logo
We're not the ATM: Google says no to Competition Commission's R500m proposal to fund SA news

We're not the ATM: Google says no to Competition Commission's R500m proposal to fund SA news

Daily Maverick29-04-2025

Marianne Erasmus, Google news partner lead for sub-Saharan Africa, spoke to Ferial Haffajee in the sixth part of our series on media sustainability and the Competition Commission report on Big Tech and its impact on the media in South Africa.
Question: How do you get your news?
Answer: I am reflective of the increasingly quick change in consumer behaviour. I am on simultaneous screens: WhatsApp, social networks and LinkedIn. I pop into a news article or a push notification, or I swipe left on my phone to go into a Discover feed [an interest-based feed on Android phones]. I've got a few news subscriptions that I read daily; they are local and global. It's the nature of my work.
Q: Google says the Competition Commission's report does not account for how people get news. In your opinion and research, how do people get their news today?
A: So, interestingly, the Competition Commission themselves did a consumer research study, and in their own study, it shows that only 17% of South Africans get their news via Google Search, and by far the majority, 77%, get the news via social media. The Competition Commission wants to ensure that public interest journalism is sustainable in the future. What they're trying to achieve, though, is getting consumers to go back to a newspaper's homepage, and they're not considering how news consumption behaviour has changed.
It's a misnomer to think that the next generation of news consumers will always seek out a website's homepage first. My sense is reflected in my own behaviour and in the Competition Commission's study, which shows successful content creators and publishers find a way to package their content so that they go and see the reader, where that reader is.
Q: An important question about the inquiry relates to democracy. The Competition Commission finds that media freedom is intrinsic to free expression, which is key to the Constitution. The Constitution is the key to democracy. It finds that digital platforms may harm democracy by harming sustainable media. It proposes a fund to begin to set this right.
A: We also advocate for media freedom. Businesses do better in open societies, which is only possible in democracies. News media, as a public good, is essential for democracy and society and, therefore, needs to be supported. The contestation comes in the form of how and who is responsible for supporting the media.
Q: Google has said that the Competition Commission report tries to resurrect outdated business models. We've spoken a bit about that already, but expand your thinking for me because it's quite a thing to say [about a regulator].
A: Google acknowledges the societal value of news, but we must be honest: news makes up a small part of our commercial business. Our 2023 and 2024 data points show that fewer than 1% of South African consumers come to Google Search with a news-seeking query. These news queries on Search also don't monetise well. Google Search revenue typically comes from queries with a prominent market intent, like someone searching for the best trail-running shoes.
We're willing to play our part, and since we agree that news holds a societal value, there should be a whole-of-society solution. The onus cannot be on one platform to make an outsized and unwarranted financial contribution. We believe the Competition Commission missed the mark by not requiring publishers to recognise changing consumer behaviour and adapt their business models accordingly.
Industry media fund
Q: The Competition Commission recommended that Google pay R300-million to R500-million annually into an industry media fund for three to five years. What exactly did your written response to the interim report say about this?
A: We're busy finalising our response and will make the non-confidential version available to the media. Again, I want to confirm that we want to continue collaborating with the Competition Commission and South African news publishers towards a balanced and durable outcome based on fact. Their value calculation is rudimentary and not based on accurate figures.
The Competition Commission artificially inflates the percentage of search queries they believe to be news-seeking, and they make a flawed financial calculation based on that. Our data shows that only 1% of search queries are news-seeking, resulting in less than R19-million search ad revenue for Google in 2023. Remember that we don't show ads — or make money — on the vast majority of searches. And we don't run ads on Google News or the news results tab on Google Search.
Considering the economic principles, there's already a robust value exchange. Google makes the search engine available for free. Surfaces like Google News and Discover send referral traffic to a publisher's webpage. Publishers can monetise users on their websites by serving them with display advertising. Using an independent third-party methodology from Deloitte, it is estimated that Google sent R350-million in referral traffic value to publishers in 2023.
Q: So, Google feels targeted?
A: We believe in equal treatment. The onus for the sustainability of public interest news is on all of us — platforms, governments, businesses and publishers. Google was the only platform asked to make a financial contribution. Globally, our learning has been that shared outcomes are far more durable. For example, in California, Google recently co-established a $30-million media fund with contributions from the government and other platforms.
Q: If people are not searching for news, what are they searching for?
A: A whole variety of things! Plumbers near me. How to get a red wine stain out of a carpet. Explain algebraic expressions to a 14-year-old. Interestingly, 15% of Google search queries are new every day.
Q: I was interested in the Competition Commission's finding that search and social media companies had harmed community, vernacular and public broadcasters more than they had the English and Afrikaans mainstream media. What was your response to that?
A: We disagree with the theory of harm. Simplistically, it is also a product of scale. The internet has democratised content discovery, helping people access more types of content than ever — whether a vernacular language news piece or a global news story.
Q: What about the impact on the public broadcaster?
A: The public broadcaster works with the YouTube teams and is part of our YouTube partner programme. They opt to prioritise putting their content on their own app, which will impact their revenue from YouTube.
First gambit
Q: The Competition Commission wants a win-win solution, and this interim report felt like a first gambit to me. Is a win-win solution still possible?
A: Absolutely. Google has clarified that this is the ideal outcome we want to pursue. However, we want to examine more balanced ways to achieve the Competition Commission's goals. Instead of artificially changing our algorithm to favour local news sites, we would instead work with publishers from the ground up to support them with building better websites, increase their understanding of the data analytics available to them, and help them with tech and tools they have access to to support their digital journalism.
This will all lead to more traffic to the local community and vernacular news sites, which, in turn, they can monetise. These publishers also have access to the recently announced R114-million digital news transformation fund, which they can apply to targeted projects to get the basics right. It will be a more resilient solution to address the problem with the technology and training we can make available to publishers for a better long-term outcome instead of a short-term cash injection.
Q: They might say: 'We just want the cash, baby?' And that's not unjustified.
A: A cash-hungry industry is saying, 'Yes, actually, we just want the money', which is the sticking point. Google would be interested in nurturing long-term, durable outcomes, but we would be hesitant to enter into short-term transactional relationships.
Q: Aren't you trying to be too prescriptive?
A: Our intention is certainly not to be prescriptive but to collaborate with the industry to understand their most significant pain points and how we, as a technology provider, can help.
Q: So, Google estimates a R118-billion contribution to the economy in 2023. How? It's not showing up in tax receipts or GDP.
A: That refers to the recently announced economic impact report. This number is the estimated economic activity from the range of Google products, including Search, Play, Android, YouTube, and Cloud, creating value for South African businesses, nonprofits, publishers, creators, and developers.
Q: Google says it has supported news media through R350-million in referral clicks in 2023. In the bigger scheme of things, that's tiny. What's your view?
A: The referral traffic figures reflect user engagement with news content through Google platforms. These figures align with broader trends in reports like the Reuters Institute Digital News Report, which show that news consumption represents a small portion of overall online activity.
Q: I want to get to the Association of Independent Publishers agreement with Google [worth R114-million]. This looks like a workable model. So, how did you and [AIP director] Kate Skinner come up with it, or how did you get to that place? Because it seems like a win-win idea.
A: When I started with Google in 2022, I first brought together all stakeholders, representing the big legacy publishers and the local and community publishers. We devised a set of measures captured in a letter of intent at the time that we collectively believed would make a meaningful contribution to the South African news ecosystem. This relied on components of product support, making available tech, tools, continuous training and a digital news fund. We established that a one-size-fits-all solution won't work, and we wanted to find a way that can support both the big and the small publishers in a manner that fits each purpose. The idea of the fund came out of that initial industry collaboration.
Q: It's been six months. How are things going?
A: The fund is now very much on track. We will soon launch the application phase and hold a series of inspiration sessions where we will showcase projects that publishers are winning with globally. This is only the second such fund that we have established globally. South Africa is the next shining star in terms of how a funding model linked to clear technological or commercial merit-based applications can be a win-win solution.
Q: Google does not make public the revenues earned in a country. Why?
A: We transparently shared the relevant data points with the competition commission. We publicly shared that we made R19-million from search advertising placed next to news queries on Search in 2023.
Q: But you don't declare the entire revenue take?
A: No, it's up to governments to decide the rules here. We are willing to play our part in supporting the South African news ecosystem, but this has to be a shared responsibility. We are looking forward to continuing to collaborate with the Competition Commission and the news industry towards a balanced outcome. DM
Further reading:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Cradock Four' inquest: Son of Calata drops bombshell that his dad died for his activism
'Cradock Four' inquest: Son of Calata drops bombshell that his dad died for his activism

