'No right talking the way she is': Alberta First Nations chiefs united after emergency meeting denouncing separation talks
Article content
Leaders of First Nations across Alberta slammed Premier Danielle Smith for not putting talks of a separation referendum to rest and emphasized their opposition to Bill 54, which would lower the threshold for citizen initiatives.
Article content
Article content
First Nations chiefs from Treaty No. 6, 7 and 8 gathered in Edmonton for an emergency meeting, and all stood firm on denouncing any movement towards a referendum on separation. Chiefs of the Confederacy of Treaty No. 6 First Nation said they cancelled a meeting scheduled with Smith for Tuesday and will remain that way until she 'changes her tone.'
Article content
Article content
Chief Kelsey Jacko of Cold Lake First Nations said for the Confederacy of Treaty No. 6 to meet with Smith, she needs to start thinking about First Nations and 'lift my people out of poverty.'
Article content
Article content
'If you want true reconciliation, give us a share of resources. Our water is suffering. Our animals are suffering out there. It's frustrating when everybody thinks about economics, and then where we're left out of it,' Jacko said.
Article content
'She has no right talking the way she is because we are treaty people.'
Article content
At the emergency meeting, Treaty chiefs addressed concerns over Bill 54 and the Sovereignty Act, prompting First Nations to band together and emphasize their historical and ongoing presence on the land.
Article content
Chief Billy-Joe Tuccaro of the Mikisew Cree First Nation who penned a cease and desist letter in late April to Smith accusing her of stoking separatist movement, threw Bill 54 in the air and said 'you're garbage' to the papers.
Article content
At an earlier press conference on Tuesday, Smith said the province was a 'number of steps' away from a referendum on separation and said the legislation is supposed to ensure the signature threshold for citizen-initiated referendums is 'reasonable.'
Article content
Article content
'You can't have a referendum on things that are enshrined in our various constitutional conventions and laws, and court decisions. So I'll wait and see what sort of referendum questions come forward, but my expectation would be that those (Treaty rights) would be honoured,' Smith said.
Article content
Article content
Chief Troy Knowlton of Piikani Nation said any talk of separation is 'really insanity' and said he spoke to Indigenous Relations Minister Rick Wilson on Monday and told him the rhetoric being promoted by the province was 'taken right out of President Trump's playbook.'
Article content
'The rhetoric and insanity of separation here in Alberta has united First Nations (not just) on this land, but all across Canada. So I want to thank you, Danielle Smith, for Bill 54, because today we stand united. We're not going anywhere and if you feel that you have problems with First Nations you could leave,' Knowlton said.
Article content
Alberta NDP Indigenous Relations critic Brooks Arcand-Paul put forward a motion in the legislature on Tuesday to respect Treaty rights and called on Smith to denounce separation. The motion did not receive unanimous consent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: It's time to fast-track actions to defend B.C.'s lands, waters, fish and wildlife
B.C. Premier David Eby and Prime Minister Mark Carney have outlined visions for rapid development of B.C. and Canada's natural resources to 'aggressively develop projects that are in the national interest in order to protect Canada's energy security.' As a drastic action to fast-track key projects, the provincial government recently narrowly passed Bills 14 and 15, laws that risk trampling Indigenous rights and circumventing environmental protections. As a scientist who studies the health of western Canada's oceans, rivers, and salmon, my alarm bells are going off. B.C. and Canada have an unfortunate track record of failing to protect ecosystems and people from industrial activities. From Eagle Creek to Mount Polley, mining disasters are releasing toxins into drinking water and killing fish — 70 per cent of B.C.'s salmon populations are declining . In the 2021 B.C. vs. Yahey decision, the B.C. Supreme Court found that the province enabled oil and gas and other industries to cumulatively degrade northeast B.C.'s ecosystems to such an extent that moose and caribou populations collapsed, violating Blueberry River First Nations' treaty rights. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Risk of such harms to lands, waters, fish, wildlife, and Indigenous rights could be decreased through effective implementation of environmental policies. Eby also states he wants to advance 'conservation of precious water and land, and partnership with First Nations.' Here are five actions that the province could advance to fast-track safeguards for the lands and waters that sustain fish, wildlife, and people: First, set interim limits of cumulative industry disturbance to minimize risks of pushing lands and waters over thresholds of unacceptable harm. Currently, neither B.C. nor Canada has a policy that provides certainty for local peoples and industry by saying, 'This is too much.' There is an opportunity to leverage the existing B.C. Cumulative Effects Framework and the 2021 Yahey legal precedence to set interim baseline thresholds for cumulative disturbance with statutory power across all sectors. Second, support and empower regional planning processes. There are various new and ongoing planning processes that work with local rights-holders and other groups to