John Fetterman Trashed In Home State Newspaper: ‘Step Away'
Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman has been accused of neglecting his duties in his home state newspaper.
The Philadelphia Inquirer's editorial board published an opinion piece on Sunday that said if Fetterman wants to continue as a U.S. senator, he "must take his position seriously."
"Public service is not about serving yourself," the board's piece concluded. "It's time for Fetterman to serve Pennsylvanians, or step away."
Newsweek has contacted Fetterman's office for comment via email.
Fetterman's victory in 2022's Senate race was cause for celebration for Democrats, flipping a seat that was key to the party holding a majority in the Senate. He ran as a hero to progressives, but his rightward shift on some issues as a senator has led some former supporters to disavow him. He has drawn rebukes from progressives over his staunch support of Israel in its war in Gaza and angered his fellow Democrats for arguing his party needs to work with President Donald Trump.
He has also faced concerns about his health since his 2022 Senate run, when he suffered a stroke. He checked himself into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for treatment for clinical depression shortly after he was sworn in to the Senate.
Several current and former staffers expressed concern about Fetterman's mental and physical health in a New York Magazine report in May that Fetterman dismissed as a "one-source hit piece."
The Inquirer editorial board's opinion piece said Fetterman has missed more votes than nearly any other senator in the past two years, regularly skips committee hearings, cancels meetings, avoids daily caucus lunches with colleagues, and rarely goes on the Senate floor.
It also said that Fetterman, like some Republican elected officials, is also avoiding holding town hall meetings with constituents "for fear of being heckled."
It noted that while Fetterman dismissed the New York Magazine report, other media outlets have "confirmed Fetterman's erratic behavior through multiple sources, including The Inquirer."
The Inquirer reported in May that Fetterman had yelled at several representatives of a teachers' union and banged his fists on the table after they pressed him to do more to push back on cuts to federal education.
The piece also criticized Fetterman for justifying his decision to skip committee work and procedural work that he described as "performative" in a recent interview with The New York Times. Fetterman also said he had missed votes he considers a waste of time to spend time with his family or visit his father, who recently had a heart attack.
"Senators often work long nights in Washington. But they also have flexible schedules and enjoy plenty of time off from Washington, since there are only an average of 165 legislative days," the opinion piece says. "Many of Fetterman's constituents would like to work half a year so they, too, could spend time with their families. Safe to say, many would do it for less than Fetterman's salary of $174,000, which is more than double the nation's median household income."
It also criticized Fetterman for having time to meet with Trump, travel overseas and appear on talk shows but not make time for his constituents.
"Fetterman has not had much time for Washington or Pennsylvania. But he found time to jet down to Mar-a-Lago to schmooze with Trump," it said.
"Fetterman has flown to Israel twice in the past year, including a recent all-expense-paid junket to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been accused of war crimes and corruption. He and his wife flew first class and stayed in five-star hotels as part of a fact-finding mission that cost $36,000 and was paid for by a New York-based nonprofit."
The opinion piece also said: "Being an elected official comes with public scrutiny. If Fetterman can't handle the attention or perform his job, then in the best interest of the country and the nearly 13 million residents of Pennsylvania he represents, he should step aside.
"After all, being an elected representative is a privilege, not an entitlement. Being a U.S. senator is a serious job that requires full-time engagement."
Daniel Pearson, editorial writer for The Inquirer wrote on X: "Showing up to work is not performative, Senator Fetterman."
Senator Fetterman told The New York Times in a recent interview that he has been shamed into fulfilling senatorial duties.
He said he was "showing up because people in the media have weaponized" his absenteeism to portray him as mentally unfit. He added: "The votes I missed were overwhelmingly procedural; they're even called 'bed check' votes. I had to make a decision: getting here and sticking my thumb in the door for three seconds for a procedural vote or spend Monday night as a dad-daughter date."
Fetterman has not publicly responded to The Inquirer editorial board's opinion piece.
