The World's Best Bourbon, According To The London Spirits Competition
getty
American whiskeys resounded at the 8th annual International London Spirits Competition (ILSC), dominating the whisky category and securing top honors for several bourbon expressions. The 2025 competition, which attracted several thousand submissions from over 30 countries, was a testament to the exceptional quality of American whiskeys. Below is a detailed account of the various American whisky category winners.
According to Sid Patel, CEO of ILSC:
This year's judging panel was a powerhouse of over 70 top industry experts, including Master Distillers, Master Blenders, Mixologists, and elite buyers. The panel featured renowned names like Dr. Emma Walker, Master Blender at Johnnie Walker, and Craig Wallace, Whisky Creation Leader and Master Blender at Diageo.
W. L. Weller Antique 107 took top honors as the 2025 Spirit of the Year and Best Spirit by Quality.
The Weller Antique 107, a wheated bourbon from Buffalo Trace Distillery, stands out in the highly regarded Weller line. Bottled at 107 proof/53.5% ABV, it offers a robust expression of the Weller profile and shares some DNA with the legendary Pappy Van Winkle, making it a unique and sought-after whiskey.
The nose features rich aromas of dark fruit, cinnamon, and vanilla, with hints of caramel and oak. It's full-bodied on the palate, with warm spice, cherry, toffee, and baking spices. The wheat lends a smooth, slightly creamy texture. The finish is long and spicy, with lingering notes of cinnamon, oak, and a touch of sweetness.
Weller Antique 107 is a perennial winner in international spirit competitions and is widely considered one of the world's great whiskeys. Its balance of heat, sweetness, and depth is exceptional. The whiskey is in high demand and difficult to find at retail, typically selling at a substantial premium to its list price.
Barrels of Bourbon aging in a warehouse
getty
Lancaster Craft Spirits Distillery, Ale Cask Rare Bourbon, was the Straight Bourbon of the Year.
Lancaster's Ale Cask Rare Bourbon is a limited-release, 6 YO straight bourbon that showcases the distillery's innovative approach to barrel finishing. Initially aged in #4 char American white oak barrels, the bourbon undergoes an extended finishing period of over a year in barrels previously used for their Scottish-style Wee Heavy Ale, known as Shaggy Bullz.
The bourbon is fruity, with distinctive vanilla, nuts, and seasoned oak notes. It's buttery smooth on the palate with a rich, full-bodied texture featuring vanilla and toasted oak, complemented by praline pecan and caramelized fruit flavors. The influence of the ale cask imparts malted sweetness and dried fruit characteristics, enhancing the bourbon's complexity.
This bourbon is bottled at 94 proof/47% ABV and reflects Lancaster Craft Spirits' dedication to blending traditional distilling techniques with creative barrel finishing methods. Finishing in ale casks adds a unique dimension to the bourbon, making it a distinctive offering for enthusiasts seeking novel flavor experiences.
Sazerac 1792 Single Barrel was the Single Barrel Bourbon of the Year.
1792 Single Barrel Bourbon, a premium expression from Sazerac's Barton 1792 Distillery in Bardstown, Kentucky, is a bourbon crafted from a high-rye mash bill, though the exact proportions are undisclosed. Each bottle originates from a single, hand-selected barrel deemed exceptional by the distillery, resulting in unique flavor profiles across different releases, making each bottle a distinct tasting journey.
Aromas of vanilla, caramel, and oak are prominent on the nose, accompanied by subtle hints of cinnamon, baking spices, and dried fruit notes. The palate offers a harmonious blend of vanilla, caramel, and oak, with varying degrees of milk chocolate, plum, and sweet pastry flavors depending on the barrel. The mouthfeel is typically creamy and full-bodied. The finish is medium to long, featuring notes of fudge, nutmeg, and hazelnut, with lingering spice notes.
1792 Single Barrel Bourbon features a rich and complex flavor profile, offering a flavorful dram for bourbon enthusiasts. Its unique characteristics, derived from individual barrels, make each bottle a distinct tasting journey. Priced around $40–$50, it's also compelling for those seeking quality bourbon without a hefty price tag.
A gloved worker seals a bottle of Maker's Mark whiskey at the distillery in Loretto, Kentucky. | Location: Loretto, Kentucky, USA.
getty
Maker's Mark Star Hill Farm Whisky was the Wheat Whisky of the Year and the Whiskey Producer of the Year.
