logo
From drone delivery to transfusions, blood plays vital combat role

From drone delivery to transfusions, blood plays vital combat role

Yahoo20-05-2025
From transfusion training to drone deliveries and even simulated fluid, the Army is finding ways to get blood where it's needed most.
On May 15, soldiers with the 173rd Airborne Brigade's Charlie 'Lifeline' Company, 173rd Brigade Support Battalion conducted drone-based blood resupply in a full-scale hospital exercise at Pabrade Training Area, Lithuania, as part of Exercise Swift Response 2025.
'Aerial resupply of blood is pretty cool for us,' said Capt. Jessica Knoll, commander of Charlie Company. 'One big initiative we're working on is getting whole blood as far forward as possible. Having drone capability means we're not risking soldiers driving into hostile areas just to deliver blood. A drone — not to say it's expendable — but it's more expendable than a soldier's life.'
How the Army is improving care in the field to keep soldiers alive
Soldiers used a TRV-150 drone to deliver simulated blood to Role 1 field carte locations.
The exercise, which included elements from the 160th Forward Resuscitative Surgical Detachment, the 519th Field Hospital, the 68th Theater Medical Command and the 7384th Blood Detachment, bridged the gap between point of injury and higher-level medical care, according to the release. It also showed how troops can reduce risk to medics while increasing soldier survivability in austere locations.
'This is our third time working with Flying Basket to drop blood using drones,' Knoll said. 'We've tested a few methods — paratroopers jumping with blood at Saber Junction, pushing blood out of airplanes — but this drone delivery is really buying down risk. Instead of sending an entire medic crew forward, we can now send a drone with Class VIII supplies or blood.
'So far, we've flown about 3 kilometers with the drone, but it's capable of more. That's just what we've trained for now.'
And where did those blood products come from?
The Landstuhl Regional Medical Center Blood Services Program recently partnered with the 86th Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron at Ramstein Air Base to provide real and simulated blood products for the Defender Europe 25 Exercise on May 14 and 15.
Defender Europe is the largest annual Army deployment to the European Theater. An estimated 25,000 U.S., allied and partner troops, 29 allied and partner nations and 18 host nations participate in the exercise.
For the exercises, troops at the center prepared more than 1,000 real and simulated blood products for transport on U.S. Air Force aircraft to Lithuania.
A U.S. military report estimates that 15% to 20% of traumatic deaths are preventable, and 66% to 80% of those deaths occur from hemorrhage, according to the release.
'Providing both real and simulated blood products is crucial for supporting real-world contingencies and the fighting military force,' said U.S. Army Sgt. 1st Class Raymond Clark, non-commissioned officer-in-charge of the LRMC Blood Services Program. 'Real blood ensures immediate availability for transfusions during combat casualties, addressing critical needs for volume resuscitation and oxygen-carrying capacity.'
But simulated blood has its role, too.
'Simulated blood products, on the other hand, play a vital role in training and preparedness,' Clark added. 'They allow medical personnel to practice life-saving procedures in realistic scenarios without depleting limited real blood supplies. This dual approach ensures readiness, improves medical skills, and ultimately enhances the survivability of our soldiers on the battlefield.'
Not to be outdone, the skills portion of the exercise was on display in the theater as well.
On May 18, combat medics and medical personnel with the 501st Aviation Battalion, 1st Armored Division conducted point-to-point blood transfusions in Hohenfels, Germany.
Medics participating in Exercise Combined Resolve 25-2 focused training on providing blood to simulated critically injured troops in a simulated mass casualty event using a 'walking blood bank' tactic, according to the release.
'A point-to-point blood transfusion entails taking blood from one person and ensuring that it's the same blood type or something acceptable for the recipient's blood type,' said Capt. Aaron Chapman, an air medical physician assistant with the 501st Aviation Battalion, 1st Armored Division.
That's a crucial skill for what experts expect to be a daunting casualty care environment in future battles.
'In today's world, in a large-scale combat environment, we won't have the luxury of someone coming to get us when we want a MEDEVAC,' he said. 'What that means is when we have guys who are losing a lot of blood, this will help us save those who need that blood using battle buddies, peers and other people who we know are willing and able to help.'
The exercise involved taking blood from a patient and then returning it to them. This is known as autologous blood transfusion, according to the release.
'The idea is that this simulates real transfusion of blood in an emergency setting, but it significantly reduces the risks of having a blood transfusion reaction if we move blood from one patient to another patient,' said British Army Maj. Catriona Kemeny, a medical officer with the 4th Regiment, Army Air Corps.
'If we can train hard, maybe we can fight easy, so that actually when we have to do it in reality, we're already well practiced,' Kemeny said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Weight Loss Before Military Training May Cut Injury Risk
Weight Loss Before Military Training May Cut Injury Risk