incorporate local values and priorities to identify opportunities and limits for industry. Local peoples may want more, or less, stringent regulations than provincial thresholds. There is an opportunity to increase investment in and authority of land-use planning processes that supersede provincial guidelines. Third, protect 30 per cent of B.C. by 2030, guided by local rights-holders and scientific information. Indigenous protected and conserved areas and other Indigenous-led conservation initiatives can protect key ecosystems for current and future generations. Collectively, these locally and science-driven conservation areas could prioritize the protection of critical areas for cultural keystone species such as moose, caribou, and salmon and set no-go zones for industry. Continued action is needed if commitments of 30 per cent protection by 2030 are to be met. Fourth, prevent empty promises of economic benefits of industries. A 2023 study found that mines underdelivered promised jobs by 40 per cent, and delivered only one-third of forecasted tax revenue. A 2024 report found that many mine claims are doing environmentally harmful explorations aimed to garner investments that make mining executives even richer, but without intent to actually extract minerals. B.C.'s lands, waters, and local peoples would have some defence against get-rich-quick schemes if mining companies were required to submit a robust economic feasibility plan as part of their project description in the early stages of environmental assessment. Fifth, reconsider Bills 14 and 15 and clarify their application. Bills 14 and 15 give authority to fast-track projects and thus are a bellwether for the true colours of the province. Amendments to the bills could clarify how selected projects will consider environmental risks and incorporate free, prior, and informed consent to avoid violation of B.C.'s 2019 Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. If the bills are used to fast-track a gold or coal mine, then it will be clear that B.C. is extracting its resources for short-term dollars at the expense of environmental well-being and future generations. In these times of crisis, B.C. and Canada have the very real opportunity to be global leaders in the triple bottom line of social, economic, and environmental thriving. As Canada takes action to fast-track sustainable development, there is a parallel need to fast-track actions to not sell off the health of our lands, waters, and futures to extractive industries. Healthy watersheds mean healthy people and healthy economies. Jonathan Moore is a professor of aquatic ecology and conservation at Simon Fraser University and Liber Ero Chair of coastal science and management.
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Premier Smith visits rural Alberta to lend voice to local byelection candidate
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith seen in Calgary on Friday, May 16, 2025. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh) Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is winning applause but also facing pointed questions from party members ahead of three byelections. Smith, in her role as United Conservative leader, appeared at a town hall meeting attended by about 300 in Three Hills Monday. She came with Tara Sawyer, who is running under the party banner in the June 23 byelection in the area. Smith was applauded for policies including a demanding a better deal from the federal government, her government's income tax cut, her vow to protect unvaccinated Albertans from discrimination, and new rules including a ban on transgender athletes in women's sport. 'Ten years of (federal) Liberal policies have gotten us nowhere,' Smith told the crowd. 'Alberta will move forward with confidence and clarity. We will develop our economy. We will exercise our constitutional rights, we will forge the future that Alberta deserves.' Sawyer is running in Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills against Bev Toews of the NDP, Cameron Davies of the Republican Party of Alberta, and Bill Tufts of the Wildrose Loyalty Coalition. Davies has criticized the UCP for failing to agree to a byelection debate while the UCP said it wasn't possible due to a scheduling conflict. Davies said the UCP was dodging accountability and democracy and avoiding the elephant in the room: talk of Alberta independence. Sawyer disagreed, telling the crowd, 'Some forces are trying to divide us and split the vote. We cannot let that happen.' Not everyone was on side. Jon Sedore, a longtime UCP member who lives in the nearby town of Trochu, said that argument doesn't hold water. 'We're in the most conservative riding of Alberta and of Canada, so I'm not concerned about the NDP here,' he said in an interview. He said he doesn't think Sawyer and the UCP have been clear about where they stand on separation, and he doesn't like Smith appointing Sawyer rather than holding a candidate race. 'I don't like the top-down approach,' he said, while also expressing strong support for Smith and her efforts to exercise more constitutional rights for the province. Sedore said questions about Alberta's independence should be answered by all candidates so voters know where they each stand. Smith has long held that she wants to see Alberta remain in Canada, but recently passed legislation to lower the threshold for citizens to spark a referendum on leaving Confederation. She's also noted that her party wanted to move quickly to have a candidate in Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills in place in order to save taxpayers' money by holding the vote in conjunction with byelections in Edmonton Strathcona and Edmonton Ellerslie. NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi is running in Edmonton Strathcona to gain a seat in the legislature about a year after winning the party's top job. The Edmonton-Ellerslie byelection is to replace NDP member Rod Loyola. He stepped down earlier this year to run in the federal election. Sawyer, speaking with The Canadian Press, echoed Smith's stance, saying she's fighting for a strong, sovereign Alberta within Canada, but it's up to the people to decide whether a referendum is held. 