EU probes TikTok again over data transfers to China
The Data Protection Commission opened the inquiry as a follow-up to a previous investigation that ended earlier this year with a 530 million euro ($620 million) fine after it found the video sharing app put users at risk of spying by allowing remote access their data from China.
The Irish national watchdog serves as TikTok 's lead data privacy regulator in the 27-nation EU because the company's European headquarters is based in Dublin.
During an earlier investigation, TikTok initially told the regulator it didn't store European user data in China, and that data was only accessed remotely by staff in China. However, it later backtracked and said that some data had in fact been stored on Chinese servers. The watchdog responded at the time by saying it would consider further regulatory action.
'As a result of that consideration, the DPC has now decided to open this new inquiry into TikTok,' the watchdog said.
'The purpose of the inquiry is to determine whether TikTok has complied with its relevant obligations under the GDPR in the context of the transfers now at issue, including the lawfulness of the transfers,' the regulator said, referring to the European Union's strict privacy rules, known as the General Data Protection Regulation.
TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance, has been under scrutiny in Europe over how it handles personal user information amid concerns from Western officials that it poses a security risk.
TikTok noted that it was the one that notified the Data Protection Commission, after it embarked on a data localization project called Project Clover that involved building three data centers in Europe to ease security concerns.
'Our teams proactively discovered this issue through the comprehensive monitoring TikTok implemented under Project Clover,' the company said in a statement. 'We promptly deleted this minimal amount of data from the servers and informed the DPC. Our proactive report to the DPC underscores our commitment to transparency and data security.'
Under GDPR, European user data can only be transferred outside of the bloc if there are safeguards in place to ensure the same level of protection. Only 15 countries or territories are deemed to have the same data privacy standard as the EU, but China is not one of them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
28 minutes ago
- Politico
Even the Obit Writers Are Jumping Ship at The Washington Post
The obituary exits are part of a broader exodus of top talent from the Post, ranging from columnist Jonathan Capehart to pioneering sports blogger Dan Steinberg and Tik Tok trailblazer Dave Jorgenson . The departures are particularly pronounced in the opinion section, where Bezos earlier this year declared that the publication would henceforth only publish items in support of free markets and civil liberties. In the media business, the buyout has led to something of a feeding frenzy , with numerous staffers taking the money and then swinging to outlets like The Athletic and The Atlantic. One veteran Post editor told me about getting a call at 9:30 in the evening from a New York Times recruiter asking about a couple of potential hires from the Post. The editor remarked that the recruiter was working rather late, and the recruiter said that the Times higher-ups had them working double shifts in the name of settling on who to poach before the end-of-July deadline. Beyond the familiar media-in-crisis storyline, there's something particularly poignant about the hollowing out of the obituary staff. Reporters or (ahem!) columnists might be let go; the work of digging up scoops or making arguments continues. It's not clear whether the same can be said for the work of writing unflinchingly about deceased notables. In dropping obits — or just limiting them to only the best-known people — an organization abandons something that used to be a basic element of being the paper of record. 'Obits are one of the three or four most essential elements in creating what Bezos calls the daily habit ' of news consumption, said Marc Fisher, a longtime Metro columnist who took a previous Post buyout (and today continues to write on a contract for the opinion section). As a business proposition, it's a conundrum. The Post pulled back on smaller-time obituaries in part because they got so little attention online. A few decades ago, the standard for inclusion was simply having lived in Washington for 20 years. Yet many paying subscribers — the readers a media company covets more than random online visitors — are fiercely devoted to obits, reading them first. Like coverage of high school football or hometown socialites, they're also a way for a publication to make itself central to its community. In the Washington of the second Trump era, that community is already feeling unprecedented disruption that has nothing to do with media staffing decisions. The tumult wrought by the mass federal firings and agency closures has upended the elites who used to count on getting written up once they die. In the current context, not earning a Washington Post obituary may be the least of their problems. Yet it adds to the general sense of withering institutions and evaporating hierarchies. 'They are not only a place to memorialize people who had what I call good Washington lives, but also a place where people who are interested in good Washington lives go to learn, to see how they got their start or how they got into government,' said Tevi Troy, a longtime conservative policy hand who frequently posts links to Post obituaries on social media. 'You work in one of these jobs, like undersecretary or something, and you're a big deal in one administration, maybe. But you're not, like, Schwarzenegger famous. And then you're out. But when you die, you get written up because it mattered how you got there and what you did. I often read one and think, 'I wish I could have read this before he died.''
New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
As U.S. Retreats on Climate, China and Europe Pledge to Go Green Together
Two of the world's three big climate polluters, China and the European Union, pledged on Thursday to work together to slow down planetary heating. Together they called the Paris Agreement, the pact among nations to address global warming, 'the cornerstone of international climate cooperation.' They didn't mention the United States by name, but they didn't have to. America, the third member of the trio of top global climate polluters, has said that it will pull out of the Paris Agreement, and the Trump administration has rolled back policies and government-funded programs that were intended to spur the development of renewable energy in the United States. The joint statement opened by saying, 'in the fluid and turbulent international situation today, it is crucial that all countries, notably the major economies, maintain policy continuity and stability and step up efforts to address climate change.' China and the European Union most certainly don't agree on everything when it comes to tackling rising emissions. European officials have in the past been vocal in criticizing China's widespread use of coal: China burns more coal than any country ever has. European officials have also criticized what they call China's dumping of inexpensive electric vehicles on the global market. And China has criticized the European Union's new border tax based on greenhouse-gas emissions, which makes it costlier to sell Chinese products there, particularly steel. Beijing and Brussels also have major differences on geopolitics, including the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But China has staked out an ambitious long-term policy of dominating the sale of clean-energy technologies to the world including solar panels, wind turbines, next-generation batteries and electric vehicles. What makes the joint pledge significant is that it represents an attempt to smooth the tensions over the trade of these products, particularly the export of Chinese EVs to Europe. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Epoch Times
28 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
TikTok Faces US Ban Unless China Hands Over Control, Lutnick Says
The commerce secretary warned that China must relinquish control of TikTok or the app would face a U.S. shutdown. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has warned that TikTok will be shut off for U.S. users unless China grants Washington greater control over the platform. 'We've made the decision. You can't have Chinese control and have something on 100 million American phones,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street' on July 24.
