PM extends legal, diplomatic support to Dr Aafia
The assurance was conveyed during a meeting with Dr Fauzia Siddiqui, sister of the incarcerated academic. According to a statement issued by the Prime Minister's Office, Sharif affirmed that the government was actively pursuing the matter and had 'not been negligent in any way' regarding Dr Siddiqui's case.
He further said that a special committee, headed by Federal Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, had been constituted to coordinate efforts in the case. The committee will remain in contact with Dr Fauzia Siddiqui and extend the necessary legal and procedural support.
Dr Aafia Siddiqui was arrested in Afghanistan in July 2008, allegedly in possession of sodium cyanide and documents related to large-scale attacks.
According to US prosecutors, she attempted to shoot American personnel during interrogation – an incident that led to her conviction in a New York federal court in 2010 on charges of attempted murder and assault. No terrorism-related charges were filed.
Her family, however, maintains that she was abducted from Karachi in 2003 along with her children and later handed over to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a claim denied by Pakistani authorities.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan risks wasting ‘golden opportunity' in US market: FPCCI
Despite securing the lowest tariff rates on exports to the United States in the region, Pakistan risks losing this competitive edge due to high energy costs and production inefficiencies, warned Atif Ikram Sheikh, President of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI). The United States has lowered its reciprocal tariff rate on Pakistani goods to 19%, compared to the 20–25% imposed on regional competitors such as Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka. Meanwhile, archrival India faced a 50% tariff after US President Donald Trump issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods from India on Wednesday, adding to the 25% tariffs already announced. 'The US has imposed the lowest tariff in the region on Pakistani products,' said Atif Ikram Sheikh, urging authorities to 'take full advantage' of this situation, read a statement on Thursday. However, higher production costs in Pakistan, as compared to other countries in the region, can neutralise this benefit, he warned. 'Taxes, high electricity rates and gas prices for the industry are a major obstacle to taking advantage of low tariffs,' said Sheikh, urging the government to take immediate action to resolve these issues and reduce energy prices for the industrial sector. 'A significant increase in exports, especially textiles, to the US is possible amid a reduction in production costs,' he said. The US administration struck a deal with Pakistan, in which Washington would work with Islamabad to develop the South Asian nation's oil reserves. 'We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves,' Trump wrote on social media. Islamabad described the deal as a marker of a broader partnership with Washington. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, who led the final round of talks, said there was a larger economic and strategic agreement. The US is Pakistan's biggest trade partner. 'This golden opportunity should be taken advantage of,' said President FPCCI. He said that investment in the export sector is essential, saying that Pakistan must create a conducive environment for FDI. 'Low tariffs, single-digit interest rates, sustainable policies and long-term planning are the solution to the problems,' he said.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Auto sector woes: What's good for Australia may not be good for Pakistan
As a lingering post-colonial inferiority complex continues to shape our national thinking, many still look to the West as a shining example – a blueprint for modernity. But what works for their today may not be what Pakistan needs for its tomorrow. As our policy-makers inch closer to opening used car imports and scaling back support for the local industry, decisions that could trigger rapid deindustrialisation and the quiet, seemingly permanent closure of Pakistan's automotive sector, they would do well to pause. On the surface, it may appear that 'even Australia did it.' But scratch deeper, and the differences couldn't be starker. In 2010, Australia had an 80-year-old automobile industry that was producing a around 239,443 vehicles annually to fulfil local demand. Pakistan's auto policy: fueling imports, killing industry But something else happened that year too. The Australian government liberalised the sector by reducing tariffs to just 5%, expecting global efficiency and higher exports. The result: swift deindustrialisation. Multinational brands found it cheaper to shut local operations and import from their foreign plants. By 2017 all local plants had closed. Yet interestingly, global brands like Toyota continued to dominate. It was number one in 2017, and still the market leader in 2024. And the market size? Still hovering around 1.2 million vehicles, 7 years later. The difference? A decade ago, those cars were built by Australians, using locally made components made with cutting-edge technology. Today, they're all imported. If a mature, exporting industry couldn't survive liberalisation, what hope does a nascent Pakistani industry have? But Australia liberalised its auto sector from a position of strength. It was a post-industrial, high-income economy characterised by high-value exports, strong services and mining sectors, and clear alternatives to cushion the shock. Pakistan, by contrast, is still in the early stages of industrial maturity. The direction we're being nudged toward seems driven by abstract ideas of 'efficiency' and 'resource reallocation.' In theory, this sounds great. In practice, it's dangerously vague. Where exactly are these so-called 'more efficient' destinations for capital? Has anyone mapped them? Is the investment already sunk into the automotive sector ready to be reallocated? Have the 2.5 million people directly or indirectly employed in the ecosystem been offered meaningful alternatives? Or are policymakers once again making decisions in haste, without regard for the industrial ecosystem they're about to dismantle? Australia's withdrawal was strategic, a pivot to areas better suited to its demographic and economic structure. But what is Pakistan pivoting to? With a population of 240 million, Pakistan has no shortage of labour or talent. Nor does it benefit from a surplus of high-value service exports. So why spend scarce foreign reserves importing fully built-up vehicles, when it can use that same capital to feed its own manufacturing base, grow the domestic parts industry, and build a more self-reliant, value-adding automotive ecosystem? By 2010, Australia had completed its industrial learning curve. It had built the technical foundations that the automotive value chain naturally fosters – process engineering, supply chain integration, metallurgy, systems design. Pakistan, on the other hand, is still climbing that curve. Shutting it down now would be like dropping out of university before the first exam and calling yourself overqualified. Policy mimicry without context is a shortcut to structural ruin. Are we really choosing our future – or merely imitating someone else's past? It's time we learn to read our own map. The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's moment in Washington
In a rare shift of focus from its usual marginal position in American discourse, Pakistan has recently found itself in the headlines in the United States for all the right reasons. Normally overshadowed by stories of political chaos, power tussles, and institutional heavy-handedness against dissent, the narrative has now turned toward Islamabad's surprising diplomatic maneuvering and its growing importance in Washington's strategic calculations. While Pakistan's domestic politics remain fraught—with Imran Khan and his party under relentless state pressure and critics of the 'deep state' still facing crackdowns—the country has suddenly carved out space on the global stage. This pivot began in earnest just before the United States carried out precision strikes on Iran's Fordow and other nuclear sites. The catalyst was an unprecedented meeting: on June 18, 2025, President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, for a private lunch at the White House, an event widely covered by international media. It was one of the most significant diplomatic engagements of Trump's second term and the first time a U.S. president hosted Pakistan's military chief without civilian leadership present. At the press briefing following the meeting, Trump openly acknowledged Munir's role in averting disaster during the recent five-day India-Pakistan conflict, saying: 'The reason I had him here… I wanted to thank him for not going into the war… ending it. Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war.' (NDTV, June 2025) This meeting reverberated across South Asia, creating political tremors in India. Rahul Gandhi, leader of the opposition Congress Party, seized the moment in a fiery parliamentary speech, lambasting Prime Minister Modi's government for failing to secure equivalent US attention. In India's parliament, even some pro-government lawmakers admitted that New Delhi had been outmaneuvered diplomatically, losing ground to Islamabad in Washington's halls of power. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
