Florida state representative Joe Casello dies after heart attack
Nikki Fried, chairwoman of the Florida Democratic Party, said he would be "deeply missed."
More politics news: Trump approval rating drops in new poll; more Americans oppose immigration policies
Remembering Rep. Joe Casello
A private ceremony will be held in the family's home state of Massachusetts, the caucus said, and a public memorial service will be announced in the coming weeks.
Casello was a firefighter for 33 years in Worcester, Massachusetts, before moving to Palm Beach County. His first entry into politics was in 2013, when he became a city commissioner in Boynton Beach. Last November, he was reelected to a fourth term in the state House by a double-digit margin. He had filed papers to run for the Palm Beach County Commission in November 2026.
Gov. Ron DeSantis will need to call a special election to fill Casello's seat, according to Florida state law.
Casello was taken off life support the morning of July 18, after he was taken to regional hospital about two weeks ago after complaining of chest pains, the Palm Beach Post reported.
State Rep. Mike Caruso, R-Delray Beach, was a close friend, and told the Palm Beach Post he and his wife visited Casello for about half an hour on July 17.
"He was very lucid," Caruso said. "I asked him if there was anything I could do for him. He said: 'See if you could get a fire truck named after me.'"
"My life has always been about public service and meeting the needs of my community," Casello said in a statement released July 17, a day before his passing. "Serving as both a firefighter for 33 years and an elected official for 13 years has been the greatest honor of my life. Representing the people -- through times of unity and division, triumph and challenge -- has been a privilege I will always cherish."
Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@usatoday.com and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Mike Diamond is a journalist at The Palm Beach Post, part of the USA TODAY Florida Network. You can reach him at mdiamond@pbpost.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
MIKEY SMITH: 8 unhinged Donald Trump moments as he scrambles to distract from Epstein scandal
Donald Trump is still scrambling to get people to talk about literally anything else - but Barack Obama is having absolutely none of it Donald Trump continued his scramble to get people to talk about literally anything but his former friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. He's not even hiding it. He flat out ordered Republicans to do the pivot from one subject to another in a televised speech last night. Meanwhile, Obama hit back at Trump's threat to jail him over a bunch of made up nonsense. Trump had some real trouble with what I believe Americans call "math". And if you weren't sure whether America is creeping slowly towards being an old school dictatorship, Republicans are in the process of naming an Opera House after the great leader's wife. Here's everything that's happened in Trump World in the last 24 hours that you need to know about. 1. Trump teaches Republicans to pivot from Epstein to 'Obama did it' At a reception for Republican members of congress, Trump went on a long detour, during which he coached those present, if asked about the Epstein files, to pivot to "Obama did it" "Remember this, Obama cheated on the election," Trump said. There is no evidence to support this claim. "You should mention that every time they give you a question that's not appropriate, just say 'by the way, Obama cheated on the election.' You'll watch the camera turn off almost instantly." 2. He claimed his poll numbers are up 5 points since the Epstein letter. They're obviously not Trump claimed at the reception: "They're the best numbers I've ever had. And with this made up hoax that they're talking about, my numbers have gone up for and five points." This is, of course, untrue. According to the most recent polling - by YouGov for the Economist - Trump's numbers are somewhere south of the gutter. He's at 55% disapprove, 40% approve, 4% not sure. His net approval is -15% - down 1.2 points since last week. For a while the only President who had worse numbers at this point in his presidency was himself eight years ago. According to the Economist poll, the has breached this threshold. 3. Pam Bondi did her own little Watergate-style purge A group of US judges last night voted to replace Trump's pick for New Jersey's top federal prosecutor - who just happens to be one of his former personal lawyers. Alina Habba defended Trump in a series of legal cases, but has no experience as a prosecutor in criminal law. Nevertheless she was given the job on an interim basis, and officially nominated for the position. So when judges rejected her as prosecutor - a rare move - at the end of her 120 post, it was expected her deputy, career prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace, would take over. That made Bondi mad, so she fired the deputy, giving no reason for the decision. "This Department of Justice does not tolerate rogue judges - especially when they threaten the President's core Article II powers," Bondi said on Twitter after the move. Bondi, it's said, plans to reinstall Habba in the post, but it's unclear how. 4. Can we just return to how the President is casually accusing his predecessor of treason and threatening to jail him? Because that seems like kind of a big deal, and it's not really being treated as one. If any previous President had done this it would be a huge scandal. Like, grounds for impeachment huge. Even the line where he accuses Obama of trying to instigate a coup, when Trump himself tried to instigate a coup four years ago, feels like a throwaway detail. 