iPad Pro M5 LEAKS: New HUGE OLED Screen (and more!)
Matt Talks Tech gives us more details about the new iPad Pro M5.
Watch this video on YouTube. What's New: Larger OLED Displays
The M5 iPad Pro is rumored to feature slightly larger OLED displays, measuring 11.5 inches and 13.5 inches. These screens are designed to offer sharper visuals, improved color accuracy, and enhanced energy efficiency, setting a new standard for display quality in tablets.
Key display improvements include: Thinner bezels, resulting in a sleeker and more modern design.
A higher screen-to-body ratio for a more immersive viewing experience.
Advanced edge detection technology to minimize accidental touches.
These enhancements are tailored to provide a smoother, more intuitive user experience, particularly for activities such as streaming media, graphic design, and gaming. The larger displays also cater to professionals who require more screen real estate for multitasking and productivity. Performance Boost with the M5 Chip
At the heart of the M5 iPad Pro lies the new M5 chip, a technological leap forward in processing power and efficiency. Featuring a 10-core CPU and a 12-core GPU, this chipset is engineered to handle demanding tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and intensive gaming with ease.
Notable benefits of the M5 chip include: Faster processing speeds, allowing seamless multitasking and handling of complex workflows.
Enhanced graphics capabilities, making it ideal for professionals and creatives.
Improved energy efficiency, potentially extending battery life despite the increased power output.
This combination of power and efficiency positions the M5 iPad Pro as a versatile tool for both casual users and professionals, offering a balance of performance and practicality. Dual Face ID Cameras: A Versatile Upgrade
One of the standout features of the M5 iPad Pro is the inclusion of dual Face ID cameras, designed to function seamlessly in both portrait and landscape orientations. This addresses a common limitation in previous models, significantly enhancing usability.
Key advantages of dual Face ID cameras include: Improved convenience for unlocking and authentication, regardless of how the device is held.
A more consistent and reliable experience during video calls and virtual meetings.
Optimized integration with iPadOS 26, making sure smooth and efficient performance.
This upgrade is particularly beneficial for users who rely on their iPads for communication, collaboration, and productivity, offering a more versatile and user-friendly experience. iPadOS 26: Unlocking New Potential
The M5 iPad Pro will debut alongside iPadOS 26, an operating system designed to fully harness the device's advanced hardware. This software is expected to introduce a range of features that enhance productivity and streamline workflows.
Key features of iPadOS 26 include: Advanced multitasking tools, allowing users to manage multiple apps and tasks more efficiently.
AI-driven enhancements, allowing smarter and more intuitive workflows.
Optimized app performance, making sure a seamless and responsive user experience.
These updates aim to make the M5 iPad Pro a powerful tool for professionals, creatives, and everyday users, unlocking new possibilities for how tablets are used in both personal and professional contexts. Release Date and Pricing
Apple is expected to unveil the M5 iPad Pro in October or November 2025, with availability shortly thereafter. Pricing is projected to remain consistent with current models, making the device accessible to a broad audience: The 11.5-inch version is expected to start at $999.
The 13.5-inch version is expected to start at $1,300.
While these prices are competitive, external factors such as tariffs or supply chain fluctuations could influence the final pricing closer to the release date. Market Impact and Broader Implications
The M5 iPad Pro's advancements are likely to have a significant impact on both Apple's product ecosystem and the broader tablet market. The M5 chip, for instance, could find its way into other Apple devices, such as the Vision Pro, further enhancing the company's hardware lineup.
Additionally, the innovative features of the M5 iPad Pro may push competitors to accelerate their own advancements, intensifying competition in the high-end tablet market. This could lead to a wave of innovation across the industry, ultimately benefiting consumers by driving technological progress and expanding the range of available options.
The M5 iPad Pro represents a bold step forward in tablet technology, combining larger OLED displays, a powerful new chip, and versatile camera features to deliver an unparalleled user experience. With its release on the horizon, this device is poised to set new benchmarks in performance, design, and functionality, reinforcing Apple's leadership in the tablet market.
Gain further expertise in M5 iPad Pro by checking out these recommendations.
