From trainee to CEO: Antonio Filosa, the new boss of Jeep maker Stellantis
MILAN, May 28 (Reuters) - Carmaker Stellantis (STLAM.MI), opens new tab has appointed Antonio Filosa, the Italian head of its North American operations, as its chief executive, effective from June 23, it said on Wednesday.
Following are some facts about the new head of the group whose brands include Fiat, Peugeot and Jeep:
* Filosa has headed Stellantis operations in North America since last October, with the task of reviving sales at the group's powerhouse.
* In a sign of his growing influence, the interim executive committee led by Chairman John Elkann gave him the additional role of global chief for quality in February. In turn, Filosa handed over the role of head of the Jeep brand, which he had held since 2023, to a colleague.
* Filosa joined Fiat Group in 1999 as a trainee. He covered several roles within the group, predominantly in Latin America. He became Fiat Chrysler chief in the region in 2018 and then served as Stellantis COO for South America.
* An Italian national, Filosa was born in the southern city of Naples, spent his youth in the region of Puglia in the south, and graduated in engineering from Milan's Polytechnic. He will turn 52 next month.
* Married to a Brazilian architect, he is the father of two sons and has a passion for water polo.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Simon Yates rides away with prize of Giro d'Italia while rivals lose the plot
The Mexican standoff is a much-loved cinematic device, but the stalemate beloved of western movie script writers has rarely, if ever, decided one of cycling's Grand Tours. The 2025 Giro d'Italia was the exception, appositely as the biggest loser was an actual Mexican, Isaac del Toro, with the unassuming Lancastrian Simon Yates the two-wheeled equivalent of the bandit who skips off with the loot, while two other bandits – in this case Richard Carapaz and Del Toro – stare each other down waiting for the other man to blink. Yates's second career Grand Tour win, forged on the Colle delle Finestre on Saturday afternoon in a peerless display of courage and cunning, and sealed 24 hours later in the streets of Rome, will go down in cycling's annals as one of the most improbable heists the sport has witnessed. The endless joy of the Grand Tours – Spain, France, Italy – is that they throw up all kinds of delightful scenarios, but there have been few, if any, where the decisive plot line was a frozen stalemate between the cyclists in first and second places, each waiting for the other to move while a third man skipped away to victory. This was probably the most bizarre act of self-immolation in a Grand Tour since 1989, when Pedro Delgado wrecked his race on day one by getting lost en route to the start of the prologue time trial. To understand how this happened, the first key element is Yates himself. Now 32, his career has been marked by two qualities: patience and sang-froid. His ability to wait for the right moment, and to seize that moment, has been the hallmark of his best wins, going back to his earliest triumphs: his 2011 stage win in the Tour de l'Avenir, his 2013 world title in the points race on the velodrome in Minsk, and his Tour of Britain stage win later that year. When he threw caution to the winds, at the Giro in 2018, it backfired spectacularly at the end of the three weeks, in no less a place than the Colle delle Finestre; when he won the Vuelta a few months later, he had learned the lesson and bided his time. That it has taken so long for him to take a second Grand Tour can be largely summed up in one word: Slovenia. Seven years ago, no one would have predicted the rise and rise of Tadej Pogacar and Primoz Roglic. Yates first looked like a potential winner on the day that Del Toro took the race lead, the gravel‑road stage into Siena, and he had ridden the perfect race since then, never losing enough time to rule him out, never putting his cards on the table. It took more than guts and patience; it needed the other pieces of the tactical jigsaw to slot into place. His team, Visma‑Lease-a-Bike, did what they had to do best: sending a satellite rider ahead in the day's main escape in case of need. Most days, the pawns had had limited impact; here, the strongest and most versatile, the Belgian Wout van Aert, was in the perfect position to help Yates to mess with Del Toro's and Carapaz's minds. Neither the Mexican nor the Ecuadorian had a teammate in place alongside Van Aert, an egregious blunder, because if either man had had an equipier to hand at the key moment – at the foot of the descent off the Finestre with 36km remaining when Yates was still just about within reach – it could well have tipped the balance. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Unwittingly, Carapaz's EF Education team slotted in another piece at the foot of the Finestre, where the EF domestiques ensured that the peloton would hit the climb at warp speed, paving the way for Carapaz to attack Del Toro. In the event, the Ecuadorian was unable to dislodge the Mexican, but their violent acceleration achieved something more insidious: it burned off Del Toro's teammates, who had defended his lead impeccably for 11 stages. By the time they rejoined Del Toro, Yates was long gone. Once Yates had flown the coop at the foot of the Finestre, it was Del Toro's job, as the race leader, to pursue the Lancastrian, whether or not he had any teammates with him. But he knew that to do so would expose him to a late attack from Carapaz, who had started the day only 43sec behind. And Carapaz was equally aware that if he chased, Del Toro might be the beneficiary. It needed either to seize the initiative, or for one team manager to issue an ultimatum to his rider. Without that, the upshot was the absorbing but unedifying spectacle of the pair freewheeling as Yates forged ahead with Van Aert – unedifying that is, unless you were a Visma team member, a British cycling fan or a connoisseur of the bizarre twists that bike racing unfailingly produces.
