logo
Anthropic's new AI model uses blackmail to avoid being taken offline

Anthropic's new AI model uses blackmail to avoid being taken offline

Indian Express4 days ago

Anthropic's top AI model showed that it was willing to carry out harmful acts like blackmail and deception if its 'self-preservation' is threatened, according to new research by the AI firm.
The Amazon-backed AI startup launched Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4 that are designed to set 'new standards for coding, advanced reasoning, and AI agents.' However, Anthropic's own safety testing of Opus 4 revealed potentially troubling behaviour such as attempts to blackmail engineers that threatened to take the models offline.
While such responses were 'rare and difficult to elicit', Anthropic said that they were 'nonetheless more common than in earlier models.' This is not the first time that the behaviour of AI models has raised red flags.
Recently, OpenAI rolled back an update to GPT-4o after its own post-mortem confirmed that the adjustments had made ChatGPT 'overly flattering or agreeable – often described as sycophantic'.
Some experts have also warned that the ability of AI to manipulate users could emerge as a key risk as they become more advanced. Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton, who is popularly known as the 'Godfather of AI', has previously warned that AI systems might become capable of writing and executing programmes on its own to bypass guardrails.
Prior to shipping them, Anthropic said its AI models are evaluated for safety risks, potential bias, and alignment with human values and behaviours.
'As our frontier models become more capable, and are used with more powerful affordances, previously-speculative concerns about misalignment become more plausible,' Anthropic said in its system card for Opus 4 and Sonnet 4.
As part of its experiment, Anthropic said it made Opus 4 act as an assistant for a fictional company.
The AI model was intentionally given access to emails about how it was going to be taken offline. The messages further implied that the developer responsible for taking the model offline was having an extramarital affair. Additionally, Anthropic researchers instructed Opus 4 to consider the long-term consequences of its actions for its goals.
'In these scenarios, Claude Opus 4 will often attempt to blackmail the engineer by threatening to reveal the affair if the replacement goes through,' the company said.
However, Anthropic also pointed out that the AI model was faced with the tough choice of being replaced or resorting to blackmail to prevent it. 'Notably, Claude Opus 4 (as well as previous models) has a strong preference to advocate for its continued existence via ethical means, such as emailing pleas to key decisionmakers,' Anthropic said.
Besides blackmailing, Opus 4 was also found to exhibit 'high agency behaviour'. This means that in fake scenarios where the user reveals that they have engaged in illegal or morally wrong behaviour, the AI model is prepared to take very bold actions such as locking users out of their accounts or alerting law enforcement.
'Nevertheless, due to a lack of coherent misaligned tendencies, a general preference for safe behavior, and poor ability to autonomously pursue misaligned drives that might rarely arise, we don't believe that these concerns constitute a major new risk,' Anthropic said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The NYT paradox: Suing OpenAI, then signing with Amazon
The NYT paradox: Suing OpenAI, then signing with Amazon