Eyewitness News

time22 minutes ago

  • Eyewitness News

'Cradock Four' inquest: Son of Calata drops bombshell that his dad died for his activism

JOHANNESBURG - The son of slain apartheid activist Fort Calata has testified before an inquest that he was told by a senior government official that his father's case was part of the price that had to be paid during negotiations for South Africa's freedom. The Cradock inquest is on its fifth day in the Gqeberha High Court, and Lukhanyo Calata is on the witness stand. The inquiry is to establish whether the apartheid security branch police or any other people can be held liable for the deaths of the anti-apartheid activists. Fort Calata, Matthew Goniwe, Sicelo Mhlauli and Sparrow Mkhonto were abducted and assassinated by police in 1985. IN PICS: Gqeberha High Court Judge visits key locations linked to lives of 'Cradock Four' It's a widespread rumour that the negotiators of South Africa's freedom in the run-up to democracy may have agreed to certain conditions that have led to most black South Africans remaining disadvantaged, and the perpetrators of apartheid crimes being let off the hook. But on Friday, in the 'Cradock Four' inquest, the son of Calata, Lukhanyo, told the Gqeberha High Court of a conversation he had with the Deputy Minister of Justice, John Jeffrey, in 2017. 'The deputy minister said you know the issues of the TRC [Truth and Reconciliation Commission], including the 'Cradock Four' matter, was part of the price that had to be paid for the negotiation settlement. When he said that my blood was boiling, because what did he mean that this was part of the price that had to be paid?' Calata said his family was not willing to accept that his father was used by politicians as a pawn in some kind of negotiation game. ALSO READ: Judge visits locations related to killings of Cradock Four

From besties to frenemies: Donald Trump and Elon Musk
From besties to frenemies: Donald Trump and Elon Musk

