
Culinary Class Wars' Paik Jong-won to suspend TV appearances amid controversies
South Korean celebrity food entrepreneur Paik Jong-won has announced that he would be discontinuing his TV appearances in an apology video. The clip was posted to his YouTube channel on May 6 following a string of controversies.
The news comes as Seoul Gangnam Police Station said that the 58-year-old is under investigation. There were allegations that his food and beverage company Theborn Korea claimed the ingredients used for its porridge product were domestically sourced in South Korea when they were not.
This follows claims that a soya bean paste produced by his company was marketed as domestically made despite using imported ingredients.
Paik is Theborn Korea's founder and largest shareholder.
Despite never having worked as a chef at a restaurant, he earned a reputation for being an approachable and humble celebrity chef by giving business advice to struggling small eateries and sharing easy-to-follow recipes with viewers in his TV programmes.
The allegations have hit Paik hard. They damage his image as an advocate for South Korea's agricultural and livestock industry, who often spoke of the importance of using home-grown and domestic ingredients.
'I will suspend all television appearances on all programmes except for the ones that are already in production. I will focus all my energy and passion on Theborn Korea, as an entrepreneur, not a television personality,' Paik said in a five-minute clip.
His announcement comes just a day after the hit competition series Culinary Class Wars (2024), which Paik fronted as a judge, won the top honour of Grand Prize in the TV category at the Baeksang Arts Awards on May 5.
He did not specify whether he would be stepping away from the second season of Culinary Class Wars , which reportedly started filming in late March and is slated to premiere on Netflix later in 2025.
Theborn Korea, which operates multiple restaurant and cafe franchises, is also accused of breaking several laws related to food and livestock sanitation.
There was a claim that it violated South Korea's food safety law when it seemingly failed to refrigerate meat used at a barbecue festival in 2023. It also allegedly used a pesticide sprayer to dispense sauce on the barbecue meats at the same festival, though it maintains that it acted in accordance with the law.
Paik said he is to be held accountable for all the accusations related to quality and hygiene issues of the company's products. He said he would treat 2025 as a 'new founding year' for the company, which was started in 1994, and dedicate himself to reforming the company and its corporate culture.
He added that he would launch an additional large-scale subsidy plan for franchise owners under Theborn Korea.
Paik had previously pledged 5bil won to help franchise owners hit by the recent controversy, including exempting them from royalty fees for three months.
Separately, a former television producer claimed that Paik made unreasonable demands while starring in the variety series My Little Television (2015 to 2017), by insisting on working with writers he picked and pushing out cast members he disliked.
While he did not directly name My Little Television , he referenced allegations of him abusing his power on set.
He said: 'If my words or actions hurt anyone during production, that is entirely my fault. I should have remained humble, especially after receiving so much support.' – The Korea Herald/Asia News Network
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
South Korea's top court clears Baby Shark of plagiarism claims
SEOUL: South Korea's Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the global children's hit 'Baby Shark' does not constitute plagiarism. The decision dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by US-based composer Johnny Only against South Korean education firm SmartStudy. The viral 'Baby Shark Dance' video remains YouTube's most-viewed content with over 16 billion views, surpassing Luis Fonsi's 'Despacito'. Johnny Only, legally named Jonathan Wright, had claimed SmartStudy's 2015 release copied his 2011 composition's bassline and rhythm. He sought 30 million won ($21,700) in compensation through his 2019 Seoul lawsuit against the Korean company. SmartStudy, now rebranded as The Pinkfong Company, maintained their version adapted a traditional children's tune in the public domain. A Seoul district court originally cleared Pinkfong of copyright violations in 2021 due to insufficient evidence. The appellate court upheld this verdict in 2023 before Thursday's Supreme Court confirmation. Court documents stated 'All appeals were dismissed and the lower court's rulings were upheld' in the final judgment. Pinkfong celebrated the ruling, stating it validated their creative adaptation of a traditional chant into a pop phenomenon. The company credited their success to adding 'an upbeat rhythm and catchy melody' to the public domain material. Only previously told CBC he had rewritten the original shark attack song into a child-friendly version in 2011. He claimed Pinkfong's version followed his creative approach during the 2019 interview. The composer had not responded to AFP's request for comment following Thursday's verdict. - AFP

Barnama
13 hours ago
- Barnama
South Korean Supreme Court Approves Rulings Against US Composer In Suit Over 'Baby Shark'
SEOUL, Aug 14 (Bernama-Yonhap) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday confirmed lower courts' rulings against an American composer in a plagiarism suit he brought against the producer of the popular South Korean children's song "Baby Shark" six years ago, Yonhap News Agency reported. New York-based composer Johnny Only, whose legal name is Jonathan Wright, filed the lawsuit in Seoul in March 2019, claiming that "Baby Shark," the world-famous song released by South Korean education startup SmartStudy in 2015, copied his 2011 song. SmartStudy, now renamed The Pinkfong Company, has said its song was a recreation of a traditional North American children's song that has no valid copyrights.


New Straits Times
13 hours ago
- New Straits Times
South Korean top court rules 'Baby Shark' not plagiarised
SEOUL: South Korea's top court ruled Thursday that the globally popular South Korean children's song "Baby Shark" was not plagiarised, rejecting a copyright claim filed by a US-based composer. With its catchy lyrics, the "Baby Shark Dance" video is the most viewed on YouTube, with more than 16 billion views, roughly double those of the runner-up, "Despacito", and third-place "Wheels on the Bus". In 2019, New York composer Johnny Only, whose legal name is Jonathan Wright, filed a lawsuit in Seoul, alleging that the 2015 hit "Baby Shark" by South Korean education startup SmartStudy copied a song he had released in 2011. Only demanded 30 million won (US$21,700) in compensation, accusing the firm of copying elements of his work, including its bassline and rhythm. SmartStudy, now known as The Pinkfong Company, argued that its version was an adaptation of a classic North American children's tune that is not protected by copyright. A South Korean lower court initially cleared the company of the charges at a trial in 2021, finding that there was insufficient evidence of copyright infringement. That ruling was upheld by an appeal court in 2023. Only then challenged the 2023 decision, but South Korea's Supreme Court affirmed the lower court rulings on Thursday. "All appeals were dismissed and the lower court's rulings were upheld," according to court documents seen by AFP. The Pinkfong Company said in a statement Thursday that the Supreme Court's decision confirmed "Baby Shark" was "based on a traditional singalong chant that has entered the public domain". The company said it had given "a fresh twist to the chant by adding an upbeat rhythm and catchy melody, turning it into the pop culture icon it is today". Only did not immediately reply to an AFP request for comment. He told Canadian public broadcaster CBC in 2019 that he had created a toddler-friendly version of "Baby Shark" in 2011, revising the original song, which was about a gory shark attack.