logo
What If Social Security Benefits Were Cut in Half? How Current and Future Retirees Could Be Affected

What If Social Security Benefits Were Cut in Half? How Current and Future Retirees Could Be Affected

Yahoo19-04-2025

Social Security exists as a safety net to help keep older adults and other vulnerable individuals out of poverty. While President Donald Trump has said he won't cut Social Security, the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has made significant layoffs to Social Security Administration (SSA) staff, leading to questions about the fate of Social Security.
Find Out:
Read Next:
Additionally, analysts have been discussing for years whether the trust that funds Social Security will remain solvent or run out by the mid-2030s. Some have speculated that to truly 'save' Social Security, it will be necessary to cut back on recipients' benefits. While we don't know exactly any changes that will happen in the future, what if there were big ones?
What would happen to current and future retirees if the amount that Social Security recipients received was cut in half?
According to George Carrillo, CEO of the Hispanic Construction Council (HCC) and the former director of Social Determinants of Health for the state of Oregon, Social Security is not 'just a policy. It is a promise, a lifeline that ensures dignity and security for retirees, disabled workers and their families.'
Having spent years as a senior executive in government managing complex social programs, he knows 'just how vital Social Security is for millions of Americans.' A hypothetical 50% cut to these benefits would 'unravel that promise, throwing many into financial despair,' he suggested.
To put that into perspective, the current average monthly benefit is $1,920. A 50% cut would leave retirees with just $960.
'For someone who relies on Social Security for half or more of their income, even a partial cut would devastate their ability to meet basic needs like housing, healthcare and food,' Carillo said.
He stressed that these are not 'theoretical numbers,' but represent real people and families who would be left scrambling to adjust.
If the average Social Security recipient's benefits were reduced by 50%, the impact would be pretty significant on the average retiree's monthly income.
Learn More:
Most retirees rely on their Social Security benefits as part of their income in retirement, 'So if it was cut in half, their retirement would be negatively impacted,' according to Krisstin Petersmarck, a national Social Security advisor (NSSA) and investment advisor representative at New Horizon Retirement Solutions.
However, those hit hardest would include low-income seniors and disabled workers who rely on Social Security as 100% of their income, she pointed out.
Women, who typically live longer and earn less over their lifetimes, would face particularly harsh realities, as well, Carillo said.
'Widows and single elderly women already struggle to make ends meet, and a severe cut would force many to make unthinkable choices between paying for food, medical care or housing.'
The financial strain would also hit minority groups especially hard. Black and Hispanic retirees rely more heavily on Social Security due to systemic inequities in lifetime earnings and savings and would suffer 'a disproportionate blow,' Carillo shared.
When individuals suffer economically, so does the larger economy. Carillo pointed out that seniors contribute significant amounts to consumer spending each year, and a loss of purchasing power would ripple across sectors like housing, healthcare and local businesses.
This could lead to rising evictions, skipped medical appointments and reduced retail spending that could create hardships for families and neighborhoods as younger generations step in to provide support, he explained.
Cuts like that could also push more seniors to use government-funded programs like welfare and Medicaid, Petersmarck said.
While it may sound extreme, the best way to factor in a Social Security cut in the future would be to plan on not having it as an income source at all, Petersmarck said. 'This would force you to save much more than needed. If there isn't a cut, then it's a bonus.'
Carrillo agreed, adding that for those still years away from retirement, this scenario highlights the urgent need to prepare.
'Boosting retirement savings, reducing debt and diversifying income streams are all crucial steps to create a safety net beyond Social Security. Workers today should plan with a focus on building more substantial private savings through options like 401(k) [plans] or IRAs,' he said.
While a 50% benefit cut would be 'catastrophic,' Carillo said it remains more of a worst-case scenario than an imminent reality.
'Social Security is politically protected for good reason, as most voters oppose significant reductions.'
That said, there is still an issue of the Social Security Trust's solvency that needs to be addressed, Carillo said. 'Measures like raising the cap on taxable earnings, modestly increasing tax rates and slowing the growth of benefits for the wealthiest beneficiaries could stabilize the system for future generations.'
While a 50% cut is unlikely to happen, it's more important than ever to protect this essential program at the policy level, and for future retirees to plan for possible cuts just to be safe.
More From GOBankingRates
5 Luxury Cars That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Spring 2025
4 Things You Should Do if You Want To Retire Early
4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025
5 Types of Vehicles Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: What If Social Security Benefits Were Cut in Half? How Current and Future Retirees Could Be Affected

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fact Check: Are Marines Refusing to Go to Los Angeles?
Fact Check: Are Marines Refusing to Go to Los Angeles?

