Teachers tend to plan pregnancies with summer due dates. Could a LAUSD policy change that?
In teacher's lounges across California, the same advice is whispered year after year: Plan your babies around summer vacation.
Unlike private sector employees in California, teachers and other public employees do not have access to the state's paid family leave or state disability insurance programs. This leaves teachers — 73% of whom are women — under a complex set of benefits that require them to use up all of their sick time. Although their jobs are protected for 12 weeks, many cannot afford to take it. Planning a pregnancy around summer vacation allows teacher parents to tack on the summer months, when school is out of session.
'It seems crazy to time a reproductive choice around your work schedule," said Maya Suzuki Daniels, an English teacher at San Pedro High School. Daniels got lucky, giving birth to her son in July. But she had to go back to work just two weeks after school began, when her son was about 8 weeks old — she couldn't afford to take the time off.
But a new resolution passed unanimously by the Los Angeles Unified School District board this week seeks to bolster paid family leave for teachers and other district workers, and improve parental support in an effort to make LAUSD a "district of choice" for employees in the midst of a statewide teacher shortage.
Read more: With Head Start in jeopardy, Trump administration threatens child care for 800,000 kids
In addressing paid family leave for teachers, the board is attempting to make progress on an issue that has bedeviled the Legislature. Lawmakers have passed two separate bills that would have provided paid leave after a birth; the first was vetoed in 2017 by Gov. Jerry Brown, and the second was vetoed in 2019 by Gov. Gavin Newsom, citing costs. A third attempt, Assembly Bill 65, introduced by Assembly Majority Leader Cecilia M. Aguiar-Curry (D-Winters), is making its way through the Assembly.
An appeal to teacher-parents
The LAUSD resolution was introduced by school board members Tanya Ortiz Franklin, Kelly Gonez and Karla Griego — all of them moms.
'We now have a school board that has five moms on it who have some experience being on school staff while having children," Gonez said. 'We know that parenthood is joyful, but we also know the challenges it comes with in a very tangible way.'
"Parental Package: LAUSD as an Equitable Employer of Choice for Thriving Families" addresses a spectrum of parental needs — including infertility support services, paid time off, lactation spaces and child care — but is only the first step. The resolution requires the district to study the reproductive health and parenting needs of employees and come up with a plan of action by November.
This includes determining the cost of providing 12 weeks of paid family leave and researching the possibility of the state paying instead.
The resolution also calls for the district to take several immediate actions, including improving lactation spaces, identifying liaisons at each site to help employees navigate a confusing set of benefits from the district, and finding providers that offer affordable and backup child care for workers.
The effort also aims to improve staff retention and recruitment at a time when hiring enough teachers can prove challenging — especially in an expensive city where the rising cost of having a family outpaces a teacher's salary.
Read more: Can a baby struggle with their mental health? How this hospital is helping L.A.'s youngest
"These are things that will make it so much easier for our employees to stay with the district and to build their families while they continue to build their careers with the district," Gonez said. "It's not only good for them, but it's also good for the district, because increased retention means consistency in the staff at our school sites, and that reaps benefits for students as well."
The current state of parental leave for teachers
For two decades, California has provided paid family leave for private sector employees who pay into the state disability insurance and paid family leave programs. Private sector workers can access eight weeks of partially paid leave after the birth of a child or to care for an ailing family member. Those who give birth can also access an additional six to eight weeks of paid leave through the state disability insurance program. These benefits have been bolstered in recent years, including paying a higher percentage of worker salaries.
But public sector employees, including teachers, are exempt from paying into these programs and, therefore, are not eligible to receive the benefits. Unions can opt in through labor negotiations, but this is rare.
This leaves teachers under a complex system after the birth of a child. Their jobs are generally protected for 12 weeks, but they must run through their accrued sick days before getting "differential pay" of at least 50% for the rest of the time, according to the California Teachers Assn.
Newer teachers, or those who have already used up their sick days, may have no accrued sick days to use. After health insurance premiums and other costs are taken out of their paycheck, many are left with little to live on, said Erika Jones, an LAUSD teacher and CTA secretary-treasurer.
Read more: A pediatrician's dilemma: Should a practice kick out unvaccinated kids?
'It's very common to get pregnant and have no pay," Jones said. 'I have been in lunch rooms where women are in labor, dilated, and trying to work until the very last minute because they don't have enough days.'
Jasmin McGregor, a social worker at Audubon Middle School who shared her story in a video shown at Tuesday's board meeting, struggled after she had a baby last May.
"Money was very much a stressor during my pregnancy and postpartum period," she said. "It became very difficult for me and that is one of the reasons I did not take the full 12 weeks of parent bonding. Because I didn't have any more money."
Legislative efforts to provide paid leave for teachers
Research has shown that women who have access to paid leave are more likely to return to their jobs after having a baby. Yet the Legislature's two previous efforts to extend paid family leave to teachers have failed.
"When it comes to teachers, they've been totally abandoned in this regard," said Liz Morris, co-director of the Center for WorkLife Law at UC College of the Law, San Francisco. "Failing to provide paid leave for teachers is shortsighted, because [it] goes a long way in retaining teachers.'
In 2019, Newsom vetoed a bill that would have provided teachers with six weeks of paid maternity leave. 'Providing every California worker with paid family leave is a noble goal and a priority for my administration,' he said in his veto message. 'However, this bill will likely result in annual costs of tens of millions of dollars and should be considered as part of the annual budget process and as part of local collective bargaining.'
