TD Bank to Close 38 Locations by June 5: See the Full List
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
TD Bank plans to close 38 of its branches across 10 states and Washington, D.C., by June 5, as part of a broader corporate strategy to reduce physical locations amid growing digital banking trends.
The closures come at a time when many banks across the country are downsizing brick-and-mortar operations due to their shifting consumer habits. Financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo, have each scaled back their branch networks in recent months. The pace of branch closures has doubled since 2020, according to Kiplinger, driven by increasing reliance on mobile apps and online platforms for daily transactions.
TD Bank has emphasized that the closures are a routine part of its store evaluations, which a spokesperson told USA Today earlier this month "may result in some closures, consolidations, or relocations." However, the closures also follow the company's recent legal troubles.
In 2024, the bank pleaded guilty to federal money laundering violations and agreed to pay over $3 billion in penalties, the largest such fine ever imposed under the Bank Secrecy Act.
List of TD Bank Locations Closing by June 5
File photo of a TD Bank branch in New York.
File photo of a TD Bank branch in New York.
AP Photo/NewsBase
Connecticut (2)
1289 Foxon Rd., North Branford
215 High St., Torrington
District of Columbia (1)
1611 Wisconsin Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C.
Florida (3)
1590 S. Nova Rd., Daytona Beach
160 N.W. Main Blvd., Lake City
500 Collins Ave., Miami Beach
Maine (4)
112 Main St., Fairfield
62 W. Main St., Fort Kent
95 Main St., Gorham
6 North St. (PO Box 713), Houlton
Massachusetts (6)
860 S. Main St., Bradford
465 N. Main St., East Longmeadow
420 Franklin St., Framingham
50 Holyoke St., Holyoke
547 Broadway, Methuen
2345 Main St., Tewksbury
New Hampshire (4)
10 N. Main St., Bristol
884 Main St., Contoocook
40 High St., Hampton
905 Elm St., Wilton
New Jersey (6)
85 Pompton Ave., Cedar Grove
1 Royal Rd., Flemington
670 Laurel Ave., Holmdel
191 E. Rte. 70, Marlton
145 Skyline Dr., Ringwood
555 Warren Ave., Spring Lake Heights
New York (5)
460 Pulaski Rd., Greenlawn
156 Dolson Ave. A-B, Middletown
125 Park Ave., New York (Manhattan)
451 Lexington Ave., New York (Manhattan)
136 Margaret St., Plattsburgh
Pennsylvania (3)
101 Lancaster Ave., Frazer
346 W. Trenton Ave., Morrisville
8600 Germantown Pike, Philadelphia
South Carolina (2)
1501 Main St., Columbia
6 Elmshorn Dr., Greer
Virginia (2)
6200 Multiplex Dr., Centreville
1750 N. Hampton Ave., Reston
Why Are TD Bank Locations Closing?
TD Bank has stated the closures are part of its regular review process aimed at aligning services with customer behavior.
A representative told Fast Company, "As part of our ongoing strategic and business-as-usual reviews of TD's retail locations, we evaluate things like store traffic, customer needs, product use, and community landscape to determine any needed changes to our physical network."
The spokesperson added, "We are committed to making this transition as smooth as possible for our impacted customers and colleagues and look forward to continuing to provide legendary service via one of our approximately 1,100 stores or any channel our customers choose."
Meanwhile, although it is unclear how connected TD Bank's compliance issues are to the branch closures, the Department of Justice reported that the bank failed to monitor over $18 trillion in payments and allowed more than $600 million in illicit transactions.
"TD Bank chose profits over compliance in order to keep its costs down," then-Attorney General Merrick Garland said during a press conference last year.
New CEO Ray Chun has pledged organizational changes and reforms aimed at improving compliance.
"Make no mistake, we will meet our commitments to our regulators...we will get the job done," Chun said during a company call in October 2024.
