Piastri Returns With Renewed 'Confidence' To Hungarian GP After 'Awkward' First Win
Oscar Piastri's first F1 win in Hungary taught McLaren valuable lessons. Now, a title contender, he leads teammate Lando Norris by 16 points. McLaren aims for its 200th win.
Some Formula 1 races remain memorable due to thrilling action, controversy, or even being so dull they prompted a rule change. Oscar Piastri's first F1 win, however, stands out as a benchmark for sheer awkwardness.
Piastri is pleased to return to Hungary this week, but his breakthrough victory there last year serves as a significant lesson for McLaren as they manage his title fight with teammate Lando Norris.
This lesson is even more crucial now. Piastri has evolved into a genuine title contender over the past year and currently leads Norris by 16 points following his victory in Belgium last week.
'I have a lot of confidence in myself that I can do it," the Australian said of his title chances on Thursday. 'The pace in the last few weekends, especially (Belgium), I've been very confident in and very proud of. I'm more than capable of continuing that for the rest of the year."
McLaren could achieve some milestones this weekend, including a potential 200th win in F1 for the team. It might also mark Piastri and Norris' fourth consecutive one-two finish, a feat McLaren last accomplished in 1988.
Piastri had been leading, but McLaren's pit strategy — which typically favours the leader — had put Norris ahead. Piastri believes the team can still draw positives from that situation.
'I think it underlined the good nature in the team. It was obviously a slightly awkward situation, but it highlighted that we will do the right thing in all circumstances — well, ideally all circumstances — when we're on track," Piastri said.
'It showed the trust that we have with the team and with each other as well, that things will be put the right way."
F1 has a history of title fights souring team relationships — notably at McLaren with Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost over 30 years ago — but Piastri and Norris have maintained a friendly rivalry. Nonetheless, there has been a collision in Canada, a near-miss in Austria, and Piastri's rejected request for Norris to relinquish the lead in Britain.
Piastri believes one factor preventing his relationship with Norris from deteriorating is their shared commitment to keeping McLaren at the top of F1 for 'many years to come."
'We've all seen how it can go wrong, but we have a lot of reasons to push for it to not go wrong," he added.
Another wet race possible
F1 might be facing its third wet race in a row this Sunday after a rain-delayed start last week in Belgium divided opinion among drivers and fans.
Max Verstappen argued that 'we could have started way sooner" and said the lack of racing in wet conditions was 'a shame," but Piastri and others highlighted the poor visibility and specific safety concerns at the high-speed Spa-Francorchamps circuit.
'(Visibility) is always much worse in the car than it looks on TV, and I think the FIA has done a very good job of listening to us and taking that feedback on board," Piastri said. 'The feeling in this room would be pretty different if we had a big crash last week."
With AP Inputs
Location :
Hungary
First Published:
August 01, 2025, 16:03 IST
News sports Piastri Returns With Renewed 'Confidence' To Hungarian GP After 'Awkward' First Win
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
'Discipline? Defence? All went out of window': English media rant after India's 'miracle'; Aussies drop Ashes truth bomb
The English media showed no mercy after England lost the fifth and final Test against India at The Oval on Monday, as the tourists drew the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2-2. Meanwhile, the Australian media delivered a brutal reality check to the Ben Stokes-led side ahead of their upcoming Ashes assignment. England's Gus Atkinson bowled out by India's Mohammed Siraj on day five of the fifth cricket test match between England and India at The Kia Oval (AP) England, at one point, were cruising towards the 374-run target, riding on centuries from Harry Brook and Joe Root. Their 195-run stand for the fourth wicket took them to 301 for three. But their hopes took a major hit on the fourth afternoon when India struck thrice around the Tea break, removing three batters for just 26 runs. On the final morning, England began positively, hitting back-to-back boundaries with just 35 runs needed. But Mohammed Siraj turned the tide, striking twice in his first two overs before cleaning up the final wicket to complete his five-wicket haul. England fell just six runs short—suffering their narrowest defeat on home soil in 123 years. The Telegraph article titled 'Chris Woakes' remarkable act of bravery will be remembered forever' questioned England's approach against the Indian seamers, strongly criticising Jacob Bethell and Jamie Smith. It argued that tail-ender Gus Atkinson was the only batter with a clear plan, while the rest 'did exactly what India's seamers wanted them to do—either by throwing the bat at anything and everything, or poking their bats at anything and everything.' The piece read: 'Discipline? Defence? It all went out of the window in the nerves of the occasion. The disease had actually started on the fourth evening when Joe Root played a shot—or dab—which he regretted the moment he had tried it. He had lost the strike as Jacob Bethell struggled to come to terms with a red ball, and after the euphoria of his 39th Test hundred, Root tried something that was unworthy of his reputation. Bethell was given scant chance by England's selectors.' The Guardian, on the other hand, in its piece 'Are you not wowed? Bazball, India and a one-armed man deliver drama and beauty', couldn't stop gushing about India's heroism on the final morning and Siraj's fire. It wrote: 'England needed 35 to win and India three and a half wickets to level the series. The players came out to a huge rolling wave of applause, India's fielders breaking from their huddle to sprint in unison, impossibly heroic already—a group who have given us everything over the past two months. And this was a day for Mohammed 'the Demon' Siraj, who really is the most lovable maniac in sport, and who bowled like a god here to win this game.' England ready for Ashes? Since the summer of 2022, when the Bazball era began in England, the Stokes-led side has played 13 Test series and won eight of them. While that tally suggests success for the McCullum-Stokes partnership, the Bazball philosophy has faltered in crucial moments—a drawn Ashes at home in 2023, a 1-4 defeat in India in 2024, and now a 2-2 draw at home against an Indian side that recently saw the retirements of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, and R Ashwin. The most recent result has prompted many—especially the Australian media—to deliver a scathing Ashes verdict. "Toppling India would have given England a timely boost of confidence ahead of the upcoming Ashes tour, but the lingering Bazball sceptics would grow in volume if Brendon McCullum's troops failed to win another marquee series," a Fox Sports article titled 'Test miracle for the ages as Poms stunned at the death despite one-arm sacrifice' read. "Regardless, failure to defeat an undermanned Indian team — who are without retired superstars Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Ravichandran Ashwin — is a hammer blow for England's Bazballers." The Sydney Morning Herald noted that England were expected to turn a corner in this series, shifting from crowd-pleasers to serious contenders. But their recurring struggles—especially the inability to manage key fast bowlers—highlighted deeper problems that Bazball alone couldn't fix. The article titled 'The hard truths that show England will struggle to win the Ashes' read: "It is worth remembering that this was the series in which England were meant to have evolved from entertainers to winners. They had become more pragmatic in tactics, more inclined to sledge opponents on the field, and more susceptible to the petulance that followed India's series-saving rearguard in Manchester. Putting on a show was no longer enough. All those changes were, however, largely cosmetic next to a couple of hard cricket truths. First, winning big series generally requires keeping your best fast bowlers fit, something England have consistently failed to do over many years, not just during the Bazball era that began in 2022."
