Global methane emissions from energy are around 80% higher than what governments are reporting
Slashing emissions of methane — second only to carbon dioxide for its contribution to global warming — is essential to meeting international targets on climate change and one of the fastest ways to curb temperature rise.
But the IEA warned that countries are considerably underestimating their energy sector methane pollution, estimating that emissions are around 80% higher than the total reported by governments to the United Nations.
The energy sector is responsible for around a third of the methane emitted as a result of human activities.
It leaks from gas pipelines and other energy infrastructure, and is also deliberately released during equipment maintenance.
Tackling this is considered one of the easiest ways to lower emissions because plugging leaks can often be done at little or no cost.
'However, the latest data indicates that implementation on methane has continued to fall short of ambitions,' said IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol.
The IEA's Global Methane Tracker report said over 120 million tonnes was released from the fossil fuel sector in 2024, close to the record high in 2019.
China has the largest energy methane emissions globally, mainly from its coal sector. The United States follows in second, driven by its oil and gas sector, with Russia third.
The IEA said its figures are based on measured data where possible, compared to emissions reported by governments, which can be outdated or estimated using information from the energy sector.
Global methane emissions are becoming easier to monitor from space, with more than 25 satellites tracking gas plumes from fossil fuel facilities and other sources.
Advertisement
The IEA said that Europe's Sentinel 5 satellite, which just sees the very largest leaks, showed that 'super-emitting methane events' at oil and gas facilities rose to a record high in 2024.
These huge leaks were observed all over the world, but particularly in the United States, Turkmenistan and Russia.
Abandoned oil and gas wells and coal mines are also significant sources of methane leaking into the atmosphere, the IEA said in new analysis for this year's report.
When taken together they would be the 'world's fourth-largest emitter of fossil fuel methane', accounting for eight million tonnes last year.
Some 40% of methane emissions come from natural sources, mainly wetlands. The rest are from human-driven activities, particularly agriculture and the energy sector.
The IEA estimated that cutting methane released by the fossil fuel sector would significantly slow global warming, preventing a roughly 0.1 degree Celsius rise in global temperatures by 2050.
'This would have a tremendous impact -– comparable to eliminating all CO2 emissions from the world's heavy industry in one stroke,' the report said.
Around 70% of annual methane emissions from the energy sector could be avoided with existing technologies.
But only five percent of global oil and gas meets 'near-zero' emissions standards, the IEA said.
Energy think tank Ember said the fossil fuel industry needs to reduce methane emissions by 75% by 2030 if the world is to meet the target of reducing overall emissions to net zero by the middle of this century.
In particular, methane from coal was 'still being ignored,' said Ember analyst Sabina Assan.
'There are cost-effective technologies available today, so this is a low-hanging fruit of tackling methane. We can't let coal mines off the hook any longer.'
© AFP 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
Irish stargazers urged to look up as major sky event to take place tonight – here's best place to watch
IRISH stargazers are set for one of the best meteor showers in the astronomical calendar tonight, with up to 150 fireballs shooting through the sky per hour. Astronomy experts at the European Space Agency say the display is so good that it will appear as though "natural fireworks will fill the sky". 2 An incredible meteor shower will occur tonight Credit: Getty Images - Getty 2 It will reach its peak activity Credit: Getty Images - Getty The Perseid shower will reach its peak activity tonight as Earth passes through debris from an ancient comet. And people may be lucky to see it without requiring any equipment. Plus, you might even spot Jupiter and Venus amid the meteor shower too, as they're due to appear at their closest. The annual meteor shower is the debris left behind by Comet Swift-Tuttle, which comes around every 20 to 200 years and it is estimated to be more than 5billion years old, older than Earth. The average speed for a Perseid meteor is around 58km per second, which will decorate the sky with fast, bright meteor trains. Meteor trains appear when the air in front of the meteor is squashed and heated to thousands of degrees Celsius. Smaller meteors then vaporise and leave behind a bright trail of light behind them, while the larger meteors can explode into fireballs, and almost none of them hit the ground. If they do hit the ground, they will then be called a meteorite. However, scientists have warned that the brightness of the full Moon may obscure the view. Dr Shyam Balaji, theoretical physicist at King's College London, said: "It is one the fastest and brightest meteor showers of the year, so an astronomical highlight for stargazers. 'Meteor' crashes to earth with loud bang & leaves houses shaking "The best place to view the Perseid meteor shower is in the North East near the constellation Perseus. "While you can look at the whole sky and are likely to see a meteor, that's the target location in order to get the best viewing experience." The best time to catch the meteor shower in its full glory will be between midnight and 5:30 am, when the sky is pitch dark. WATCHING TIPS However, it may be difficult to spot it in light-polluted areas such as busy towns and cities, so they are encouraged to seek a dark area outside of those areas that have no light pollution, even without street lamps. For those living in the capital, Phoenix Park and Bull Island would be ideal spots to take in the sights as there's less light pollution. What's the difference between an asteroid, meteor and comet? Here's what you need to know, according to Nasa... Asteroid: An asteroid is a small rocky body that orbits the Sun. Most are found in the asteroid belt (between Mars and Jupiter) but they can be found anywhere (including in a path that can impact Earth) An asteroid is a small rocky body that orbits the Sun. Most are found in the asteroid belt (between Mars and Jupiter) but they can be found anywhere (including in a path that can impact Earth) Meteoroid: When two asteroids hit each other, the small chunks that break off are called meteoroids When two asteroids hit each other, the small chunks that break off are called meteoroids Meteor: If a meteoroid enters the Earth's atmosphere, it begins to vapourise and then becomes a meteor. On Earth, it'll look like a streak of light in the sky, because the rock is burning up If a meteoroid enters the Earth's atmosphere, it begins to vapourise and then becomes a meteor. On Earth, it'll look like a streak of light in the sky, because the rock is burning up Meteorite: If a meteoroid doesn't vapourise completely and survives the trip through Earth's atmosphere, it can land on the Earth. At that point, it becomes a meteorite If a meteoroid doesn't vapourise completely and survives the trip through Earth's atmosphere, it can land on the Earth. At that point, it becomes a meteorite Comet: Like asteroids, a comet orbits the Sun. However, rather than being made mostly of rock, a comet contains lots of ice and gas, which can result in amazing tails forming behind them, thanks to the ice and dust vaporising. Make sure that your stargazing spot has an unobstructed view of the horizon and above - away from treelines or cityscapes is best. Binoculars might not always be needed - or helpful. They can limit your view of the sky, and in trying to get a more detailed look, you could miss shooting stars out of frame. He added: "For me personally, the best way to view the meteor shower is just with your naked eye because of the speed with which they move. "But you could use Sky Guide or Stellarium or other stargazing apps to get a better viewing experience, to target the right regions of the sky to see the meteor shower."