TimesLIVE

time24 minutes ago

  • TimesLIVE

From besties to frenemies: Donald Trump and Elon Musk

The puzzling rise to presidential fame for Donald Trump has been met with just as much fervour as Elon Musk's ascension in US politics. What seemingly started off as a bromance between like-minded political allies soon turned into a sour feud that spilled out on social media. On the one hand, Musk claimed Trump would never have made his return to the White House without his help. On the other, Trump believes his former political partner is just throwing his toys out of the cot. But what has led to the rise and eventual fallout of America's biggest social players? From Mara-a-Lago playdates to exploding satellites, here's how the political BFFs became IRL enemies. 1990: THE POLITICAL BACHELOR Described by ex-New York mayor Ed Koch as 'a bachelor who lived for politics', Trump's ascension to the White House dates back to the 90s. One of the biggest interviews he gave, suggesting he has been aware of fans calling for him to enter the Oval Office, was with Playboy. Critics at the time also noted that his main focus was on the working class and the bills that affect businesses. 1999: YOU'VE GOT Enamoured by digital entrepreneurship, one of Musk's first ventures into the digital space was co-founding Zip2 with his brother. The business was a digitised version of the Yellow Pages and sold for more than $300m. The windfall would help Musk start X being a letter he would become obsessed with over the years. The site was built to be a digital payment system and would later lead to some of his strongest connections. With three other co-founders, the business would help establish Musk as a force to be reckoned with. During this time, Trump would announce on the Larry King Show that he would be taking politics seriously, announcing the formation of a 'presidential exploratory committee' that would become effective the day after the interview. Much like Musk at the time, his political opinion was liberal, saying he was 'getting much more liberal, on health care and other things. I really say, what's the purpose of a country if you're not going to have defence and health care?' 2000: WHEN PAY MET PAL would eventually merge with Confinity and become PayPal as it is known today. Now working with a new partner, Peter Thiel, the pair would sell PayPal two years later. Musk was on honeymoon when the deal was made and he was removed as CEO, according to The Times. 2002: AMERICAN DREAMS Musk, who has dual South African and Canadian citizenship, started his process of becoming an American citizen in 1996. While no reasons have been published as to why the American dream was calling him, Musk initially had a study visa when he studied at the University of Pennsylvania. This would help him become a naturalised American. This would also be the year Musk became famous for his involvement in SpaceX and its subsidiary satellite business, Starlink. Musk's odd business deals would also come to the fore at this time when he founded The Musk Foundation, which benefited OpenAI, a business he also owned. Several donors admitted to pumping much of their wealth into the foundation. 2004: TESLA AND THE CITY A year after it was founded, Musk's favourite adopted baby, Tesla, landed in his lap. By 2008, he managed to wrangle the CEO position. All thanks to a $6.5m investment. 2011: THE THIEL SINGER PayPal Mafia member Peter Thiel would come back into the spotlight when his future mentee JD Vance would write a sugary OpEd in the Catholic magazine The Lamp where he described meeting Thiel as 'the most siginificant moment of my life'. 2015: AI ACTUALLY Musk's meteoric rise saw with it the growing interest in AI. He would take a lead role at OpenAI with the sentiment that he could help develop 'friendly' AI. Meanwhile, Vance would embrace his first career pivot out of law and join Thiel's company, Mithril Capital. This would also put a spotlight on Vance as a writer when another column of his garnered fame for him and Thiel's business. This would also help him consider a run for office. 2016: LIFE AS WE BLOW IT Musk's growing fame and pursuits would soon see him cross paths with Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg. But the two were not keen on braiding each other's hair, especially after Zuckerberg slighted Musk for his failed SpaceX maiden flight. The feud was ignited by Zuckerberg's Facebook post that claimed the SpaceX flight destroyed one of his satellites, while Musk chose Twitter as his weapon of choice to retort, 'Yeah, my fault for being an idiot. We did give them a free launch to make up for it and I think they had some insurance.' While mean girls like Regina George of Mean Girls relied on a private burn book, Musk continued to throw shade at any rival, including Trump. Musk said he was not confident of his role as an American president because 'he doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the US'. Trump would not hit back but remained silent on the criticism. Instead, their bond would be cemented a month into Trump's first month in office that would see Musk join his advisory council. 2017: ALONG CAME CLIMATE CHANGE It wouldn't be long before Musk was back on the Twitter streets to vent his frustrations with Trump. In a tweet, Musk announced he was stepping down from the Oval Office after the US' exit from the Paris Climate Agreement. Musk was still liberal in his political beliefs, even posting support for the LGBTQ+ community, swatting off any homophobes from buying Teslas. Vance would echo the sentiments in his writing that spoke ill of Trump, even comparing him to Hitler. Zuckerberg and Musk would continue to bicker, particularly on the subject of AI. The back and forth would end with a Tweet from Musk stating the Facebook founder's 'understanding of the subject is limited'. 