IFGICT Grants Esteemed Fellowship to Kautilya Prasad
Dr Kayyali Mohamed the president of IFGICT mentioned that ' Kautilya Prasad's Fellowship is a testament to his profound expertise in building cutting-edge digital experiences, where he masterfully intertwines artificial intelligence (AI), digital experience, and data analytics to design solutions that consistently elevate customer experiences' . His work not only showcases technical brilliance but also a deep understanding of how technology can genuinely impact business outcomes and user satisfaction.
Kautilya Prasad's career is a compelling narrative of continuous innovation and significant contributions to the digital realm. His journey has been marked by a relentless pursuit of excellence and a dedication to pushing the boundaries of what's possible in digital experience platforms.
At the core of Kautilya Prasad's impact lies his ability to leverage advanced technologies like AI and data analytics to craft truly transformative digital experiences. He possesses a unique foresight in identifying how these powerful tools can be harnessed to deliver personalized, intuitive, and highly effective customer journeys. From optimizing e-commerce platforms to streamlining complex digital processes, Prasad's solutions are designed with the end-user in mind, ensuring seamless interactions and measurable business growth. His focus on data-driven insights ensures that every digital initiative is not just aesthetically pleasing but also strategically sound and performance-optimized.
Beyond his project work, Kautilya Prasad is a highly respected thought leader who actively shapes the discourse on emerging technologies. His influence extends through various channels, making him a pivotal figure in the digital experience community.
Prasad's exceptional contributions have not gone unnoticed. He is a multiple recipient of the prestigious Most Valuable Professional (MVP) award for his outstanding impact on the digital experience industry, particularly within the Sitecore ecosystem. This consistent recognition underscores his deep technical knowledge, his commitment to sharing insights, and his ability to inspire others. His frequent engagements as a speaker at prominent industry events, including the renowned Sitecore Symposium, further highlight his status as a go-to expert. At these forums, he shares invaluable insights on critical topics such as customer experience, e-commerce strategies, and the transformative role of AI in digital transformation, offering practical takeaways from his real-world project experiences.
As a Fellow of the British Computer Society, Kautilya Prasad has been instrumental in developing pioneering solutions that have significantly benefited the industry. A prime example is the widely adopted InsitePlusSitecore connector, a testament to his ability to create practical and impactful tools. This solution has streamlined integration between commerce systems and digital experience platforms, simplifying complex processes for businesses and developers alike. His technical leadership and architectural innovations consistently deliver tangible business results, earning him widespread acclaim and respect within the Sitecore community and beyond.
Kautilya Prasad's influence extends to shaping industry best practices, particularly in the critical areas of composable architecture and martech innovation. He understands that the future of digital experience lies in flexible, scalable, and integrated systems.
In an increasingly complex digital landscape, Kautilya Prasad IFGICT champions the adoption of composable architecture. This modular approach allows businesses to build highly adaptable and future-proof digital platforms, enabling them to respond swiftly to evolving market demands and customer expectations. His work emphasizes the strategic alignment of business objectives with technical strategies, ensuring that technology investments yield maximum returns. By advocating for composable principles, Prasad helps organizations build robust foundations that support operational scalability and sustainable digital transformation.
Kautilya Prasad IFGICT's expertise also extends to martech innovation, where he focuses on how marketing technology can be leveraged to create unparalleled customer experiences. He understands that the right martech stack, integrated intelligently and powered by AI, can unlock new levels of personalization and engagement. His vision for digital transformation is holistic, considering not just the technical infrastructure but also the strategic deployment of tools that empower marketers and enhance customer journeys.
The IFGICT Fellowship is the highest honor bestowed by the International Federation of Global & Green ICT, recognizing individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to the field of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). This prestigious acknowledgment for Kautilya Prasad signifies his profound impact on the industry, his pioneering spirit, and his ongoing commitment to advancing ICT for the betterment of society.
This fellowship grants Kautilya Prasad IFGICT permanent access to an elite global network of ICT leaders, fostering unparalleled opportunities for collaboration and knowledge sharing. It further amplifies his voice as a thought leader, providing a platform to influence global ICT policies and practices.