Irish Independent
26-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Irish professor appointed to UN panel on effects of nuclear war
An Irish professor is one of 21 scientists that have been appointed to a United Nations panel to report on the effects of a nuclear war. Dr Neil Rowan of the Technological University of the Shannon, who was recognised in the top 2pc of scientists in the world by Stanford University in 2023, has been appointed to the newly established panel. Register for free to read this story Register and create a profile to get access to our free stories. You'll also unlock more free stories each week.
Irish Times
24-07-2025
- Irish Times
We are banking on costly, speculative ‘negative emissions technologies' to make climate strategies add up
In May, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) published a report projecting that global temperatures are expected to continue at or near-record levels over the next five years . As global heating accelerates, there is even a small chance (1 per cent, the WMO said) that the temperature rise could exceed 2 degrees in this period. For decades, scientists have been warning about the devastating consequences that even a 1.5-degree increase in global temperatures would bring. You would think that no effort would be spared in implementing workable, scalable solutions and in eliminating fossil energy as quickly as possible. However, international agencies and EU governments are still heavily relying on costly and speculative negative emissions technologies (NETs) to make their climate strategies add up. These technologies are controversial because they often prolong our dependence on fossil energy, cannot be deployed at scale quickly or are hugely expensive compared to energy efficiency and renewables. They include carbon capture utilisation and storage (CCUS), direct air capture (DAC) and bioenergy carbon capture and storage (BECCS). READ MORE CCUS was hyped up after the adoption of the Paris Agreement, but has consistently underperformed since then. The International Energy Agency's 2024 analysis said CCUS roll-out remained nowhere near what was needed to deliver under the Agency's Net Zero Scenario. CCUS would need to capture and store around one gigatonne of carbon dioxide (CO2) a year by 2030, but current projections estimate the removal of only 430 megatonnes of CO2 by then. To meet the 2050 target, CCUS would have to scale up a hundred-fold. The EU's 2040 target of 90 per cent emission reductions relies heavily on NETs for 'hard-to-abate' sectors such as aviation and industry, projecting that 400 megatonnes of CO2 will be removed permanently. The small number of working DAC projects globally – including an innovative Irish project in Co Waterford called Neg8 Carbon – remove carbon at a steep cost of anywhere between €200 and €1,000 a tonne of CO2 removed. Their potential is largely determined by the price of carbon credits on voluntary carbon markets. The current pipeline of projects will at best remove around three megatonnes of CO2 globally by 2030, which is a drop in the ocean when you consider that global carbon-dioxide emissions last year were about 38 billion tonnes. Enhanced weathering is another carbon removal technology that works, but can at best deliver 30 megatonnes of CO2 a year by 2030. Most of these industrial-sector NETs come with high energy demands, high capital and operational costs and the need for significant CO2 storage infrastructure. As things stand, these technologies are not delivering carbon reductions that are needed. Global emissions of greenhouse gases are still dominated by fossil fuel combustion; until coal, oil and gas are replaced by renewable energy sources we do not stand a chance of averting climate disaster. That is simply physics, not an opinion. Given the timescales available for meaningful action – the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states that global CO2 emissions need to be halved by 2030 – the reliance on unproven technological solutions to meet near-term targets is ethically and politically disastrous. We should not stop researching them, but policymakers should be acutely conscious of their limitations for staying within the increasingly constrained global and national carbon budgets. We need a technological strategy that is humble and agile. The road to climate neutrality is paved with great ideas that failed to reach the market in time to make a difference or had unintended negative consequences such as job displacement or 'sacrifice zones' to extract critical raw materials. Moving from the laboratory to market requires massive capital investment and a stable, science-based policy framework underpinning research and investment. It also requires public acceptance or what is termed a 'social licence'. Part of the policy challenge is that we take the convenience and availability of fossil energy and chemical fertilisers for granted. To decarbonise the energy system, we will need to redesign it and adapt our use of energy to its availability. For householders, that might mean only using the washing machine when the sun is shining on PV panels or a smart grid and smart tariffs that determine the optimal time to do so. For a manufacturing plant, it means generating and even selling its own power or deploying entirely new production systems, for example, electric arc furnaces. This will require behavioural shifts, organisational modifications and energy market redesigns that are much more complex than the actual technologies involved. Even 'cost-effective' solutions require an implementation pathway, and many proven measures face barriers to market entry, often due to the dominance of fossil incumbents or the lack of grid infrastructure and storage. As long as national policies are pulling in different directions, we won't have the net zero-aligned financial and regulatory framework that new technologies require to make a real impact. But the truth is that many emerging technologies simply can't compete with the growing affordability of solar PV, wind and battery technologies. So what are we waiting for, except the displeasure of the fossil fuel industry? Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher
