logo
Bill would give Maine more accurate home construction data

Bill would give Maine more accurate home construction data

Yahoo09-04-2025

Apr. 9—When state officials issued a report in late 2023 saying that Maine needed to build 84,000 new homes in the next seven years to accommodate its current and future population, housing advocates knew it would be difficult to accurately track progress toward that goal.
That's because Maine, like most states, doesn't have a uniform system to collect home production data that's already available in many city and town offices. Instead, MaineHousing and other agencies rely on construction estimates based on data that some municipalities provide voluntarily to the U.S. Census Bureau.
LD 1184 would take some of the guesswork out fixing Maine's housing crisis by requiring municipalities to report annual home construction data — including building, demolition and occupancy permits — to the Maine Department of Economic and Community Development. The data would be overseen and organized into an online portal by the department's Housing Opportunity Program, which promotes residential development that's affordable to low- and moderate-income Mainers.
In gathering more accurate housing data, Maine would become the second state in the nation to tackle its housing crisis by the numbers. Connecticut began closely tracking home construction and demolition data in recent years.
LD 1184 would allow Maine to "manage and measure" its progress in promoting home construction, said Rep. Traci Gere, D-Kennebunkport, the bill's primary sponsor, testifying Tuesday before the Legislature's housing committee.
Currently, Maine estimates home production at the state and county levels based on building permit data submitted voluntarily to the Census Bureau, said Hilary Gove, a Housing Opportunity Program coordinator. Because it's voluntary, many Maine municipalities don't collect or report building permit data to the bureau, resulting in data gaps, Gove told the committee.
"Relying on this building permit data is not an exact measure of housing production because not all reported building permits for housing units result in completed housing units," Gove said. "By requiring municipalities to collect and report (comprehensive housing data) on an annual basis, we will have a more precise picture of housing production from year to year."
Committee member Rep. Amanda Collamore, R-Pittsfield, questioned whether reporting housing data would be mandatory, which would require the bill to get two-thirds House approval. Collamore also questioned whether smaller towns would have a difficult time complying with limited staffing and budgets and whether municipalities would be penalized if they didn't participate.
Gere said the bill doesn't call for penalties, the reporting form would be designed to not be "burdensome," and sponsors were open to making compliance optional — which prompted committee member Rep. Mark Walker, R-Naples, to question whether optional reporting would diminish the purpose of the legislation.
Eamonn Dundon, advocacy director for the Portland Regional Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the bill, noting the need for accurate home construction data and the success of a pilot program conducted by the Greater Portland Council of Governments.
Kristina Egan, executive director of GPCOG, said the pilot program drew voluntary compliance from 26 of 29 communities in Cumberland County and tallied nearly 1,600 new homes in the region in 2024. Moreover, municipal staff who provided housing data said it took one to two hours to fill out the online form.
The pilot revealed significant discrepancies in census-based home construction estimates, according to a GPCOG report. While the regional census estimated that 1,392 homes were built in the region last year, the municipalities counted 1,568 homes — an 11% increase or 176 additional homes.
Looking at data for individual communities, the census estimated that 47 homes were built in Cape Elizabeth, while the town counted only 16 homes — a 194% difference or 31 fewer homes. And the census estimated that three homes were built in Yarmouth, while the town counted 13 homes — a 77% difference or 10 additional homes.
Gove, the state Housing Opportunity Program coordinator, suggested a few bill amendments, including the addition of a yearly deadline of Jan. 31 to submit data.
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Haitian is the third-most-spoken language in Florida, after English and Spanish
Haitian is the third-most-spoken language in Florida, after English and Spanish

Axios

time2 days ago

  • Axios

Haitian is the third-most-spoken language in Florida, after English and Spanish

Haitian, Portuguese and French are the three most commonly spoken languages in Florida other than English and Spanish, per new census data. Why it matters: Florida has the largest Haitian population in the nation, most of whom lawfully live and work in the state. But the community's been saddled with uncertainty since President Trump took office. He rolled back protections for Haitian migrants in February and this week issued a ban against all travelers and immigrants from Haiti. The big picture: The myriad languages spoken nationwide reflect both the settlement and colonization of centuries long past, as well as more modern immigration patterns. While Spanish is far and away the predominant non-English language nationwide, with about 41.2 million speakers, putting it aside offers insight into other groups and population centers around the country. By the numbers: About 426,000 people in Florida speak Haitian, 139,000 speak Portuguese, and 103,000 speak French, per U.S. Census Bureau survey data. That's for languages spoken at home during the 2017-2021 period among people 5 years and older. Between the lines: Many multilingual people speak one language at home with family but use English at work, school and elsewhere.

