logo
Global plastic pollution treaty talks in a 'haze'

Global plastic pollution treaty talks in a 'haze'

News.com.au6 days ago
Countries scrambled Thursday to secure a global agreement on tackling plastic pollution as 10-day talks headed towards overtime, with one diplomat saying negotiators were in a "haze" on how to find common ground.
After three years of negotiations, nations wanting bold action to turn the tide on plastic garbage were trying to build last-minute bridges with a group of oil-producing states.
As the hours ticked away, talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso was doing the rounds between regional delegations at the United Nations' headquarters in Geneva, trying to stitch together a consensus agreement following a botched attempt on Wednesday.
"We are in a complete haze. We've got the impression something is missing," a diplomatic source in one of the regional delegations told AFP.
The talks are due to end Thursday, and technically a plenary session bringing all 185 negotiating countries together at the UN Palais des Nations must open before midnight (2200 GMT) to be valid.
That meeting, however, has been repeatedly postponed due to deadlock since being first scheduled to start at 1300 GMT.
- Elusive middle ground -
"We need to have a coherent global treaty. We can't do it on our own," said Environment Minister Deborah Barasa of Kenya, a member of the High Ambition Coalition seeking aggressive action on plastic waste.
Barasa told AFP that nations could strike a treaty now, then work out some of the finer details down the line.
"We need to come to a middle ground," she said. "And then we can have a step-wise approach in terms of building up this treaty... and ending plastic pollution."
"We need to leave with the treaty," she added.
Back-to-back regional and cross-regional groups huddled in meetings throughout Thursday.
The High Ambition Coalition, which includes the European Union, Britain and Canada, and many African and Latin American countries, wants to see language on reducing plastic production and the phasing out of toxic chemicals used in plastics.
A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group -- including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia, Iran, and Malaysia -- want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management.
One senior Western negotiator, who was among those who skewered the previous draft, told AFP: "It's all up in the air."
- Macron's call to action
The plastic pollution problem is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
On current trends, annual production of fossil-fuel-based plastics will nearly triple by 2060 to 1.2 billion tonnes, while waste will exceed one billion tonnes, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
With 15 million tonnes of plastic dumped in the ocean every minute, French President Emmanuel Macron asked: "What are we waiting for to act?"
"I urge all states gathered in Geneva to adopt an agreement that truly meets the scale of this environmental and public health emergency," he posted on X.
Vayas, the Ecuadoran politician leading the talks, produced a draft treaty text on Wednesday that was immediately shredded to bits as one country after another branded it unacceptable -- high-ambition and like-minded nations included, with both feeling his attempts at a convergence document was shorn of anything they really wanted.
- Tension as clock ticks -
From here, "it's very simple: there are only two scenarios: there's bad and very bad -- and a lot of ugliness in between," Aleksandar Rankovic from The Common Initiative think-tank told AFP.
"The bad scenario is that countries adopt a very bad treaty. The very bad is that they don't agree on anything, and they either try to reconvene" or the treaty is "kept in limbo for a long time -- so practically abandoned," he said.
Greenpeace delegation chief Graham Forbes told AFP: "It is very tense.
"These final hours are critically important. We need to see meaningful obligations in this text -- and now is the moment to do it."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 'best way' for Anthony Albanese to make amends with Benjamin Netanyahu laid out by Jewish Liberal MP Julian Leeser
The 'best way' for Anthony Albanese to make amends with Benjamin Netanyahu laid out by Jewish Liberal MP Julian Leeser

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

The 'best way' for Anthony Albanese to make amends with Benjamin Netanyahu laid out by Jewish Liberal MP Julian Leeser