In an era defined by rapid technological evolution, Kautilya Prasad stands out as a true visionary. His IFGICT Fellowship is not just an award; it's a recognition of his enduring legacy and his continued dedication to shaping a more digitally connected and intelligent future. His work continues to inspire and empower organizations to navigate the complexities of digital transformation, proving that with the right expertise and vision, the possibilities for cutting-edge digital experiences are limitless.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
As tech CEOs predict AI will replace humans in just 5 years, this Fortune 500 boss says taking the focus off real people is a ‘recipe for failure'
As tech giants lay off thousands of workers to make way for AI, the CEO of the $8 billion food company Ingredion says real people are still the most important ingredient for a successful business. Not having a human-centred approach is a 'recipe for failure,' says the Fortune 500 boomer boss James Zallie. AI is already leaving its mark on corporate America, with tech layoffs hitting 75,000 this year alone as companies prepare for the technology to rival humans in just five years time. While this may fuel dreams of a two-day workweek—or fear an AI-fueled apocalypse—James Zallie, CEO of Fortune 500 food ingredient company Ingredion, has a clear answer: People—and culture—still come first. 'If you take your eye off either the customer or the employee and you get very internally focused, it's a recipe for failure,' said Zallie in an appearance on the Inside the Ice House podcast, hosted by the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange. And while Zallie's $8.7 billion company has embraced technology like AI in part to predict supply chain issues, refine recipe formulations, and keep up with regulations—letting anything distract from people and culture could backfire, the baby boomer said. 'I think in society today that if you don't have a strong culture, your business will suffer. And if you don't focus on people, you will also,' Zallie added. 'People will see through whether you're really living your values and whether you have a care for people in general.' At a time when some companies like Meta and Target have rolled back DEI initiatives, Ingredion still includes 'Everybody Belongs' as one of its five core values. And while serving as CEO is the dream job title for most business leaders, Zallie said in reality, he more so sees his job as a chief clarity officer of sorts—the messenger of what the company is doing—and why. 'We in positions of leadership and management have a responsibility and accountability to (employees) to continuously try to figure out on their behalf how they can have fulfilled careers, be motivated,' he said. 'I look at my job as CEO as chief clarity officer.' Fortune reached out to Zallie for further comment. While Ingredion has made it clear that people are their priority, other companies are rather confident they can do more with less people. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy recently said that his $2 trillion company would be shedding members of its corporate workforce thanks to generative AI's enhanced capabilities. 'We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs. It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company,' Jassy wrote in an internal memo last month. Microsoft has already put some of this into action by laying off 15,000 employees this year alone. And while the company cited the changes as a means to 'best position the company and teams for success in a dynamic marketplace,' the cuts hint at prioritization of automation. Last year, AI saved the company $500 million in its call center alone, reports Bloomberg. And while some CEOs like Salesforce's Marc Benioff and Google's Sundar Pichai have increasingly touted AI automation as somewhat of a flex, its replacement of workers has left many, such as software engineers, feeling helpless. Instead of using layoffs as a means to create a more leaner operation, GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke said the wiser move is to double down on talent. 'The companies that are the smartest are going to hire more developers,' Dohmke said to The Silicon Valley Girl Podcast late last month. 'Because if you 10x a single developer, then 10 developers can do 100x,' he said. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
The Babble Effect: When Style Gets Promoted Over Substance
Can height shape how we see leadership? Psychologists call it the 'height premium" or the 'style advantage' —and it's more than a quirk of perception. Research from the University of Florida found that each additional inch of height corresponds to an average $789 boost in annual earnings. Malcolm Gladwell also opined on this phenomenon in his book Blink: In the U.S. population, about 14.5% of all men are six feet or over. Among CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, that number is 58%. We unconsciously equate height with authority, strength, even intelligence—a leftover bias from evolutionary psychology. Tallness signals dominance, and dominance gets confused with leadership. It's not rational. But it's real. And it shows up not just in paychecks, but in who we trust to take charge. But height isn't the only signal that gets misread as strength. The way someone speaks—how often, how confidently, how loudly—can tilt perception too. Take the Babble Effect. A recent study led by research scientist Neil G. MacLaren helped renew attention to a long-observed but underexamined