logo
Chicago's Venezuelan migrants face uncertainty after Supreme Court allows Trump to strip protected status

Chicago's Venezuelan migrants face uncertainty after Supreme Court allows Trump to strip protected status

Chicago Tribune20-05-2025

When Ana Gil heard the news that the Supreme Court Monday allowed the Trump administration to strip legal protections for thousands of recent Venezuelan migrants, she cried. The move means 350,000 Venezuelans in the United States, including some of the estimated 50,000 who arrived in Chicago over the last several years, could be deported.
How or where? That is unknown, Gil said. She is co-founder of the Venezuelan Alliance in Chicago. Over the last decade, Gil has worked with other immigration advocates to provide resources and legal advice for migrants who have arrived here from Venezuela.
Most, she said, have fled political turmoil and extreme poverty. Temporary Protected Status, a humanitarian protection granted to nationals from countries facing extraordinary conditions such as war and disaster, provided room for families and individuals to start anew by providing them a work permit and protection from deportation.
For the Venezuelan community in Chicago, the news has turned hope into heartbreak.
Maria Belen arrived in Chicago from Venezuela under humanitarian parole in December 2022. Shortly after, she applied for TPS, which was essential for her and her family to establish themselves in the city. It is the sole protection she had from deportation.
'Now I have nothing,' Belen said Monday.
Belen said she and her family have made Chicago their home. She is an assistant teacher at a CPS school, thanks to her education degree from Venezuela. Her husband works for an IT company, and their daughter is finishing her general education before pursuing a career in engineering at Wilbur Wright College.
'But right now, we really don't know anything. We don't know what's going to happen, where are we going to go or how,' Belen said. 'When we came here we had a clear goal: work and do well for society. We paid our taxes, we were doing everything right as dictated by the law and we are still getting kicked out.'
At the center of the chaos, Gil said, is fear and uncertainty. Some migrants have requested information on how to migrate to another country while others are choosing to wait for advocates to act on their behalf and find a way to defend their status.
'I'm so sad. I still can't believe we have reached this point,' Gil said. 'But we will keep fighting against this. We've done it before'
The court's order, with only one noted dissent, puts on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that kept in place Temporary Protected Status for the Venezuelans that would have otherwise expired last month, The Associated Press reported. The justices provided no rationale, which is common in emergency appeals.
The complex economic and political crisis in Venezuela has driven more than 7.7 million people to leave the South American nation since 2013. Venezuela's most recent economic troubles pushed year-over-year inflation in April to 172%. The latest chapter even prompted President Nicolás Maduro to declare an 'economic emergency' last month. Maduro, whose reelection last year to a third term has been condemned internationally as illegitimate, also has cracked down on political opponents.
In the dispute over TPS, the administration has moved aggressively to withdraw various protections that have allowed immigrants to remain in the country, including ending the temporary status for a total of 600,000 Venezuelans and 500,000 Haitians. That status is granted in 18-month increments. Venezuela was first designated for TPS in 2021; Haiti, in 2010.
The new decision from the Supreme Court only impacts 2023 designation of TPS for Venezuelans. Haiti's determination is still under review but not impacted by this specific decision. Any Venezuelan who was granted status under the 2021 designation is not affected and continues to have status until Sept. 10. The justices left open the possibility that individual Venezuelan citizens could bring their own challenges against efforts by Kristi Noem, secretary of Homeland Security, to terminate their work permits or to remove them from the United States, according to SCOUTUSblog.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that she would have denied the government's request and left the lower court's ruling in place while litigation continues.
That's what gives Gil hope. She said that it is too early to have a strategy on how to move forward, but said that the Venezuelan Alliance in Chicago is working hand in hand with the National TPS Alliance and other local organizations.
'It is extremely expensive to find a way to stay in the country legally individually, but as a group, we can do more,' Gil said.
The Supreme Court's decision does not end the litigation, which will continue in the court of appeals, said Helena Olea, deputy director of Alianza Americas. The Chicago-based organization works to provide resources to asylum-seeking migrants and other immigrants.
'However, by lifting the stay on the termination of TPS for Venezuela, the final ruling — which could side with the plaintiffs — will arrive too late. Without TPS, many Venezuelans could be deported, could decide to travel to other countries or could be arbitrarily labeled as members of the Tren de Aragua or as enemy combatants and sent to El Salvador. All of these are devastating alternatives that put deserving individuals at imminent risk of human rights violations,' Olea said.
As legal advocates push for federal intervention, community leaders are calling on local residents to stand in solidarity.
'Today the Supreme Court allowed Trump and the Department of Homeland Security to once again sow panic and confusion among our communities,' said Dulce Ortiz, executive director of Mano a Mano Family Resource Center, board president of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR).
'Over the last three years, many ICIRR member organizations across the state worked to welcome new arrivals, many of whom are from Venezuela and seeking safety and opportunity in a new home. Some arrived on their own, and others as part of a political stunt that attempted to use immigrants as a weapon against welcoming communities. Regardless of how they arrived in Illinois, all people deserve to be treated with dignity and respect,' Ortiz said.
In the Chicago area, roughly 9,000 Venezuelan migrants are estimated to have TPS, according to the Venezuelan Alliance and the The Resurrection Project, which have held legal clinics to provide free counsel for migrants.
Chicago has helped thousands of Venezuelan migrants to settle in the city after a tumultuous start when Texas Gov. Greg Abbott sent busloads of migrants to Chicago over the past couple of years.
Many Venezuelans have filled key roles in industries facing labor shortages — including health care, construction and caregiving. With TPS ending, employers and communities alike worry about the impact.
'Venezuelan migrants have become an integral part of our communities. They are our neighbors, co-workers, caregivers, and should be recognized for their societal contributions,' said Olea. 'It must not be forgotten, there is ongoing political repression, economic collapse, widespread human rights violations, and a humanitarian crisis — marked by food and medicine shortages — that make Venezuela unsafe for return, warranting continued TPS protection,' Olea said.
The Resurrection Project and other immigrant legal clinics say they are being flooded with calls from panicked families.
'Today's decision will harm hundreds of thousands of immigrants, their families and their communities,' said Erendira Rendón, vice president of immigrant justice at The Resurrection Project. 'TRP remains committed to working toward a future where all people in the U.S. are afforded an opportunity to achieve the American Dream.'
TRP will continue to provide legal guidance to those who have TPS by appointment through their legal clinic.
State Rep. Barbara Hernandez, head of the state's House Immigration Committee and a Democrat who represents portions of Aurora, North Aurora and Batavia, told the Tribune Monday the decision is 'terrible' and 'disappointing.'
Many of these Venezuelan families, she said, were approved to stay in the country because going back to Venezuela meant returning to a dangerous situation. That federal approval allowed them to work and start a life for the past several years.
'I think it leaves families uncertain about their future in this country,' said Hernandez. 'These are people who were being retaliated against in their home country, so they can't go back to their home country. So now we are leaving families to go through the trauma again, potentially going back.'
The decision, she said, also makes it more difficult for the state to fight federal immigration policies, but in the meantime, 'we need to just protect the people we have right now.'Despite the uncertainty Belen said she remains hopeful.
'Everything happens very fast. We thought we would lose TPS in April. We didn't. Now we're back to this, but we don't know what can happen next,' Belen said.
Though the uncertainty sometimes feels debilitating, she said that she and her family are committed to staying together.
If she must leave the United States, she will be devastated. Returning to Venezuela is not an option because 'there's nothing there for us.'
'Maybe a different country,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries
Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump announces travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries

US President Donald Trump has resurrected a hallmark policy of his first term, announcing that citizens of 12 countries would be banned from visiting the United States and those from seven others would face restrictions. The ban takes effect Monday at 12.01am, a cushion that may avoid the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice in 2017. Mr Trump, who signalled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him. Some, but not all, of 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Mr Trump's first term. The new ban includes Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. There will be heightened restrictions on visitors from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. In a video released on social media, Mr Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Mr Trump's restricted list. The Department of Homeland Security says he overstayed a tourist visa. Mr Trump said some countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of visa overstays of tourists, business visitors and students who arrive by air and sea, singling out countries with high percentages of remaining after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Mr Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade war there. Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Mr Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. 'To include Afghanistan – a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years – is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' said Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac. Mr Trump wrote that Afghanistan 'lacks a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures'. He also cited its visa overstay rates. Haiti, which avoided the travel ban during Mr Trump's first term, was also included for high overstay rates and large numbers who came to the US illegally. Haitians continue to flee poverty, hunger and political instability deepens while police and a UN-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85% of its capital, Port-au-Prince. 'Haiti lacks a central authority with sufficient availability and dissemination of law enforcement information necessary to ensure its nationals do not undermine the national security of the United States,' Mr Trump wrote. The Iranian government offered no immediate reaction to being included. The Trump administration called it a 'state sponsor of terrorism', barring visitors except for those already holding visas or coming into the US on special visas America issues for minorities facing persecution. Other Middle East nations on the list – Libya, Sudan and Yemen – all face ongoing civil strife and territory overseen by opposing factions. Sudan has an active war, while Yemen's war is largely stalemated and Libyan forces remain armed. International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations roundly condemned the new ban. 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. The travel ban results from a January 20 executive order Mr Trump issued requiring the departments of State and Homeland Security and the director of national intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US and whether entry from certain countries represented a national security risk. During his first term, Mr Trump issued an executive order in January 2017 banning travel to the US by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries — Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travellers from those nations were either barred from getting on their flights to the US or detained at US airports after they landed. They included students as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban', was retooled amid legal challenges, until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. The ban affected various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families. Mr Trump and others have defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was aimed at protecting the country and not founded on anti-Muslim bias. However, the president had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House.