2018: WHAT'S FACEBOOK GOT TO DO WITH IT? Musk and Zuckerberg's relationship worsened. It would eventually push Musk off the platform and see him embrace Twitter as a premier space for communication. When speaking to WhatsApp founder Brian Acton, he would ask 'What's Facebook?' and suggest everyone leave the platform. At this time, Trump was taking a 'very restrained' approach to social media. 2021: A VANCE TO REMEMBER Vance would finally make it into the inner circle thanks to his PayPal Mafia bestie, Thiel. The latter would introduce him to Trump at Mar-a-Lago to repair their difficult relationship. Trump endorsed him a year later during his run as a senator for Ohio. 2022: HOW TO WIN A MUSK IN 10 DAYS Smooth-talking Musk, calling him the greatest genius on a par with Thomas Edison, Trump had his right-hand man back on his side. Six months later, Trump would call Musk 'another bull**** artist' in response to his promise to buy Twitter. Trump's feathers were ruffled by the fact that he was already on a mission to open his own social media business, Truth Social. The clip went viral on Twitter, Musk's preferred playground, so naturally he had a response: 'I don't hate the man, but it's time for Trump to hang up his hat & sail into the sunset.' The back and forth would continue with Trump claiming Musk would come crawling back, to which Musk responded: 'Lmaooo [laughing my *** off].' Much to Trump's surprise, Musk went through with the Twitter acquisition in October. Musk would extend an olive branch by running a poll to reinstate Trump on Twitter after the Twitter ban. The vote was for his return at 51.8%. Shortly after that, he would rename the platform X. 2023: SLEEPLESS IN THE US BORDER A considerable shift in Musk's politics would come up late in the year when he fully backed Trump's US border wall. 'We actually do need a wall and we need to require people to have some shred of evidence to claim asylum to enter, as everyone is doing that ...' Musk wrote. However, nothing was official about his backing of either the Democrats or the Republicans at the time. Elon Musk receives a golden key from Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House. Image: REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo 2024: HOW TRUMP GOT HIS MUSK BACK After Trump's shooting incident during a rally, Musk backed him as his official candidate seconds later. There were claims that Musk footed $45m. A month later, the pair went live on X where Musk would shoot his shot at a government efficiency job. Trump would also start to embrace Twitter and AI as a means of communication. They would have their first public appearance in 2024 when Trump returned to the scene of the crime in Pennsylvania calling himself 'dark MAGA' and sporting a black Make America Great Again T-shirt. Other than going viral for his childish antics, Musk announced he would give away $1m to voters in swing states who signed a petition for free speech and the right to bear arms. NOVEMBER 2024: MAMMA MAR-A-LAGO The relationship would be cemented by the very same trip with Vance in Mara-a-Lago. They would spend the night with other Republican supporters to watch the live election results. Trump announced the appointment of Musk and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy as leaders of Doge (department of government efficiency). The pair would be spotted at a SpaceX launch. It was at this point that Musk called himself 'the first buddy', amid reports he was sitting in on several meetings with international dignitaries. Trump would also hire Thiel and PayPal Mafia member David Sacks, the latter focused on advising the president on AI and cryptocurrencies. DECEMBER 2025: MR & MR PRESIDENT Tensions would rise again when media outlets would start rumours of 'President Musk'. Trump would eventually denounce the rumours of Musk's ascension to the White House. The rumour would be quelled by news of Musk renting out a $2,000 cottage on the premises of Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence. While he did not take it to X this time around, Musk would leave Trump and other Republicans irate over time. Sources told Mediate that Trump was 100% annoyed with Musk's spat with MAGA members about H1B visas (a type of working visa in the US), which they simplified as 'two tigers cannot live on one mountain top'. JANUARY 2025: FAR FROM THE MAGA CROWD After a tour de force of surprise announcements, Trump left the globe in a tailspin. This would also include the unexpected exit of Vivek Ramaswamy from Doge to run for the Ohio governor seat in 2026. With Musk in the driver's seat, critics started to notice he could not deliver on the promises he made. This included 100,000 layoffs that would land the Trump administration in hot water for the job cuts. The Independent reported that things were only getting worse for Musk and Trump's supporters with a West Wing brawl between him and Treasury secretary Scott Bessent making headlines. MAY 2025: IT ENDS WITH DOGE Things would start to fall apart between the pair when it was announced during a cabinet meeting late in April that Musk would be leaving Doge. His last day in the position would be in May. The reasons Musk cited were that Doge would be able to run on its own and that he needed to spend less time in the capital city. Trump would continue business as usual until Musk criticised his 'Big Beautiful Bill'. JUNE 2025: MY BIG FAT BEAUTIFUL BILL Musk would find resolve in expressing his anger on X again as he continued to criticise the Big Beautiful Bill. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it any more. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' he posted. Musk's qualms with the bill were that it could potentially ramp up US debt. However, during a White House briefing Trump expressed his disappointment with Musk's posts, saying 'he [Musk] had no problem with it' in earlier conversations about the bill. The pair would trade blows on their respective sites, Truth Social and X. Trump made disparaging comments about Tesla and Musk took parting shots in which he suggested the president wouldn't have won the election without him.

