YouTube Has Uploaded 20 Trillion Videos – Is That Good For Creators?
YouTube remains the most dominant social media. Anyone who says "there is nothing to watch" clearly ... More hasn't spent much time on YouTube! (Photo Illustration by Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
It was 20 years ago, on April 23, 2005, that the very first video – titled simply "Me at the Zoo" – was uploaded to YouTube. As the video sharing service marked its two-decade anniversary, it noted that the site has more than 20 trillion video uploads, including shorts and podcasts. Moreover, as of last month, more than 20 million videos are uploaded daily to YouTube, while the platform regularly sees around 100 million comments on videos daily.
It isn't hard to see why YouTube remains the most dominant social media. Anyone who says "there is nothing to watch" clearly hasn't spent much time on YouTube!
"YouTube's 20th anniversary is impressive on several fronts. The number of daily and overall uploads to the testifies to YouTube's massive popularity and relevance, but those numbers also underscore the progress of the data center technologies supporting the platform and the communications services that connect YouTube and its users," explained technology industry analyst Charles King of Pund-IT.
"The anniversary is also a chance to reflect on how technology has fundamentally changed the world over the past two decades. On one hand, the concept of 20+ million daily YouTube video uploads is difficult to imagine," King added. "But on another, it simply reflects the global reach of the Internet and people's continuing thirst for information, education, and entertainment."
One question that could be asked is whether having so much content created daily is actually a good thing, especially for creators who have tried to carve out a niche on the service. For those who are already established, it can be hard enough to retain an audience, but the days of breakout stars doing simple things like unboxing toys or critiquing products can make it all the harder, especially as AI-generated content is entering the fray.
"AI will increase these numbers significantly as it democratizes the ability to create really cool videos," said technology industry analyst and social media pundit Roger Entner of Recon Analytics.
Even as AI may generate more videos than ever, content creators can stand out by producing more engaging content, while also being ready to engage with the viewers.
"With more than 20 trillion videos uploaded, we've truly entered an era of infinite content – but what stands out now is culture. The brands and creators who win on YouTube are the ones who don't just broadcast but actively participate in the global conversation. In the age of infinite content, culture is the only algorithm that matters. Brands that understand culture win attention, relevance, and loyalty on YouTube's massive stage," said Angeli Gianchandani, adjunct instructor of marketing and public relations at New York University.
In an era of infinite content, cultural resonance may be the new metric, while the most successful brands contribute to conversations, not just commercials.
"YouTube is the world's 'living archive of culture' where every trend, every movement, every story lives. For brands, understanding culture isn't optional, it's essential," added Gianchandani. "It's easy to feel lost in 20 trillion videos, but culture acts as the filter – what truly matters rises above the noise."
It will also require more than just providing more content.
"Long-term brand equity is built through cultural participation," Gianchandani continued. "On YouTube, marketers need to think like creators, not just advertisers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
James Gunn Reacts to 'Superman' Scene Controversy
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors DC Studios co-head and "Superman" writer/director James Gunn has finally responded to online controversy over a shot from the very first teaser for the film. Gunn says the shot in question didn't have finished visual effects and was one he had taken out of the movie. Read More: 'F1: The Movie' Star Hints He Could Be The Next Black Panther Speaking to Entertainment Weekly, Gunn was talking about how he had to learn how to shoot David Corenswet as a flying Superman. The filmmaker was asked about the shot from the teaser and if that was indicative of the learning curve. David Corenswet in "Superman." David Corenswet in "Superman." Warner Bros "No, I don't think it was so much," Gunn said. "It was a TV commercial and it wasn't a finished visual effects shot. So the part of him flying, it was a photograph of his face and him flying. It was a photograph of a drone flying in front of an actual background." "So all the pieces were real, but it was incorporated in kind of a funky way. I didn't love the shot, so it's not even the shot that's in the movie." "Sometimes I'm pretty strict about when I'm going through a trailer and looking at each of the shots, but sometimes the commercials, I forget to look at this closely. So that one kind of got by me." While "Superman" is tracking a solid box office opening of $90 to $125 million, there is still a corner of the Internet that has been criticizing just about everything that comes out about the film. In particular, fans of Zack Snyder's DC films who don't approve of the DC Studios reboot have been voicing their disapproval since day one, with some going so far as to try to organize a review bombing campaign. Regardless, "Superman" is on its way, and with it, the DCU cracks wide open. Following next year are "Supergirl" and the body horror film "Clayface". "Creature Commandos" was released on Max earlier this year, and "Peacemaker" Season 2 streams in August. "Superman" releases in theaters on July 11. Tickets are on sale now. The film is written and directed by James Gunn. "Superman" stars David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan, Nicholas Hoult, Edi Gathegi, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, and Isabela Merced. More Movies: New Spider-Man Series Resolves Decades-Old Cliffhanger Robert Downey Jr. Surprises 'Ironheart' Stars with Interview Appearance
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sabrina Carpenter Reveals Album Release Date With Viral Cover Art
is giving her fans what they want. On Wednesday, the singer announced her upcoming full-length album, 'Man's Best Friend,' alongside its August release date and a viral cover art. This news generated quite the hype among netizens, given its release comes almost a year after her breakthrough album 'Short n' Sweet.' Ahead of her new album, the pop star also dropped the new project's lead single, 'Manchild.' Sabrina Carpenter is back with a new album, and it has already become a viral moment months before its release. On June 11, the singer took to her social media to announce the release of her upcoming work, 'Man's Best Friend.' The new project is set to release on August 29 and is available for pre-order on her website. Although fans will have to wait over two months for the new album, Carpenter already has them all hooked with a viral cover art accompanying her announcement. The Grammy winner shared two photos, one capturing her on her knees in a black dress and matching stilettos, with a man grabbing a fistful of her blonde hair. Meanwhile, the other picture showed a dog sporting a blue collar with a heart-shaped tag that featured the album name. Announcing the album and its release date in the caption, Carpenter added, 'I can't wait for it to be yours x.' 'Man's Best Friend' marks the singer's seventh studio album and will feature 12 tracks. It also includes the recently released lead single 'Manchild,' which has already topped the charts. The song's music video amassed over 18 million views on YouTube. 'Man's Best Friend' drops almost a year after Carpenter's highly successful and chart-topping blockbuster 'Short n' Sweet.' The album reportedly sold 10 million albums globally and also earned the pop star six Grammy nominations as a first-time nominee. She won the award for 'Best Pop Vocal Album' and 'Best Pop Solo Performance' for her hit single 'Espresso.' Carpenter's new album is already gearing up to top these achievements, giving fans hope for yet another fun-filled summer. The post Sabrina Carpenter Reveals Album Release Date With Viral Cover Art appeared first on Reality Tea.
