GB News Wins Landmark Legal Battle With UK Media Regulator Ofcom Over Trump Report
GB News has won a landmark legal battle with UK media regulator Ofcom over a report by presenter Jacob Rees-Mogg about Donald Trump.
In a High Court ruling, a judge found that Ofcom was unlawful in determining that GB News breached broadcasting rules in two separate editions of Mogg's State Of The Nation show.
More from Deadline
James Cameron Says New Zealand Citizenship Is "Imminent" Amid Trump's "Sickening" Administration: "It's Inescapable"
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Suggests That Skydance-Paramount Merger Review Is Far From Finished
Warner Bros. Discovery Drops Diversity & Equity Language Amid DEI Rollbacks - "Our Overarching Work In This Space Will Now Be Referred To As Inclusion"
Ofcom argued that Mogg, a former Conservative minister, veered into newsreader territory when telling viewers in May 2023 that a jury had found Donald Trump guilty of sexually assaulting writer E. Jean Carroll.
The regulator said this, and a separate report on Valdo Calocane killing three people in Nottingham, constituted a breach of rule 5.3 of the UK broadcasting code, which states: 'No politician may be used as a newsreader, interviewer or reporter in any news programmes unless, exceptionally, it is editorially justified.'
In reaching this conclusion, Ofcom ruled last March that State Of The Nation could be characterized as both a 'news programme' and a 'current affairs' show, the latter of which is exempt from rule 5.3.
The court found that the statute underlying British broadcasting rules treats news programmes and current affairs shows as being distinct. Because State Of The Nation was predominantly a current affairs show, the court said rule 5.3 did not apply.
'I am minded to quash the two decisions in this case,' said Mrs Justice Collins Rice. 'Because they applied rule 5.3 to news in any form outside the confines of a news programme, and because they conflated a news programme and a current affairs programme. Rule 5.3 does not apply outside news programmes. This was a current affairs programme and not a news programme.'
GB News CEO Angelos Frangopoulos said: 'This landmark decision by the High Court vindicates GB News' position as the fearless defender of free speech in the United Kingdom. Our court victory is hugely significant for the entire British broadcasting industry. We are proud that we were the only media company prepared to have the courage of our convictions.'
He added: 'I call on the government and Parliament to consider the seriousness of this fundamental failure by Ofcom. GB News is thriving with record audiences because it is focussed on serving all of the nation's communities and delivering on its mission to be The People's Channel.'
An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'We accept the court's guidance on this important aspect of due impartiality in broadcast news and the clarity set out in its judgment.'
Significantly, Ofcom added that will now consult on redrafting rule 5.3 of the broadcasting code 'to restrict politicians from presenting news in any type of programme to ensure this is clear for all broadcasters.'
Rule 5.3 was written nearly two decades ago, at a time when it was not envisaged that a news channel would have lawmakers hosting shows on a nightly basis. Critics of Ofcom's approach have been calling for a review of the rule for more than a year.
Chris Banatvala, Ofcom's former director of standards, told Deadline last year: 'It would be wise, given broadcasters are coming up against the code, for Ofcom to have a rigorous discussion and a possible consultation around this matter and be open about why changes may or may not be needed.'
