Witness recants, undermining State's case against Bulelani Yosana in murder trial
Bulelani Yosana is currently awaiting trial alongside accused hitman James Easton for the contract murder of Bloekombos teacher and ANC activist Vuyo Dana. Yosana's latest bail appeal bid failed in the Western Cape High Court.
Image: File
Accused killer, Bulelani Yosana's bail appeal again failed in the Western Cape High Court this week, where he argued that the State's case against him has considerably weakened after a Section 204 witness recanted on their statement.
Yosana is currently awaiting trial alongside accused hitman James Easton for the contract murder of Bloekombos teacher and ANC activist Vuyo Dana. A trial date is yet to be set for the matter.
After a previous unsuccessful attempt, Yosana, a former police officer and ANC branch secretary, filed a new bail bid appeal with the High Court, citing the recanted statement, that a trial date remains unset, and that his bank account is about to be closed for non-compliance with the Financial Intelligence Centre Act.
Dana was shot and killed at his home in February 2022 while on his way to work at Bloekombos Senior Secondary School, in Kraaifontein, in what has been alleged to be a politically motivated killing.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Yosana brought the second bail application on the basis that new facts have arisen since the initial bail court (Regional Court) refused to admit him on bail, pending the finalisation of his trial.
Yosana and Easton face a variety of offences arising out of the murder which occurred on February 22, 2022. The offences include a contravention of Section 18 of the Riotous Assemblies Act, conspiracy to murder, and murder.
Through his attorney, Yosana submitted that following the bail application, hearing, and the appeal, they discovered a statement in which the Section 204 witness recanted what he stated in his Section 204 affidavit.
According to Yosana's lawyer, there are no eyewitness accounts that place Yosana on the scene, and he claims that due to the recanting statement, there is insufficient evidence.
'According to Mr Booth (Yosana's attorney), this recanting statement was never discovered by the State, and as such, it alters the overall picture of the State's case.
'In this (newly) discovered statement, the Section 204 witness is recanting what he initially told the police about the involvement of the applicant (Yosana) in the commission of the offences the applicant is arraigned on. Booth advanced the argument that the State case is based primarily on the evidence of the Section 204 witness.
'Booth's argument postulates that if the Section 204 witness has recanted his original police affidavit, wherein he originally implicated the applicant in the crimes, the necessary corollary is that the State's case has since been considerably weakened. According to the applicant, this discovery presents an insurmountable hurdle for the State,' the court record read.
The State did not dispute that the Section 204 witness has since recanted his first key pre-trial statement.
'According to the State's heads of argument, the Section 204 witness filed a recanting statement after the residence of the witness was visited by the applicant and after the applicant's arrest. To this end, the State specifical contends that the recanting statement is a product of interference with a State witness,' the judgment further read.
High Court judge Constance Nziweni, said: 'There is no doubt that the existence of a recanting statement presents considerable odds in the prosecution's case. Undoubtedly, the strength of the State's case is now called into question. It is appropriate at this stage to say something about the presumption of innocence.
'It should be observed that, according to the Constitution's principles, the bail court is deeply concerned with the right of a person who is presumed to be innocent, whose right to liberty is at stake. However, despite the right to be presumed innocent, there are instances where an accused person has to be detained pending the trial.'
Judge Nziweni said that Yosana did not satisfy the court with reasons to be released on bail.
'In view of the foregoing, this court is of the firm opinion that in this matter, it cannot be said that there is no longer a 'just cause' behind the accused's detention. Though the prolonged detention of the applicant is regrettable, it cannot be said that the delay is unreasonable, as such, it amounts to a new fact that warrants his release,' said Judge Nziweni.
chevon.booysen@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Private governance, public consequences: Who really runs SA's gated communities?