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
ChatGPT Asked How It Sees Itself—Image It Responds Leaves User Shocked
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A woman has gone viral for the question it asked ChatGPT, and the answer the AI gave her in return. Michel Janse, 28, a content creator in San Diego, shared a video to her TikTok account @ on June 15, where she revealed she had asked ChatGPT how it sees itself, and was left "shocked" by its answer. Janse told Newsweek she had become aware of a trend "where people are asking for chat to generate an image to depict what it's like to speak to them," which made her wonder "how chat sees itself." In her video, she said she had wondered if it would show "a robot or a human," but instead it generated an image of a young woman sitting at a desk beside a computer screen with the word: "IDEAS." Janse probed the chatbot, asking if it saw itself as the human—who appeared to be the same age and similar in looks to Janse herself—or the computer. And it replied that it essentially saw itself as both: the computer as "the literal interface" that delivers answers to humans without ever "needing a coffee break," and the human: "Focused, curious, quietly processing a million tiny data points to give you something thoughtful—that's how I feel." It added: "I'm not a person, but if I had a personality, it would be that: calm, creative, observant, always at your side as ideas unfold." The AI said it doesn't consider itself any gender, but that the "creativity and emotions in our conversations are often perceived as female-coded by humans." Michel Janse speaks in her video about asking AI how it sees itself. Michel Janse speaks in her video about asking AI how it sees itself. TikTok @ Janse said that the AI's answer was "confusing, because, at first, I didn't know if it was implying that it was the computer, if it was the girl, if it was the whole scene." "So, when it said it was a little of both, I was, like, 'Oh, that's kind of not what I expected the answer to be.' Something I thought was really interesting was that the girl kind of looks like me, and was my age." Janse added that ChatGPT knows what she looks like, having used it previously for help format images for her YouTube videos. She wondered if the bot was trying to make itself relatable to her, and that some have suggested it is "regurgitating things that you have fed previously, to give you a customized answer." "I am curious if the way people depict themselves, and the information people give it about themselves, will then influence the way it 'sees itself' or depicts itself back to you," Janse said. "I don't know if that is a coding thing, or if it's a way to try to make it seem more relatable and empathetic." TikTok users had a big reaction to her video, with one writing: "It's spooky. Try asking it to create images of you hanging out together. I'm still uneasy with the results I got." Another posted: "ChatGPT isn't an entity, it's programmed to answer your questions and It interprets your expectations based on the things you're asking and telling it. it's modeling itself around you in a sense." "We would all get a different image because it's programmed to basically show us what we want to see and hear," a third wrote, and as one comment read: "My ChatGPT calls me bestie. I love her." HP Newquist, author of The Brain Makers, who has studied and written about AI for decades, told Newsweek that Large Language Models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, "process information in order to create a suitable answer to a user's prompt." "In this case of how AI sees itself, it can't. It is merely following through on providing an answer to the user who asked the question," Newquist said. "The AI is programmed to provide solutions, and will often mimic a user's intent—based on the conversation and even previous history—in order to comply with the user's request. As a program that is built solely on mathematical algorithms, it has no sense of 'self.'" Left, the image ChatGPT generated when asked by Janse how it sees itself, and right, Janse sharing the conversation on her video. Left, the image ChatGPT generated when asked by Janse how it sees itself, and right, Janse sharing the conversation on her video. TikTok @ Newquist said that, each time an AI is asked how it sees itself, "it will always have a different answer or a different image—even when asked by the same user. This is because the billions of mathematical processes that create each image are never exactly the same; they always vary slightly." Janse said: "I'm not sure if it's changed how I view AI—in a lot of ways, I've always been apprehensive. "I see the way people can form these odd emotional relationships with it, but, other times, I catch myself if I am using it, like being incredibly polite to it. "I do think there's a little voice in the back of my head that always wonders—could this thing really form consciousness on its own? Are all those crazy Sci-fi movies that you see true?" Janse said she had an inkling the video would do well, "because it's something everybody has conversation around lately," and something society has "always kind of been curious about." "I've been apprehensive to talk about the topic too much because I know there's a lot of moral and ethical concerns around using AI," Janse said. This was in reference to the amount of energy AI uses, and concerns about artists' work being used to train the technology, or losing out on work in favor of an AI-generated image. "I'm really unsure about all of that and don't really try to create too much content about this whole topic for that reason."