‘We Don't Want Them': Trump's Travel Bans Are Back
‘We Don't Want Them': Trump's Travel Bans Are Back

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘We Don't Want Them': Trump's Travel Bans Are Back

Donald Trump has revived his first administration's travel ban policy, signing a proclamation Wednesday banning travel from twelve countries and restricting travel from several more. Banned from entering the U.S. are nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Partial restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The proclamation carves out exceptions for lawful permanent residents, visa holders, World Cup and Olympics athletes and their immediate relatives, and people whose visit is deemed to benefit U.S. national interests, among other classes. The ban, which goes into effect after midnight on Monday, was issued due to national security risks, the White House said. The antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado last weekend, in which several attendees at a gathering calling for the release of hostages held by Hamas were burned, spurred Trump to complete work on the proclamation quicker, CNN reported. The attack 'underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said. 'We don't want them.' The suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is an Egyptian national who overstayed his visa. Egypt is not included in the president's travel ban. Deputy White House Press Secretary Abigail Jackson said the list of countries named in the proclamation includes those that show high visa overstay rates, among other qualifying factors. 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,' she wrote on X. 'These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information.' A White House fact sheet offered justifications for each country. Libya, for instance, has 'no competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents,' it states. Libya was among the countries Trump singled out in his initial travel ban in early 2017, a move which sparked widespread protests in part because each of the seven nations were predominantly Muslim. Though Trump cited national security and not religion, he had called for a ban on Muslims' entry into the U.S. during his 2016 presidential campaign. Legal challenges to that ban were filed almost immediately. The Trump administration then reworked the language of the ban, and it was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. That decision, Trump v. Hawaii, was cited in the White House fact sheet Wednesday, along with a national security-related executive order Trump signed in January.

Trump hits Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti with travel bans amid immigration crackdown
Trump hits Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti with travel bans amid immigration crackdown

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump hits Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti with travel bans amid immigration crackdown

