logo
Inside the conference that exploded a legal bombshell about the Union

Inside the conference that exploded a legal bombshell about the Union

The National26-05-2025

The conference, which took place last weekend, had been planned for more than six months.
The Dunfermline Carnegie Conference Centre was a fitting venue as Dunfermline of course served as the de facto capital of Scotland between the 11th and 15th centuries.
We had a couple of disappointments when people's diaries didn't line up and even briefly considered cancelling. However, fortunately we didn't cancel and those who missed it can find it on the SSRG TV YouTube channel.
As a non-partisan think tank, the SSRG holds weekly meetings and invites many experts to them, both from academia and current and past elected politicians.
READ MORE: Former BBC TV presenter and executive Alan Yentob dies aged 78
We seek to address and research the big questions that any new sovereign state needs answered.
The most recent publication by the SSRG was on Scotland in Europe, We found that joining Efta and the EEA was the preferable option for Scotland rather than trying to rejoin the EU, especially as Scotland would need to have control over its own currency before applying to rejoin the EU.
This is but one major issue political parties must consider before announcing they want to rejoin the EU without carefully weighing the options.
So what did people learn while at the SSRG conference? On the Friday there was a panel on social security and pensions which included Tommy Sheridan, Alba Party deputy leader Neale Hanvey, and Jim Osborne.
We learned that the UK pension is a Ponzi scheme and that National Insurance is being paid by today's workers to pay today's pensioners and nothing had been invested.
This is completely different from the likes of Norway which has a sovereign wealth fund, officially the Government Pension Fund Global. It had a value of around $1.738 trillion as of March this year. The UK has no sovereign wealth fund.
A session on what happens on the day after independence saw Jim Sillars and constitutional expert Dr Elliot Bulmer discuss how Scotland will need to negotiate with England on a future trade agreement and the division of assets and liabilities.
There was some passionate debate from delegates and this creative dialectic only served to enhance the effect of the conference.
Of course, it wasn't all about the big questions. There were a couple of lighter sessions including a Scottish Questions and a Meet the Authors which allowed for more general subjects to be aired.
Saturday kicked off with a session on energy policy which included panellists that actually worked in and have experience in the energy sector. It was hosted by the SSRG's Mark McNaught, while Phil Boswell and Rhys Stanwix took questions from delegates. Everyone left the session wiser than before on energy policy.
However, the big event saw a panel of legal and constitutional experts one by one started to dismantle the prevailing legal narrative that Scotland was in and had joined a Union with England in the 1706 Treaty and the 1707 Acts of Union.
Professor Alf Baird presented how Scotland was living in a colonial mindset reinforced by British-ness in the media or, as I would call it, the BBC. Craig Murray talked about how Scotland must take its sovereignty back.
Sharof Azizov, a lawyer from Justice Pour Tous Internationale in Geneva, talked about how he would be taking Scotland's claim to the UN C24 committee for Scotland to be listed for decolonisation.
Then evidence was expertly presented by Professor Robert Black KC, who demonstrated that no legal Union was ever created –England continued as before while Scotland was extinguished. The word 'extinguished' became a running joke as I had accidentally used the word to describe the panel instead of 'distinguished'. Ah the joy of live TV.
The legal ramifications of what was revealed over the fictitious nature of the Union cannot be overstated. Every treaty the UK has signed in the last 300 years is based on a legal fiction. This is truly a legal bombshell that exploded on to the world stage during our conference.
So where does this leave the political parties and the elected politicians? Few of them have taken the time to even question the validity of the British state, yet here we have expert legal opinion based on verifiable documented evidence that the UK is a legal fiction and Scotland is a Non-Self-Governing-Territory (NSGT).
By the time you read this the number of people who have viewed this historic session will have reached over 10,000 and none of this could have happened without Sara Salyers, who co-founded Liberation Scotland.
The 18,000-plus strong membership group, has for the last few years been navigating the many corridors of the National Archives, historical documents and several dead ends until the full picture could be made clear.
After the live transmission on YouTube, Christophe Dorige-Thomson, who had been watching in Jakarta, tweeted to the SSRG that a Scottish woman, called Muriel Stuart Walker, aka K'tut Tantri, attended the 1955 Bandung Conference in Indonesia.
She supported its decolonisation through the UN C24 process and pushed the issue across media interviews. This led to Indonesia being the first nation to be decolonised under this process, which led to other nations following it. So my question is, is Sara Salyers the 21st-century Muriel Stuart Walker? I do hope so.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four streaming platforms you don't need £174 TV licence for
Four streaming platforms you don't need £174 TV licence for