Source & Image Credit: Matt Talks Tech Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPad, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Why Donald Trump's tariffs take aim at Asia and your iPhones
When he began his trade war, President Donald Trump said his goal was to bring American jobs and manufacturing back to the US, reduce trade deficits and create a more level playing field for American companies competing globally. But after months of negotiations and many countries' refusal to meet America's demands, his strategy has taken a more punitive companies have been here before. Under Trump's first administration, when he imposed tariffs on Chinese exports, they scrambled to limit their exposure to Beijing, with many shifting production to Vietnam, Thailand and India to avoid higher levies. But his battery of new tariffs does not spare any of these economies. Stocks saw a sell-off, with benchmark indexes in Taiwan and South Korea in the red on Friday. Both countries are central to Asia's sprawling electronics production. The details are still hazy, but US firms from Apple to Nvidia will likely be paying more for their supply chains - they source critical components from several Asian countries and assemble devices in the they are on the hook - for iPhones, chips, batteries, and scores of other tiny components that power modern lives. It's not good news for Asian economies that have grown and become richer because of exports and foreign investment - from Japanese cars to South Korean electronics to Taiwanese chips. Soaring demand for all these goods fuelled trade surpluses with Washington over the years - and has driven President Trump's charge that Asian manufacturing has been taking American jobs away. In May, Trump told Apple CEO Tim Cook: "We put up with all the plants you built in China for years... we are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves." Apple earns roughly half its revenue by selling iPhones that are manufactured in China, Vietnam and India. The tech giant reported bumper earnings for the three months to June, hours before Trump's tariff announcement on Thursday night, but now the future looks more executive Tim Cook told analysts on a conference call that tariffs had already cost Apple $800m (£600m) in the previous quarter, and may add $1.1bn in costs to the next quarter. Tech companies typically plan years ahead, but Trump's unpredictable tariff policy has paralysed businesses. Amazon's online marketplace, for instance, is just as dependent on China for what it sells in the US. But it's not yet clear what rates Chinese imports into the US could face because Beijing has yet to strike a deal with Washington - it has until 12 August to do so. Before they agreed to de-escalate, the two sides imposed tit-for-tat tariffs that reached a staggering 145% on some goods. But it's no longer just about China. On Thursday, Mr Cook said that most iPhones sold in the US now come from India. But Trump has just levelled a 25% tariff on Indian imports, after Delhi was unable to clinch a deal in time. Other firms chose to re-route their goods bound for the US through Vietnam and Thailand after the tariffs in Trump's first term. It became so common that it was called the "China+1" strategy. But this time, these trans-shipped goods are also being targeted. In fact, trans-shipping has been a big part of the US negotiations with Asian countries. Vietnamese imports face a 20% US levy but trans-shipped goods face 40%, according to Trump. It's harder still for advanced manufacturing like semiconductors - more than half of the world's chips, and most of its advanced ones, come from Taiwan. It is now subject to a 20% tariff. Chips are the backbone of Taiwan's economy, but also central to US efforts to gain a technological lead over China. So it is another US company, Nvidia, that will pay steep levies to put advanced chips by Taiwan's TSMC inside its AI products. But perhaps the biggest casualty of Trump's tariffs could well be Asia's e-commerce giants - as well as the American companies that rely on Chinese sellers and marketplaces. In a surprise move this week, Trump ditched the "de minimis" rule which exempted parcels under $800 from customs duties. He first did this in May, targeting such parcels from China and Hong Kong - and this was a blow for retailers like Shein and Temu, whose huge success has come from online sales in the West. Now American sites like eBay and Etsy have also lost that exemption - and the price of second-hand, vintage and handmade items for US customers will go up. President Trump says he is batting for Americans with these tariffs, but in a deeply globalised world, US firms and customers could also become casualties. There is still so much uncertainty that it is hard to see who the winners really are.
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Tesla found partly to blame for fatal Autopilot crash
A jury in Florida has found Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash in which a Model S sedan using self-driving software killed a pedestrian and severely injured had argued the assistance software, called Autopilot, should have alerted the driver and activated the brakes before the had maintained the driver, George McGee, was at fault and called the verdict "wrong" in a statement to the BBC, while vowing to appeal. The result means the company will have to pay as much as $243m (£189) in punitive and compensatory verdicts marks a setback for Tesla and CEO Elon Musk, who has touted self-driving technology as critical to the company's future. Shares of Tesla dipped following the news and was nearly 2% lower when US markets the verdict, plaintiff's attorneys said Mr Musk had misrepresented the capabilities of the company's Autopilot driver assistance software."Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," said attorney Brett Schreiber in a statement to the BBC. Mr Schreiber said Tesla and Mr Musk had long propped up the company's valuation with "self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.""Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology," he added. The company was sued by the family of Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, who was killed when she was struck by the Model S at a T-intersection in Florida Keys in 2019. Her boyfriend Dillon Angulo suffered life-long injuries and was also involved in the court heard the driver, George McGee, lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone as he was approaching the intersection, causing his car to continue through it and crash into an SUV parked on the other side. The two victims were standing Mr McGee, nor the Autopilot software, hit the brakes in time to prevent the crash. After a three-week trial, the jury awarded $329m in total damages, including $129m in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages aimed at deterring Tesla from harmful behaviour in the will be responsible for paying one-third of compensatory damages - $42.5m - and the entirety of the $200m in punitive damages, but according to the company, punitive damages are likely to be capped at a lesser amount."Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," Tesla said in a said evidence at the trial showed the driver was solely at fault because he was speeding with his foot on the accelerator, which overrode Autopilot, while looking for his phone and not at the road."To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash," Tesla said. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility."While there have been other federal lawsuits involving Autopilot during fatal crashes, Tesla has settled prior year, it settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X collided with a highway barrier while operating the company's Autopilot Florida case which culminated on Friday was the first to go to a trial, Mr McGee said his concept of Tesla's Autopilot was that "it would assist me should I have a failure" or "make a mistake," and that he felt the software had failed McGee has settled a separate lawsuit with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed has long faced scrutiny over its Autopilot and self-driving technology, and critics hailed the jury's decision."Tesla is finally being held accountable for its defective designs and grossly negligent engineering practices," said Missy Cummings, a robotics professor at George Mason verdict comes as Tesla is battling weakening sales stemming in part from Mr Musk's political activities. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Tesla must pay $329 million for a deadly crash involving Autopilot, jury says
A Miami jury has ordered Elon Musk's car manufacturer, Tesla, to pay $329 million to victims of a fatal crash involving its Autopilot driver-assist technology. The ruling, delivered on Friday, could open the door to further costly lawsuits and deals a significant blow to the company's reputation for safety. The federal jury found Tesla bore substantial responsibility, citing a failure in its technology. This determination means that not all blame could be attributed to the reckless driver, who admitted being distracted by his mobile phone before hitting a young couple who were stargazing. The conclusion of this four-year case is remarkable, not just for its outcome, but because it even reached trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have previously been dismissed or settled by the company to avoid public scrutiny. This decision comes as Mr Musk seeks to convince the public of his vehicles' safety, particularly as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. Mr Musk's Tesla company doesn't have the permits required to run any autonomous service, even with a safety driver, and they're unable to charge for it. Tesla has been in discussions with Golden State regulators about expanding the service to California but it would be with significant restrictions to Elon Musk's promises for his Robotaxi service, Politico reported. at least five times since the start of last year, documents reviewed by the outlet show.
