5 lethal weapons that helped Israel carry out attacks and hit important targets in Iranian cities like Tehran Isfahan, Shiraz, and..., weapons are...
Tensions between Israel and Iran grew much worse after June 13, 2025, when Israel started a major military attack called 'Operation Rising Lion.' This attack showed just how strong and advanced Israel's military really is. Israel hit Iran's nuclear plants, army bases, and even top leaders. More than 400 people died in these attacks. Iran tried to fight back with missiles and drones, but its response was weak. Now, let's look at five such weapons that helped Israel carry out these attacks and hit important targets in cities like Tehran. 1. F-35I 'Adir' Stealth Fighter Jet
One of Israel's strongest weapons is the F-35I Adir jet. It is a stealth jet, which means it can fly without being seen on enemy radar. Some key features: It can fly 2,200 kilometers without needing to refuel.
It can go up to Mach 1.6 speed (that's 1.6 times the speed of sound).
It can carry up to 8,160 kg of bombs and missiles.
It uses smart Israeli bombs called Spice precision-guided bombs.
During the operation, more than 200 F-35I jets attacked over 100 important targets in Iran, including the Natanz and Fordow nuclear plants. Because of its stealth, Iran's air defense systems could not detect them.
The jets were able to destroy underground buildings, military command rooms, and other key sites in Iran. Thanks to the F-35I's advanced technology, Israel gained full air control over Tehran, attacking major targets without much risk to its own forces.
Israel also used some very smart and powerful weapons in its attack on Iran. Two of these were the GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) and the Jericho-3 ballistic missile. 2. GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bomb (SDB)
This is a very smart bomb that weighs around 250 pounds. Even though it is small in size, it is very powerful and can hit targets up to 110 kilometers away. It uses GPS and internal navigation to reach its target with great accuracy. One amazing thing about this bomb is that it can break through up to 3 feet of reinforced concrete. Because it is small, fighter jets like the F-16 and F-35 can carry many of these bombs at once.
During the attacks in June 2025, these bombs were used to hit: Missile launchers
Nuclear research centers
Command centers 3. Jericho-3 Ballistic Missile
The Jericho-3 is a long-range missile made by Israel. It can travel between 4,800 to 6,500 kilometers, and carry a payload of up to 1,300 kilograms. This missile can be loaded with normal or even nuclear warheads (Israel is believed to have around 90 nuclear weapons).
It uses a guidance system to find its way to the target and may also have GPS help.
Although it's not clear if this missile was used in the June 2025 attack, its long range makes it possible to hit Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz, and other major Iranian cities. 4. Spike Anti-Tank Missiles
These are special missiles made to hit targets even when they are not directly in front (called Non-Line-of-Sight or NLOS). They can strike from as far as 30 kilometers away and use infrared and electro-optical technology to find and lock on to their targets.
Spike missiles can be launched from vehicles, helicopters, or even drones, and they are powerful enough to destroy armored targets like tanks or bunkers.
In the June 2025 strikes, these missiles were used to kill top Iranian military leaders, including: IRGC Commander Hossein Salami, Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri, 9 nuclear scientists 5. Heron TP Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles)
The Heron TP is a large and powerful Israeli drone. It has a wingspan of 26 meters, ability to fly at 45,000 feet and more than 30 hours of flight time.
This drone can carry up to 1,000 kg of equipment like cameras, sensors, and even missiles (like the Israeli-made 'Ankor' missiles).
In the attack on Iran, Heron TP drones were used to: Watch Iran's skies closely and send back real-time data
Help F-35I fighter jets by giving them important information during the strikes
Destroy mobile missile launchers
Keep pressure on Iran by flying near important cities like Tehran
Israel even set up a drone base near Tehran, which gave them an edge in the battle. Why Iran's Defense Failed 1. Old and Outdated Defense Systems
Iran still depends on older missile defense systems like: The Russian S-300
Iran's homemade Bavar-373
Old Soviet-era equipment
These systems couldn't detect or stop Israel's stealth aircraft (like the F-35I) or small smart bombs like the GBU-39/B.