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Four streaming platforms you don't need £174 TV licence for

Failing to pay for a TV licence when you need one could result in a fine of up to £1,000 but people who only use these services are exempt. Brits who only watch television via four streaming platforms are exempt from paying for a BBC TV licence. This could save you an expense of £174.50 a year. The payment has been a standard annual bill for many people in the UK since its introduction in 1946. Back then, the BBC was the sole broadcaster in the country, and the licence cost £2, which is equivalent to approximately £105 today. ‌ Despite significant changes in how we consume television, including the introduction of numerous channels, streaming and on-demand platforms, this fee remains. As of April 1 this year the price was set at £174.50, having increased from £169.50. ‌ The licence fee applies to any households that: Watch or record programmes as they're being broadcast live on any TV channel Watch live programmes on any online TV service - such as Channel 4, YouTube, or Amazon Prime Video It's also needed if you download or watch any BBC programmes on BBC iPlayer. If you need a licence and don't pay for one you could be fined as much as £1,000. However, there are some lesser-known circumstances in which you don't actually require a licence. This includes if you still use your TV to watch shows but only through Netflix, Disney Plus, Channel 4 's on-demand service (previously known as All 4), and Amazon Prime Video. However, as mentioned above, you do need a licence to view live content on these platforms. You also do not need a licence if you watch content such as videos on websites like YouTube and videos or DVDs. ‌ Other reasons you don't need a licence According to you don't need a licence if you're a student who lives at another address outside of term time, which already has a licence. You can use that TV licence while you're at university on any device that's: Battery powered Not plugged in Not connected to an aerial. You also do not need to buy your own TV licence if you live in a shared home, which already has a licence. You can have one TV licence for the whole household if you either: ‌ Watch TV in a single shared area Have a joint tenancy agreement Other exemptions and discounts Certain individuals are also exempt from paying for a TV licence or qualify for a discounted rate. The Government website states that you can obtain a free TV licence if you're 75 or older and you either: ‌ Receive Pension Credit Live with a partner who receives Pension Credit If you're currently receiving Pension Credit, you can apply for a free TV licence when you reach the age of 74. However, you'll need to continue paying for your licence until the end of the month before your 75th birthday. If you live in residential care or sheltered accommodation, this entitles you to apply for a discount. If you live in a qualifying residential care home, supported housing or sheltered accommodation, you can obtain a TV licence for £7.50. ‌ To be eligible, you must also be either: Retired and over 60 Or disabled Your housing manager can verify your eligibility and apply on your behalf. If you're registered as blind, or severely sight impaired, or live with someone who is, you can receive a 50 per cent discount. The licence must be registered in the name of the blind person - if it's not, a new application can be made to transfer it into their name.

Starmer's latest freebie: British sovereignty in exchange for nothing
Starmer's latest freebie: British sovereignty in exchange for nothing

Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's latest freebie: British sovereignty in exchange for nothing

While we can't rely on the French to help police the Channel – despite paying them £500 million for the privilege – we can always trust our Gallic cousins to bear a grudge. We already knew that the Prime Minister's great EU 'reset ' was a sham; that much was clear when all we got in return was the use of e-gates that were already operational in many European countries. Now, we learn that we may not even be granted access to the bloc's industrial defence programme, despite Sir Keir Starmer's insistence that defence and security was a central tenet of the deal. As he boasted last month after selling us out to Brussels: 'We've also struck a new defence and security partnership to strengthen our cooperation and strengthen our security – which is vital in this dangerous new era. 'And it will open the door to working with the EU's new defence fund – providing new opportunities for our defence industry, supporting British jobs and livelihoods.' Except, of course, the French have other ideas. In yet another example of just how bad Labour is at negotiating anything (see also the Chagos surrender and, more recently, the 'deal' to allow Spanish border guards to check passports on Gibraltar) we now learn that Emmanuel Macron is trying to shut out British arms firms from the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP). While different to the defence fund, which is known as SAFE (Security Action for Europe), EDIP will see cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware. It was created for the benefit of the EU and 'allies' but French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine – shutting out the UK. So much for Starmer's boast that the reset deal would put Britain 'back on the world stage' and give us 'unprecedented access to the EU market, the best of any country.' Labour is yet to reveal how many billions is being squandered on a reset that has already prompted another big fat 'non' from Paris.

