Ramadoss urges T.N. govt to issue notification for admitting underprivileged students to private schools under RTE Act
Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) founder S. Ramadoss on Saturday urged the State government to immediately issue a notification and begin the process of admitting children from underprivileged sections to private schools as part of the 25% quota reserved for them under the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009.
In a statement, he pointed out that the notification was yet to be released. The fees for children admitted under this category would be borne by the government. 'Since the summer holidays have already begun, it is condemnable that the notification under the prescribed quota is yet to be published,' he said.
Under the RTE Act, the admission notification for private schools is usually released in March, and applications are collected in April. The selection process will be completed in May to ensure that the entire admission process is finalised before June, when schools usually reopen. 'However, there were rumours that the government might have decided to discontinue free education in private schools under the RTE Act. It is the responsibility of the Tamil Nadu government to address and dispel these doubts,' Dr. Ramadoss said.
The admissions under the RTE quota in Kendriya Vidyalaya schools were completed two weeks ago. Likewise, the Tamil Nadu government should have expedited the RTE admission process in private schools across the State. The government must immediately issue the notification and begin accepting applications, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Nearly half of Haryana's information officers fail to pay RTI penalties: Data
Over the past 18 years, 48.6% of information officers in Haryana have failed to deposit fines imposed on them by the Haryana State Information Commission. This data, procured under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, reveals that these penalties were levied on officers for failing to provide complete information within the stipulated time. Responding to a query by Haryana Soochna Adhikar Manch convener Subhash, the commission disclosed that 4,043 information officials had been fined in this period. The total penalty imposed on them amounts to Rs. 5.9 crore, of which Rs. 2.84 crore has been recovered. However, 1,965 officials are yet to pay their fines, leaving over Rs. 3 crore unpaid. RTI activist Subhash, who founded the Haryana Soochna Adhikar Manch in 2007, has emphasised the need for strict action against officials who withhold information and later fail to deposit fines. Another activist, P P Kapoor, previously approached the Lokayukta demanding action against defaulting officers. He also urged the anti-corruption ombudsman to direct the government to recover fines with interest. Kapoor told The Indian Express that hearings on the matter were nearing completion, and he expected a ruling soon. He has suggested that retirement benefits should be withheld from officers who fail to clear penalties before superannuation. Former State Information Commissioner Hemant Atri has consistently pushed for a mechanism to ensure compliance with commission orders. He advocates for strict action against State Public Information Officers (SPIOs) who ignore hearings and fail to implement directives. Atri explained that, during his tenure, he held First Appellate Authorities (FAAs) accountable for enforcing his orders. He emphasised that drawing and disbursing officers (DDOs) and FAAs should be responsible for ensuring penalty payments, warning that failure to comply could result in action under Section 20(2) of the RTI Act, 2005. A senior Haryana government official told The Indian Express that the administration would soon issue instructions directing SPIOs to deposit their fines with the state exchequer. Sukhbir Siwach's extensive and in-depth coverage of farmer agitation against three farm laws during 2020-21 drew widespread attention. ... Read More
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Only civil courts can try land ownership or title disputes: Odisha HC
CUTTACK : In a significant ruling, the Orissa high court has held that revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputes involving ownership or title to land, emphasising that such matters fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of civil courts. The vacation bench of Justice S K Panigrahi issued the order on May 30, setting aside an eviction order passed by the tehsildar of Dhamnagar under the Orissa Prevention of Land Encroachment (OPLE) Act, 1972. The case pertains to Dinabandhu Behera, who challenged the eviction proceedings initiated against him on the grounds that the state had erroneously recorded the disputed land in its name during the hal settlement. Behera claimed that his father had legally come into possession of the property after an 'ekpadia' (a written recognition) was issued by the ex-intermediary post-estate abolition. His father's name was subsequently recorded in the tenant ledger and rent was regularly paid to the govt. Upon his death, Behera came into possession of the land. But, despite these records, the tehsildar initiated eviction proceedings treating Behera as an encroacher. The sub-collector and collector of Bhadrak later upheld the eviction order. The HC, while setting aside all these orders, stated that the existence of a bona fide dispute over ownership and title renders summary eviction proceedings under the OPLE Act is inappropriate. "The revenue authorities, who conduct summary procedures, are not competent to adjudicate such complex disputes of title," Justice Panigrahi observed. The court further noted that Behera had already approached the civil judge, junior division, Dhamnagar, seeking declaration of his right, title and interest in the suit land. He had also prayed for a declaration that the encroachment proceedings were unsustainable, given the pending civil suit. Reaffirming the supremacy of civil courts in deciding title-related matters, the court ruled that "summary proceedings by revenue authorities cannot constitute the proper forum for adjudication where a bona fide dispute exists over title".