Why It Matters
TD Bank is one of many financial institutions scaling back in-person services. Since the pandemic, foot traffic to physical branches has declined rapidly. The number of bank branches nationwide has decreased by 5.6 percent since 2020, according to Kiplinger, as the rise of mobile banking services has transformed how customers manage their finances.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
The Surprising Impact of Trump's Tariffs On American Farmers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. American farmers are once again caught in the crossfire of Trump's trade wars. Despite a 90-day tariff truce with China, they continue to face rising export costs for soybeans, corn and pork, along with effects from earlier retaliatory tariffs and export restrictions. The numbers tell a stark story. U.S. soybean exports to China experienced a significant decline during the height of trade tensions. According to data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), from mid-2018 to the end of 2019, retaliatory tariffs imposed by six major trading partners—Canada, China, Turkey, Mexico, the EU, and India—resulted in estimated losses of over $27 billion in U.S. agricultural exports. Soybeans alone accounted for more than 70 percent of those losses. The financial strain has left many farmers relying on taxpayer-funded bailouts. "Input costs for farmers remain a challenging factor, further compounded by ongoing uncertainty in markets," Evan Hultine, Vice President of Illinois Farm Bureau (IFB), told Newsweek. "It's hard enough to market in the weather, let alone add the volatility within the markets." Despite the economic toll, political loyalty to Trump among many farmers has remained strong. However, analysts warn the cycle of trade disruption and federal compensation is not only unsustainable but damaging to the long-term health of American agriculture. "I don't think farmers support protectionist trade policies—they support Trump for other reasons—mainly social or cultural issues—even though trade wars are bad for their bottom lines," Tad DeHaven, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute and former Senate policy adviser told Newsweek. DeHaven's analysis highlights a paradox. While Trump's trade wars have hurt farmers financially, the Trump administration sought to "buy off" the agricultural sector with billions in subsidies. "Farmers were bailed out by taxpayers in the first Trump administration," he said. "Knowing that they would likely be bailed out again, farmers were more willing to accept the economic pain." That pain, however, was significant. During Trump's first term, China—previously the largest buyer of U.S. soybeans—retaliated against U.S. tariffs with tariffs of their own. Even after a 2020 trade agreement partially restored soybean exports, the damage had been done. According to DeHaven, China, along with other trading partners, began shifting to more reliable suppliers, like Brazil and Argentina. "Rather than stabilize agricultural production, [Trump's] tariff-driven bailouts deepened dependency and inefficiency," he noted. "They introduced uncertainty and compelled importers in countries like China to source more of their ag imports from other countries." Illinois Farm Bureau/Catrina Rawson Analysts observe that Chinese importers are now turning to South America for poultry and pork and eyeing Australia for wheat, sorghum and barley. Canada and Mexico, also targeted by Trump's trade barbs, have begun diversifying their import portfolios away from the U.S. Meanwhile, U.S. farmers are being squeezed on the cost side. Tariffs on steel and aluminum have driven up the cost of farm equipment, while trade restrictions have made key inputs like fertilizer more expensive. Canada, the largest supplier of potash—a vital fertilizer ingredient—has faced barriers under Trump-era trade policies, contributing to higher input prices at home. "Increased tariffs mean reduced market access and higher costs," DeHaven said. "Trump effectively treats all imports as bad, but U.S. agriculture depends on open markets both to sell goods and buy inputs affordably." To offset the fallout from these policies, Trump's first term saw $23 billion in direct payments to farmers. And the cycle is poised to repeat. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has already announced a new $10 billion round of taxpayer-funded farm bailouts authorized in late 2024. But experts warn this model is unsustainable. "If history repeats itself, American farmers—caught once again in the crossfire of economic nationalism—will be left with fewer markets, more expensive supplies and increased reliance on federal aid," DeHaven said. "For taxpayers, the bill will be high. And for U.S. trade credibility, the cost may be even greater." Illinois Farm Bureau/Catrina Rawson On May 15, Sec. Rollins visited the UK to strengthen ties and champion U.S. farmers and ranchers. Over the next five months, she'll tour Japan, Vietnam, Brazil, Peru, Italy and India to open new markets and boost exports. USDA spokesperson Seth W. Christensen told Newsweek that Sec. Rollins top priorities are increasing access for American products in existing markets, opening new markets with strong demand for our products and making sure trading partners are treating American farmers, ranchers and producers fairly. Meanwhile, Hultine said the IFB continues to push for a five-year Farm Bill, emphasizing the need for consistent support and strategic market development both domestically and globally. DeHaven believes that the key lies in shifting away from reactionary financial relief and toward trade liberalization. He argues that rather than insulating farmers with bailouts, the government should support policies that expand trade, giving farmers greater access to global markets and reducing the cost of essential inputs like machinery, fertilizer, and herbicides. Instead, the administration's trade policies have limited market access for U.S. goods, creating challenges for the agricultural sector that it publicly champions.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is TD Bank Stock a Good Buy in June 2025?