Medscape

time7 days ago

  • Medscape

Weight Loss Before Military Training May Cut Injury Risk

TOPLINE: Army recruits who lost excess weight to enter military training experienced fewer musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs), particularly in the lower extremities, during basic combat training than those who did not lose weight to join the service. METHODOLOGY: The nation's obesity epidemic means that fewer individuals meet the US Army's weight and body-fat standards for entering basic combat training. Only 29% of 17- to 24-year-olds in the country would have qualified to join the military in 2018, with overweight and obesity among the leading disqualifying factors. Researchers analyzed data from 3168 Army trainees (mean age, 20.96 years; 62.34% men; mean maximum-ever BMI, 26.71) to examine the association between weight loss before enlistment and rates of MSKI during basic combat training. Trainees completed a baseline questionnaire that asked whether the person lost weight to enter the Army and included follow-up questions about the amount of weight lost, duration of weight loss, methods used, and prior physical activity. MSKIs were classified as any injury to the musculoskeletal system and further categorized by body region (lower extremities, upper extremities, spine/back, and other areas, including the torso and head/neck). Researchers identified MSKIs from medical records collected throughout basic combat training and for up to 6 weeks afterward to capture injuries that occurred during training but were documented only after its completion. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 829 trainees (26.16%) reported losing weight to enter the Army, and they tended to have higher mean maximum-ever BMI, body-fat percentage, and lean mass compared with those who did not lose weight to join the service. The mean weight loss was 9.06 kg at a rate of 1.27 kg/wk among the 723 trainees with complete data. The most commonly reported weight-loss methods were exercising more (83.72%), changing diet (61.04%), skipping meals (39.32%), and sweating using a sauna or rubber suit (25.57%). Trainees who lost weight to join the service had a lower risk of any MSKI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86) and lower extremity MSKIs (HR, 0.84) during training than those who did not lose weight to enter the Army. No difference was found between the two groups in the risk of upper extremity, spine/back, or other MSKIs. Among trainees who lost weight to join the Army, the amount of time it took to lose weight was not associated with the risk for any MSKI or region-specific MSKIs. IN PRACTICE: "The findings highlight that losing excess weight before entering military training may reduce MSKI risk for incoming recruits, enforcing the benefits of healthy weight loss programs," the authors wrote. SOURCE: The study, led by Vy T. Nguyen, MS, DSc, Military Performance Division, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, was published online in Obesity. LIMITATIONS: The study did not assess whether the association between weight loss and the rate of MSKIs persisted over long-term military service. How the two most frequently reported weight loss methods — increased exercise and dietary changes — may have influenced the observed association remains unclear. Medical records may not have captured all MSKIs if trainees did not seek medical care due to concerns about graduating on time or being placed on limited duty. DISCLOSURES: The study was supported by the US Army Medical Research and Development Command's Military Operational Medicine Program. Two authors received support from the funder. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Are you hot, fit and tan? Get ready for liberals to label you a MAGA fanatic.
Are you hot, fit and tan? Get ready for liberals to label you a MAGA fanatic.

USA Today

time05-08-2025

  • USA Today

Are you hot, fit and tan? Get ready for liberals to label you a MAGA fanatic.