He is likely to continue facing scrutiny in the coming weeks and months. Fetterman is up for reelection in 2028.
Related Articles
John Fetterman 'Of Course' Being Wooed by GOP Amid Liberal Backlash-SenatorJohn Fetterman Staffer Left Crying Over His Erratic Behavior: ReportJohn Fetterman Reacts to Concerns About His HealthVideo of John Fetterman Arguing About Plane Seatbelt Takes Off Online
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump Investigates Biden's Autopen
The White House launches a probe into Biden's autopen scandal — as democrats deflect by saying Trump has dementia — a recycled hoax that nobody believes. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit Jeffrey Petz
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mike Johnson Goes After Musk for Mega Bill Meltdown
House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was let down by Elon Musk's bombshell rebuke of the Trump administration's signature legislation as lawmakers swiftly took sides on the debate. Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday, Johnson launched into a defense of President Donald Trump's 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' after the recently departed DOGE chief branded it a 'disgusting abomination' that would 'massively increase' the budget deficit. 'Let me say this: It's very disappointing,' Johnson said of Musk's comments. 'I've come to consider Elon a good friend. He's obviously a very intelligent person, and he's done a lot of great work… But with all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong.' Johnson maintained that the mega bill delivers on Trump's campaign promise of putting America first and saves the government more than $1.6 trillion—despite analyses from nonpartisan organizations like the Congressional Budget Office and the Penn-Wharton Budget Model estimating that the measure would cause the deficit to soar by about $4 trillion. The House Speaker said he and Musk spoke at length over the phone on Monday to discuss the bill, which the tech mogul blasted in an earlier interview with CBS News. 'I extolled all the virtues of the bill, and he seemed to understand that,' Johnson said. 'We had a very friendly conversation about it.' Musk has become increasingly vocal about his opposition to the bill since leaving the Trump administration. He told CBS last week that the measure 'undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' and wrote in X posts on Tuesday that the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled' legislation would 'burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' he said. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' House Republicans narrowly passed the bill last month in a 215 to 214 vote, with all Democrats uniting against what they described as a giveaway to billionaires at the expense of vulnerable American families. Musk's comments divided GOP lawmakers and appeared to unite Democrats. Four Republican senators were exasperated when they spoke to Politico about Musk's latest jab. North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said Musk was 'entitled to his opinion,' while North Dakota Sen. Kevin Cramer said: 'I like Elon Musk, but he's one man.' Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said lawmakers would continue to work on the measure. 'We need spending reductions, no doubt,' Schmitt said. 'I think the Senate should make the bill substantially better, and I hope and believe we'll do that,' Cruz added. Several other Republicans joined their Democratic colleagues in agreeing with Musk's take. 'I agree with Elon,' Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said on X. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.' Utah Sen. Mike Lee wrote in a reply to Musk's post that 'the Senate must make this bill better.' Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna threatened to withhold votes if the bill fails to codify the sweeping cuts made by DOGE. 'NO CODIFY VOTES? Then guess what: NO VOTES,' she said. 'Half the reason GOP took the majority is because of Trump and Elon and now they are too scared to codify!' Several Democrats, led by Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, echoed Musk's scathing criticism of the bill. 'If even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process and is Trump's buddy, says the bill is bad, you can imagine how bad this bill is,' Schumer told reporters. 'Musk said people shouldn't vote for the bill. Let's hope the Republicans follow him, not Trump.' 'Breaking news: Elon Musk and I agree with each other,' Jeffries said in a press conference. 'The GOP tax scam is a disgusting abomination.' Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders similarly agreed with Musk. 'Musk is right,' he said on X. 'Let's defeat this disgusting abomination.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will crypto replace banking? The Trump administration can't decide
