logo
Trump hits Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti with travel bans amid immigration crackdown

Trump hits Cuba, Venezuela, Haiti with travel bans amid immigration crackdown

Yahooa day ago

President Donald Trump announced a total ban Wednesday on the entry of Haitian nationals into the United States and partially limited Cubans and Venezuelans from coming into the country, as part of a broader travel ban affecting several other nations.
The White House published a proclamation that 'fully restricts and limits the entry' of Haitian nationals and 'partially restricts and limits' the entry of Cuban and Venezuelan nationals. The travel ban goes into effect on June 9.
READ MORE: Trump travel ban: 'no exceptions' for Cubans, Venezuelans. Other islands may join Haiti on list
The travel ban is the latest of federal government move to clamp down on legal immigration from Cuba, Haiti and Venezuela in particular. On his first days in office, Trump asked his administration to evaluate what countries had insufficient vetting and screening that warranted visa suspensions.
As a result of the proclamation, the United States will suspend the issuance of most immigrant and non-immigrant visas for Cubans and Venezuelans. Nationals from those countries seeking to travel on immigrant visas and tourism, business, student and academic non-immigrant visas — visa categories B-1, B-2, B1/B-2, F, M, and J — will not be allowed to enter the United States starting June 9. Meanwhile, there will be a full ban on entry into the U.S. for Haitian nationals.
The ban does not apply to individuals who currently hold valid visas.
Other nations affected by the full ban include Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Countries affected by the partial ban include Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo and Turkmenistan.
The proclamation applies to nationals from the designated countries who are outside the United States and don't have a valid visa on the effective date of the proclamation. It notes there are exceptions for green-card holders, dual nationals who have a passport not designated under the travel ban, and immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, including minor children, parents and spouses with certain immigration visas. But U.S. citizens seeking to reunite with older children and siblings in the countries included in the ban will be affected.
Diplomats, foreign government officials and members of international organizations fall under the exceptions.
'The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those aliens approved for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans or our national interests,' Trump said in the proclamation.
In 90 days and every six months thereafter, the secretaries of State and Homeland Security must evaluate whether any suspensions should be continued or terminated.
At the annual Haiti Funders Conference in Boston on Wednesday evening, several attendees expressed shock and dismay at the development.
'Singling Haiti out for special treatment provides no protection to U.S. national security, but is another in a long line of transparently racist attacks against Haitians period,' said Brian Concannon, executive director of the Boston-based Institute for Justice and Democracy.
Trump declared in the proclamation that he views the measure as a way to protect the United States from terrorism and crime, and that the designated countries lack screening and vetting information for travelers. He added that the countries singled out cannot effectively manage the travel documents of their nationals.
In the proclamation, the White House said Cuba is considered a state sponsor of terrorism and that its government does not cooperate on law enforcement matters or take back its own nationals as deportees. It also declared that Venezuela lacks a competent central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, and does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures.
It also pointed to Venezuela's traditional refusal of deportees, though independent information obtained by the Miami Herald show that over 4,600 Venezuelan nationals have been deported to Caracas in the last four months. The diplomatic relations between Caracas and Washington have been suspended in 2019 when the Trump administration recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the interim president of Venezuela.
For both Venezuela and Cuba, the proclamation says that consular officials shall reduce the validity of other non-immigrant visas to the 'extent permitted by law.'
In Havana, the U.S. Embassy has not issued visitor visas since late 2017, with some exceptions made to allow the entry into the U.S. of a few humanitarian cases, activists, independent entrepreneurs, artists, among others. Most Cubans have since needed to apply for non-immigrant visas in third countries.
Since Trump took office, the Cuban government has accepted a monthly flight with deportees from the U.S., as it has done since deportations flights to Cuba resumed on April 2023.
In the case of Haiti, the White House pointed to rates of overstay in the United States by visa holders and said the country's lack of a centralized government means it cannot ensure nationals are not national security threats.
The U.S. Embassy in Port-au-Prince has not been processing visa requests in its consulate for at least two years, which also prompted many Haitians to apply for a Biden-era humanitarian parole program the Trump administration ended as soon as it came into office.
The travel ban was announced as Haitians awaited to hear whether the Trump administration would extend or revoke Temporary Protected Status for more than 500,000 Haitians currently living in the U.S. Trump unsuccessfully attempted to end Haiti's TPS during his first term, and experts and advocates fear it will happen again.
Pierre Imbert, a Miami community leader and cofounder of Ayiti Community Trust and Hope on a String, noted that Wednesday's ban bars Haitians who are lifelines between their families on the island and South Florida.
'Access to the United States is key to sustaining families. But it's not a one-way thing. You have a number of families in commerce in Haiti who go back and forth on a U.S. visa....Banning them from accessing the country is yet another chapter in the tragedy of Haiti,' Imbert said.
He highlighted how Haitians under the Biden admnistration had come legally through the humanitarian parole program because visa services on the island were either suspended or severely limited. The Trump administration ended the parole program for Haitians, and now they cannot enter on visas.
'It's not only unfair, but it fails the test of rational thinking,' said Imbert, noting that many Haitian nationals attending the Boston conference will not be able to enter the United States in a few days.
Guerline Jozef, co-founder and executive director of immigrant advocacy group Haitian Bridge Alliance, told the Miami Herald in a statement that it's ironic that the United States views Haiti as a national security threat when the U.S. is the principal source of illegal weapons to Haitian gangs.
Wednesday's proclamation comes after the U.S. Supreme Court gave Trump the green light to go ahead with plans to suspend a Biden-era parole program known as CNHV that allowed over half a million immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela to live and work in the United States.
In addition, the Trump administration ended Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans—a designation that had provided deportation protection to over 600,000 people. The Supreme Court has allowed Trump to move forward with the termination as litigation continues in the lower courts.
Adelys Ferro, executive director of the Venezuelan American Caucus, based in South Florida, criticized the proclamation, calling it a clear display of racism and discrimination.
'They didn't even try to hide the racism, discrimination and xenophobia when drawing up this list. They don't bother anymore,' Ferro said. She noted that the countries facing full or partial restrictions share a common thread: 'They are nations ravaged by war, dictatorships, famine, and death.'
International human rights organizations such as Human Rights First, which has offices in New York City, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., condemned Trump's new travel ban, calling it a continuation of xenophobic policy.
'This return to divisive and racist policies to target entire populations marks yet another anti-immigrant and punitive action taken by President Trump,' said Robyn Barnard, senior director of Refugee Advocacy at Human Rights First. 'The ban will harm refugees, asylum seekers and other vulnerable populations, including many who have been waiting to reunite with loved ones in our country. Bans do nothing to make our country secure, but rather undermine our national security and arbitrarily target those most in need of protection.'
This is not the first travel ban under a Trump administration. Trump first issued a travel ban in January 2017 during his first term, when he imposed a 90-day ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and barred entry for all refugees without a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days.
In September 2017 a new proclamation expanded the restrictions, banning nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Chad, Venezuela and North Korea from entering the U.S. In the case of Venezuela, certain government officials and their immediate family members were banned, but not its nationals in general on tourist or business visas.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Migrants and ICE officers contend with heat, smog and illness after detoured South Sudan flight