Best of Deadline
All The Songs In 'Running Point' On Netflix: From Tupac To Steve Lacy
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
How To Watch The 2025 Oscars Online And On TV
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
17 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Gavin Newsom is having his social media moment
'Fuck around' and 'find out,' read a TikTok post, following a screenshot announcing that California is suing President Donald Trump for deploying the National Guard to the streets of Los Angeles. But the TikTok wasn't shared by a typical meme account—it came from California Governor Gavin Newsom. 'I damn near fell over when I realized this was Gov. Newsom's page,' one user commented. Since Friday, demonstrations have erupted across Los Angeles in protest of the president's immigration policies and the ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Although many of the demonstrations have remained peaceful, there have been violent incidents including authorities deploying tear gas and rubber bullets, and protestors setting Waymo vehicles ablaze throughout the city. As tensions escalated, the Trump administration deployed the National Guard and Marines—despite objections from local officials—sparking a lawsuit from the state, threats of arrest against Governor Newsom, and a surge of defiant memes. 'And remember kids, the next time anybody tells you 'the government wouldn't do that', oh yes they would,' says the popular TikTok sound used on Newsom's official account video, playing over screenshots of news headlines and images of armed forces confronting demonstrators. In another viral video from the governor's page, which amassed over 5.4 million views, Taylor Swift's 'You Need To Calm Down' plays over a series of photos of the two politicians. 'r u ok?' the post asks, with a caption reading: 'America's keyboard warrior.' Newsom's clapback drew widespread praise in the comments. 'I do disagree with Newsom a lot but him standing up to tyranny and standing with your state takes some serious guts. Hats off to you Newsom,' wrote one user. He's also taken to his personal account to deliver meme-laced messages to Trump—one featuring a photoshopped image of the president wearing a crown, captioned 'send in the troops.' The slideshow ends with a shot from the musical Hamilton, with text reading: 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes. It's time for all of us to stand up.' The online showdown has significantly boosted Newsom's social media presence, growing his personal TikTok account by approximately 397,000 followers and his official Governor account by 479,000 since Friday. Newsom is the latest in a growing number of politicians leveraging memes and social media to bypass traditional media and speak directly to the public through humor. Famously, Kamala Harris gained momentum during her presidential campaign with ' Brat summer ' and the coconut tree trend, while Joe Biden leaned into the viral ' Dark Brandon ' meme during his reelection campaign. Although meme strategies can generate enthusiasm and visibility, the 2024 election results suggest that online popularity doesn't always translate at the polls.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions
All members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced their resignation on Wednesday, releasing a statement accusing President Donald Trump's administration of political interference in the prestigious exchange program. The 12-member board alleged the Trump administration "usurped the authority of the Board" by denying Fulbright awards to "a substantial number of individuals" who were selected for the 2025-2026 academic year. The board also alleged the administration is currently "subjecting" an additional 1,200 international Fulbright recipients to "an unauthorized review process and could reject more." "We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute," the board said in its statement. MORE: State Department delivers crushing news to Fulbright scholar hopefuls in Afghanistan The board oversees the Fulbright Foreign Student Program, which offers international graduate students, young professionals and artists the opportunity to study and conduct research in the United States. The government-funded, non-partisan program -- which was established by Congress in 1942 under then-President Harry Truman's administration -- operates in more than 160 countries worldwide, providing scholarships to approximately 4,000 foreign students annually. In the joint letter on Wednesday, the board said the awards that were overridden by the administration were concentrated in biology, engineering, architecture, agriculture, crop sciences, animal sciences, biochemistry, medical sciences, music and history. MORE: State Dept. suggests Afghan Fulbright hopefuls seek other options as program stalls The board claimed it has raised "legal issues and our strong objections with" senior Trump administration officials "on multiple occasions," including in writing, but says the concerns have not been acknowledged. In a statement to statement to ABC News after the board announced its resignation, a senior State Department official called the decision "a political stunt attempting to undermine President Trump." "It's ridiculous to believe that these members would continue to have final say over the application process, especially when it comes to determining academic suitability and alignment with President Trump's Executive Orders." the official said. The board, however, said in its statement that the decision was not one "we take lightly," woth the board calling on Congress, the courts and future Fulbright Boards to "prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs." "Injecting politics and ideological mandates into the Fulbright program violates the letter and spirit of the law that Congress so wisely established nearly eight decades ago," the board concluded in its statement. Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions originally appeared on