Israel even destroyed four S-300 systems, including one near Natanz (a key nuclear site). 2. Weak Short-Range Missiles
Iran's short-range air defense missiles were not enough to stop high-speed or long-range Israeli attacks. Because of this, Israel was able to control the airspace over Tehran, allowing them to attack key locations like the Ministry of Defense and nuclear sites without much resistance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
17 minutes ago
- Hans India
79 and soaring: India's unfinished triumph
New Delhi: On August 15 this year, India marks 79 years of independence -- an occasion that is as much about the promise ahead as the struggle behind. From the ashes of 1947's partitioned, impoverished land, India has emerged as the world's largest democracy, a cultural powerhouse, and a fast-growing economic giant, making bold moves both at the national and the global level. Whether it is the economy, social sector, infrastructure, and development, or in the defence sector, India is making bold moves, gaining huge applause from the global level as well. From Scarcity to Scale In 1947, India's 340 million people faced widespread poverty, a literacy rate below 20 per cent, and a life expectancy of just 32 years. Yet, the founding vision of leaders like Nehru and Patel -- anchored in democracy, self-reliance, and unity -- set the stage for transformation. Today, with a population exceeding 1.4 billion, literacy approaches 78 per cent, life expectancy has more than doubled, and GDP has surged to $3.9 trillion, making India the fourth-largest economy, according to an article by the India Narrative. Economic and Social Shifts The 1991 reforms under Dr Manmohan Singh opened the economy to globalization, sparking decades of growth. From the Green Revolution to the IT boom, India has diversified into a leader in tech, pharmaceuticals, and digital services. Multi-dimensional poverty has dropped below 15 per cent, and the country boasts over 100 unicorn startups. Education has expanded from 20 universities to over 1,100, while healthcare drives like Ayushman Bharat have brought insurance to millions. Women have led space missions, governed states, and brought home Olympic medals, even as the fight against inequality continues. Innovation, Infrastructure, and Influence India's scientific leap is epitomized by ISRO's Chandrayaan-3 and Mars missions. UPI now powers over 12 billion digital transactions a month, and Aadhaar enables targeted service delivery. Connectivity has exploded -- from vast expressways to over 150 airports -- and Indian Railways is rapidly electrifying. Strategically, India is a nuclear power with the world's fourth-largest military, a leading voice in G20, BRICS, and QUAD, and a global cultural force -- from Bollywood to yoga. The Path to 2047 As the centenary of independence nears, India's ambitions sharpen: inclusive growth, universal healthcare and education, climate leadership, and deeper democratic pluralism, the article says.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
India talked big on Russia-Ukraine mediation. Alaska meet offers a window
On Friday, Trump is set to meet Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. This is no random coffee shop—during the Cold War, it was the 'top cover for North America', guarding against Soviet bombers. Today, it still houses F-22 Raptors, the stealthiest fighters in the world, that routinely intercept Russian jets sniffing around US airspace. At first glance, these two threads—Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska and India's hopes—feel out of sync. But the riddle begins to unravel if you follow the breadcrumb trail of strategic ego, economic carrots, political grudges, and converging interests. Donald Trump is at it again. The man who claimed he could end the Ukraine war 'in 24 hours' is about to once again try his hand at what has become the bloodiest conflict in Europe since WW2. Curiously, India is watching this with cautious optimism, and Prime Minister Modi has even spoken with President Zelenskyy on the phone. In anticipation of the Alaska meeting, European leaders are scrambling to have a phone call with Trump, cautioning him of all the things that could go wrong with hurried decisions. The amount of international speculation the meeting has garnered is understandable. This is Trump and Putin's first in-person encounter since Osaka 2019, and Trump's first as the re-elected US president. The announcement was dropped—in classic Trump style—just before the 8 August deadline for putting fresh sanctions on Russia for failing to stop the war. Instead of pulling the sanctions trigger, Trump decided to invite Putin for a chat in the Arctic. India's déjà vu If you're in New Delhi, you've seen this movie before—and it wasn't exactly a box office hit. Smug with Trump's cosying up to Putin in the early weeks of taking office, India was ill-prepared for the US president's re-pivot to Europe. Trump's latest swings on Russia policy have had collateral damage for India. Punitive tariffs have been slapped on Indian goods, a hard-negotiated trade deal stands iced, and a 25-year strategic partnership has been suddenly made to look inconsequential. The not-so-secret spoiler here is also the Modi government's misreading of Donald Trump on events after Operation