The UK stepped back as the rest of Europe stepped up, it is time for Scotland to rejoin the mainstream
The UK stepped back as the rest of Europe stepped up, it is time for Scotland to rejoin the mainstream

Scotsman

time8 hours ago

  • Scotsman

The UK stepped back as the rest of Europe stepped up, it is time for Scotland to rejoin the mainstream

AFP via Getty Images Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine over three years ago, the world shifted on its axis. Standing alongside the then Prime Minister of Finland, Sanna Marin, the former Premiere of Sweden, Magdalena Andersson said, 'There is a before and after 24 February [2022]. This is a very important time in history. The security landscape has completely changed. We have to analyse the situation to see what is best for Sweden's security, for the Swedish people, in this new situation.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Three years on, both of our Nordic neighbours are members of the NATO alliance. Something that would have been unthinkable even a few months before. The brutal reality of expansionist authoritarianism, coupled with the growing complexity of hybrid, non-military threats, demands a profound recalibration for all countries and a political response with the courage to see that through. For the SNP - a party rooted in centre-left, social democratic and pro-European values – this, including lessons from our Nordic neighbours, presents a challenge and an opportunity. As champions of Scottish statehood, it is no small responsibility to articulate a credible security policy that is forward-looking and unapologetically supportive of our common European security. That requires a serious engagement on defence, that other countries would expect of a Scotland that aspires to membership of the EU and other international organisations. Our neighbours would expect no less. To that end the SNP is better placed than the biggest Westminster parties who steadfastly cling onto a Brexit that has left us poorer, less secure and outside the European mainstream at a critical moment in history. It continues to be a massive strategic error that most at Westminster continue to refuse to confront. Rather than taking cheap political pot shots at the SNP, those Westminster parties would be better served using their energies addressing the fundamental weakness that the UK is exposed to by being outside of the EU. However, politics aside, it requires all parties to have difficult conversations around how we engage with the defence sector as well as how to build greater common defence and security links across Europe, as the United States becomes increasingly unreliable and when the international rules-based system is under greater threat than for decades. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This will be in our security and economic interest. One of the recent criticisms aimed at the UK has been the running down of the army. Back in 2004 the SNP walked out of the House of Commons when the then MP for Perth, Annabelle Ewing was thrown out for calling the then Defence Secretary, Geoff Hoon, a 'backstabbing coward' after he announced dramatic cuts to the Scottish Regiments. Two decades on neither Hoon nor Ewing is in the Commons, but Putin remains in the Kremlin, and an even greater threat than ever. At the time of that exchange, I was spending time working in the South Caucasus on that region's various conflicts and the international community's stabilisation efforts. Anyone could have told you then of the threat Russia posed to its neighbours, but too many refused to listen, and we are now paying the price. Working with the defence sector and the SNP's values are not, and have never been, exclusive. My party's commitment to social justice, equality, and international cooperation has long been a part of our DNA, and defence is an integral part of that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was a wake-up call, exposing the fragility of the post-cold war settlement. It underscored that peace, democracy and sovereignty—all central to our cause —requires active defence which underpins our principles. As social democrats of the European mainstream, we well understand the value in sharing the burden of continental security. NATO and the EU are the twin pillars of the European security framework. Defence burden sharing isn't a political convenience, but a vital framework for protecting our values and way of life. Neighbouring states such as Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania are all able to combine progressive social policy with a robust defence stance. Those states, who underscore the benefits that Independence in Europe can bring their citizens, also understand the importance of securing their sovereignty collaboratively. There is much we can learn from our neighbours who understand the need to safeguard the conditions that allow our social democratic vision - free education, a national healthcare service, and a society that values human rights and the rule of law - to exist. The threats we face today are not abstract; they are direct challenges to the open, inclusive societies we seek to build. That requires engaging with our defence and research sectors to secure that peace is secured and Scotland counted on as a reliable part of the European community of democracies. The EU is a significant defence actor and one that is investing in its security. The UK is an important part of that infrastructure but is strategically hobbled by remaining outside the EU – a massive historic error that is still viewed with incomprehension across Europe and the democratic world. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Defence is increasingly a priority for the EU, especially when it comes to industry and procurement. Scotland is a natural partner for Brussels in that regard given our excellence in terms of industry and research as well as our important strategic location. Russia's war of conquest in Ukraine has shown that peace cannot be taken for granted. As a centre-left, pro-European party, we have a duty to protect the democratic ideals that underpin our vision for Scotland's future. Rewiring and renewing our defence platform to take account of this new insecure world, is a credible demonstration of a party of aspiration and responsibility. A Scotland that contributes to European security and safeguards the values we hold dear. The UK stepped back as the rest of Europe stepped up, it is time for Scotland to rejoin the mainstream. The wellbeing of future generations relies on it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store