Maker's Mark Star Hill Farm Whisky is the distillery's first wheat whisky, marking its first new mash bill in over 70 years. Named after the 1,100-acre Star Hill Farm in Loretto, Kentucky, this release emphasizes regenerative agriculture and estate-grown grains.
The mash bill is a blend of two recipes—one with 70% soft red winter wheat and 30% malted barley, and another with 100% malted soft red winter wheat. This results in a combined mash bill of 61% wheat, 20% malted wheat, and 19% malted barley.
The whiskey is a blend of seven- and eight-year-old whiskeys, distilled and barreled in 2016 and 2017, and is bottled at a cask strength of 114.7 proof/ 57.35% ABV. It's scheduled for release in May 2025 at an RRSP of $100 for a 750 ml bottle.
The release carries the Estate Whiskey Certification from the University of Kentucky's Estate Whiskey Alliance, highlighting its commitment to local sourcing and sustainable production.
Sazerac Early Times was the Blended American Whiskey of the Year. The whisky has a bourbon DNA but is aged in a combination of new and used oak barrels and is classified as an American whiskey.
Templeton Rye Whiskey Single Barrel was the Rye Whiskey of the Year. Uncle Nearest 1884 Small Batch Whiskey was the Tennessee Whiskey of the Year, while Uncle Nearest Single Barrel Whiskey Batch 905 was the Single Barrel American Whiskey of the Year.
The American whiskeys that took top honors at the 2025 International London Spirits Competition are an eclectic blend of legacy and craft whiskey producers, featuring historic brands and new whiskey expressions. These whiskeys are outstanding and worth trying, especially the new and craft expressions. See also The World's Best Single Malt Scotch Whiskies, According to the London Spirits Competition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
7 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Basic Capital Closes $25 Million Series A Funding Round Led by Forerunner and Lux Capital
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Basic Capital, a 401(k) platform that offers an innovative financing option to help workers achieve their retirement goals, announced the successful closing of its $25 million Series A funding round led by Forerunner and Lux Capital, with participation from existing investors SV Angel, Box Group and financial luminaries including Henry Kravis. New investors included HOF Capital and Inspired Capital. Basic Capital is the first and only 401(k) platform that allows participants to finance assets and offers access to alternative investments. This significant investment will accelerate the company's expansion efforts, allowing Basic Capital to modernize and enhance 401(k) offerings for employers and employees. "The engine of 401(k)s has not been significantly upgraded in 40 years,' said Abdul Al-Asaad, Founder and CEO of Basic Capital. 'This new investment into Basic Capital, alongside policy changes emerging from Washington, D.C., represents a huge win for American workers as retirement plans get brought into the 21st century.' Basic Capital plans to use the funding to accelerate the adoption of its 401(k) solution among employers and continue building out its team. The company partners with employers to offer its 401(k) platform and offers individual IRA plans, with the goal of scaling to serve significantly more retirement savers across both product lines. 'American innovation has generated extraordinary financial prosperity,' said Peter Hebert, Co-Founder & Partner, Lux Capital. 'But historically, federal regulation has prevented millions of American workers from accessing opportunities to build wealth. The Basic Capital team has developed a novel solution to help everyday Americans finance investment, rather than consumption.' About Basic Capital Basic Capital is a full-stack retirement platform that amplifies retirement investments by providing financing within IRAs and 401(k)s. The company offers $4 of financing for every $1 contributed, giving investors 5x the investing power in diversified portfolios designed for long-term growth About Forerunner Forerunner is a venture capital firm focused on the modern consumer. The firm invests at the intersection of shifting behavior and emerging technology, backing changemakers building category-defining companies across health and wellness, commerce, personal finance, career and learning, productivity and empowerment, social and entertainment, and resilience. Founded in 2012 and based in San Francisco, Forerunner has raised nearly $3 billion in assets under management to date. About Lux Capital Lux Capital is a venture firm based in New York City and Silicon Valley with more than $5 billion under management. It invests in counter-conventional, seed, and early-stage science and technology ventures. For more information about Basic Capital, visit .
