Institute researchers find links between exposure to Carcinogens and aromatics released from gasoline
In a review of existing scientific literature, researchers identified links between exposure to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) aromatics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from fossil fuels and breast cancer risk in humans.
Breast cancer rates continue to rise, especially in young women. Years of scientific research has shown breast cancer risk which runs in families is often caused by germline mutations — mutations in parental cells that are passed down to offspring. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are two of the most commonly known genetic mutations linked to inherited breast cancer risk.
At the same time, more than 80% of breast cancers develop sporadically without any inherited mutations — and causes for these breast cancers have remained unknown. Several risk factors have been identified, such as timing of puberty onset and menopause, age at first pregnancy, diet and lifetime exposure to estrogens. However, these factors do not cause breast cancer, but alter vulnerability to environmental carcinogens that then can cause breast cancer.
The Biofuels Research Project researchers have studied the carcinogenic (cancer-causing) effects of compounds originating from burning fossil fuels.
In their newly published review of existing scientific literature, researchers identify exposure to PAHs from fossil fuels as key mutagens (compounds that can lead to DNA mutations) causing breast cancer in humans.
Among their key findings:
—Exposure to BTEX aromatics in fossil fuels may add to the adverse effects of PAH exposure.
—Exposure to BTEX compounds early in life, including in utero, may increase susceptibility to PAH-initiated breast cancer.
—Early life exposure to BTEX compounds may increase later breast cancer risk by silencing DNA repair mechanisms, increasing the number of targets in the breast that are known to be the sites where breast cancers are initiated (terminal lobular ductal units or TLDUs), and causing persistent gut dysbiosis (imbalance of healthy and harmful gut bacteria) which in turn impairs immune responses in the tumor microenvironment, preventing effector CD8+ T cells from killing cancer cells.
"It is essential to reduce exposure to the products from burning fossil fuels to prevent breast cancer. We are studying if reducing BTEX exposure will reduce susceptibility to PAH induced breast cancer. One way to reduce BTEX compounds is to reduce exposure by adding ethanol to gasoline," Hilakivi-Clarke said.
The Hormel Institute researchers Theresa Jolejole, PhD candidate; Joas Lucas da Silva, PhD, post-doctoral associate; and Fabia de Oliveira Andrade, PhD, senior scientist, are among the authors of the paper.
The research project is supported by 15 different ethanol and biofuels funding agencies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Forest Lake Endodontics Welcomes Endodontist Dr. Linda Liu to the Practice
FOREST LAKE, Minn., Aug. 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Forest Lake Endodontics in Forest Lake, Minnesota, announced today that endodontist Dr. Linda Liu has joined its team, bringing advanced training in root canal treatment and a strong commitment to patient-centered care. Dr. Liu earned her Bachelor of Science in Microbiology with a minor in Mathematics from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. She went on to obtain her Doctor of Dental Surgery degree and complete a General Practice Residency at the University of Toledo. Dr. Liu then specialized in Endodontics at the University of Minnesota, where she also earned her Master's degree. Residing in Blaine with her husband, Philip, an anesthesiology resident at the University of Minnesota, and their goldendoodle, Dr. Liu looks forward to serving patients in the greater Forest Lake community. Outside of her professional life, she enjoys playing the piano, pickleball, traveling to new destinations, and exploring local restaurants. Forest Lake Endodontics has served the Twin Cities metro area for 6 years, specializing in root canal therapy and other advanced endodontic treatments in a welcoming environment. The practice partners closely with referring dentists to provide patients with seamless, high-quality care. "I am honored to join the talented team at Forest Lake Endodontics," said Dr. Liu. "It is incredibly rewarding to relieve patients' discomfort and preserve their natural teeth. I look forward to contributing my skills and working alongside my colleagues to deliver the highest level of care." Forest Lake Endodontics provides the following services: Root canal treatment. Root canal retreatment. Endodontic surgery (apicoectomy). Emergency dental care for traumatic injuries. Advanced diagnostics for tooth pain. External root resorption repairs. About Forest Lake Endodontics Forest Lake Endodontics specializes in advanced endodontic treatments designed to save natural teeth and restore oral health. The practice combines cutting-edge technology with a patient-first philosophy to deliver exceptional results. For more information, visit or contact Forest Lake Endodontics, 1420 Lake Street S., Suite 200a, Forest Lake, MN 55025, 651-464-9888. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Forest Lake Endodontics Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
5 days ago
- Business Insider
I had a double mastectomy at 26. I struggled with my new body and people's insensitive 'boob job' jokes.