South Africa is quietly fragmenting. Not through secession or revolution, but through something far more ordinary: boom gates, biometric scanners and body corporates. Across the country, from suburban enclaves to sprawling estates, a quiet retreat from the state is underway. The lines that once marked a shared civic life are being redrawn by private power. Behind the walls of gated communities, homeowners' associations now draft rules, enforce fines, manage infrastructure and contract private security. In form, they are residential schemes. In substance, they are mini-municipalities. And in a country grappling with decaying public institutions, they are increasingly viewed not as alternatives to the state – but as replacements. We've seen this story before. In a recent piece, I explored the case of Kleinfontein, an Afrikaner enclave whose encounter with the High Court laid bare the tension between cultural autonomy and constitutional order. But Kleinfontein is no anomaly. It is merely the ideological extreme of what is becoming a structural norm: the rise of privately governed spaces that operate in the shadow of the state. This is the age of the parallel republic – not defined by flags or constitutions, but by access control, conduct rules, and levies. Governance is no longer something we elect. It is something we buy. Gated communities emerged in the late apartheid era, born of fear and segregation. But in the democratic era, they have exploded. Today, they span all provinces and income brackets — from elite estates to middle-class security complexes. The one thing they have in common is their internal logic: a system of rules, rights, and responsibilities that exists apart from public law. At the centre is the homeowners' association (HOA) or body corporate. These entities, created by contract, exercise significant power: they impose penalties, regulate behaviour, and restrict freedoms. Want to host religious gatherings, rent out your unit, or paint your house a different shade? That's not a question of constitutional rights. That's a clause in your estate's conduct rules. The illusion is that this system is voluntary. But when the choice is between functional private governance and dysfunctional public service, is there really a choice? In many parts of the country, buying into a gated estate is not a lifestyle decision. It is a survival strategy. The state is no longer the default provider of roads, safety, electricity or water. The HOA is. I live in one of these estates. I also come from Mabopane, a township in Pretoria. The contrast is staggering. Inside the gates, roads are smooth, lights are on, and children play freely. Outside, potholes scar the tarmac, spikes wait on dark roads for unsuspecting motorists, and a flat tyre can mean a life-or-death situation. In estates, cameras watch. In townships, communities rely on each other and prayer. These communities operate in a strange legal twilight. On paper, they are regulated by laws like the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act and the Community Schemes Ombud Service Act. In practice, oversight is limited, fragmented, and poorly enforced. Many residents have little idea of their rights, or even where to turn when they are violated. This raises a deeper question: do constitutional rights stop at the gates? Section 8(2) of the Constitution says they don't. Even private parties can be bound by the Bill of Rights when their actions affect others. These aren't abstract legal debates. They speak to the heart of what it means to live in a constitutional democracy. If private associations wield public power – setting rules, enforcing discipline, managing shared resources – then they should be subject to public law standards. Otherwise, we create zones of authority without accountability. Nowhere is the retreat of the state more visible than in policing. South Africa has one of the largest private security industries in the world. As of 2022, more than 2.5 million private security officers were registered – dwarfing the South African Police Service and South African National Defence Force combined. Armed response team in Johannesburg. Image: Flickr Estates don't just contract guards. They build militarised ecosystems: electric fences, thermal cameras, patrol vehicles, drone surveillance. Some estates even have their own emergency lines, faster than 10111. But this security comes at a cost – not only in rands, but in equality. The right to safety is a constitutional promise. Yet it is now distributed by income. Those who can pay for protection get it. Those who cannot, wait. In the meantime, neighbourhoods self-police. Vigilantism rises. And a sense of abandonment takes hold. This is not to blame those who seek security. It is to ask why the state has allowed itself to become irrelevant in this most basic of functions. Security, like justice, must be a public good. Otherwise, we are not citizens. We are customers. Consider Steyn City in Johannesburg: private schools, fibre networks, restaurants, golf courses, medical facilities – all managed by a private company. Or Waterfall City, with its own water management, road infrastructure, and law enforcement arrangements. These are not suburbs. They are cities. But unlike real cities, they have no elected officials, no municipal oversight, no public participation. Disputes in these spaces are resolved by trustees or private arbitrators. Fines are imposed for painting your door the wrong colour. Prayer meetings can be restricted by by-law mimicry. Uniformity is enforced in the name of order. These systems of governance are efficient. But they are not democratic. You don't vote for the rules. You buy into them. And in doing so, you surrender the protections of public law for the promises of private order. The Constitution does not vanish behind the gates. Section 8(2) ensures that private conduct can be held to constitutional standards, particularly where it affects dignity, freedom, or equality. Yet in practice, there is a hesitancy to extend these protections to HOA governance. Courts often defer to contract. The state often defers entirely. This must change. If estates perform public functions, then they should meet public obligations. That means transparency, participation, reasonableness, and proportionality. It means recognising that rights cannot be signed away under economic duress. The alternative is dangerous: a society where the rule of law depends on postcode. Where private rules trump public values. Where governance is exercised without constitutional restraint. The gated life is not immune from the life outside. Crime does not respect property lines. Nor does inequality. Every day, thousands of workers cross from townships to estates to clean homes, care for children, and guard perimeters. The line between inside and outside is thin, porous, and morally fraught. I am a lawyer. I live in a secure estate. I also grew up navigating township streets, where a broken streetlight could mean a mugging. I know that fear drives the desire for walls. But I also know that no wall can protect us from the consequences of a divided society. Gated communities are a symptom. The disease is inequality. And no amount of private governance will cure it. If our Constitution is to mean anything, it must mean something everywhere – in the suburbs and the settlements, in the estates and the townships. Governance cannot be a commodity. It must be a commitment. Not only by the state, but by all of us. In the end, the question is not who runs South Africa's gated communities. It is who we become when we allow law, service and protection to retreat behind gates. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
