Nationals in close battle for safe Labor seat after string of victories
While the Liberals have been left counting their losses after a landslide defeat, one party has enjoyed a string of success, with a safe Labor seat currently within reach.
The National Party, along with the Queensland-based Liberal National Party, have secured 24 of the 150 seats in the House of Representatives as of Wednesday morning.
The National Party alone have secured nine lower house seats, losing just one – Calare in NSW – to Independent Andrew Gee, who quit the Nationals in late 2022.
But they could soon be gaining another.
Nationals candidate Andrew Lethlean is in a close contest to nab the Victorian seat of Bendigo from Labor's Lisa Chesters.
Labor has held the seat since 1998, with Ms Chesters heading into this year's election with a margin of 11.2 per cent.
But as of Wednesday morning, Ms Chesters leads with a slim 50.16 per cent of votes, with Mr Lethlean battling it out with 49.84 per cent. Over 85 per cent of votes have so far been counted.
A Nationals' victory for Bendigo would represent an over 10 per cent swing towards the party.
The Nationals have not confirmed how much money they have thrown at Mr Leathen's campaign but Ms Chesters has claimed he had access to a $1 million pot, the ABC reports.
During the campaign, Mr Lethlean came under scrutiny after it was reported a bar he owned sold alcohol while its licence was suspended. The licence has since been paid and reinstated.
Mr Lethlean said the suspension was the result of an 'administrative oversight' and said the annual licence fee was paid as soon as the issue was identified.
Push for more ministries
As of Wednesday morning, the Coalition has secured 40 seats in the lower house, while Labor has 88.
Nationals MP Michael McCormack told the ABC his party would be calling for more shadow ministries because the Nationals made up a larger percentage of the Coalition.
'It's worked out on a per capita basis with how many seats you hold as part of a joint number in the Coalition,' Mr McCormack said
As the Liberals come to term with their losses, the Riverina MP, who retained his seat with a 3.3 per cent swing, advised Liberals to keep their grievances to their party room.
'Anonymous Liberal people who so often background and brief journalists in Canberra, shut your bloody mouths,' he said.
'Don't share it with the rest of the world and if you do share it with the rest of the world, have the courage and conviction to put your name to it.'
Call for Coalition gender quotas
There is set to be a record number of women in Australia's parliament than ever before following Saturday's election. However minimal will be from within the Coalition.
In the House of Representative, Labor has increased its female representation to 47 MPs out of a confirmed 87, meaning the number of female MPs outnumbers male MPs (40).
New faces set to enter parliament this year include Barton's Ash Ambihaipahar, who retained the seat of former Indigenous minister Linda Burney for Labor, Claire Clutterham, who flipped the Adelaide seat of Sturt, and Ali France, who defeated Liberal leader Peter Dutton in Dickson.
Meanwhile, the Coalition has seven female MPs out 39, a decrease from its 2022 result of nine.
The drop in numbers is largely due to the election losses of former Hughes MP Jenny Ware and Bass MP Bridget Archer, and the retirements of McPherson MP Karen Andrews and Forrest MP Nola Marino.
Following the results, Liberal senator Maria Kovacic is calling for the Coalition to implement gender quotas – which the party has long resisted – to ensure more women are elected to parliament.
'We don't have as many women as we have men, and people want us to have more women representing our party in the parliament,' she told ABC Radio on Tuesday.
'We need to move back to the centre. It is very, very clear that the Australian public, the voting public, were not happy with the way that we were conducting ourselves as a potential government.'
However, Shadow Minister for Indigenous Australians Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has rejected the calls for quotas, labelling it a 'knee jerk reaction to the outcome of the election'.
'We have to make sure that we are reaching women for their support and putting forth an argument to demonstrate to them what we're going to do to improve their lives and a future for their children, but I don't believe we need to introduce quotas,' the Northern Territory Senator told Sky News.
'I would hate to think that I ever got to my position on the fact that I'm a woman or anything else for that matter, but what I do think we need to do is preselecting people with very strong values and we need to get out there and push harder and stronger.'