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
How retail accounting could distort profitability as tariffs take effect
As more tariffs take effect on goods imported into the U.S., a specific accounting method could have major implications for how American retailers calculate the impact. A tariff adds to the cost of an imported item when it's received and paid for when it crosses a border. While there's debate over who pays that tariff — the manufacturer, the retailer, the consumer or some combination — the hit will likely show up in retailers' bottom lines. But a specific accounting practice, called retail inventory method accounting, or RIM, can make profitability appear stronger than it is in the short term. "Retail inventory method accounting (RIM) is less responsive to initial product cost changes compared to cost accounting, and can initially overstate profitability," said Ali Furman, PwC U.S. consumer markets industry leader. "This would normalize once tariffs stabilize, depending on how much of the cost retailers absorb." Because RIM uses an average cost-to-retail price ratio across a broad group of items, rather than the actual cost of every item, like in cost accounting, RIM does not entirely capture the immediate impact of rising costs. Nearly a quarter of U.S. retailers use the retail inventory method of accounting, according to PwC. Walmart, Target and Home Depot are among them. All three retailers report quarterly earnings this week, and their results may not fully show how tariffs have cut into their profitability so far. Take Walmart, the largest U.S. retailer, which will post fiscal second-quarter earnings Thursday. TD Cowen analyst Oliver Chen estimated about half of Walmart's quarter will include the impact of levies, as the company brought in inventory at different cost levels before and after new tariff rates took effect. That could temporarily distort gross margin profitability, Chen said. Walmart's accounting has in part informed its strategy in recent months as it navigates President Donald Trump's unpredictable tariff policy. A week after Trump's April 2 announcement of so-called "reciprocal tariffs" on a wide swath of trade partners, Walmart withdrew its guidance for operating income in its first fiscal quarter. However, the company maintained its annual forecast, citing in part the influence of RIM accounting. Then when it reported its fiscal first-quarter earnings in May, Walmart said it would mitigate higher costs as much as possible, but would likely have to increase some prices at the current tariff rates. In response, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that Walmart should "just eat" the tariffs. Doing so could actually benefit a retailer's bottom line, at least initially, according to Furman. "The more costs retailers absorb in retail accounting, the greater the risk of overstating profitability during periods of increasing costs, such as tariff increases," she said. Walmart management briefed Trump this spring about the impact its accounting method may have on results in a high-tariff environment, according to a person familiar with the discussion, who asked to remain unnamed while speaking about private conversations. Still, James Bowie, managing director in EY's technical accounting advisory group, warned "all of the inventory costing methodologies will be affected in some ways." It typically takes a large, non-fast fashion retailer using RIM roughly two to four quarters for cost volatility to settle and profitability to get closer to its true level, according to PwC. The method could make profitability look higher initially, then lower in a subsequent quarter, before it has time to stabilize. "It's kind of like you've got a speed boat on the price," he said. "I can turn pretty quickly, but I've got a cruise liner that is carrying all my average of my inventory. It takes a little longer for it to turn and so even though they might ultimately be able to go the same speed, it takes a little bit of time for that one turn to take place." While RIM is more likely to lead to a temporary overstating of profitability, it can also wind up understanding profits if tariffs are negotiated lower. Bowie said if a retailer responds to lower tariff rates by cutting retail prices, under RIM accounting, "it looks like my margin has eroded, but it's only because I now am waiting for the cost relationship to catch back up, so [it] might look like there's margin compression even in a period of decreasing tariffs." Furman added that PwC is seeing "a clear disconnect" for companies that use RIM accounting. "Companies might be doing all the right things: navigating sourcing challenges, managing suppliers, and even mitigating tariffs," she said. "But, those efforts often aren't reflected in the financials. That misalignment between operational execution and reporting for those using RIM is exacerbating the challenges retailers face." The retail inventory method of accounting is an older method that was most useful for retailers when they had many items from a range of categories without an easy, or technological, way to track inventory. "Inventory accounting methods existed before this thing called Excel," said Bowie. "[A retailer] had an abacus and a dream trying to figure out what you're going to do." Over time, technology made it easy to use actual costs rather than averages, so cost accounting became more common. As retailers grow and accounting methods become ingrained, it's difficult, though not impossible, to