20 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Killer gets double life sentences for hit on 75-year-old man, family, during morning prayer
Reagan Davids, 35, murdered Haslim Ahmed Dennis and attempted to kill Dennis' wife and daughter after the daughter's husband paid him R1,000. The Western Cape Division of the High Court in Cape Town sentenced Reagan Davids, 35, to two life sentences and 15 years for the murder of Haslim Ahmed Dennis, 75, and the attempted murders of his wife, Kulsoem Dennis, 70, and daughter, Ibtisaam Dennis. Tears flowed as Judge Gayaat da Silva Salie on Thursday, 19 June 2025, handed down the hefty sentence that has finally brought a sense of closure to a family devastated by the crime committed on 31 January 2020. Haslim Dennis was washing in the bathroom while Kulsoem was seated on their bed reciting passages from the Holy Qur'an before the Fajr (sunrise prayer) at 4.30am when Davids attacked them. Haslim sustained nine stab wounds to his upper body. Kulsoem was violently assaulted with a firearm while praying. Her injuries included a fractured sternum and head injuries. She survived by pretending to be dead. Their daughter Ibtisaam narrowly escaped death by slamming closed the sliding door to the main house, stopping Davids. Ibtisaam's husband, Brent Williams, was the mastermind of the callous crime. The couple, who have two children, were undergoing marital problems. Williams hired Davids and another man, unknown to the State, to invade and attack his wife and in-laws to 'neutralise' his problems. Prosecutors proved the murder had been a contract killing – Davids was paid R1,000, which he used to buy takkies. Williams died on 10 February 2025, shortly before the State closed its case, leaving Davids to face justice alone. 'Exceptional brutality' Delivering the sentence, Judge Da Silva Salie stated: 'These offences are marked by exceptional brutality, targeting vulnerable elderly victims in a sanctified setting. 'The level of violence, disregard for human life and the psychological terror inflicted upon the surviving victims and so too the surrounding community, warrant the imposition of a long period of direct imprisonment.' The judge said the murder plot was yet another act of domestic and gender-based violence. 'South Africa has been recorded as having one of the highest rates of domestic violence in the world. The convictions in this matter touch on so many disturbing and prevailing features of crime in our society: domestic violence, gender-based violence and murders, exposure of children to violence and harm, violence and murder of elderly people, to mention a few,' the judge reiterated. On the morning of 31 January 2020, when devoted Muslims Haslim and Kulsoem Dennis began their daily routine by waking up for the Fajr, the sunrise prayer at or around 4am, they left the sliding door of their flat in Northpine, Cape Town, slightly ajar, allowing their daughter or grandchildren, who live in the main house, to join them. While sitting on the bed, Kulsoem heard the voice of an intruder who, with brutal force, attacked her by hitting her head, neck and chest area with a firearm. According to the judgement, she uttered ' Allahu-Akbar' with every inflicted blow until she fell to the floor. She then lay on the floor, pretending to be dead, with her burqa falling over her face, as she kept her eyes closed. While lying on the floor, she heard shoving noises in the room as it was ransacked. As her husband returned from the bathroom, he too was mercilessly assaulted by the intruders. When it was quiet, Kulsoem stood up and found her husband dead on the floor, bleeding from multiple stab wounds. Ibtisaam called the police and her sister after she had blocked the intruders from entering the main house. The attackers fled, but CCTV footage captured Williams driving his bakkie towards the site of the attack, the home he shared with his wife, two children and his elderly parents-in-law. He was seen dropping off the two men he had hired and giving them access through the front safety gate and door. He waited at a nearby Caltex garage. Shortly after the attack, the two assailants were captured on CCTV running back to Williams' bakkie and getting into the front of the vehicle, next to him. The bakkie was seen with Williams driving away with his co-perpetrators. Western Cape NPA boss, advocate Nicolette Bell, said after the judgment, 'It can never be overemphasised how important human life is and the NPA will continue being vigorous in its pursuit of these cases to serve as a deterrent to would-be murderers.' DM
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Plettenberg Bay court hands down 20-year sentence for brutal attack on elderly couple
The aftermath of the violent robbery that shocked the Plettenberg Bay community, leading to a 20-year prison sentence for the perpetrator. Image: Supplied The Plettenberg Bay Regional Court has sentenced a man to 20 years direct imprisonment following his conviction for an attack on an elderly couple who were robbed. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Eric Ntabazalila, said a panga-wielding Cole Bruiners robbed the couple in January 2024, as they walked along Challenge Drive. He wanted to rob the woman of her bag, but she resisted. Ntabazalila said a struggle ensued, and Bruiners assaulted her with the panga, leaving her with bruises and cuts on her upper body. He also stabbed her husband on the head as he tried to stop the robbery, leaving the husband with a laceration to the left side of his skull. "The accused took the couple's hats before he fled," Ntabazalila said. "The incident was caught on CCTV cameras, and the footage was widely circulated. He was recognised by a member of the community forum, and a search ensued for his arrest. "He was arrested the following day, and the police found him with the panga. He cooperated with members of the community forum and the police and pointed out where he sold the stolen items. "The couple's items were later recovered." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The court sentenced Bruiners to 15 years direct imprisonment for each count of robbery with aggravating circumstances and ordered the second count of robbery with aggravating circumstances to run concurrently with the first count of the same crime. He was effectively sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment. "The NPA welcomes the conviction and sentencing of a man who targeted and terrorised an elderly couple in Plettenberg Bay. This sentence sends a strong message that crimes against vulnerable members of society will not be tolerated and will be met with the full force of the law. The NPA remains committed to ensuring justice and the protection of all communities, especially the elderly," Ntabazalila said. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