pattern: people who speak more in group settings are more likely to be seen as leaders, regardless of what they say. MacLaren and a team of researchers found consistent evidence that people attribute leadership to those who 'babbled' or talked more frequently. The study also found that men received an additional vote on average just because of their gender. I recently spoke with MacLaren to understand the context behind the study. His responses emphasized that this is still an emerging area of research but one with real implications for how organizations identify and grow leaders. In my own research, coaching and succession work, I've seen how performative behaviors like constant speaking often get rewarded—not because they're valuable, but because they're visible. That disconnect shows up across leadership selection, promotion processes and even team dynamics. Performative Leadership Isn't Always A Choice There's a common critique of performative leadership. But the truth is more complicated. Most leaders don't begin that way. They become performative because they've learned what earns attention. What gets rewarded gets repeated. Speak more, get more. Be seen, move up. Babble becomes audition. A way of signaling, 'I belong here.' It isn't always ego. Sometimes it's survival. A perception gap only deepens the problem. While 68% of board directors believe their succession plans are equitable and inclusive, just 38% of C-suite leaders and 33% of next-generation leaders agree, according to a Russell Reynolds study. In the absence of clear merit signals, high-potential leaders often reach for the next best tool—visibility. Even if that means stepping into a version of themselves that feels unnatural. Not to impress, but to stay in the running. And when polish is mistaken for readiness, when confidence is confused for competence, we begin to lose the plot. Noise gets misread as value. And the leadership pipeline fills with those who learned how to perform, not necessarily how to lead. The Real Cost Of Mistaking Volume for Vision In many organizations, presence still substitutes for performance. The first person to speak is seen as decisive. The most vocal shapes the discussion. The smoothest communicator becomes the natural pick for the next stretch role. But that pattern carries a cost. Leaders with strategic patience are misread as passive. People who elevate others don't always dominate the room. And those who think deeply often go unnoticed. Gallup's recent research on neurodivergent employees adds to the picture. Many bring rare strengths like ideation, strategic thinking and pattern recognition. But in systems that reward verbal fluency and fast thinking, they are often overlooked. We end up reinforcing a narrow definition of what leadership looks like—and miss out on the very people who see around edges. Maclaren noted that the Babble Effect tends to show up most strongly in unstructured environments without formal hierarchies. That doesn't mean it vanishes in more formal organizations—it may just look different. So far, there's little research on how it plays out in succession or promotion decisions, but the potential impact is clear. As he put it, 'There hasn't been much research that's tried to go beyond the babble observation.' That gap in evidence doesn't make the pattern less real. It just means most organizations haven't yet asked the right questions. What we label as leadership often reflects what we see first, not what drives the best outcomes. Man yelling into bullhorn Three Shifts To Build Leadership Cultures That Listen Charisma isn't a competency. Yet too often, it becomes the shortcut for advancement. Structured evaluation helps leadership teams assess potential based on contribution, not just presence. Too often, leadership potential is assessed by gut feel, surface-level impressions, or informal 360s that rely on perception. Candidates who 'appear confident,' 'speak boldly,' or 'stand out' may be favored, even if their actual impact is uneven or untested. That is not evaluation—it's projection. And it's one of the fastest ways to miss real capability. This is where objective assessments matter. Tools that evaluate judgment, strengths, and problem solving—without being filtered through charisma—can change the conversation. These tools don't eliminate bias, but they reduce the weight of first impressions. When used alongside structured observation, they create a fuller picture of leadership readiness. We also need to recalibrate what counts as evidence. Instead of defaulting to polish or airtime, ask: Who made others better? Who clarified thinking? Who improved the outcome? If thoughtful contributors are passed over for louder voices, we're not just missing talent. We're reinforcing a model of leadership that fails under real complexity. In succession planning, track who gets nominated—and who never does. Bias doesn't just shape final decisions. It influences who gets seen, supported, and stretched in the first place. Leadership move: Insist on objective, validated measures of talent—tools that assess how people think, not just how they talk. Reimagine talent reviews as structured data conversations, not loose discussions based on perceived readiness. Ask, 'Where is the evidence of contribution?' not just, 'Who feels ready?' Not everyone leads with volume. Some lead through clarity, systems thinking, or reflection. These are the leaders who stabilize progress long after the spotlight moves on. I've coached high-potential leaders who consistently elevate team performance