Counting continues on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
High school ‘Tradwife' debate topic divides
A hot button topic put forward for Year 9 students to discuss during a statewide debate competition has caused a stir online. Debating SA, a non-profit organisation that runs debating competitions in South Australia, revealed its latest topics ahead of next week's debates. However, it was the topic for round three — 'The 'Trad Wife' movement is good for women' — that has raised eyebrows and sparked fierce discussion. The 'Trad Wife' movement has been popularised by the likes of influencer Hannah Neeleman, also known as Ballerina Farm, who has more than 10 million followers on Instagram, and Nara Smith, a US-based model and influencer with nearly 5 million followers. The movement is often rooted in 'traditional' values, based on the idea of a woman looking after the home and children while the woman's husband goes off to work and earn money. Typically, it is associated with conservative values where the woman is seen as submissive, however defenders say those who follow it, do so as a matter of personal choice. Debating SA's topic choice left many questioning whether it was appropriate for Year 9 students to research and discuss, let alone be aware of the phrase 'Trad Wife'. 'Personally I think being able to debate around a topic even one that is clearly terrible is still an important skill,' one social media user said. 'But the point of contention is that tradwife stuff promotes not only staying at home, but actual straight up misogyny. And it would always be controversial to debate 'is it okay to hate women?'.' Another said: 'This is a huge misstep by the debating orgs (and I'm saying this as a former high school debater and coach).' 'Sounds like those who champion 'critical thinking, cultural nous and debate' to set this topic have NFI of the current cultural implications of the 'tradwife' movement online, especially its direct pipeline to white supremacy and misogyny,' another added. But others argued there was no real issue. 'I thought one of the points of debating was arguing for a side you don't necessarily agree with. My son recently was involved with a school debate where the topic was 'Is the current climate change man made?'. I don't see a trad wife debate being much different,' one parent wrote. Another weighed in: 'Honestly, if the goal is to teach kids how to think critically about the content they're bombarded with online, this isn't the worst topic to explore. 'The tradwife movement is something they'll run into on TikTok or YouTube eventually, so better to unpack it in a guided, moderated classroom than leave them to figure it out through algorithm-fed echo chambers. Context and intent matter. If this was framed as a critical discussion — not an endorsement — then it's literally education doing its job.' Following the outrage, Debating SA sent a clarification to schools, saying that students 'must look critically at sources'. 'It goes without saying that any websites that denigrate women (or any person) are not a good source of information and are not relevant to the topic,' the clarification, which also appeared on its website, said. 'To avoid any confusion about the topic, the following definitions for the purpose of the debate apply: 'Tradwife is a portmanteau for 'traditional wife', a woman who embraces traditional gender roles, primarily focusing on home making and family care, while her husband is the primary breadwinner. This can include cooking, cleaning, child-rearing, and maintaining the home. 'This term is intended to be synonymous with the idea of a stay at home parent.' 'The tradwife movement is therefore a group of people who support a lifestyle such as the above. Note that this does not include any concept of 'submission' as some sources may define. 'Good for women generally refers to something that has a positive impact on women's lives and wellbeing. Note specifically that the definition does not infer 'all women'.' In a further email provided to Sonja Lowen, the chairman of Debating SA, said: 'The positive response to the topic and our organisation [has] been well expressed by a number of people in the mainstream media. 'The negative response from some of the public has been very illuminating in the way in which they chose to express not only their views. but also the idea that there can be no debate about this subject. It seems that thinking about a subject that they don't agree with has become a radical act. Shutting down discussion is not a good idea and is the antithesis of a free society.' Ms Lowen said it made her realise debate provides a regulated forum for students to be able to present a case in a measured way, 'something some of the public would do well to emulate'. 'We expect our debaters to present their case with evidence and reasoning. It is very necessary for young people to be able to develop the skills to navigate their way in what is now a very complicated social landscape and those skills are perfected and refined by debating,' she said. 'Debating is an intellectual and academic discipline that allows the participants to examine both sides of a topic regardless of their own personal beliefs. This ability to explore both sides makes us tolerant of other views. Thinking is hard work and we should not surrender our intellectual independence because a topic may be difficult or in this case deemed unacceptable by some of the public.' But some were not satisfied with the reasoning from Debating SA. 'This isn't moderated in class discussion, it's a discussion topic for a Debating Competition, and the organisers have said that they used trad-wife as a synonym for 'stay at home parent',' one said. 'Honestly, their excuse sounds pretty pathetic – trad-wife is not a synonym for stay at home parent, it's a controversial social movement with significant connections to right-wing politics and influencers.' Another added: 'They're engaged enough to know the term, but not the context. 'Tradwife' is absolutely not a synonym for 'stay at home parent'. They've gone awry from the outset.' 'The issue is them conflating SAHM with Trad Wife. Trad wife is a social movement. They are vastly not the same thing. And the Trad Wife may not necessarily have children,' another said.
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark discusses Australia's national defence future. 'Obviously, the Australian government has a three-pronged attack on this,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'There are a variety of steps that each company must do to each of those elements, if you're a supplier that is different to being a company that wishes to be a builder, as such. 'I would suggest quite heavily that Australian companies are investing in infrastructure, skills, capabilities.'
News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Trump AUKUS review: Expert urges Australian defence companies not to get ahead of themselves
Defence industry Specialist Brent Clark says it is not unusual for governments to do reviews of defence partnerships. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's upcoming review of the AUKUS security partnership. 'Quite clearly, Australian companies would be concerned about the review; however, I think it is important to not let ourselves get ahead of where we are right now,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'It is not an unusual event for governments to do reviews. 'I would think that the Trump administration would be remiss if they actually weren't doing the review into AUKUS.'