switch tactics. Macy's and Nordstrom recently made the change to cost accounting. PwC said it takes an average of two to three years to make the transition from one accounting method to another and can require millions of dollars and a restatement of previous years' financials to provide apples-to-apples comparisons. Still, the accounting firm said about half of retailers that use RIM have considered switching. CNBC worked with PwC's Furman and Suni Shamapande, the firm's U.S. retail customer experience and operations leader, to develop a simplified example demonstrating the difference between RIM and weighted average cost accounting in how they affect gross profit margins. The example demonstrates how RIM accounting can "overstate" true profitability at a moment in time when costs increase quickly. For the purposes of this example, PwC and CNBC used weighted average cost accounting, which takes a SKU-level weight average and blends all costs together, regardless of purchase date. A SKU is a stock-keeping unit, which retailers use to track inventory of specific items. Base case: No tariffs The base case, which does not include tariffs, uses three different T-shirts types from three different countries. Each type of T-shirt, or individual SKU, has a different cost and is sold to consumers at a different retail price. The retailer bought each type of T-shirt in different quantities, as did consumers. Here's how the math differs to start. The gross profit margin for the items calculated using weighted average cost accounting is 46%. Using RIM, it's 53%. Tariff case 1: Retailer's costs increase, all else remains the same If the retailer's cost for each T-shirt goes up as a result of tariffs, but everything else — units bought, units sold and retail price — remains the same, gross margin falls if calculated using cost accounting and RIM. But it would still be higher under RIM than if the company used cost accounting. Here's the math for our simplified example: Tariff case 2: Retailer raises prices to offset higher costs If the retailer passes on the full dollar value of the tariff cost to the customer, and units bought and sold stay the same, gross margin improves under both accounting methods. In our example, it goes to 36% in cost accounting and 47% with RIM. Both gross margin percentages are lower than the base case, which assumes no tariffs, but the percentage change is smaller under RIM than under cost accounting. Tariff case 3: Retailer raises prices and units bought and sold both fall Here's where it gets interesting, and likely more realistic, to reflect supply and demand choices a retailer and consumer would likely make as costs rise. If the retailer passes on the full dollar value of tariffs to the customer and also sells fewer items to consumers at the higher retail price, RIM makes profit margins look temporarily rosier. Gross margin in our example falls to 27% under cost accounting, but holds steady under RIM at 47% even though units sold have changed. Here's where you see how the ratio of cost of goods sold to selling price hasn't had time to adjust.
NBC News
38 minutes ago
- NBC News
When 'invest like the 1%' fails: How Yieldstreet's real estate bets left customers with massive losses
When Justin Klish stumbled upon an ad for Yieldstreet in February 2022, he said, it was the company's tagline that stuck in his head. 'Invest like the 1%,' the startup said. The ad spoke to his desire to build wealth and diversify away from stocks, which were then in freefall, Klish said. Yieldstreet says it gives retail investors such as Klish access to the types of deals that were previously only the domain of Wall Street firms or the ultrarich. So Klish, a 46-year-old financial services worker living in Miami, logged on to Yieldstreet's platform, where a pair of offerings jumped out to him. He invested $400,000 in two real estate projects: A luxury apartment building in downtown Nashville overseen by former WeWork CEO Adam Neumann 's family office, and a three-building renovation in the Chelsea neighborhood of New York. Each project had targeted annual returns of around 20%. Three years later, Klish said he has little hope of ever seeing his money again. Yieldstreet declared the Nashville project a total loss in May, according to an investor letter, wiping out $300,000 of his funds. The Chelsea deal needs to raise fresh capital to avoid a similar fate, according to another letter. Both letters were reviewed by CNBC. 'There isn't a day that goes by without me saying, 'I can't believe what happened,'' Klish told CNBC. 'I lost $400,000 in Yieldstreet. I consider myself moderately financially savvy, and I got duped by this company. I just worry that it's going to keep happening to others.' Distributed risk Yieldstreet, founded in 2015, is one of the best-known examples of American startups with the stated mission of democratizing access to assets such as real estate, litigation proceeds and private credit. To do so, it gathers funds from thousands of investors such as Klish, who typically put in at least $10,000 each for projects vetted by Yieldstreet managers. The startup's central premise is that the world beyond public stocks and bonds — often called alternative assets or private market investments — provides both smoother sailing and the possibility of higher returns, a win-win proposition. This month, President Donald Trump signed an executive order designed to allow private market investments in U.S. retirement plans. But Yieldstreet customers