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
Potential US-China Trade 'deal'highlights US dependence on China's rare earth minerals
President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. has reached a trade deal with China, subject to final approval by Chinese President Xi Jinping. A central component of the deal, reportedly includes expanding U.S. access to Chinese rare earth minerals, in exchange for concessions allowing more Chinese students to attend American universities and the export of sensitive products to China. Though the full details of the deal are still unfolding, the U.S. is at a disadvantage in the negotiations. Reportedly Beijing is only offering a concession that it had already offered a month ago to lift the blockade on shipments of rare earth minerals. The current deal may be a short-term solution for a much larger, long-term problem. Much attention has been given to the importance of rare earth minerals for electric vehicles, electronics, robots and wind turbines. But rare earth minerals are not just important to the global economy and energy supply. They also play a critical role in defence. Syracuse University Professor Sean McFate claimed that 'what oil was to the 20th century, rare earth minerals are to the 21st." Rare earths minerals are used in almost every form of advanced defence technology. Tanks, lasers, missiles, fighter jets, submarines, and warships all rely on rare earth minerals. Just one F-35 fighter jet uses about 900 pounds of rare earth minerals. Consisting of a group 17 metals (and ranging from heavy to light), each rare earth mineral offers distinct properties and uses. Minerals such as neodymium is a key component in missile guidance systems, such as the Tomahawk cruise missile, helping it to be more precise and manoeuvrable. Yttrium is used to coat jet engines to ensure that they don't melt mid-flight due to high temperatures. Gadolinium is crucial for sonar and radiation detection systems and radiation shielding, especially in nuclear-powered submarines. Though there is an abundance of rare earth minerals with 110 million tonnes of deposits across the world, China dominates the market, producing more than 70% of the total supply. While the US is the second largest producer generating 14% of the total, 70% of U.S. rare earth minerals imports come from China. Worldwide China maintains a near monopoly-accounting for 61% of rare earth production and 92% of their processing. China's dominance is even greater in heavy rare earth minerals—which are more critical to the production of defence equipment . It processes nearly 100% of heavy rare earth minerals. At one point Vietnam also had some capacity to process these types of minerals, but its facility was shut down in 2024 and is no longer operable. China is also the world's sole producer of samarium, a light rare earth metal that is vital for military hardware including building fighter jets, missiles, electric warfare systems, and radar and sonar applications. Samarium magnets are essential for signal generation and play an important role in navigation, target tracking and threat detection. Samarium magnets are also valued because they can tolerate high temperatures without losing their magnetic force, which is critical to withstanding the heat created by fast moving motors. Currently the U.S. is lagging far behind in production capacity—and has only has two domestic rare earth mining centers located in the state of Georgia and in Mountain Pass, California. But the U.S. hadn't always trailed China in this area. From the 1960s until the 1990s, the U.S. was the global leader in rare earth production. This all changed in 1998 when Molycorp, then the only U.S. rare earth producer, shut down its chemical processing operations after a radioactive wastewater leak. At the same time, production had already shifted to China due to low labour costs and lax environmental standards. Since then concerns over rare earth dependency have circulated in Washington for years. By 2010 policymakers were raising the alarm that the U.S. was losing its rare earth production capacity to produce minerals that are critical to national security just as China was tightening export controls. Under the Biden administration, the Department of Defence earmarked more than $439 million to build a domestic 'mine to magnet' supply chain. Additionally, in 2022, the company MP Materials was awarded a $35 million contract from the Department of Defence to build a facility that could process heavy rare earth elements in Mountain Pass. Biden also tried to issue a large contract to construct two samarium production facilities, but this plan never materialized. As part of Trump's ongoing trade war with China, Beijing strategically applied export restrictions (requiring domestic producers to apply for export licences from the Chinese government) in April on seven medium and heavy earth metals including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, which are all important to the defence industry. Trump's announcement of a deal may mean that these export restrictions on rare earth minerals have been reversed. But knowing how important these minerals are to U.S. national security, there are no guarantees that China won't rescind this offer in the future and use its rare earth dominance to push for a deal that's even more favorable to its own terms.
