing 'jihadi' activities by Muslims and expressed strong anti-Muslim sentiments. According to the ATS, in one such meeting held in Bhopal in April 2008, Purohit suggested carrying out a bomb blast in Muslim-dominated Malegaon to take revenge for atrocities committed by Muslims on Hindus. Thakur, according to the ATS, quickly responded by offering to provide people for carrying out the blast, for which RDX was allegedly supplied by Purohit. On January 20, 2009, the ATS arrested 11 people and filed a chargesheet against them and two wanted planters — Ramji Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, both associated with Thakur. The agency invoked the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) due to the involvement of Rakesh Dhawde, an accused who was linked to previous blast cases. The agency later also arrested Pravin Takkalaki, an alleged close aide of Purohit, and filed a supplementary charge sheet against him. NIA wanted to exonerate Pragya Thakur in 2016 However, in April 2011, the case was transferred to the NIA, a specialised federal agency established after the 2008 Mumbai terror attack to handle terrorism-related cases with national ramifications. In May 2016, the NIA filed a supplementary chargesheet in the case, exonerating Thakur and five other accused, and recommending their discharge from the case. The agency said it found no evidence linking Thakur directly to the blast, adding that the motorcycle registered in her name was in the possession of absconding accused Kalsangra before the attack. The NIA also dropped anti-terror MCOCA charges against all the accused, citing its questionable application by the ATS. It found flaws in the ATS's investigation, describing it as filled with 'lacunae' or gaps. It said that some of the confessions recorded by the state agency, such as that of Chaturvedi's, were likely obtained through torture and were unreliable. Accordingly, the special NIA court in December 2017 dropped MCOCA charges against all the accused, but retained charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court discharged Kalsangra, Sahu, and Takkalaki from the case, but refused to discharge the remaining seven arrested accused, including Thakur, and two wanted accused. The court refused to discharge Thakur, citing her attendance at meetings where the blast was discussed, such as one in Bhopal in April 2008. While Thakur continued to be on trial, she secured bail in the case and even contested the 2019 general elections on a BJP ticket, winning the Bhopal constituency.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store