who participated in its real estate deals in recent years say they've learned the flip side of the private markets: They face huge losses on investments that turned out far riskier than they thought, while their money has been locked up for years with little to show for it besides frustration. The company said in a statement that its real estate equity offerings from 2021 and 2022 were 'significantly impacted' by rising interest rates and market conditions that pressured valuations industrywide. This article is based on dozens of investor letters that were sent to customers by Yieldstreet and reviewed by CNBC. The documents show investors put more than $370 million into 30 real estate projects that have already recognized $78 million in defaults in the past year. Yieldstreet customers who spoke to CNBC say they anticipate deep or total losses on the remainder. The breadth of Yieldstreet's struggles in real estate — its biggest single investment category — hasn't previously been reported. CNBC's analysis covers a wide swath of deals that the company offered between 2021 and 2024, but doesn't include every project, of which there were at least 55, according to Yieldstreet. The troubled projects vary. They include apartment complexes in boomtowns such as Atlanta, Dallas and Nashville, Tennessee; developments in coastal cities including New York, Boston and Portland, Oregon; apartment buildings in the Midwest and single-family rental homes across Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. Of the 30 deals that CNBC reviewed information on, four have been declared total losses by Yieldstreet. Of the rest, 23 are deemed to be on 'watchlist' by the startup as it seeks to recoup value for investors, sometimes by raising more funds from members. Three deals are listed as 'active,' though they have stopped making scheduled payouts, according to the documents. Additionally, Yieldstreet shut down a real estate investment trust made up of six of the above projects last year as its value plunged by nearly half, locking up customer money for at least two years. Yieldstreet's overall returns in real estate have plunged in the past two years; the category went from a 9.4% annual return rate in 2023 to a 2% return rate in the company's most recent update on its website. But only customers participating in a specific fund get information about its performance, and Yieldstreet labels its investor updates 'confidential,' warning customers that the information in them can't be shared without consent from the startup. While not uncommon in the private markets, those limitations make it hard for investors to know if their experience is unique. Klish said he began to worry about his investments in early 2023 when updates became late and began to hint at deteriorating market conditions. Frustrated by those delays and what he described as a lack of candor from Yieldstreet about his sinking investments, Klish turned to forums on Facebook and Reddit for a sense of the bigger picture. There he said he found a few dozen other customers who shared their Yieldstreet experiences. 'When I dug into the other deals, I realized that this is systemic,' said Klish. 'Almost every single deal is in trouble.' In July, Klish filed a complaint, which CNBC has reviewed, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that Yieldstreet misled its investors. Klish said he has yet to receive a response to his complaint. Missing ships, busted tie-up Yieldstreet calls itself the leading platform offering access to the private markets, a category that has boomed over the past decade as professional investors seek sources of yield beyond stocks and bonds. Founded 10 years ago by Michael Weisz and Milind Mehere, the company has well-known VC backers including Khosla Ventures, Thrive Capital and General Catalyst. Yieldstreet was part of a wave of fintech startups created in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, including Robinhood and Chime, with a populist message. 'Our mission at Yieldstreet is, how do we help create financial independence for millions of people?' Weisz said during a 2020 CNBC interview. 'You do that by helping people generate consistent, passive income.' Weisz, who became CEO of Yieldstreet in 2023, brought experience in litigation finance, where hedge funds lend money to plaintiffs for a slice of the payout if the lawsuit wins. Mehere, a former software engineer who had co-founded online marketing startup Yodle, was the more technical of the pair. Yieldstreet declined to make the co-founders or other executives available for this article. In early 2020, Yieldstreet announced a partnership with BlackRock, the biggest asset manager in the world. The startup said at the time that its new Prism fund would contain a mix of its private market assets with conventional bond funds managed by BlackRock. Here is the 2020 interview with Yieldstreet co-founder Weisz: The move seemed to signal that Yieldstreet was primed for mainstream success. BlackRock had spent 18 months vetting the company before agreeing to the tie-up, Yieldstreet's co-founders told CNBC at the time. The month after its public announcement, though, Yieldstreet had tougher news to share. It was becoming clear that customers in another one of its product lines — loans backed by commercial ships that are torn apart for scrap metal — would suffer losses, the firm told them in March, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Yieldstreet lost track of 13 ships in international waters that