President Donald Trump announced a total ban Wednesday on the entry of Haitian nationals into the United States and partially limited Cubans and Venezuelans from coming into the country, as part of a broader travel ban affecting several other nations. The White House published a proclamation that 'fully restricts and limits the entry' of Haitian nationals and 'partially restricts and limits' the entry of Cuban and Venezuelan nationals. The travel ban goes into effect on June 9. READ MORE: Trump travel ban: 'no exceptions' for Cubans, Venezuelans. Other islands may join Haiti on list The travel ban is the latest of federal government move to clamp down on legal immigration from Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela in particular. On his first days in office, Trump asked his administration to evaluate what countries had insufficient vetting and screening that warranted visa suspensions. As a result of the proclamation, the United States will suspend the issuance of most immigrant and non-immigrant visas for Cubans and Venezuelans. Nationals from those countries seeking to travel on immigrant visas and tourism, business, student and academic non-immigrant visas — visa categories B-1, B-2, B1/B-2, F, M, and J — will not be allowed to enter the United States starting June 9. Meanwhile, there will be a full ban on entry into the U.S. for Haitian nationals. The ban does not apply to individuals who currently hold valid visas. Other nations affected by the full ban include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Countries affected by the partial ban include Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo and Turkmenistan. The proclamation applies to nationals from the designated countries who are outside the United States and don't have a valid visa on the effective date of the proclamation. It notes there are exceptions for green-card holders, dual nationals who have a passport not designated under the travel ban, and immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, including minor children, parents and spouses with certain immigration visas. But U.S. citizens seeking to reunite with older children and siblings in the countries included in the ban will be affected. Diplomats, foreign government officials and members of international organizations fall under the exceptions. 'The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those aliens approved for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans or our national interests,' Trump said in the proclamation. In 90 days and every six months thereafter, the secretaries of State and Homeland Security must evaluate whether any suspensions should be continued or terminated. At the annual Haiti Funders Conference in Boston on Wednesday evening, several attendees expressed shock and dismay at the development. 'Singling Haiti out for special treatment provides no protection to U.S. national security, but is another in a long line of transparently racist attacks against Haitians period,' said Brian Concannon, executive director of the Boston-based Institute for Justice and Democracy. Trump declared in the proclamation that he views the measure as a way to protect the United States from terrorism and crime, and that the designated countries lack screening and vetting information for travelers. He added that the countries singled out cannot effectively manage the travel documents of their nationals. In the proclamation, the White House said Cuba is considered a state sponsor of terrorism and that its government does not cooperate on law enforcement matters or take back its own nationals as deportees. It also declared that Venezuela lacks a competent central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, and does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures. It also pointed to Venezuela's traditional refusal of deportees, though independent information obtained by the Miami Herald show that over 4,600 Venezuelan nationals have been deported to Caracas in the last four months. The diplomatic relations between Caracas and Washington have been suspended in 2019 when the Trump administration recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the interim president of Venezuela. For both Venezuela and Cuba, the proclamation says that consular officials shall reduce the validity of other non-immigrant visas to the 'extent permitted by law.' In Havana, the U.S. Embassy has not issued visitor visas since late 2017, with some exceptions made to allow the entry into the U.S. of a few humanitarian cases, activists, independent entrepreneurs, artists, among others. Most Cubans have since needed to apply for non-immigrant visas in third countries. Since Trump took office, the Cuban government has accepted a monthly flight with deportees from the U.S., as it has done since deportations flights to Cuba resumed on April 2023. In the case of Haiti, the White House pointed to rates of overstay in the United States by visa holders and said the country's lack of a centralized government means it cannot ensure nationals are not national security threats. The U.S. Embassy in Port-au-Prince has not been processing visa requests in its consulate for at least two years, which also prompted many Haitians to apply for a Biden-era humanitarian parole program the Trump administration ended as soon as it came into office. The travel ban was announced as Haitians awaited to hear whether the Trump administration would extend or revoke Temporary Protected Status for more than 500,000 Haitians currently living in the U.S. Trump unsuccessfully attempted to end Haiti's TPS during his first term, and experts and advocates fear it will happen again. Pierre Imbert, a Miami community leader and cofounder of Ayiti Community Trust and Hope on a String, noted that Wednesday's ban bars Haitians who are lifelines between their families on the island and South Florida. 'Access to the United States is key to sustaining families. But it's not a one-way thing. You have a number of families in commerce in Haiti who go back and forth on a U.S. them from accessing the country is yet another chapter in the tragedy of Haiti,' Imbert said. He highlighted how Haitians under the Biden admnistration had come legally through the humanitarian parole program because visa services on the island were either suspended or severely limited. The Trump administration ended the parole program for Haitians, and now they cannot enter on visas. 'It's not only unfair, but it fails the test of rational thinking,' said Imbert, noting that many Haitian nationals attending the Boston conference will not be able to enter the United States in a few days. Guerline Jozef, co-founder and executive director of immigrant advocacy group Haitian Bridge Alliance, told the Miami Herald in a statement that it's ironic that the United States views Haiti as a national security threat when the U.S. is the principal source of illegal weapons to Haitian gangs. Wednesday's proclamation comes after the U.S. Supreme Court gave Trump the green light to go ahead with plans to suspend a Biden-era parole program known as CNHV that allowed over half a million immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to live and work in the United States. In addition, the Trump administration ended Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans—a designation that had provided deportation protection to over 600,000 people. The Supreme Court has allowed Trump to move forward with the termination as litigation continues in the lower courts. Adelys Ferro, executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, based in South Florida, criticized the proclamation, calling it a clear display of racism and discrimination. 'They didn't even try to hide the racism, discrimination and xenophobia when drawing up this list. They don't bother anymore,' Ferro said. She noted that the countries facing full or partial restrictions share a common thread: 'They are nations ravaged by war, dictatorships, famine, and death.' International human rights organizations such as Human Rights First, which has offices in New York City, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., condemned Trump's new travel ban, calling it a continuation of xenophobic policy. 'This return to divisive and racist policies to target entire populations marks yet another anti-immigrant and punitive action taken by President Trump,' said Robyn Barnard, senior director of Refugee Advocacy at Human Rights First. 'The ban will harm refugees, asylum seekers and other vulnerable populations, including many who have been waiting to reunite with loved ones in our country. Bans do nothing to make our country secure, but rather undermine our national security and arbitrarily target those most in need of protection.' This is not the first travel ban under a Trump administration. Trump first issued a travel ban in January 2017 during his first term, when he imposed a 90-day ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and barred entry for all refugees without a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days. In September 2017 a new proclamation expanded the restrictions, banning nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Chad, Venezuela and North Korea from entering the U.S. In the case of Venezuela, certain government officials and their immediate family members were banned, but not its nationals in general on tourist or business visas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store