Sindoor. The cold shoulder toward Modi and punitive tariffs aren't solely about India buying Russian oil. These US actions are more about Modi refusing to publicly acknowledge Trump for facilitating the 'ceasefire' between India and Pakistan—something Trump has bragged about dozens of times while India has repeatedly and unnecessarily denied. The US' sudden reduction of a self-assured India to a strategic expendable has gone down bitterly in New Delhi. This time, though, it is keeping its powder dry. Any US-Russia dialogue is welcome and conducive to Indian interests, but the memory, impact, and shock of recent disappointments linger. That said, pragmatism calls for keeping our cards open. The calculation is simple—if Trump warms up to Putin, India might get short-term relief (having the punitive tariffs lifted) and long-term diplomatic flexibility—engaging both Russia and the West without alienating either. The catch? India has talked a big game about playing peacemaker and mediator, but hasn't shown much appetite or capacity for actual, even limited, mediation. It has facilitated no prisoner swaps, no ceasefire preparatory talks—nothing on the level of what the Emiratis, Saudis, or Turks have done. The truth is, India's leverage in ending the war is rather limited. More disappointingly, it has not even lived up to its widely respected 'humanitarian actor' reputation in the war. Part of the problem is that India hasn't capitalised on its 2023 'moment'—hosting the G-20 and basking in global attention. Instead of pushing hard for investment, reforming defence procurement, and capitalising on 'China + 1' diversification, India got distracted. Now, with Trump and Putin set to meet again, India is reclaiming its mediator role. However, a little scrutiny will tell us that nothing decisive can be expected from Alaska. Also read: Trump is swinging on Russia again. What this means for Europe's security architecture Roadblocks in Alaska Even with Trump's flair for theatrics, three big roadblocks remain: 1. Land swap paradox: Trump's team has repeatedly mentioned land swap—the question is, how? Ukraine doesn't hold Russian territory; Russia only partially holds some annexed Ukrainian regions. Putin wants all four annexed territories without more fighting, and Ukraine refuses to gift land that it is still defending. Does Trump mean to ask Russia to give its own land to Ukraine? Or does he mean to ask Russia to give back some of the land taken from Ukraine? Either seems a rather outlandish proposition. The strategy, therefore, has a fundamental paradox to resolve. 2. Battlefield dynamics: The war in Ukraine began in 2014 with Russia's annexation of Crimea and the gaining of de facto control over the Donbass region. In 2022, Moscow escalated to a full-scale invasion, seeking to seize more territory and formally declaring four Ukrainian regions—Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson—as part of Russia. Of these, Donetsk and Luhansk were part of the earlier occupied Donbass, while Zaporozhzhia and Kherson were new claims. However, after 11 years of grinding conflict, Russia fully controls only Luhansk. Roughly a quarter each of Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia remains under Ukrainian control, with fierce fighting ongoing. Despite expectations of major breakthroughs, battlefield dynamics have stayed relatively static, and Russia's summer offensive has underperformed. Notably, following Trump's announcement of planned talks with Putin in Alaska, Russian forces have intensified operations, attempting to seize as many villages as possible before potential negotiations. Yet Russian gains average at about 20 per cent of Ukrainian territory. Putin's strategy hinges on presenting a simplified battlefield dynamic to Trump, which will not hold in reality. 3. Diffused power differential: Who holds the cards to end the Ukraine war? Trump may hold immense power, but the US cannot singlehandedly end the conflict. Russia, for all its reputed military might, has failed to secure victory on the battlefield, while Ukraine—despite its resilience and courage—remains unable to reclaim its lost territories through force alone. However, in its fourth year of war, Ukraine boasts one of the world's most advanced drone warfare capabilities despite war fatigue and apparent fissures in Zelesnkyy's popularity. Then there is Europe. Unable to play a decisive role initially, Europe's unprecedented transformation to ramp up its defence spending despite fragile solidarity and resilience to stay united behind Ukraine has been surprising. While the UK and France have maintained consistent strategic positions, Germany's rearmament and Poland's resurgence have been pivotal. As Trump took office, Poland, as EU Council chair, championed security and defence as core priorities—driving a difficult but essential enabler toward military modernisation. Chancellor Merz's constitutional changes, boosting Germany's defence spending, complemented Poland's leadership in steering structural reforms for a good six months within a traditionally geo-economic EU. They reshaped Europe's strategic focus toward security preparedness, and in the process, accorded the EU undeniable agency as a bloc. Today, it is Europe that provides more support to Ukraine, not the US. Even the American