5. Obama has had enough of this nonsense "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," the former President said in a statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. "These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio." As we've written previously, Trump, Gabbard and the people who go out to bat for them on TV either don't know the difference between "Russia hacked the vote tallies" and "Russia ran a propaganda campaign, some of which included hacking and leaking people's emails" - or they're lying. Bottom line is, Obama's right - the documents don't say what they say they say. 6. And yet, Gabbard keeps declassifying meaningless documents Last night Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard added another meaningless document to her crazy wall of conspiracy theories. This time the red wool leads the reader to a 44-page report prepared by Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee - without input from their Democrat counterparts - from 2020. The previously secret document spends a long time quibbling about whether the Intelligence community's view that Vladimir Putin had a "clear preference" for Donald Trump winning the election was based on good intelligence. The Republicans, shockingly, decided was not. It's notable though that the document itself doesn't say Putin didn't want Trump to win - only that in their view the source of that claim from back in 2016 was sketchy. It also doesn't say Putin didn't try to influence the result by attacking Hillary Clinton's campaign - just that in their view the motivation was to sow discontent, rather than influence the outcome. It's really incredible how many previously classified files a government can release while it's trying not to release other ones, isn't it? Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 7. For a businessman, Trump has a hard time with percentages Discussing his plan to reduce drug prices, Trump said he was going to cut them by "numbers that are not even thought to be achievable." "This is somebody nobody else can do. I can get the drug prices down… 1000% 600% 500% 1500%. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable." Given all of those reductions would result in drug companies giving money to patients to use their drugs, no Donald, they're not even thought to be achievable. Stay in school, kids. 8. They might be renaming an opera house after Melania Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee have voted to adopt an amendment that would re-name the second largest auditorium in the Kennedy Center after Melania Trump. It isn't currently named after anyone.
NBC News
7 hours ago
- NBC News
Calls to strip Zohran Mamdani's citizenship spark alarm about Trump weaponizing denaturalization
WASHINGTON — Immediately after Zohran Mamdani became the presumptive Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City last month, one Republican congressman had a provocative suggestion for the Trump administration: 'He needs to be DEPORTED.' The Uganda-born Mamdani obtained U.S. citizenship in 2018 after moving to the United States with his parents as a child. But Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., argued in his post on X that the Justice Department should consider revoking it over rap lyrics that, he said, suggested support for Hamas. The Justice Department declined to comment on whether it has replied to Ogles' letter, but White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said of his claims about Mamdani, 'Surely if they are true, it's something that should be investigated.' Trump himself has claimed without evidence that Mamdani is an illegal immigrant, and when erstwhile ally Elon Musk was asked about deporting another naturalized citizen, he suggested he would consider it. The congressman's proposal dovetails with a priority of the Trump administration to ramp up efforts to strip citizenship from other naturalized Americans. The process, known as denaturalization, has been used by previous administrations to remove terrorists and, decades ago, Nazis and communists. But the Trump DOJ's announcement last month that it would 'prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings' has sparked alarm among immigration lawyers and advocates, who fear the Trump administration could use denaturalization to target political opponents. Although past administrations have periodically pursued denaturalization cases, it is an area ripe for abuse, according to Elizabeth Taufa, a lawyer at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. 