US Patriot missile batteries in S. Korea to be temporarily deployed to Middle East
South Korea and the United States have recently agreed on a plan to temporarily deploy Patriot missile defense batteries from the South to the Middle East, sources said Friday, amid speculation over a potential shift in the role of the US Forces Korea.
The allies agreed last month on the "monthslong" partial deployment of the Patriot Advanced Capability-3, the first known case involving the relocation of USFK assets to the Middle East, according to the sources.
The missiles work alongside South Korea's own air defense assets in a multilayered missile defense system against North Korea's missile and nuclear threats, according to the sources.
The rare move comes after US broadcaster NBC News reported last week that US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized at least two Patriot missile defense batteries from Asia to be moved to the Middle East as the US takes military action against Yemen's Houthi rebels.
But it also comes amid growing concerns here that Washington may demand that Seoul further shoulder the cost of the upkeep of the USFK or reconsider the role of US troops in South Korea as US President Donald Trump takes a "transactional" approach to alliances.
The USFK reaffirmed its ironclad commitment to the Korean Peninsula, without providing further details, citing internal policy, when asked about the latest deployment.
"USFK will temporarily deploy personnel and equipment from the Republic of Korea as part of a rotational deployment," it said in a statement. "USFK will still maintain a ready, capable, and lethal force on the Korean peninsula prepared to respond to any contingency." (Yonhap)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea vows closer talks with US on FX policy following monitoring list status
The Ministry of Economy and Finance vowed Friday to enhance communications with the United States to strengthen mutual understanding and trust regarding foreign exchange rate policies. The pledge came after the US Treasury Department kept South Korea on its monitoring list for currency practices. Seoul was reinstated on the list in November 2024 after being removed in November 2023 for the first time since April 2016. "We will continue to expand mutual understanding and trust regarding exchange rate policies through regular communication with the US Treasury Department," the ministry said in a press release. "Ongoing discussions between the Korean and US financial authorities on exchange rate issues will also be conducted thoroughly," it added. Currency policy has been one of the key topics in bilateral negotiations related to US President Donald Trump's administration's sweeping tariff measures. In April, the two countries agreed to focus their talks on four categories -- tariff and non-tariff measures, economic security, investment cooperation and currency policy. They aim to reach a "package" agreement by July 8, when the 90-day suspension of Washington's tariff implementation is set to expire. Last month, South Korea's Deputy Finance Minister Choi Ji-young met with US Treasury Assistant Secretary for International Finance Robert Kaproth on the sidelines of the 58th Asian Development Bank Annual Meeting in Milan to discuss currency-related issues. (Yonhap)
![[Lee Byung-jong] Danger of too much power?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F05%2Fnews-p.v1.20250605.37ad2cf553ae443ab411a1db98568db6_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Lee Byung-jong] Danger of too much power?
After six months of excruciating political uncertainty and public anxiety, South Korea has ushered in a new era with the election of President Lee Jae-myung on Wednesday. The initial response has been broadly positive: The stock market surged, and allies such as Japan and the US offered swift messages of support and continued cooperation. Lee's decisive victory — garnering over 17 million votes, the most for any Korean president — gives him a strong and clear mandate to pursue his policy agenda. However, the scale of Lee's victory could also be cause for concern. With his Democratic Party of Korea holding an overwhelming majority in the National Assembly, the Lee administration may be tempted to overextend its executive power. The judiciary, increasingly seen as vulnerable to public pressure, may not be able to serve as an effective check. Lee's firm control over his party, filled with his loyalists, further eliminates internal constraints, heightening fears of a concentration of power. The first signs of potential executive overreach appeared on day one of Lee's presidency, when the ruling party put forward a bill to expand the number of Supreme Court justices from 14 to as many as 30. This proposal, floated even before the election following the Court's ruling against Lee for election law violations, is officially framed as a response to the judiciary's heavy caseload. Yet critics argue it is a thinly veiled attempt to stack the Court with pro-government justices. Other controversial bills are likely to follow now that executive and legislative powers are united under one party. These include measures to strengthen protections for unionized workers and rice farmers, and to impose tighter regulations on major corporate shareholders. Such bills were repeatedly vetoed by former President Yoon Suk Yeol on the grounds that they would stifle economic growth. Another previously blocked bill, which would expand civil society influence in public broadcasting oversight, is also expected to be revived despite concerns about ideological bias, as civil society groups in Korea often lean liberal and support the Democratic Party's agenda. These initiatives are likely to be pushed through in the early days of Lee's presidency. Concerns about the concentration of power are compounded by the current disarray of the opposition People Power Party, following the impeachment of President Yoon. While the ruling party, along with its allies, commands a near two-thirds majority in the Assembly, the opposition is fractured — torn by internal debates over the legitimacy of Yoon's impeachment, especially his imposition of martial law in December. The party was sharply divided between pro and anti-impeachment factions. With the next parliamentary elections still three years away, the opposition's ability to check President Lee's administration appears weak at best. This concentration of power threatens the foundations of Korean democracy, still fragile in the aftermath of the failed marshal law declaration. Similar patterns of democratic erosion have emerged globally — in Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and other nations that maintain the form of democracy through elections while systematically weakening checks and balances, silencing dissent and undermining independent institutions such as the press and civil society. These so-called 'elected autocracies' or 'illiberal democracies' consolidate power under the guise of democratic legitimacy. Even the United States — long regarded as a beacon of democracy — has shown signs of democratic backsliding. The newly returned Trump administration has increasingly relied on executive orders to bypass Congress on contentious issues such as immigration and tariffs. Like the aforementioned regimes, US President Donald Trump has targeted the media, demonized critics and used federal agencies to investigate political opponents. His fights against higher educational institutions like Harvard University and moves to reduce or close federal government agencies are accused of executive overreach. Yet the US system retains important guardrails. Many of Trump's executive actions have been blocked by the judiciary, including the Supreme Court, despite its conservative majority. Midterm elections, seen as a confidence vote on the presidency, serve as a vital democratic check, and the federal structure ensures that state governments can limit federal overreach. South Korea also operates a system of local autonomy, with major cities like Seoul and Busan still under opposition control. However, local governments remain weak in practice, as the central government controls budgeting and other key decisions. Given the ruling party's big win in the presidential election, next year's local elections are unlikely to yield many opposition victories. Unlike the US, Korea lacks midterm elections, meaning the opposition may remain marginalized for the next three years. Concerns over excessive presidential power are not new in Korea. Whenever presidents have faced their downfall — whether by impeachment or scandals of power abuse — calls for constitutional reform have resurfaced. Proposals have included shifting to a cabinet system or introducing power-sharing arrangements with a prime minister or vice president. In this latest election, all major candidates pledged to reduce the power of the presidency to prevent another 'imperial presidency.' Whether President Lee will follow through on such promises remains to be seen.
Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump speaks with Xi amid stalled talks between the US and China over tariffs
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, have spoken amid stalled negotiations between both countries over tariffs that have roiled global trade. The discussion on Thursday followed Trump suggesting it was tough to reach a deal with Xi. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!,' Trump posted Wednesday on his social media site. Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a May 12 agreement between both countries to reduce their tariff rates in order to have talks. Behind the gridlock has been the continued competition for an economic edge.