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Was backing England to score the runs, but Siraj got quite a bit of movement: Alex Carey
With England set to travel to Australia for the Ashes later this year, Carey said the home side will not make too many changes in the brand of cricket it plays, given that England have been playing 'Bazball' cricket -- a term used to describe Ben Stokes' team's aggressive, positive, and attacking style of Test cricket. "We probably don't have to go too far away from our style of cricket. When we were over there (England) last time in the Ashes, there was a lot of talk about their new style of play. We've seen it for a number of years now and there will be no surprises with it. "We know the way that they play. Both teams have a good balance between grinding and going after them with certain players," said Carey. Carey, who is recovering well from a concussion he suffered during the third Test against the West Indies in Jamaica, congratulated England batting mainstay Joe Root, who overtook Australian legend Ricky Ponting to become the second-highest Test run-getter after Sachin Tendulkar. "I don't think he'll be feeling any pressure (in the Ashes). Congratulations to him as well (for passing Ponting), it's a fantastic career so far. No doubt, legends of the game want to do really well in every series and he'll be no different," said Carey.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy better than Ashes 2005? R Ashwin, Monty Panesar weigh in
With the India-England Test series ending in a gripping 2-2 draw, comparisons with the legendary Ashes 2005 have taken over cricket circles. Former players R Ashwin and Monty Panesar weighed in on the debate. read more It's human nature to compare, and the recently concluded, thrilling India vs England Test series is no exception, with former cricketers comparing it to the iconic 2005 Ashes. Legendary Ravichandran Ashwin has claimed that the 2025 five-match Test series between India and England that ended with a scoreline of 2-2 on Monday after the visitors won the final match at Oval on the last day was even better than the Ashes 2005. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD England's 2-1 Ashes 2005 win was their first since 1986-87, but the on-field drama, confrontations, and close matches made it a legendary contest. Ashwin: IND vs ENG better series than Ashes 2005 Ashwin, who retired from Test cricket last year, feels the 2025 India vs England series is 'slightly better than even the 2005 Ashes' as the latest series had a number of imperfections. 'A lot of people are comparing this series with the 2005 Ashes, but I think this series was slightly better than even the 2005 Ashes – because there was so much more imperfection, from both sides,' Ashwin said on his YouTube channel. 'If you look at that Australian team, there was Glenn McGrath, Shane Warne, you had Michael Kasprowicz, Shaun Tait. From this side [England] you had Simon Jones, Steve Harmison, you had Ashley Giles. There was a lot of experience in the bowling attacks. There was experience in the batting too. There was a lot of hard-fought cricket, where you couldn't see a lot of mistakes. It was hard-fought.' Also Read | India player ratings for England Tests: Heroes and duds as Shubman Gill and Co secure thrilling 2-2 Test series draw Explaining the imperfections, Ashwin said that the way players fought back on numerous occasions made the series a riveting affair. 'In this series, there were a lot of mistakes,' Ashwin added. 'But the young players have corrected their mistakes and gotten better through the series. You had somebody like KL Rahul who's not put a foot wrong in the series. Then you had somebody like a Rishabh Pant or Shubman Gill, who made errors – both got run out once – they played some poor shots and got out at the crucial moments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In the bowling too, Mohammed Siraj has had some down spells, Prasidh [Krishna] has had some ordinary spells. England have bowled poorly, but have fought back through Ben Stokes. So there has been a lot of imperfection. There was a lot of perfection in the 2005 Ashes, but we got to see a lot of imperfection in this series. Also Read | Gavaskar compares workload debate to jawans at border, drops ODI captaincy hint 'And that's the beauty of it. Players corrected their vulnerabilities, and made this series like a festival for us. [For] anyone who paid money to go watch the match, no one would say they didn't have their money's worth. Twenty-five days of riveting cricket, and I could give anything to watch this series, I have not missed a moment.' Monty Panesar compares IND vs ENG to Ashes 2005 Former England spinner Monty Panesar felt it was the 'most exciting series' since the 2005 Ashes. 'It's been a famous victory for India. They played brilliant, brilliant cricket. And yesterday, we kind of thought when Joe Root and Harry Brook were batting that this was out of their reach. But the conditions this morning obviously favoured India with the seam positions, and the key was that they didn't take the new ball. And with the old ball, Siraj was amazing, and Krishna, as well, got that length a bit fuller. And it's a famous victory, probably the most exciting series since 2005, between England and Australia,' Panesar told IANS. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