Newsweek

time33 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Fact Check: Are Marines Refusing to Go to Los Angeles?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Posts on social media suggest Marines are refusing to enter Los Angeles during protests and rioting, but there is no evidence to suggest that is the case. Protests in L.A. against immigration enforcement began on Friday and are continuing, resulting in some isolated incidents of violence and looting. Tensions escalated when, in response, President Donald Trump announced the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops to restore order, without the consent of California Governor Gavin Newsom. On Monday he said 2,000 more guardsmen would be deployed, as well as active-duty U.S. Marines. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said the use of troops was unnecessary and counterproductive. Newsom in response filed an emergency motion to block this deployment. A judge rejected this request. A curfew has been imposed in parts of the city. Los Angeles Police Department officers push protesters toward Little Tokyo in downtown LA, Calif., on June 9, 2025. Los Angeles Police Department officers push protesters toward Little Tokyo in downtown LA, Calif., on June 9, 2025. Photo by Caylo Seals/Sipa USA)(Sipa via AP Images The Claim A number of posts on social media suggested that 700 Marines did not go to Los Angeles despite Trump's call. One post, which at the time of writing had been viewed more than 380,000 times, said: "The fact that 700 Marines didn't actually show is a bigger deal than a lot of people are acting, imo [in my opinion.] The same social media user later posted: "It's commanding officers refusing to cooperate with the Secretary of Defense's orders." The Facts However, the social media accusations appear to be based on misunderstanding of a report by Fox News' chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin. She posted on X that Marines ordered to help had not yet arrived because they were undergoing training. This is not akin to Marines refusing to cooperate with orders. A CBS News report also said that 700 Marines arrived in the area and were ready to be deployed. Reuters said they were in a staging area in Seal Beach, about 50 km south of L.A. And a New York Times report cited a U.S. Northern Command spokeswoman who reportedly said the Marines will work alongside 2,100 National Guard members who are already in the city and are expected to be deployed on Wednesday. The spokeswoman told the publication the troops would not be involved in making arrests. The Ruling False. While it appears to be true that at the time of posting on social media, Marines had not arrived in L.A, this is because of training schedules and other scheduling choices, and not because they had refused to serve or comply with orders. Newsweek contacted the Pentagon and the White House outside of normal business hours to comment on this story. FACT CHECK BY Newsweek

'Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump
'Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump

Elon Musk went into damage-control mode early Wednesday as he tried to mend fences with President Donald Trump after their spectacular falling-out last week. And his critics are mocking his public show of fealty on his own platform. Musk spent some $291 million during the 2024 election cycle, most notably to help Trump, according to and became a constant presence by his side. Once in office, Trump put Musk in charge of the 'DOGE' initiative to cut government spending. But Musk left his role, attacked Trump's signature 'big beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination,' and went scorched-earth against his one-time ally in a series of posts on X last week. Musk wrote that Trump won't release the files of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein because the president is named in them, shared a post in support of impeaching Trump and replacing him with Vice President JD Vance, and floated the creation of a third political party. Trump in turn threatened repercussions for Musk's businesses and warned him of 'serious consequences' if he backed Democrats for office. But Musk blinked on Wednesday. He wrote that he regretted some of his posts about Trump and said some of them 'went too far.' He also deleted many of those messages. His critics fired back:

'They Went Too Far': Elon Musk Just Walked Back Some Of His Explosive Criticism Of Trump
'They Went Too Far': Elon Musk Just Walked Back Some Of His Explosive Criticism Of Trump

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'They Went Too Far': Elon Musk Just Walked Back Some Of His Explosive Criticism Of Trump

Elon Musk on Wednesday conceded that some of his recent, sharp criticism of Donald Trump 'went too far,' in an apparent effort to mend ties with the president after their nasty public feud. In a post on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, Musk made his most overt offer yet to bury the hatchet. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' Musk wrote. 'They went too far.' Musk didn't clarify which posts he was referring to. About a week after he left his post at the White House, Musk condemned Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' urging Americans to kill the legislation, describing it as a 'disgusting abomination.' In response, Trump threatened to revoke the government contracts Musk's companies have secured, prompting the billionaire to turn his attacks up a notch. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk wrote Thursday. '[Trump] is in the [Jeffrey] Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' The White House had promised to release the full documents related to the disgraced financier's case, but what was ultimately put out was largely already known. Musk also at one point seemed to call for the president's impeachment — another stunning development given his prominent role in Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Musk appears to have since deleted both posts. Trump over the weekend told NBC's Kristen Welker he has no interest in repairing their relationship. But the president has since appeared more open to rapprochement. Asked if he plans to speak to Musk, Trump told reporters on Monday: 'I would imagine he wants to speak to me, I would think so.' 'If I were him I'd want to speak to me,' he added. Even before Wednesday's explicit acknowledgement of his regret for some of his criticism of Trump, Musk has signaled he was ready for a truce. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO seemed to applaud Trump's response to the protests in Los Angeles, amplifying social media posts by the president and his allies about the immigration protests. The billionaire donated nearly $300 million to Trump's 2024 White House bid and served as a top surrogate on the campaign trail. Elon Just Couldn't Stop Posting About Trump — And Experts Say It's Very Revealing Trump Reveals What's Next For That Tesla He Bought From Elon Musk Jon Stewart Busts Biggest Right-Wing Myth About 'F**king Pussies' Trump And Elon Musk

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store