time31 minutes ago

Migrants and ICE officers contend with heat, smog and illness after detoured South Sudan flight

WASHINGTON -- Migrants placed on a deportation flight originally bound for South Sudan are now being held in a converted shipping container on a U.S. naval base in Djibouti, where the men and their guards are contending with baking hot temperatures, smoke from nearby burn pits and the looming threat of rocket attacks, the Trump administration said. Officials outlined grim conditions in court documents filed Thursday before a federal judge overseeing a lawsuit challenging Immigration and Customs Enforcement efforts to swiftly remove migrants to countries they didn't come from. Authorities landed the flight at the base in Djibouti, about 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from South Sudan, more than two weeks ago after U.S. District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Boston found the Trump administration had violated his order by swiftly sending eight migrants from countries including Cuba and Vietnam to the east African nation. The judge said that men from other countries must have a real chance to raise fears about dangers they could face in South Sudan. The men's lawyers, though, have still not been able to talk to them, said Robyn Barnard, senior director of refugee advocacy at Human Rights First, whose stated mission is to ensure the United States is a global leader on human rights. Barnard spoke Friday at a hearing of Democratic members of Congress and said some family members of the men had been able to talk to them Thursday. The migrants have been previously convicted of serious crimes in the U.S., and President Donald Trump's administration has said that it was unable to return them quickly to their home countries. The Justice Department has also appealed to the Supreme Court to immediately intervene and allow swift deportations to third countries to resume. The case comes amid a sweeping immigration crackdown by the Republican administration, which has pledged to deport millions of people who are living in the United States illegally. The legal fight became another flashpoint as the administration rails against judges whose rulings have slowed the president's policies. The Trump administration said the converted conference room in the shipping container is the only viable place to house the men on the base in Djibouti, where outdoor daily temperatures rise above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius), according to the declaration from an ICE official. Nearby burn pits are used to dispose of trash and human waste, and the smog cloud makes it hard to breathe, sickening both ICE officers guarding the men and the detainees, the documents state. They don't have access to all the medication they need to protect against infection, and the ICE officers were unable to complete anti-malarial treatment before landing, an ICE official said. 'It is unknown how long the medical supply will last,' Mellissa B. Harper, acting executive deputy associate director of enforcement and removal operations, said in the declaration. The group also lacks protective gear in case of a rocket attack from terrorist groups in Yemen, a risk outlined by the Department of Defense, the documents state. ___

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Education Department Firings
Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Education Department Firings

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Allow Education Department Firings

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump asked the US Supreme Court to let him resume dismantling the Department of Education, seeking to lift a lower court order that requires the reinstatement of as many as 1,400 workers. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. The emergency filing Friday challenges a federal district judge's conclusion that Trump's effort to shut down the department would leave it unable to perform duties required under US law, including managing federal student loans, aiding state education programs and enforcing civil rights law. The filing marks the 17th time since Trump's inauguration that his administration has asked the Supreme Court for help as he seeks to implement a far-reaching agenda through executive orders and other unilateral steps. It's the first Supreme Court clash to squarely address Trump's authority to dismantle entities created by Congress, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the US Agency for International Development and the US Institute of Peace. Education Secretary Linda McMahon announced March 11 that the department was cutting half its staff through a reduction in force. Trump followed with a March 20 executive order that said McMahon should 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education.' The effort is being challenged in two lawsuits, one brought primarily by states led by Democrats and the other filed by several Massachusetts public school systems and unions. US District Judge Myong Joun in Boston ruled in May that the personnel cuts would 'likely cripple the department.' He said the challengers were likely to succeed in showing that Trump lacked power to effectively dissolve the department by getting rid of its employees, closing regional offices and moving programs to other federal agencies. 'A department without enough employees to perform statutorily mandated functions is not a department at all,' Joun wrote. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself.' The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday refused to block Joun's ruling, paving the way for Trump's Supreme Court filing. Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to leave mass layoffs at Education Department in place
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to leave mass layoffs at Education Department in place

Washington Post

time33 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to leave mass layoffs at Education Department in place

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to pause a court order to reinstate Education Department employees who were fired in mass layoffs as part of President Donald Trump's plan to dismantle the agency. The Justice Department's emergency appeal to the high court said U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston exceeded his authority last month when he issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs of nearly 1,400 people and putting the broader plan on hold.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store