Auto Car
36 minutes ago
- Auto Car
Real range anxiety: Driving London to Land's End in 1921
Indeed, many competitors floundered, but there were several impressive performances too, like that by VG Lloyd, who 'astounded everyone with his speed' in his two-cylinder Carden. Notably, Lionel Martin 'romped up the hill' in his new production Aston Martin (he had co-founded the company in 1913 to build hillclimb specials; Aston was a course in Buckinghamshire). Several had to shed passengers to reach the top, while others fouled the hill by hitting the wall at the hairpin. Some even managed to clear it while avoiding a comrade's stricken car. One did it on a flat tyre. From there on to Land's End, there was little to really concern the drivers. Forty-two made it to the finish – and we were surprised to see among them HJG Smith's 10hp Eric-Campbell (a small firm that briefly made cars at the Handley Page aircraft factory in London), as he had broken a tie rod on Porlock so effectively was steering with one wheel. He won a gold medal along with 22 other worthy competitors. We concluded: 'The general consensus of opinion was that a better trial had never been, or one to which more merit was attached to a reward, while, as to sport, no man could wish for better.' Since then, more notoriously difficult sections have been added, most famously Beggars Roost (in 1922) and Blue Hills (in 1936), and the Land's End Trial continues to challenge the best trials drivers and cars. Long may it continue.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Ask the expert: Our car could have caught fire. Can we claim compensation?
Dear Alex, Our small family company bought two Ford Kuga plug-in hybrids (PHEV) in early 2024, because we wanted to be eco-friendly and intended to use the cars mostly in electric-only mode. In March this year we received a recall notice advising us to stop charging our cars due to a potential battery fault which could result in fire. Ford said it doesn't have a fix and doesn't know when it will have one. We now use the cars only in petrol mode, making them far less efficient than an ordinary petrol Kuga. I complained but was only offered a £100 goodwill payment for each car. Do you know when a fix will be released? Should we push for more compensation? – AS Dear AS, I know it's no consolation, but you're not the only one to have been affected by this fault. I've received several letters concerning Ford's recall notice 24S79, which affects Kuga plug-in hybrid (PHEV) models built from 2020 to 2024, a total of 26,328 vehicles in the UK. The recall notice states: 'In the event of a high-voltage battery internal short circuit, you will experience a 'Stop Safely Now' message in the instrument cluster. You may also experience a loss of motive power, increasing the risk of an accident. 'You will continue to have 12-volt accessories, steering and braking control. You may also experience battery thermal venting potentially resulting in a vehicle fire. 'Ford engineers are developing new software to remedy the potential condition. In the meantime please DO NOT PLUG IN YOUR VEHICLES TO CHARGE THE HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY and use the drive mode 'Auto EV' only. This will prevent the potential issue from occurring while charging or driving.' The letter goes on to say that you'll be booked in at your local dealer as soon as Ford has a fix (although, as you say, there is no indication of when that might be). While credit should be given to Ford for identifying and taking action to remedy this potentially very serious fault, the lack of a potential end date had many owners worried – not only about the fire risk, but about the increased cost of use of their cars in the meantime. As you rightly point out, using a PHEV without charging it can result in much higher fuel consumption than even the equivalent pure petrol model. There is some good news, however. I asked Ford if it could provide an update and it said the fix is ready to be rolled out; as of 20 May, customers should have started to receive notifications to book in their cars, first via the FordPass app, then by post. I also asked whether Ford had a policy regarding compensation for customers' increased fuel use, but it responded only that customers would 'need to contact our Customer Contact Centre who are ready to assist with any further questions'. Ford has already offered you a gesture of goodwill, but I would encourage you to pursue additional compensation. I would strongly suggest working out the cost of the additional fuel you've had to use during that time, based on the mileage travelled, the proportion of those miles that would have been covered under electric power and the fuel economy the car has achieved in that time. While I appreciate the sums aren't easy to do retrospectively, submitting a claim for a specific figure is more likely to yield a result than a nebulous request for an unspecified amount.