backed $89 million in member loans, according to an April 2020 lawsuit filed by the startup against the borrower in that project, which it accused of fraud. In October 2020, a British court sided with Yieldstreet in the lawsuit against the borrower, a Dubai-based ship recycler. The episode scared off BlackRock, which ended the partnership weeks after it was announced, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked to remain unnamed so they could speak freely about private conversations. A Yieldstreet spokeswoman at the time told The Wall Street Journal that the BlackRock launch was initially successful but the fund 'was then faced with the market environment caused by Covid-19.' Three years later, the SEC fined Yieldstreet $1.9 million for selling a $14.5 million marine loan to investors even when it had reason to believe the borrower had stolen proceeds from related deals. Yieldstreet also didn't use 'publicly available' methods to track the ships it was relying on for collateral, the SEC said. 'YieldStreet aims to unlock the complex alternative investments market for retail investors but failed to disclose glaring red flags it had about the security of the collateral backing this offering,' an SEC official said in a 2023 release accompanying the settlement, for which the company neither denied nor admitted to the agency's findings. Still, the company continued to rack up assets on its platform, in part by ramping up activities in real estate. By 2023, real estate funds made up 26% of all investments on the platform, the largest asset category and well ahead of runners-up such as private credit, Yieldstreet said at the time. Late that year, Yieldstreet announced it had acquired Cadre, a startup co-founded by Jared Kushner that focused on broadening access to commercial real estate. The companies declined to disclose terms of the deal, but Yieldstreet said the combined entities' 'investment value' was nearly $10 billion. In May 2025, Yieldstreet replaced Weisz as CEO with Mitch Caplan, a former E-Trade chief who joined the startup's board in 2021. That's the year the venture firm where Caplan serves as president, Tarsadia Investments, took a stake in Yieldstreet. The company declined to say why Weisz was replaced. In July, Yieldstreet announced a $77 million capital raise, led by Tarsadia Investments. 'Difficult news' Yieldstreet continued to make moves in real estate well after a seismic shift that made the industry far harder to navigate had begun. In early 2022, the Federal Reserve kicked off its most aggressive rate-hiking cycle in decades to combat inflation, turning the economics of many projects from that period upside down. The value of multifamily buildings has dropped 19% since 2022, according to Green Street's commercial property index. Projects that Yieldstreet put its customers into struggled to hit revenue targets amid price competition or had problems filling vacancies or raising rents, and thus began to fall behind on loan payments, according to investor letters. Combined with the use of leverage, or borrowing money that amplifies both risks and returns, Yieldstreet investors suffered complete losses on projects in Nashville, Atlanta and New York's Upper West Side neighborhood, the letters show. 'After exhausting all options to preserve value, YieldStreet determined there was no reasonable path to recovery,' the firm told customers who invested $15 million in the Upper West Side deal. 'We sold our position for $1.' It's unclear if Yieldstreet, which makes money by charging annual management fees of around 2% on invested funds, itself suffered financial losses on the defaults. In at least a half dozen cases, Yieldstreet went to its user base again in 2023 and 2024 to raise rescue funds for troubled deals, telling members that the loans combined the protections of debt with the upside of equity. But if the project was doomed, a bailout loan was, at least in one case, effectively throwing good money after bad. A $3.1 million member loan to help rescue the Nashville project, located at 2010 West End Avenue, was wiped out in just months. 'We are reaching out to share difficult news,' Yieldstreet told investors of the Nashville project and its member loan in May. 'Following multiple restructuring attempts, the property has been sold to Tishman Speyer ... resulting in a complete loss of capital for investors.' In a statement provided in response to CNBC's reporting for this article, Yieldstreet said it has offered 149 real estate deals since inception and has delivered positive returns on 94% of matured investments in the category. That 94% figure likely doesn't include the distressed projects that CNBC has identified, since those funds aren't yet classified as matured while Yieldstreet seeks to salvage projects on its watchlist. The watchlist designation doesn't always result in the loss of investor funds, Yieldstreet said in another statement. 'Of the nearly $5 billion invested across the platform, a set of real estate equity offerings originated during 2021–2022 were significantly impacted by rising interest rates and broader market conditions that pressured multifamily valuations across the industry,' Yieldstreet said through a spokeswoman. Adverse selection On its website, the startup says it offers only about 10% of the opportunities it reviews, signaling its discernment when it comes to risk. But several professional investors pointed to the possibility that, instead of securing only top-quality deals in real estate, Yieldstreet may be getting ones that are picked over by more established players. 