'It can be very easily weaponized at any point,' she said. Noor Zafar, an immigration lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union, said there is a 'real risk and a real threat' that the administration will target people based on their political views. Asked for comment on the weaponization concerns, a Justice Department spokesperson pointed to the federal law that authorizes denaturalizations, 8 U.S.C. 1451. 'We are upholding our duty as expressed in the statute,' the spokesperson said. Immigrant groups and political opponents of Trump are already outraged at the way the Trump administration has used its enforcement powers to stifle dissent in cases involving legal immigrants who do not have U.S. citizenship. ICE detained Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist engaged in campus protests critical of Israel, for more than 100 days before he was released. Turkish student Rümeysa Öztürk was also detained for two months over her pro-Palestinian advocacy. More broadly, the administration has been accused of violating the due process rights of immigrants it has sought to rapidly deport over the objection of judges and, in cases involving alleged Venezuelan gang members and Salvadoran man Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Supreme Court. Denaturalization cases have traditionally been rare and in past decades focused on ferreting out former Nazis who fled to the United States after World War II under false pretenses. But the approach gradually changed after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Aided by technological advances that made it easier to identify people and track them down, the number of denaturalization cases has gradually increased. It was the Obama administration that initially seized on the issue, launching what was called Operation Janus, which identified more than 300,000 cases where there were discrepancies involving fingerprint data that could indicate potential fraud. But the process is slow and requires considerable resources, with the first denaturalization as a result of Operation Janus secured during Trump's first term in January 2018. That case involved Baljinder Singh, originally from India, who had been subject to deportation but later became a U.S. citizen after assuming a different identity. In total, the first Trump administration filed 102 denaturalization cases, with the Biden administration filing 24, according to the Justice Department spokesperson, who said figures for the Obama administration were not available. The new Trump administration has already filed five. So far, the Trump administration has prevailed in one case involving a man originally from the United Kingdom who had previously been convicted of receiving and distributing child pornography. The Justice Department declined to provide information about the other new cases. Overall, denaturalization cases are brought against just a tiny proportion of the roughly 800,00 people who become naturalized citizens each year, according to the Department of Homeland Security. 'Willful misrepresentation' The government has two ways to revoke citizenship, either through a rare criminal prosecution for fraud or via a civil claim in federal court. The administration outlined its priorities for civil enforcement in a June memo issued by Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate, which listed 10 potential grounds for targeting naturalized citizens. Examples range from 'individuals who pose a risk to national security' or who have engaged in war crimes or torture, to people who have committed Medicaid or Medicare fraud or have otherwise defrauded the government. There is also a broad catch-all provision that refers to 'any other cases ... that the division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.' The denaturalization law focuses on 'concealment of a material fact' or 'willful misrepresentation' during the naturalization proceeding. The ACLU's Zafar said the memo leaves open the option for the Trump administration to at least try to target people based on their speech or associations. 'Even if they don't think they really have a plausible chance of succeeding, they can use it as a means to just harass people,' she added. The Justice Department can bring denaturalization cases over a wide range of conduct related to the questions applicants for U.S. citizenship are asked, including the requirement that they have been of 'good moral character' in the preceding five years. Immigration law includes several examples of what might disqualify someone on moral character grounds, including if they are a 'habitual drunkard' or have been convicted of illegal gambling. The naturalization application form itself asks a series of questions probing good moral character, such as whether the applicant has been involved in violent acts, including terrorism. The form also queries whether people have advocated in support of groups that support communism, 'the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship' or the 'unlawful assaulting or killing' of any U.S. official. Failure to accurately answer any of the questions or the omission of any relevant information can be grounds for citizenship to be revoked. In 2015, for example, Sammy Chang, a native of South Korea who had recently become a U.S. citizen, had his citizenship revoked in the wake of his conviction in a criminal case of trafficking women to work at a club he owned. The government said that because Chang had been engaged in the scheme during the time he was applying for naturalization, he had failed to show good moral character. But in both civil and criminal cases, the government has to reach a high bar to revoke citizenship. Among other things, it has to show that any misstatement or omission in a naturalization application was material to whether citizenship would have been granted. In civil cases, the government has to show 'clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence which does not leave the issue in doubt' in order to prevail. 