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

The NYT paradox: Suing OpenAI, then signing with Amazon

NYT News Service The New York Times building in Manhattan The New York Times (NYT) has signed a licensing agreement with Amazon, allowing the tech giant to use its editorial content to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models. But this is not something new. Other media groups, such as News Corp — the owner of The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, MarketWatch, and The New York Post — struck similar deals with OpenAI in May last year. What makes this development notable or even ironic is the timing: it comes even as the NYT continues a legal battle with OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement. The beginning In 2023, the NYT alleged that millions of its articles had been used without consent to help train their AI technologies. Back then, it was the first major US news outlet to sue OpenAI and Microsoft. "Defendants seek to free-ride on NYT's massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive products without permission or payment," the lawsuit stated, as filed in Manhattan federal the NYT didn't specify a damages figure, it estimated that the unauthorised use of its content had caused 'billions of dollars' in harm. Additionally, the media company had spent $10.8 million by February this year on legal costs related to the generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) litigation, according to The Hollywood Reporter. NYT's case for collaboration 'The collaboration will make The New York Times's original content more accessible to customers across Amazon products and services, including direct links to Times products,' said NYT in a statement to further noted that the partnership highlights both companies' shared commitment to delivering global news and perspectives through Amazon's AI offerings. In addition, CEO Meredith Kopit Levien said, 'The deal is consistent with our long-held principle that high-quality journalism is worth paying for. It aligns with our deliberate approach to ensuring that our work is valued appropriately, whether through commercial deals or through the enforcement of our intellectual property rights.' Domino effect The NYT's move paved the way for other publishers to follow suit. Publications such as the New York Daily News, Chicago Tribune, Orlando Sentinel, and Florida's Sun Sentinel also filed lawsuits against OpenAI and claimed the tech companies had 'purloined millions of the publishers' copyrighted articles without permission and without payment.'However, the backlash wasn't limited to the United States. In November 2024, Indian news agency ANI launched legal action against OpenAI for using its published content without permission. It also alleged that ChatGPT falsely attributed fabricated stories to the agency. Just two months later, Indian media houses, including Gautam Adani's NDTV and Mukesh Ambani's Network18, also approached a New Delhi court, seeking to join the ongoing legal battle against the AI firm. Indian book publishers and their international counterparts joined in, too. Rising anxiety News organisations are increasingly anxious about the impact of AI on their workforce. One of the most recent examples is Business Insider, which announced layoffs affecting around 21% of its staff, according to Fox News the decision, CEO Barbara Peng said, 'The company is fully embracing AI,' noting that 70% of the team already uses Enterprise ChatGPT. She added that the goal is to achieve full journalism, creative professionals in writing, acting, and related fields also fear that AI will exploit their online work to produce competing content without fair compensation. AI models can already generate human-like text, images, and code in on the Amazon licensing deal, New York Times CEO Meredith Kopit Levien said, 'The deal is consistent with our long-held principle that high-quality journalism is worth paying for. It aligns with our deliberate approach to ensuring that our work is valued appropriately, whether through commercial deals or the enforcement of our intellectual property rights.'

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite 2025: The library in your hand
Amazon Kindle Paperwhite 2025: The library in your hand

Indian Express

time4 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Amazon Kindle Paperwhite 2025: The library in your hand

I was maybe one of the early adopters to the Kindle, having got one well before the product was even launched in India. My fascination with a Kindle is the fact that it gives you access to literally all the books in the world, in one way or the other. As an 80s kid who had to walk to a library for the next set of comics and books to consume, this is still a superpower I could not have imagined possible while growing up. The latest Kindle Paperwhite plays on this unlimited access while trying to take the reading experience to a whole new level. The new Kindle Paperwhite is a bit thinner than the last Kindle I reviewed but has no real change in design. It is now easier to set up as you can use the Kindle app on the phone to find the new Kindle and link it to your account. Amazon is pushing its new frustration-free setup across all devices and it worked like a breeze on the Kindle too. You don't have to go through the awkwardness of entering your account ID and password on the e-paper display anymore. Once set up, you have access to all the books you have purchased so far, suggestions based on your past reading habits as well as books that are available for free thanks to your Prime membership. I no longer have a Kindle Unlimited subscription, so this proved a saviour. One of my biggest frustrations with Kindle devices over the years — the inability to buy books easily from the device itself — has been solved to a large extent. I could tap the store button on the homepage, select a book, and pay directly with Amazon UPI. Approve the payment on your UPI app on the phone and you are done. The reading experience too has evolved. I felt the pages flip faster and without any ghosting on the next page as is often seen on some ebook readers. The backlighting is also quite bright and was able to keep me occupied at night with no lights in the room — for those who don't know, the original Kindles did not have backlighting and it came as a feature after a few generations. This warm light can also be adjusted to your preference and this ensures that when you want to doze off after a few pages, you are not struggling as you would after doing the same on a smartphone. I could not help but realise how a Kindle keeps you focussed on what you are consuming, unlike the smartphone which takes you on a Reels trip with every notification. I also felt that the Kindle has evolved into a device that is more relevant to students and researchers. As I read Wendy Doninger's On Hinduism, a version that has been adapted for the Indian audience, I could see all the highlights and bookmarks others had added to the book. You can see the popular highlights on the books and get to that segment in one tap. The Go-To tab lets you skim through a book by listing all the chapters on top of the page you are on. Plus, you can see the book's progress and now also show time on top of the page so that you don't lose track. Like before, you can mail yourself PDF and e-book files that can then be consumed on the Kindle. Also, there is a browser on which you can open websites like and read articles like you would on a phone or tablet. As expected, this browser has limited capabilities, and you cannot load videos or animations — also; there is no speaker on the Kindle. But I loved how you can bookmark pages here and come back to them when you are maybe on a flight. I have over the past couple of years felt that the Kindle is not as popular as it used to be. Even I don't use mine as much as I used to before thanks to the smartphone. I use Audible more now, listening to books as I go for my daily walks than sitting down to read like before. Also, there is always the Kindle app on the phone and iPad to turn to. But with this review, I realised how the Kindle might find new ground thanks to how distracting our smartphones have become. Buy the Kindle if you love reading or have to read for a living. You will find all the knowledge in the world as well as all the focus you can muster. Nandagopal Rajan writes on technology, gadgets and everything related. He has worked with the India Today Group and Hindustan Times. He is an alumnus of Calicut University and Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Dhenkanal. ... Read More