The path for Anthony Albanese to make amends with Netanyahu has been laid out by senior Jewish Liberal MP Julian Leeser, after Albanese was called a 'weak man' by Israel's Prime Minister. On Wednesday, the Israel-Australia relationship hit a new low after the turmoil following the Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Mr Netanyahu called Mr Albanese 'weak' and accusing him of abandoning Jewish Australians. While Mr Albanese downplayed any personal offence, noting that Mr Netanyahu has made similar remarks about other leaders, Mr Leeser told Sky News it was 'sad' the relations between the two countries had 'got to this point' under Labor. 'Australia was there from the foundation of the modern state of Israel. We were there when Australian troops were part of the charge of the (Australian) Light Horse at Beersheba. We were the first nation to vote for Israel in the United Nations at its founding,' he said. 'To be in a situation where we've got a friend, an ally and a security partner with whom we've got relations, they've deteriorated to this point, is a poor reflection on the way in which this government has handled the foreign policy of the country.' Mr Leeser said if the Prime Minister wanted to make amends with Netanyahu and repair Australia's relationship with Israel, he should implement Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism Jillian Siegel's recommendations. 'That's the best way that he can rebut the criticisms that Mr Netanyahu has made of him,' Mr Leeser said. Asked if it was Australia that changed or Netanyahu, considering the Israeli Prime Minister made similar criticisms against Canada, the UK and France for their recognition of Palestine announcements, Mr Leeser insisted the answer was Australia. 'I think Australia has changed. Australia's policy has changed in this regard. Ever since the Albanese government came to office, they have walked away from traditional policy in relation to Israel,' he said. 'You'll remember the ham-fisted way in which they changed the capital of Israel. You've seen various votes at the United Nations. We've seen the funding of UNRWA. And now we've seen this move for a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state.' Mr Leeser said Mr Albanese had 'lots of questions to answer' about how he could hold the Palestinian authorities to the conditions tied to Australia's recognition of Palestine and what he would do if Hamas was elected in the West Bank. 'It's Australian foreign policy that's changed. I lament that we've got to this point,' he said. Mr Leeser said Australia differed from France, the UK and Canada in that it was one of a small number of countries that had stood with Israel against 'international pylons', but since Mr Albanese was elected that 'ceased to be the case." The Jewish MP said Australia was for a two-state solution but said other issues needed to come before Palestinian recognition. 'In relation to what's happening in Israel with the settlements, we've always been clear about this. We are for a two-state solution and the desire to put some of these settlements in place by some of the ministers in the Israeli government is because they don't want to see the two-state solution and therefore we do not support the settlements,' Mr Leeser said. 'We believe that issues around settlements and borders about the final status of places like Jerusalem and other issues are really matters that need to come and be discussed and put on the table and resolved before we start talking about whether we can recognise the Palestinians.'

Australia-Israel relations at new low after Netanyahu attacks Albanese
Australia-Israel relations at new low after Netanyahu attacks Albanese

Sydney Morning Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australia-Israel relations at new low after Netanyahu attacks Albanese

Benjamin Netanyahu's personal attack on Anthony Albanese as 'weak' marks a new low in Australia-Israel relations. Relations between the two nations, which have been historic allies since the establishment of Israel after World War II, have been deteriorating for more than a year. Following the brutal attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel had enormous sympathy from the international community. The horrific images of people being attacked, kidnapped and killed drew widespread condemnation. But Israel's unrelenting, scorched-earth approach to Gaza since then has done enormous damage to that global goodwill, and contributed directly to Albanese's decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations next month. The government's decision to bar far-right Israeli MP Simcha Rothman from entering the country escalated tensions between the two nations to another level. Home Affairs minister Tony Burke has form in cancelling visas for people he believes could damage social cohesion in Australia. This includes rapper Kanye West, because of his anti-semitic remarks. Of course, there is a big difference between denying a celebrity rapper a visa and denying a member of another nation's parliament, and Israel's tit-for-tat response to the Rothman decision – revoking visas to Australian diplomats working in the occupied West Bank – was arguably a proportional diplomatic response. Netanyahu's furious personal attack on Albanese, including calling him a 'weak' politician who had abandoned Australia's Jews, was not.

Australia-Israel relations at new low after Netanyahu attacks Albanese
Australia-Israel relations at new low after Netanyahu attacks Albanese

The Age

time9 hours ago

  • The Age

Australia-Israel relations at new low after Netanyahu attacks Albanese

Benjamin Netanyahu's personal attack on Anthony Albanese as 'weak' marks a new low in Australia-Israel relations. Relations between the two nations, which have been historic allies since the establishment of Israel after World War II, have been deteriorating for more than a year. Following the brutal attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel had enormous sympathy from the international community. The horrific images of people being attacked, kidnapped and killed drew widespread condemnation. But Israel's unrelenting, scorched-earth approach to Gaza since then has done enormous damage to that global goodwill, and contributed directly to Albanese's decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations next month. The government's decision to bar far-right Israeli MP Simcha Rothman from entering the country escalated tensions between the two nations to another level. Home Affairs minister Tony Burke has form in cancelling visas for people he believes could damage social cohesion in Australia. This includes rapper Kanye West, because of his anti-semitic remarks. Of course, there is a big difference between denying a celebrity rapper a visa and denying a member of another nation's parliament, and Israel's tit-for-tat response to the Rothman decision – revoking visas to Australian diplomats working in the occupied West Bank – was arguably a proportional diplomatic response. Netanyahu's furious personal attack on Albanese, including calling him a 'weak' politician who had abandoned Australia's Jews, was not.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store