'A simple game of gotcha with naturalization applicants isn't going to work,' said Jeremy McKinney, a North Carolina-based immigration lawyer. 'It's going to require significant materiality for a judge to strip someone of their United States citizenship.' Targeting rap lyrics In his June 26 tweet, Ogles attached a letter he sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking her to consider pursuing Mamdani's denaturalization, in part, because he 'expressed open solidarity with individuals convicted of terrorism-related offenses prior to becoming a U.S. citizen.' Ogles cited rap lyrics that Mamdani wrote years ago in which he expressed support for the 'Holy Land Five.' That appears to be a reference to five men involved in a U.S.-based Muslim charitable group called the Holy Land Foundation who were convicted in 2008 of providing material support to the Palestinian group Hamas. Some activists say the prosecution was a miscarriage of justice fueled by anti-Muslim sentiment following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Ogles' office and Mamdani's campaign did not respond to requests seeking comment. Speaking on Newsmax in June, Ogles expanded on his reasons for revoking Mamdani's citizenship, suggesting the mayoral candidate had 'failed to disclose' relevant information when he became a citizen, including his political associations. Ogles has alleged Mamdani is a communist because of his identification as a democratic socialist, although the latter is not a communist group. The Trump administration, Ogles added, could use a case against Mamdani to 'create a template for other individuals who come to this country' who, he claimed, 'want to undermine our way of life.' (Even if Mamdani were denaturalized, he would not, contrary to Ogles' claim, automatically face deportation, as he would most likely revert his previous status as a permanent resident.) In an appearance on NBC's ' Meet the Press' on June 29, Mamdani said calls for him to be stripped of his citizenship and deported are 'a glimpse into what life is like for many Muslim New Yorkers and many New Yorkers of different faiths who are constantly being told they don't belong in this city and this country that they love.' Targeting Mamdani for his rap lyrics would constitute a very unusual denaturalization case, said Taufa, the immigration lawyer. But, she added, 'they can trump up a reason to denaturalize someone if they want to.' McKinney, a former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the relatively low number of denaturalization cases that are filed, including those taken up during Trump's first term, shows how difficult it is for the government to actually strip people of their citizenship. 'But what they can be very successful at is continuing to create a climate of panic and anxiety and fear,' he added. 'They're doing that very well. So, mission accomplished in that regard.'
The Herald Scotland
12 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Donald Trump considering tax break that would impact housing market
"We are thinking about no tax on capital gains on houses," Trump said during an Oval Office meeting with the president of the Philippines. Trump, a wealthy real estate developer who has extensive property holdings, didn't go into details about his proposal, and the White House didn't immediately respond to questions. Trump on July 4 signed a measure that extends his 2017 tax cuts and includes new tax breaks, including on tipped wages, overtime pay and car loans. The law also slashes spending on the Medicaid health insurance program for lower income Americans and lifts the nation's looming debt ceiling. The measure is expected to increase the federal debt by $3.4 trillion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Trump can't turn his suggestion for the housing market into reality by himself: cutting the tax on home sales would require additional legislation. The move also comes as the president has long pushed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. "If the Fed would lower rates, we wouldn't have to do that," Trump said of the potential home sales tax cut. In general, the Fed cuts interest rates to stimulate a flagging economy and job market. It increases interest rates - or keeps them higher for longer - to lower inflation or prevent a spike in prices. Powell warned in April about the impact of Trump's tariffs on inflation, telling the Economic Club of Chicago that "Unemployment is likely to go up as the economy slows, in all likelihood, and inflation is likely to go up as tariffs find their way and some part of those tariffs come to be paid by the public." Contributing: Paul Davidson