but rarely get noticed because they don't fit the traditional mold. Gallup's research on neurodivergence reinforces this. Many bring powerful cognitive strengths that remain invisible in cultures obsessed with ease of expression. MacLaren noted that introverts are especially susceptible to being misread in these environments. Talkativeness is often equated with extroversion, and extroversion with leadership. He also raised a useful question: Do people speak more when the conversation plays to their strengths? That kind of nuance rarely shows up in performance reviews, but it should. Leadership move: Rotate facilitation. Normalize written input. Create space for insight that doesn't compete for airtime. Redesign team rituals so that introverted, deep-thinking contributors shape outcomes just as much as fluent speakers do. Talent development isn't just about giving feedback. It's about creating access. Many leaders don't self-promote—not because they lack ambition, but because the system asks them to perform a version of leadership that doesn't reflect who they are. As MacLaren pointed out, even raters are vulnerable to the Babble Effect. That's why he recommends more holistic evaluations. Pair leaderless group exercises with structured assessments. Reduce the role of personality-driven impressions wherever possible. Leadership visibility should not depend on who interrupts best or commands a room. It should reflect who delivers value and helps others succeed. If we don't challenge the idea that influence equals volume, we'll keep recycling the same traits in our talent pipelines. Leadership move: Ask in your next one-on-one, 'What part of your thinking does this organization need more of?' Then make that thinking visible. Influence starts by being seen for what matters. Amplifying The Voices We Don't Hear Leadership today doesn't suffer from a lack of ideas. It suffers from a lack of listening. The best insight might not come from the first voice. The most thoughtful contribution may not be the smoothest. The next great leader may not match the voice you've been trained to follow. Loud is easy to reward. But wisdom often speaks more quietly. And if leadership systems reward what's visible over what's valuable, we will keep cycling through the same kinds of risk, the same kinds of mistakes, and the same kinds of leaders. What if the next big idea wasn't in a polished pitch? What if it was scribbled in the margins by someone who wasn't invited to the room? What we choose to notice becomes what we scale. And what we overlook is often where the future quietly lives. Where substance matters more than style.
American Military News
3 days ago
- American Military News
North Korean workers infiltrated US companies in major fraud scheme
President Donald Trump's Justice Department has confirmed that the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea infiltrated over 100 U.S. companies in a major fraud scheme to fund the North Korean government by having remote information technology workers employed in Fortune 500 and other U.S. companies. Last Monday, the Justice Department issued a press release announcing 'coordinated actions against the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea (DPRK) government's schemes to fund its regime through remote information technology (IT) work for U.S. companies.' The Justice Department noted that the coordinated actions included an arrest, two indictments, an information and related plea agreement, searches of 29 'laptop farms' in 16 states, and the seizure of 21 fraudulent websites and 29 financial accounts used to launder illegal funds. 'According to court documents, the schemes involve North Korean individuals fraudulently obtaining employment with U.S. companies as remote IT workers, using stolen and fake identities,' the Justice Department stated. 'The North Korean actors were assisted by individuals in the United States, China, United Arab Emirates, and Taiwan, and successfully obtained employment with more than 100 U.S. companies.' READ MORE: Videos: 'We're coming after you': top Trump official says amid DOGE audit of gov't fraud According to the Justice Department, U.S.-based individuals contributed to one of the schemes by establishing fraudulent websites and front companies to 'promote the bona fides of the remote IT workers and hosted laptop farms' that allowed North Korean workers to remotely access laptop computers in the United States. The North Korean workers were then provided with salary payments and given access to 'sensitive employer information,' including U.S. military technology and virtual currency. The Justice Department said that North Korean workers also used false identities to gain access to and steal over $900,000 in virtual currency from a blockchain research and development company in Atlanta, Georgia. 'These schemes target and steal from U.S. companies and are designed to evade sanctions and fund the North Korean regime's illicit programs, including its weapons programs,' Assistant Attorney General John A. Eisenberg of the Justice Department's National Security Division said. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Counterintelligence Division Assistant Director Roman Rozhavsky warned that while North Korea continues to try to fund its weapons programs by 'defrauding U.S. companies and exploiting American victims of identity theft' to 'funnel hundreds of millions of dollars' the North Korean government, the FBI is 'equally intent on disrupting this massive campaign and bringing its perpetrators to justice.'