Proposed tax increases spark clash in Maine Legislature
Proposed tax increases spark clash in Maine Legislature

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Proposed tax increases spark clash in Maine Legislature

Jun. 5—AUGUSTA — Lawmakers and advocates clashed over proposed tax increases Thursday as the debate over the state budget heats up in the closing days of the session. Progressive activists and some Democrats gathered at the State House and urged lawmakers to increases taxes on the wealthiest Mainers to help close a budget gap. But Republicans reiterated at a separate press conference that they will oppose any budget that includes tax increases. And Gov. Janet Mills, who has proposed a series of targeted tax increases and program cuts in her budget, has said she would not support any broad-based tax increases. Lawmakers are facing a budget squeeze as they try to pay for programs and commitments created in previous budgets, as state revenues flatten. Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart, R-Presque Isle, said Democrats are responsible for the budget deficit because they have repeatedly passed majority budgets without Republican support. "They own this," Stewart said. "They set up three majority budgets in a row. They have run out of your money, and now they want to raise taxes on Maine people. We're not going to vote for it. But if they want to jump over that cliff, that's on them." Historically, lawmakers have sought to pass two-year state budgets with a bipartisan supermajority, so the funding can become available at the start of the fiscal year on July 1. Budgets passed by a simple majority, which the Democrats have done in recent years, don't become effective until 90 days after adjournment. Most of the budget negotiations have been taking place behind the scenes among Democrats, who are balancing Mills' proposed budget with their own priorities. More than 100 bills passed by the Democratic majority await funding. Earlier this session, Democrats used their majorities to pass an $11.3 billion continuing services budget over Republican objections. It includes funding to cover 55% of public education costs and provides $122 million to help stabilize MaineCare. But that budget doesn't include at least $122 million in additional funding needed to support MaineCare — Maine's Medicaid program — in the second year of the budget. The continuing services budget does not include $285 million in additional spending originally proposed by Mills, who also has proposed $156 million in tax increases, including increasing taxes on cigarettes, online streaming service and other areas. Mills has also proposed cutbacks, which include eliminating state funded food assistance for noncitizens, cutting two crisis receiving centers planned for Aroostook and Kennebec counties and stopping planned increases in child care worker stipends and cost-of-living increases for direct care workers. Mills also proposed reforms to the state's General Assistance program aimed at reducing costs. The governors said the changes would return the program to its original mission as a last resort safety net, rather than an ongoing housing assistance program. Advocates argued that increasing taxes on wealthy residents and corporations could raise millions of dollars to avoid the cuts proposed by Mills and support other vital programs. Maura Pillsbury, tax policy analyst for the Maine Center for Economic Policy, urged lawmakers to pass LD 1089, which would increase taxes on incomes over $1 million to fund public kindergarten through 12th grade education, and LD 1879, which would increase the tax rate on large corporations to support agricultural businesses. "These are reasonable, responsible steps to balance our budget and protect critical services, like child care, health care and food assistance, and not balancing the budget on the backs of vulnerable Mainers through harmful cuts," Pillsbury said. Amended versions of each of those bills have been advanced by the Taxation Committee and face floor votes in the coming days. It's unclear what changes the committee recommended, since the amendments are not yet posted. Advocates also support bills to overhaul of the state tax code to shift the burden more to higher income earners, which passed last year but vetoed by Mills, and increasing taxes on real estate sales over $1 million. Rep. Cheryl Golek, D-Harpswell, said her proposal for a millionaire's tax is modest compared to a proposal approved by voters in 2016 to add a surcharge to incomes over $200,000 and would correct "massive injustice in the tax system." "Today, I am asking that our richest share a slice of bread to those who turned the dough and made the loaf for them to eat," Golek said. Our economy shouldn't be balanced on the backs of the working class. Hard-working Mainers are struggling to pay their bills, yet we continually ask more of the most vulnerable among us by cutting vital programs and services instead of making our tax code more fair." Copy the Story Link

Bills to help mobile park residents protect homes advance but funding remains an obstacle for some
Bills to help mobile park residents protect homes advance but funding remains an obstacle for some