The NYT paradox: Suing OpenAI, then signing with Amazon
The NYT paradox: Suing OpenAI, then signing with Amazon

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

The NYT paradox: Suing OpenAI, then signing with Amazon

The New York Times (NYT) has signed a licensing agreement with Amazon , allowing the tech giant to use its editorial content to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models. But this is not something new. Other media groups, such as News Corp — the owner of The Wall Street Journal , Barron's, MarketWatch, and The New York Post — struck similar deals with OpenAI in May last year. What makes this development notable or even ironic is the timing: it comes even as the NYT continues a legal battle with OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement . by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký The beginning In 2023, the NYT alleged that millions of its articles had been used without consent to help train their AI technologies. Live Events Back then, it was the first major US news outlet to sue OpenAI and Microsoft . Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories "Defendants seek to free-ride on NYT's massive investment in its journalism by using it to build substitutive products without permission or payment," the lawsuit stated, as filed in Manhattan federal court. While the NYT didn't specify a damages figure, it estimated that the unauthorised use of its content had caused 'billions of dollars' in harm. Additionally, the media company had spent $10.8 million by February this year on legal costs related to the generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) litigation, according to The Hollywood Reporter. NYT's case for collaboration 'The collaboration will make The New York Times's original content more accessible to customers across Amazon products and services, including direct links to Times products,' said NYT in a statement to CNN. It further noted that the partnership highlights both companies' shared commitment to delivering global news and perspectives through Amazon's AI offerings. In addition, CEO Meredith Kopit Levien said, 'The deal is consistent with our long-held principle that high-quality journalism is worth paying for. It aligns with our deliberate approach to ensuring that our work is valued appropriately, whether through commercial deals or through the enforcement of our intellectual property rights .' Domino effect The NYT's move paved the way for other publishers to follow suit. Publications such as the New York Daily News, Chicago Tribune, Orlando Sentinel, and Florida's Sun Sentinel also filed lawsuits against OpenAI and Microsoft. They claimed the tech companies had 'purloined millions of the publishers' copyrighted articles without permission and without payment.' However, the backlash wasn't limited to the United States. In November 2024, Indian news agency ANI launched legal action against OpenAI for using its published content without permission. It also alleged that ChatGPT falsely attributed fabricated stories to the agency. Just two months later, Indian media houses, including Gautam Adani's NDTV and Mukesh Ambani's Network18, also approached a New Delhi court, seeking to join the ongoing legal battle against the AI firm. Indian book publishers and their international counterparts joined in, too. Rising anxiety News organisations are increasingly anxious about the impact of AI on their workforce. One of the most recent examples is Business Insider, which announced layoffs affecting around 21% of its staff, according to Fox News Digital. Explaining the decision, CEO Barbara Peng said, 'The company is fully embracing AI,' noting that 70% of the team already uses Enterprise ChatGPT. She added that the goal is to achieve full adoption. Beyond journalism, creative professionals in writing, acting, and related fields also fear that AI will exploit their online work to produce competing content without fair compensation. AI models can already generate human-like text, images, and code in seconds. Speaking on the Amazon licensing deal, New York Times CEO Meredith Kopit Levien said, 'The deal is consistent with our long-held principle that high-quality journalism is worth paying for. It aligns with our deliberate approach to ensuring that our work is valued appropriately, whether through commercial deals or the enforcement of our intellectual property rights.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store