'I understand we're in a pressure cooker situation. I think it's important for (Albertans) to know that they are being heard,' she said. Sawyer, a farmer and former chair of the Grain Growers of Canada, said Davies' suggestion that she is the UCP's hand-picked 'Ottawa-first' candidate is 'hogwash.' 'I have raised my family here. I grew up here, and my entire life has been to be a voice to improve my community,' she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025. Lisa Johnson, The Canadian Press
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Lawsuit accuses province of failing to protect Saskatchewan River delta, violating treaty obligations
Social Sharing Cumberland House Cree Nation says the provincial government is not protecting the Saskatchewan River system, and now it's time to take the province to court. Lawyers for the First Nation in northeastern Saskatchewan filed a statement of claim Tuesday in Saskatoon Court of King's Bench, alleging the government has failed to uphold its treaty obligations. It names the government of Saskatchewan as the defendant. For generations, the people of Cumberland House Cree Nation have depended on the Saskatchewan River delta, the largest freshwater river delta in North America, stretching 9,700 square kilometres from northeast Saskatchewan into western Manitoba, the lawsuit says. But government-approved activities upstream — such as dams, irrigation and industrial and urban uses — have dramatically reduced the amount of water that reaches the delta, continually degrading the ecosystem, the lawsuit says. That has affected the ability of the people there to exercise their treaty rights to maintain their way of life, Cumberland House Cree Nation Chief Rene Chaboyer said at a Tuesday news conference in Saskatoon. "We feel that our hand is being forced to … move forward into the court of law to seek justice, and today's a very important day in the history of our community, our province, in our country." He and other community members spoke about how the delta has changed over their lifetimes: the water is no longer safe to drink, species of fish have disappeared, moose are migrating elsewhere, birds are changing their migration patterns and muskrats are hard to find, they said. "Back in the day, it was healthy.… Nowadays it's scary," Chaboyer said. Treaty rights Treaty 5 covers an area of about 260,000 square kilometres in parts of what are now Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. It was signed in 1875, with the ancestors of Cumberland House signing on in 1876. The inhabitants agreed to share their land with the newcomers in exchange for promises, including that Cumberland House would be free to continue to hunt, fish, trap and harvest in the treaty territory, the lawsuit says. "The treaties are what allowed the newcomers to come and settle in Saskatchewan, and the treaties were only made because of that promise that Cumberland House Cree Nation could continue to maintain its way of life," Tim Dickson, the First Nation's lawyer, said at Tuesday's news conference. "That treaty promise is part of the foundation of Canada and of Canadian law. It's protected by the Canadian Constitution and it's enforceable in court." WATCH | Massive Saskatchewan irrigation plan threatens wildlife, opponents say: Massive Saskatchewan irrigation plan threatens wildlife, opponents say 10 months ago Duration 1:55 First Nations and environmental groups warn Saskatchewan's $4 billion farm irrigation plan threatens the diverse ecosystem of the Saskatchewan River Delta — North America's largest inland river delta. The Saskatchewan River delta is the First Nation's homeland and "essential" to their culture and identity, Dickson said. CBC News has reached out to the Saskatchewan government for its response to the lawsuit. Ongoing degradation Activities upstream — including hydroelectric dams, water diversion and withdrawal of water for irrigation, industrial uses and drinking water — have starved the delta of its vital sediment and polluted the water, Cumberland House is arguing in its lawsuit. The proposed construction of the $1.15-billion Lake Diefenbaker irrigation megaproject, which the government has committed to beginning this year, is also seen as "a very serious threat," Dickson said. Cumberland House has tried to engage with the province on the project, but "there has been very little engagement from the government," Dickson said. Instead, residents have watched as, year after year, the delta degrades. The loss of the delta would be felt not just by the people who live there, but by everyone, said Cumberland House Cree Nation Coun. Beverly Goulet. At the end of Tuesday's news conference, she responded to a question asked earlier by a journalist about how much compensation the community was seeking. "Instead of worrying about money, because we certainly can't take it with us when we pass … remember the children," Goulet said. "That's who we want to protect, because we've done enough damage to this planet. Like, what are they going to have? What have we done? "So, let's all think about that."