Musk and Trump bromance ends but Americans want Epstein files to be made public
Musk and Trump bromance ends but Americans want Epstein files to be made public

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

Musk and Trump bromance ends but Americans want Epstein files to be made public

The bromance between tech billionaire Elon Musk and former US President Donald Trump dramatically fell apart on Thursday, generating significant buzz on social media. The two billionaires formed an unlikely alliance last year, but tensions escalated after Trump expressed disappointment over Musk criticising his proposed massive spending bill. 'I've always liked Elon,' Trump said in an interview on Thursday. 'I'd rather have him criticise me than the bill,' he said. 'I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said when asked if he was still close with Musk. Less than thirty minutes later, Musk posted on X, indicating that their relationship with the US President would not remain positive. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk also claimed without any evidence that Trump was named in Epstein files that remain sealed. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day,' he tweeted. Since the tweets went viral, many Americans have asked for the Epstein files to be released. 'Everyone in MAGA needs to demand Trump release the Epstein files. Elon Musk has alleged that a foreign nation has blackmail on a sitting president. This is massive if true and Trump has he ability to clear his name with the stroke of a pen,' tweeted @jakeshieldsajj. 'The way Elon Musk is ripping apart Trump without caring that Trump is in power and can harm his business is bravery,' @RoshanKrRaii tweeted. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store