Written by Adam Othman at The Motley Fool Canada Canadian bank stocks have been off to an impressive start despite all the fears that trade tension-induced panic due to tariffs might bring the Canadian economy into recession. Right now, there's a pause on tariffs, and the recession feared to be inevitable has yet to come around. As we move closer to the halfway mark of 2025, the S&P/TSX Composite Index only seems to be climbing to new all-time highs. Positive movement in the Canadian benchmark index reflects a broader picture of the Canadian stock market and, in turn, the economic situation. With the index reaching newer heights, it seems that the so-called top Canadian bank stocks have become quite the leaders, driving the market upward. In light of this development, we will take a closer look at one of the biggest bank stocks to determine whether it might be a good investment at current levels. Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD) has been quite a comeback story over the last few years. The reason I want to focus on TD Bank stock is its remarkable performance despite all the trouble it faced with American regulators. The $164 billion market-cap stock faced regulatory action in the US due to the bank's money-laundering fiasco last year. The restrictions and penalties imposed on it had a negative impact on the bank's performance in the stock market, but it is making remediations. The financial institution has new managers aboard, and it has revisited its growth plan. These factors are major contributors to the stock's performance in the last few weeks. The bank has paid all the fines it was supposed to, and it will settle with the asset cap on US-based assets. The bank is also selling off some of its non-core assets to improve its liquidity position. Greater liquidity can mean more spending money for the bank to make big moves. However, it remains to be seen what the new CEO of the bank will consider doing with the newly refreshed war chest. The bank is playing the long game in the US market, but its US-market-based growth will face significant restrictions for a few years to come. TD Bank's operations in the US market might be slower now, but that doesn't mean there is no growth potential in the domestic side of things. The extra money that the bank amasses from the sale of non-core assets can be valuable for any planned acquisitions or other growth-focused decisions the bank makes. As of this writing, TD Bank stock trades for $95.22 per share and distributes $1.05 per dividend per share each quarter to its investors, translating to an annualized 4.4% dividend yield. Suppose you're looking for a reliable dividend stock that is fundamentally strong and supports regular dividends. In that case, TD Bank might be an excellent pick to consider for your self-directed investment portfolio. The post Is TD Bank Stock a Good Buy in June 2025? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. Before you buy stock in TD Bank, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor Canada analyst team just identified what they believe are the Top Stocks for 2025 and Beyond for investors to buy now… and TD Bank wasn't one of them. The Top Stocks that made the cut could potentially produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider MercadoLibre, which we first recommended on January 8, 2014 ... if you invested $1,000 in the 'eBay of Latin America' at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $21,345.77!* Stock Advisor Canada provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month – one from Canada and one from the U.S. The Stock Advisor Canada service has outperformed the return of S&P/TSX Composite Index by 24 percentage points since 2013*. See the Top Stocks * Returns as of 4/21/25 More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Says He'll 'Take A Look' At Elon Musk's Government Contracts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has said he plans to "take a look" at Elon Musk's government contracts after their huge blow-up. In the midst of the dispute on Thursday, Trump had warned that the "easiest way" to save bullions in the budget was to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts." Cooler heads prevailed on Friday, with Musk and Trump refraining from slinging direct insults at each other. But when asked if he planned to go through with his threat to cut Musk's government subsidies, by a reporter on Air Force One, Trump did not rule it out. "We'll take a look at everything. It's a lot of money. It's a lot of subsidy. So we'll take a look at that — only if it's fair for him and for the country ... but it has to be fair," he said. This is a breaking news story, updates to follow.