weapons for Ukraine are purchased by Europe. Therefore, Europe and Ukraine's agencies are crucial. There is credible evidence to show that if the Alaska talks are steered bilaterally between the US and Russia, the diffused power differential among key stakeholders will foil the outcomes before they even start taking effect. Also read: Asim Munir wants to be guardian of the Middle East. He's fated to fail at home The Trump carrot Promising to give Ukraine some due, Trump is dangling eye-popping offers to Russia. The list includes mineral access in Russian-occupied Ukraine, lifting sanctions on the aviation sector, and even letting Russia develop Arctic resources in the Bering Strait—an area holding an estimated 13 per cent of the world's oil. For a man who once almost convinced the world about taking Greenland militarily, this is counterintuitive. The US has carefully guarded its Arctic dominance for decades; handing any of that to Moscow would be a seismic policy shift—that is, if Trump means it. If, against all odds, Alaska produces even a partial step toward peace, India could quietly position itself yet again for a role in Ukraine's reconstruction—bridging American, European, Russian, and Ukrainian interests. Is it a risk-averse approach? Yes. Is it aspirational? Also yes. Where Trump is involved, anything is possible—from a headline-grabbing 'deal' announced beamingly on Truth Social to a total flop, with fighting resuming. The most probable scenario, however, would be a ceasefire immediately and then steps toward discussing the quid pro quo on territories and guarantees. India should keep hedging to avoid the fate of being collateral damage in someone else's great-power drama. But as Alaska looms, one thing is clear: the real battlefield is as much about leverage, resilience, and perception as it is about territory and capabilities. On that front, the safest strategy for India is to translate its potential into leverage. And that is no easy feat. Swasti Rao is a Consulting Editor (International and Strategic Affairs) at ThePrint. She tweets @swasrao. Views are personal. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Himachal CM inaugurates first-ever ‘zero waste' tribal festival in Keylong
Himachal Pradesh chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu virtually inaugurated the tribal festival at Keylong in Lahaul-Spiti district from Shimla on Thursday. Himachal chief minster Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu planting a sapling on Thursday. (HT Photo) The festival, which will conclude on August 16, is being organised for the first time in the state on the theme of 'zero waste'. Sukhu said the event would promote environmental conservation and showcase the unique art and culture of the district. It would provide tourists an opportunity to know the region better. He said that the festival symbolises the commitment to preserving its heritage and would inspire people to celebrate responsibly. Sukhu said that climate change has posed serious challenges to the country and the state and Lahaul-Spiti was no exception, with unusually heavy rainfall in the district being a major cause of concern. The state government was taking all possible measures to provide relief during disasters and was working with the Centre to ensure environmental protection. The chief minister said that Lahaul-Spiti had emerged as a model district in women empowerment and the traditional products of the area would be promoted under the 'Him-Ira' brand. Sukhu also laid the foundation stone for five bridges in Udaipur sub-division under PMGSY Phase-3, to be built at a cost of ₹36,41,78,000. These include a 35 metre steel truss bridge over Chaikhang Nallah costing ₹9.93 crore, a 49-metre double-lane steel truss bridge over the Chenab River costing ₹9.46 crore, a 22-metre RCC T-beam bridge over Kishori Nallah costing ₹17.68 crore, a 76-metre RCC beam bridge over Teling Nallah costing ₹13.35 crore and a 22-metre RCC beam bridge over Moring Nallah costing ₹1.89 crore. Rajiv Gandhi Van Samvardhan Yojna launched Chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu inaugurated the 76th State-Level Van-Mahotsav at the Kanlog area in Shimla on Thursday. He also planted a deodar sapling during the event. Sukhu launched the Rajiv Gandhi Van Samvardhan Yojna across all assembly constituencies and virtually interacted with Ministers and MLAs participating in the programme and discussed forest conservation and afforestation measures in detail. He said that the state government was working to protect and enrich the rich biodiversity of the state. These efforts would contribute to achieving the target of increasing 30% forest cover by 2030. He said that the Rajiv Gandhi Van Samvardhan Yojna would not only promote forest development but also enhance public participation and strengthen the rural economy. Under this scheme, mahila mandals, yuvak mandals, self-help groups and joint forest committees would plant and look after saplings on one to five hectares of designated forest land for five years. A budget provision of ₹100 crore has been made for this purpose. 'This year, saplings were being planted across 1,000 to 1,500 hectares of forest land at a cost of ₹20 crore. An additional ₹1.2 lakh per hectare was being provided for sapling maintenance,' said Sukhu.