Two days before my 26th birthday, cancer was the furthest thing from my mind until a phone call from my sister changed everything. At 31, and just three weeks postpartum, she had been diagnosed with stage 3C breast cancer. Genetic testing revealed she carried the BRCA1 mutation, which gives women up to an 87% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. I got tested next, and I had the mutation too. Suddenly, I saw my breasts as a ticking time bomb. The choice I never thought I'd have to make I had two options: monitor closely with regular screenings and hope for early detection, or have a preventive double mastectomy. It felt like no real choice at all, and the decision wasn't easy. I'd always imagined breastfeeding my future children. I wasn't even close to starting a family. After meeting with surgeons, I opted for the mastectomy with implant reconstruction using cadaver skin. It had the shortest recovery time, but it was still a massive surgery. I was overwhelmed by the options and the gravity of what I was about to do. The comments I received didn't help. Some asked, "How big are you going to go?" It felt invasive and disheartening, as if people were more focused on my aesthetics than the life-saving reason behind the surgery and how scared I was for it. My operation took eight hours and left me with diagonal scars across each "mound," as my surgeon called them. I chose to remove my nipples, too; they're made of breast tissue, and I didn't want to leave any cancer risk behind. The physical aftermath was brutal. My pectoral muscles were cut and repositioned; I couldn't even hold my phone. I had to use my chin to pump soap. I had expanders placed to slowly stretch my skin for nine months before getting implants. Each saline injection was painful, sometimes causing intense spasms that sent me back to the hospital. Public reaction was strange The expanders were disfiguring, hard as rocks, and nothing like real breasts. Even though people knew I was having a mastectomy, many tried to lighten the mood with jokes comparing it to a " boob job." Their comments weren't malicious, just painfully unaware of the difference between elective enhancement procedures and a medically necessary, painful amputation and reconstruction. I felt minimized, misunderstood — like my experience was trivialized. Then, there was a seemingly insignificant interaction that changed everything for me. A self-conscious woman at the pool bravely and nervously asked if my breasts were real. For once, someone couldn't tell I was "different." I smiled and told her the truth. She looked relieved and thanked me for being so open. That moment sparked something in me. Perhaps being more proactively transparent could help others feel seen as well. I continued sharing my experience I had already been sharing my journey on Facebook, but I continued to open up, both online and offline, about the good, the bad, and the painful. I talked about genetic testing, reconstruction setbacks, and how awkward people can be when they don't know what to say. I often would joke about how you could bounce a quarter off my expanders ("but please don't because it hurts!"). The more I shared, the more comfortable I became in my new body. I found strength in the scars, humor in the awkwardness, and connection in the vulnerability. One day, a former college roommate reached out. After following my posts, she inquired about her family history and underwent testing. She and two other women in her family were positive for a similar mutation. My story helped her. When I first looked at my post-op body, I felt disconnected, disgusted, and self-conscious. Now, despite bright scars, numb patches, and misshapen "mounds," I'm overcome with gratitude when I see myself. My risk for breast cancer isn't zero, but it's significantly reduced. And every day I get to rock and sing with my two kids at night, something I hope to do for a long time.
National Geographic
5 days ago
- National Geographic
Invasive ticks have scientists spooked about new diseases
Over 100 new tick species have entered the U.S. in the last 50 years. Scientists say it's just the beginning. Two Asian longhorned ticks sit on an open palm. On the left is an adult female, and on the right is a nymph. The longhorned tick is from East Asia, but since entering the U.S., has introduced a diseases dangerous to cattle. Photograph by Lauren Bishop/CDC / Science Source Between 2019 and 2023, seven ticks not native to the United States entered Connecticut, according to a new study published in the journal iScience. They came from a variety of countries as far away as Germany, Guatemala, Tanzania, Brazil, Scotland, and Poland. While the study didn't find evidence of these invasive ticks bringing new diseases to the U.S., experts say they could one day soon. Meanwhile, the study does suggest they could drive a rise in tick-related diseases already seen in the U.S., as they found these ticks can carry pathogens similar to those carried by native ticks. Two invasive tick species from Central America tested positive for a bacteria similar to Rocky Mountain spotted fever, a disease that can cause fever, vomiting, muscle pain, and even death if untreated. It's part of an alarming trend: cases of tick-borne disease in the U.S. jumped from about 23,000 in 2004 to around 71,000 cases in 2022. 