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Bills to help mobile park residents protect homes advance but funding remains an obstacle for some

(Photo by Getty Images) Building off of a law passed last year, the Maine Legislature has advanced a number of bills that aim to support mobile home park residents in purchasing their parks. The Senate voted in favor of two of these bills on Thursday. Others have already passed both chambers but still need to be funded. 'As legislators, we consistently hear that one of the top issues on the minds of Maine people is access to safe, affordable housing,' Sen. Chip Curry (D-Belfast), co-chair of the Housing and Economic Development Committee, said during a press conference following Thursday's votes. 'That's why our committee has been focused on two deeply connected challenges: how to build more housing in Maine, and just as urgently, how to protect the affordable housing we still have. It has become very clear to us that a critical component of this mission is protecting the residents of mobile home parks.' The upper chamber voted 25-7 on Thursday to pass LD 1145 — after much discussion and a motion to table the measure failed. This bill would give a group of mobile home owners or a mobile home owners' association the right of first refusal to purchase a mobile home park if the owner intends to sell. 'This bill is about giving Mainers a fighting chance, a chance to protect their homes, a chance to protect their communities,' Sen. Tim Nangle (D-Cumberland) said on the floor. Nangle's father bought a mobile home park in Massachusetts and ran it as a community, with the philosophy 'pay what you can and communicate,' Nangle said. Since his father died, he and his siblings have tried to keep that spirit alive, however they started getting calls from out-of-state private equity firms recently interested in purchasing. But Massachusetts has a right of first refusal law, so the park residents were afforded the time to purchase the park themselves. Last session, lawmakers passed a law that requires mobile home park owners to notify residents of their intent to sell and give them at least 60 days to make an offer. 'But it really didn't go far enough,' Nangle said. 'Right now, even if residents organize, raise the money and match or even exceed the offer, they can still be turned away with no explanation. The bill says, if you can match the offer, you have the right to pay.' The version passed by the Senate was amended to include an emergency preamble, which was the version also passed by the majority of the Housing and Economic Development Committee. If enacted as an emergency, which will require the support of two-thirds of the Legislature, the bill would take effect immediately. Having the bill take effect sooner would be beneficial for the newly created Friendly Village Cooperative, said cooperative president Dawn Beaulieu, a 30-year resident of the park. Residents formed the cooperative after being notified in March that the park was for sale. '[We] have since made a counteroffer to purchase the park,' Beaulieu said during the Thursday press conference. 'As of today, we are still waiting for a response to that offer. Our livelihoods should not be in the hands of an out-of-state conglomerate that sees us not as a community, but as an investment. The legislation being considered here in Augusta will help us put our fate in our own hands.' Whether other related bills become law will likely be a matter of funding priorities. Both chambers already backed LD 255, which would allocate $3 million in one-time funding to create the manufactured and mobile home park preservation and assistance program to help preserve parks as affordable housing and support residents in purchasing their parks. However, it now sits on the appropriations table, where bills with fiscal notes that are backed by the full Legislature are placed to vie for remaining funds after the budget is set. To save affordable housing, states promote resident-owned mobile home parks Though, the bill could still be funded in the two-year budget addition, which lawmakers have yet to set with less than two weeks remaining until their expected end date. That's also the case for LD 554, which aims to encourage resident-owned communities through tax deductions. Another bill, LD 1768, which would amend the real estate transfer tax in an effort to protect mobile home parks, has also been backed by both chambers. But it would result in a decrease to state revenue and need a one-time appropriation so it may also land on the table. On Wednesday, the Senate also passed LD 1016, which would establish the assistance program fund but also a fee to help with ongoing funding. The fee would be paid by certain park buyers equal to $10,000 for each lot in the community. 'I want to be very clear, I have no intention to de-incentivize the purchase of these parks by everyone,' said Sen. Cameron Reny (D-Lincoln), the bill sponsor. 'There are exceptions to this fee to state and municipal housing authorities, for resident owner cooperatives and for smaller businesses and individuals with net worths of less than $50 million.' However, Sen. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford), who supported the minority committee report recommending against the bill's passage, said he finds some of the carveouts troubling, specifically the one based on net worth. 'It is treating people unfairly based on an arbitrary amount of money that that person or entity owns,' Bennett said. 'I believe this is unconstitutional for that reason, although it's very well intentioned.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store