Last year, Donald Trump took the stage of the Las Vegas Bitcoin Conference to worship at the altar of cryptocurrency. He said he would fire Gary Gensler, the former chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission who led a yearslong crackdown on crypto fraud. The audience roared. He ended on a rousing note: 'We will make America and Bitcoin bigger, better, stronger, richer, freer, and greater than ever before.' This company asked most corporate employees to relocate to Chicago. The majority declined Trump administration orders Pennsylvania power plant to run through the summer Redfin: These 31 major housing markets have shifted to buyer's markets Some crypto activists were perturbed. Sure, Trump rallied behind Bitcoin as a source of industrial growth, but why wouldn't he commit to outright replacing banking with digital currencies? Trump failed to comment on the traditional banks, which crypto advocates thought were discriminating against them by shutting down their accounts, or fiat currency, which some crypto boosters hope to replace entirely. One year later, President Trump skipped out on the Bitcoin Conference, but he sent his envoys. The administration's crypto message has become even more muddled. While Vice President JD Vance emphasized that stablecoins regulated by the administration's new crypto proposal (the GENIUS Act) don't 'threaten the integrity of the U.S. dollar,' Eric Trump said that he'd like to see some major banks 'go extinct.' It seems no one will decide whether crypto is a strength to—or a replacement for—the U.S. financial system. Vice President Vance headlined the conference, where he struck a similar tone to Trump's 2024 speech. He emphasized that Bitcoin is part of the 'mainstream economy,' calling it a digital asset—but not a currency. Vance also promoted the GENIUS Act, which would set regulations for currency or commodity-backed stablecoins (crypto currencies pegged to fiat currency or other reference asset) so they could flow more freely. The bill has already passed through the Senate, and is waiting for a House vote. Vance promised that these coins wouldn't threaten the dollar. 'Dollar-pegged stablecoins, particularly once GENIUS is enacted, are only going to help the American economy and [are] only going to help the American dollar,' he claimed. Central to Trump's crypto strategy was the establishment of a Bitcoin reserve, allowing the government to collect and hold cryptocurrency from criminal or civil asset seizures. But whether this stockpile operates alongside, or in competition with dollar spending remains blurry. Bo Hines, the executive director of Trump's digital assets advisory, spoke of Bitcoin as something the government could grow endlessly. 'We want as much of it as we can possibly get,' he said at the conference. 'We're not going to sell any Bitcoin that we have in the U.S. government, period.' On the other hand, Trump's crypto czar David Sacks was more measured in his words. He said that he 'can't promise anything,' but that he hoped the government would be able to buy more Bitcoin. 'If either the Commerce Department or the Treasury Department can figure out how to fund it without adding to the debt, then they are allowed to create those programs,' he claimed. 'Maybe find the money from some other program that's not using it.' While they struck different tones, Vance, Hines, and Sacks all spoke of Bitcoin as an asset class. Whether it could constitute a new financial system—the currency's original mission—was outside the question. But Eric Trump—while not an administration official, is certainly influential on Trump policy—claimed that crypto could replace banking entirely: 'It makes everything cheaper, it makes it faster, it makes it safer, it makes it more transparent.' He said that he'd 'love to see some of the big banks go extinct.' Trump has backed crypto expansion forcefully, but his rationale remains slippery. At the recent Blockworks Digital Asset Summit, Trump told the audience that they will 'unleash an explosion of international growth,' but didn't explain how, other than a brief reference to stablecoins supporting the dollar. 'It is exciting to watch as you invent the future of finance,' Trump said, while not venturing to explain whether that future included traditional banks. Why is Trump so into crypto? Much of it is likely for personal gain. Trump has raked in millions on his memecoins and NFTs, sending cash directly to his wallet. Crypto advocates also helped Trump reach the White House in the first place. Their lobby has political heft: According to a New Yorker report, they tanked Katie Porter's California Senate bid after she expressed mere glimmers of anti-crypto rhetoric. But there's a political tension underlying Trump's crypto push. If he says that crypto will replace banking—or even fiat currency—traditional financiers could riot. But, if he claims that Bitcoin is merely an asset class and not the future of finance, he could anger the crypto community. For now, Trump and his administration will try to sit on both sides of the fence. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data