'There's no question you've seen deals that institutions have passed on that went to the platforms because retail investors might have less discipline than the institutional ones,' said Greg Friedman, CEO of Peachtree Group, an Atlanta-based commercial real estate investment firm. 'It's a reflection of a lack of discipline in underwriting and market conditions going against them,' Friedman said of Yieldstreet's track record. 'Anything done after 2022, they should have done more carefully knowing that we are in a higher-rate environment.' In late 2022, Yieldstreet even told investors that real estate was a 'safe(er) haven' asset during periods of rising rates and high inflation. By then, the Fed's intent to squash inflation with higher rates was well understood. 'Real estate can be an effective inflation hedge, carries low correlation to traditional markets, and has even benefitted in times of market downturns, generating outsized returns,' the startup said in a blog post at the time. In the post, Yieldstreet gave the example of the Alterra Apartments, a multifamily project in Tucson, Arizona, where it said rent increases and a contractual cap on interest rates protected it from the Fed hikes. But this year, Yieldstreet told investors in the $23 million deal that the Tucson development was in technical default and headed for a full write-off. 'Mind-boggling' Customers interviewed by CNBC accuse the company of downplaying investment risks and say that its disclosures around performance can be sloppy or misleading. Mark Underhill, a 57-year-old software engineer, said he invested $600,000 across 22 Yieldstreet funds and faces $200,000 in losses on projects that are on watchlist and have never made payouts. 'With any investment, there's a risk of loss,' Underhill said. 'But there's no consideration of these type of gut-punch losses. They talked about how their deals were backed by collateral, and they gave you all these reasons that make you feel there's something left if the deal goes south.' Underhill, who was treated with chemotherapy for multiple myeloma last year and travels the American West in a camper van, said his losses are forcing him to work beyond his expected retirement date. 'The thing that is mind-boggling is, how did they fail so badly on so many deals in so many markets?' Underhill said. The offering sheet for the Upper West Side project said sales prices would have to plunge 35% for Yieldstreet members to see any losses, a worse hit than what New York experienced during the 2008 recession, Klish wrote in his July complaint to the SEC. But the project defaulted even though prices in the area didn't fall by that much, Klish wrote. In another example, while participants in the Nashville deals got letters showing a complete loss, or a -100% return, Yieldstreet's public-facing website listed a 0% internal rate of return, or IRR, giving the false impression that investors got all their capital back. After CNBC asked Yieldstreet for comment on the discrepancy, the website was updated to reflect the -100% return. The company also stopped issuing quarterly portfolio snapshots after early 2023, making it harder for prospective investors to see how Yieldstreet's overall investments are performing. So besides marketing materials, customers are mostly left to rely on the company's disclosures about its performance as a gauge of whether to invest with the startup. Yieldstreet says it updates its metrics quarterly, and its website shows a 7.4% internal rate of return through March 2025 across all investments. That period likely excludes the impact of the Nashville defaults, which were disclosed in May 2025. 'Winter is coming' Yieldstreet's real estate woes threaten to wipe out decades of savings for Louis Litz, a 61-year-old electrical engineer from Ambler, Pennsylvania. Seeking income and stability, Litz put $480,000 into Yieldstreet funds, he said. Three of those projects have defaulted, while seven developments are on watchlist, he said. 'At least half of this stuff is going under,' Litz said. 'I'm 61, so there's no way I can really recover.' Under its new CEO, Caplan, Yieldstreet has decided to pivot away from a business model of mostly offering bespoke investments like the ones that cratered for its real estate customers. This month, Yieldstreet said that it officially became a broker-dealer, allowing it to offer funds from outside asset managers including Goldman Sachs and the Carlyle Group. The plan is to become a distribution platform where 70% of funds are from these established Wall Street giants, Caplan said this month. The move is worlds away from the confidence that Yieldstreet co-founder Weisz had in the company's original model. In the 2020 CNBC interview, Weisz said that he often reminded his staff that 'winter is coming' and to prepare for turbulence. Yieldstreet would protect its customers from losses because of the underlying collateral the firm was investing in: real buildings with tenants in sought-after locations all over the country, Weisz said. 'I'm not here to tell you that Milind and Michael are the world's smartest investors and there's never going to be something that goes wrong,' Weisz said, referencing himself and his co-founder. 'We understand that when winter comes, there will be challenges, but we take comfort in knowing that there's underlying collateral.' 'Anybody could put money out,' Weisz said. 'It's about bringing it back home.'
