MP govt cracks down on stubble burning: No benefits for violators
Madhya Pradesh is cracking down on stubble burning. Farmers risk losing MSP benefits and state Kisan Kalyan Yojana payouts from May 1 if caught. This action follows a surge in stubble burning incidents. The government will promote eco-friendly alternatives. Officials aim to curb pollution and soil degradation. Penalties and incentives will encourage sustainable farming in the wheat belt.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Madhya Pradesh government is getting tough on stubble burning as the Rabi harvest begins. Chief Minister Mohan Yadav announced that from May 1, farmers caught burning stubble will be denied MSP procurement benefits and the ₹6,000 annual payout under the state's Kisan Kalyan Yojana While the central government's PM-Kisan payouts will continue, the state has seen an alarming rise in stubble burning-23,000 incidents this season compared to 7,000 last year. The government plans awareness drives promoting eco-friendly alternatives like happy seeders and super seeders Officials say the tough stand is necessary to control rising pollution levels and prevent long-term soil degradation. Madhya Pradesh, being a major wheat belt, cannot afford to let unchecked stubble burning impact environmental health or food security. Authorities are also ramping up penalties and incentives to nudge farmers towards sustainable farming practices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
5 hours ago
- New Indian Express
'We've lived here for generations': Batla House residents worried as demolition looms
NEW DELHI: Inside the maze of congested bylanes of southeast Delhi's Batla House, families pack up their possessions as they prepare to leave the place they called home for decades now. 'We've lived here for generations. Now, they just paste a notice and expect us to disappear,' said 65-year-old Abdul Rashid, who has been living in the locality since 1980. The notice in question was issued by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) on May 26, informing residents that Khasra number 279, on Muradi Road, belongs to authority, making all structures on the land unauthorised. Residents were given 15 days' notice to vacate the land with a demolition drive set to begin on June 11. A cloud of apprehension looms as hundreds of families in the area are living under threat of eviction. 'Most people who lived here on rent have already moved away. Among the homeowners, those who have the means have also shifted. But the rest of us don't have any other option. If the authorities actually do carry out the demolitions, we will be in ruin,' Rashid laments. The DDA notice excludes houses under the PM-UDAY scheme meant to regularise Delhi's unauthorised colonies, but many claim they were unfairly left out despite submitting the necessary paperwork. Faizan Quereshi, another local, shows electricity bills and a property tax receipt dating back to 1992. 'This is not an unauthorised settlement. It was regularised decades ago. We have documents, addresses, connections, all legal.' Residents are left to endure an uncertain future. 'My children have exams. My wife is unwell. We can't sleep at night with the notice hanging around our necks,' Parveen Akhtar, a resident of Khizar Baba Colony. said. 'We don't know if tomorrow the bulldozers will come.'
India Gazette
7 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Will move SC to challenge DDA's demarcation of properties in Batla House area": AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan
New Delhi [India], June 12 (ANI): Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Amanatullah Khan on Thursday said he would move the Supreme Court to challenge the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) demarcation of properties in the Batla House area of Okhla. The move followed directions from the High Court's Division Bench, which granted affected residents three days to file individual writ petitions. This comes a day after Khan withdrew his Public Interest Litigation (PIL) from the Delhi High Court that had sought to stop demolition action initiated by the DDA. Speaking to ANI, the AAP MLA said, 'The Division Bench has given time for the affected parties to file their writ individually within three days. We have also withdrawn our PIL. People have been living there since 1971, and you suddenly declared it unauthorised and separated it from the PM-UDAY scheme.' '...The manner in which DDA wants to demolish this entire area is beyond my demarcation done by them is not accurate. I withdrew my plea because I will challenge the demarcation before the Supreme Court,' he said. Khan withdrew the PIL on Wednesday to inform the residents of his area to file an appropriate petition before the court. The withdrawal was allowed by a division bench of Justices Girish Kathpalia and Tejas Karia of the Delhi High Court, which suggested that individual residents approach the court with their grievances. 'In furtherance of the last order, senior counsel on the instructions of briefing counsel seeks permission to withdraw the petition filed by the petitioner, who is a public-spirited person, so he can inform the residents of Batla House to file an appropriate petition before the court,' the High Court said. At the outset of the hearing, the High Court noted that some aggrieved individuals have already been given protection by the court after hearing their individual petitions. The High Court at the beginning emphasised that any adverse order while deciding the PIL may affect the rights of the individuals who are already before the single-judge bench. The court has also emphasised that any aggrieved individual may approach the court like other people who have already approached the court. This issue is not a subject matter of the PIL. Khan had filed a PIL challenging the notice issued by the DDA for the demolition of alleged illegal properties in the area of Batla House in Okhla. The High Court on Monday had refused to grant an immediate interim stay on the demolition, which was proposed for June 11. Earlier, the apex court on May 7 refused to grant relief and directed the demolition of the illegal properties. Senior advocate Salman Khurshid appeared for the petitioner and argued that they (DDA) are pasting notices on the properties which fall beyond the khasra no. 279. The order of the Supreme Court was regarding the illegal properties within this khasra. The counsel for respondents contended, on the other hand, that the PIL is not maintainable as the Supreme Court specifically directed that the individual aggrieved persons adopt the legal remedy. DDA's counsel also said that the notices issued by the DDA are not generic and are in compliance with the Supreme Court. All the notices were given 15 days to respond. No demolition was carried out during the notice period. (ANI)
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
4 DSE alumni in PM Economic Advisory Council
NEW DELHI: Four academics from the Delhi School of Economics (DSE) have been appointed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's newly formed Economic Advisory Council (EAC-PM). Ram Singh, director of DSE and Delhi School of Public Policy & Governance, said Chairman of EAC-PM S Mahendra Dev is an alumnus of DSE. Former DSE director Pami Dua has been appointed as a part-time member of the council. Dr Shamika Ravi, a DSE alumnus, has been made a full-time member of EAC-PM and Chetan Ghate, also an alumnus of the institute, a part-time member. Expressing happiness over the appointments, DU Vice Chancellor Yogesh Singh said, 'This is a proud moment for DU and DSE. These eminent economists will make important contributions to the formulation of the country's economic policies. These four members of the DU-DSE family have vast and diverse knowledge of the Indian economy.'