Since President Donald Trump's return to the White House, I've noticed a steady stream of rhetoric that attempts to make health and fitness partisan. It's the heart of summer, and the days are long and toasty. Beaches on the coasts (or Lake Michigan, closer to where I live) are packed and clothing is minimal. Some people look good showing extra skin. Most of them don't. The reality is that more than 70% of Americans are overweight or obese, and the trend has been moving rapidly in the wrong direction, leading to a plethora of preventable health problems and costs associated with them. It's concerning, and the effort to combat obesity should be something we can all agree on. Sadly, it's not. Since President Donald Trump's return to the White House, I've noticed a steady stream of rhetoric that attempts to make health and fitness partisan. If you're fit and enjoy working out (or even sport a tan), chances are there's a progressive who will eye you with suspicion of being MAGA. Sydney Sweeney's jeans ad triggers liberals. She looks good. They don't. | Opinion It's an extreme example of the 'if-Trump-is-for-it, we-must-be-adamantly-against-it' mentality that has infected the left. To borrow a phrase from former Democratic vice presidential contender Tim Walz, it's weird. Trump wants kids to be more fit. Why is that a negative? Trump brought physical fitness into the limelight on July 31 by signing an executive order reestablishing the Presidential Fitness Test for America's public school students. The test had been around for decades until the 2012-13 school year, when President Barack Obama replaced it. The order states: 'We must address the threat to the vitality and longevity of our country that is posed by America's declining health and physical fitness. For far too long, the physical and mental health of the American people has been neglected.' The rise in obesity and the decline in health is especially disheartening when it comes to the country's kids. According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2024 report, about 20% of children are obese (2 in 5 adults are obese). That's a sharp increase from when childhood obesity rates were 5% in the 1970s. Not only is this a national health concern, it's a national security one, as Trump acknowledges in his executive order. The CDC report found that only 2 in 5 young adults are weight-eligible and active enough to serve in the military. 'The military has experienced increasing difficulty in recruiting soldiers as a result of physical inactivity, obesity, and malnutrition among our nation's youth,' retired Army Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling said in the report. Yet, Trump's commonsense approach to boost fitness was met with consternation among media progressives. 'Trump is reviving an outdated and problematic practice for American schoolkids,' proclaimed MSNBC. 'Generations of Americans who struggled to complete a pull-up in front of their classmates winced as President Trump announced that he was reinstating the annual assessment,' The New York Times opined. Opinion: Trump is racking up GOP wins no one else could. What do Never Trumpers say now? Doing Pilates does not make you an authoritarian. Nor does having a tan. Leftists also have thoughts about fitness for adults and what it says about conservatism. Earlier this year, fitness influencer MaryBeth Monaco-Vavrik posted a video that went viral connecting the 'popularization of Pilates & running instead of strength training … and the rise of extreme American authoritarianism.' She also equated conservatism with 'smaller bodies.' Leno's right: Colbert got canned because Americans are tired of left's lectures | Opinion Men, on the other hand, must avoid looking too manly and the trap of toxic masculinity and the "manosphere," which liberals tell us have flourished under Trump. For instance, actor Sacha Baron Cohen's appearance on the August cover of Men's Fitness UK sparked criticism over his newly chiseled body. One headline said his physique 'is repellent to most women.' (It must be because I'm a conservative woman, but I found Baron Cohen's new look the opposite of repellent.) In 2024, a columnist in The Guardian warned, 'There is a dark side to wellness, which I always, for shorthand, thought of as political: getting fit makes you more rightwing.' And now, enjoying sunshine and getting a tan could mark you as a MAGA fanatic. After all, Trump and his health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., sport a perennial bronze shade. As The Atlantic recently observed: 'Tanning is back. Only this time, it's not just about looking good − it's about embracing an entire ideology.' I'd wager the vast majority of people who are fit and spend time outdoors do so because they know it's beneficial for their health and simply enjoy it. It has nothing to do with Trump or how they vote. Progressives trying to demonize fitness to "get back" at Trump are hurting themselves − and the next generations of Americans. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X: @Ingrid_Jacques

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store