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Why Is BJP Keen To Ally With PMK In Tamil Nadu? Answer Lies In Caste Arithmetic
Last Updated: BJP sources told News18 that the party is keen on a patch-up between Ramadoss and his son Anbumani and wants to seal the deal by June-end The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which sealed its deal with AIADMK in Tamil Nadu in April this year—with Union Home Minister Amit Shah declaring that a 'coalition government" would be formed after the elections— now has its eyes on a smaller ally, the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK). In fact, RSS ideologue S Gurumurthy's crucial visits to the residence of senior Ramadoss are being seen as efforts to bring the two warring factions of the PMK—founder S Ramadoss's camp and that of his son Anbumani Ramadoss—to a common ground so that the NDA deal can be sealed. In the 2024 Lok Sabha election, PMK fought across 10 constituencies but failed to win any seats. PMK came second in one seat (Dharmapuri), third in eight seats, and fourth in one seat. So, why then is the BJP so keen to ally with such a small player? Despite losses, the PMK secured a vote share of approximately 4.33 per cent across the 10 constituencies in 2024. The party also holds notable political significance in Tamil Nadu, primarily as a regional party representing the Vanniyar community, which forms a significant portion of the state's population, especially in northern and western districts. Founded in 1989 by Dr S Ramadoss, PMK is a key advocate for the Vanniyar community, a Most Backward Class (MBC) group. The party's strong hold in districts like Dharmapuri, Cuddalore, Villupuram, and Salem makes it a critical player in mobilising Vanniyar votes, which can be decisive in close contests. In a state where the BJP is seen as 'party of Savarna" or upper caste, an ally like PMK will take away a lot of DMK's caste-based rhetoric during campaigning in Tamil Nadu, BJP sources reveal. Moreover, at a time when Tamil Nadu is witnessing rejuvenation of caste-based advocacy, having outfits like PMK—which successfully pushed for 10.5 per cent exclusive reservation for Vanniyars within the MBC quota in 2021 (though this was later struck down by the Supreme Court)—will help the BJP gets mainstreamed in Tamil Nadu politics, its state units believe. 'PMK has its own uses and its own limitations, like its influence is limited to northern Tamil Nadu alone. But we are approaching this election with a different mindset where we would like to think PMK's interests and NDA's interests would align better with each other," said a BJP source. But before the PMK aligns with NDA, the former must decide who will head it. Dr Ramadoss recently accused his son Anbumani of forcing him to join the NDA during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in which PMK couldn't win a single seat. Though back-channel talks are on where Gurumurthy and Chennai mayor Saidai Duraiswamy visited the senior Ramadoss who wants his son to relinquish the power of being the head of the party, Gurumurthy claimed he met the senior Ramadoss as his 'friend". Interestingly though, just before his meeting with senior Ramadoss, Anbumani went and met his father. BJP sources told News18 they would have liked the patch-up between the father-son duo to happen on a day when Shah was in the state. The home minister addressed the state core committee and even wooed Tamil sentiments by saying: 'I apologise to my BJP workers of Tamil Nadu as I cannot talk to them in one of the greatest languages of India—Tamil." Before Shah left the state, away from Madurai where BJP's meeting was in full swing, senior Ramadoss told reporters they can expect 'good news" about the patch-up between him and his son. BJP sources suggest 'an arrangement has been mutually agreed" where the father will become the party president and the son will become the working president. 'The sooner they shake hands, the better as BJP would like to seal the alliance before June ends," said a BJP source. In the 2021 Tamil Nadu legislative assembly election, the alliance led by the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and including the BJP and PMK, won 75 seats out of the 234 total constituencies. The AIADMK secured 66 seats, the BJP won four seats, and the PMK won five seats.