'Prior to 2018, here in the northeastern U.S… we didn't have cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. But since 2018, we are seeing a number of up to ten cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in [Connecticut]. And we have had mortalities as a result,' says Yale University epidemiologist Goudarz Molaei, co-author of the new study. Experts say identifying all the ways ticks can spread and carry diseases is critical to reducing the number of people who become seriously ill after being bitten. Their spread is a concern—during the last 50 years, over 140 non-native tick species have been brought into the U.S., hitching a ride on livestock, exotic pets, or people. At the same time, climate change has expanded the habitat ticks can live in. If more invasive ticks establish U.S. populations, 'it is just a matter of time that these invasive ticks will either pick up local pathogens or native pathogens that circulate in the U.S., or they start carrying the pathogens that they transmit in their native range,' says Molaei. How ticks spread diseases Ticks pick up diseases after biting animal hosts like deer. They can then transmit disease to humans by biting us. The U.S. is home to around 50 native tick species that bite people. Those bites can result in illnesses such as Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and Rocky Mountain spotted fever. (Learn more about how a warming climate is helping ticks reach new places.) A crowdsourced and laboratory-validated tick map shows some species moving northward in recent years. 'We are seeing the increasing prevalence of pathogens in new counties, in new areas, that we never saw in 2019,' says Saravanan Thangamani, SUNY Upstate Medical University microbiologist whose research team created the tick map. Molaei hypothesizes that not all these reported cases are 'true' Rocky Mountain spotted fever, but instead a similar illness caused by the closely related bacterium R. amblyommatis—the same species the invasive ticks in the study are carrying. 'We have evidence that this bacterium is being carried by not only these invasive ticks coming from South and Central America, [but] some local ticks,' says Molaei. The most successful invasive tick to enter the U.S. is the Asian longhorned tick, a relatively recent arrival that was first documented feeding on a sheep in New Jersey in 2017. Native to East Asia and now found in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific Islands, this tick has since spread to at least 21 U.S. states and Washington D.C. and carries pathogens responsible for various diseases that native U.S. ticks carry. But a tick testing positive for a pathogen doesn't necessarily mean it's capable of transmitting that pathogen to humans, says Molaei. 'Investigations are ongoing to find out exactly to what extent [the Asian longhorned tick] bites humans, and what disease agents this tick will transmit,' says Molaei. 'Some of the early fears [about longhorned ticks] have not seemed to come to be realized,' Bryon Backenson, director of the Bureau of Communicable Disease Control at the New York State Department of Health. He adds that disease spread depends on ticks finding the right host and conditions: 'Finding a pathogen in the tick is different from whether or not the tick can actually transmit it.' New diseases in animals, but not humans (yet) 'To my knowledge there has not been a human clinical case acquired in the U.S. from an introduced tick,' says Risa Pesapane, Ohio State University disease ecologist. However, the longhorned tick did bring a non-native parasite called Theileria orientalis that can cause bovine theileriosis in cattle, says Pesapane, now widespread and dangerous for livestock health. And invasive ticks that arrived in Florida through the reptile pet trade now feed on native reptiles, adds Pesapane. And climate change is predicted to create a hospitable environment for some warm-weather ticks that may not have been able to survive in a U.S. climate before, allowing tick populations to move farther north. 'One degree is a lot for [ticks]. One degree allows them to move way further north than they would otherwise,' says Backenson. Climate change also means shorter winters, so both ticks and humans are active for more of the year. 'We are seeing longer seasons where more ticks are active… and this generally means there are more days of the year where people are out wearing shorts and sandals and potentially encountering ticks,' says Pesapane. One dangerous virus Thangamani points to is tick-borne encephalitis, which ticks carry in Europe and Asia and can be fatal. Although very few cases have been reported in travelers returning to the U.S., Thangamani claims if those ticks and pathogens were to establish themselves in the U.S., it would be a major threat to human health. 'Ticks are very resilient,' says Thangamani, adding that after feeding, a female tick can lay thousands of eggs. 'All you need is one tick to establish a population in an area.' Preventing tick-borne disease While it's unclear how risky invasive tick species are, it is something scientists are monitoring, says Hannah Tiffin, entomologist at the University of Kentucky. 'It's something that we could do a better job with,' Tiffin says, suggesting better coordination among public health officials and scientists to identify ticks and pathogens before they spread. Thangamani recommends using the tick map to see where you might be most at risk of getting a tick bite. His research team is also encouraging health care providers to refer to the map, so doctors can take it into account when treating patients with tick bites. (Ticks are taking over city parks. Here's how to avoid them.) Travelers should let their doctors know of recent travel if receiving treatment for a tick bite, since some invasive and native ticks look similar, says Tiffin; without knowing a patient's recent travel history, it's easy to visually misidentify a tick species. If hiking near home or abroad, wear protective clothes, use insect repellent, and stay away from tick-infested areas. Before returning to the U.S., Thangamani recommends travelers diligently check their bodies, clothes, and luggage. He adds: 'It is very easy to introduce a new species without us knowing it's happening.'