This legislative session, AB 65 would provide 14 weeks of paid leave to school and community college employees. The bill, which is estimated to cost about $120 million annually, would be paid for through Proposition 98 general funds and has the support of the teachers unions.
But opponents, including the Assn. of California School Administrators and the California School Boards Assn., say the law would be unaffordable for districts because there is no dedicated funding source and would exacerbate staffing shortages.
Instead, parental leave should be bargained through teacher union negotiations, said Dorothy Johnson, legislative advocate for the Assn. of California School Administrators. "To have a blank check for this level of leave — there's no way to really plan or prepare for it from a staffing or financial standpoint, which in the end hurts students.'
This article is part of The Times' early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist
Trump 'gold card' website opens. Here's how to join the $5 million waitlist Show Caption Hide Caption Trump wants to sell $5 million 'gold cards' as path to citizenship President Donald Trump says he wants to offer wealthy immigrants "gold cards" that would give a pathway to citizenship in exchange for a $5 million purchase price. President Donald Trump's long-touted "gold card," which offers foreigners a path to U.S. citizenship after paying $5 million to the government, is open for business. But even if you have the money, there's a waitlist at And read the fine print carefully: Your $5 million doesn't buy you immediate citizenship. Trump has said that he is not seeking approval from Congress as he is not providing gold card buyers with citizenship - only a path to citizenship. The path to citizenship requirements for card buyers are unclear and White House officials have said more details will be provided soon. The most common path to U.S. citizenship through naturalization is being a lawful permanent resident for at least five years. It requires the applicant to be least 18 years old when they apply, be able to read, write, and speak basic English (depending on age) and be of "good moral character." Trump has described the card, which he has also dubbed the Trump card, as 'somewhat like a green card, but at a higher level of sophistication.' 'FOR FIVE MILLION $DOLLARS, THE TRUMP CARD IS COMING!,' President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social on June 11. 'Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World.' The website shows an image of the gold-colored card, emblazoned with a likeness of Trump's face, and asks a few questions including name, region, email address and if an applicant is applying for themselves or as a business. The new website asks interested people to fill out a form that specifies eight regions: Europe, Asia (including Middle East), North America, Oceania, Central America, South America, Caribbean and Africa. Other countries also offer immigration programs that offers permanent residency or citizenship to foreign investors in exchange for investment. Portugal, for example, offers residency and a path to EU citizenship after five years. When he first floated the idea in February, Trump said the card would replace the "EB-5" immigrant investor green card visa program, The EB-5 visa allows immigrant investors the option to invest between $800,000 and $1.05 million to obtain a green card. The investment money is used to help create or preserve U.S. jobs. 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card,' Trump said in February. 'They'll be wealthy, and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money, and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people.' 'It's a road to citizenship for people and essentially people of wealth or people of great talent where people of wealth pay for those people of talent to get in,' he said. Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Primaries topple at least two Assembly incumbents — and more could follow
Assembly candidate Katie Brennan celebrates with running mate Hoboken Mayor Ravi Bhalla, center, and Jersey City Councilman James Solmon after Brennan declared victory in the 32nd District's Assembly race on June 10, 2025. (Photo courtesy of Ben Ackman/Jersey City Times) At least two sitting members of the Assembly appear to have lost their reelection campaigns Tuesday, though it may take days yet to determine which lawmakers will see their tenures end in January. Democratic incumbents face defeat in the 28th and 31st districts, with the chance of another loss in the 32nd, according to election results that remain preliminary. So far, only one incumbent, Assemblywoman Garnett Hall (D-Essex), appears certain to lose her seat in the 28th District after a single term in office. Three Democrats vied for two spots on the November ballot in this largely Democratic district. Hall sought a second term under gubernatorial hopeful Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop's 'Democrats for Change' slogan after Essex County Democrats backed Assemblywoman Cleopatra Tucker (D-Essex) and former assistant community affairs commissioner Chigozie Onyem over Hall. Hall trails Onyem by 3,563 votes, about 12 points, with nearly 98% of the 28th District's votes reported. The gap between Hall and the two candidates currently in the lead is insurmountable. In the Hudson County-based 31st District, four Democrats vied for two slots, with the incumbent Assembly members — William Sampson and Barbara McCann Stamato — running against one another on opposite slates. Hudson County Commissioner Jerry Walker, who ran with Sampson, appears certain to ascend to the Legislature, running in first place with 8,453 votes with about 96% of the district's votes counted. And Sampson narrowly leads McCann Stamato 7,161 to 6,853, with Bayonne Councilwoman Jacqueline Weimmer trailing the pack with 6,853 votes. 'We still have an election to go on in November, and we want to wipe Republicans out,' Walker said at a victory party Tuesday. 'And look, I'm happy to say this right here: Steven Fulop, you lost.' Walker and Sampson had the backing of the Hudson County Democratic Party. McCann Stamato and Weimmer ran under a ticket backed by Fulop. Whoever ends up in second place in this contest, one of the 31st District's incumbents won't return to Trenton next year. In the Hudson-based 32nd District, six Democrats vying for two seats were on Tuesday's ballot. Two candidates ran with the backing of Hudson's Democratic Party, two ran on Fulop's slate, and two ran solo. Former New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency chief of staff Katie Brennan leads the pack with 6,762 votes. Her running mate, Hoboken Mayor Ravi Bhalla, has a narrow edge over Assemblywoman Jessica Ramirez (D-Hudson), leading Ramirez 6,535 to 6,462. 'We did it. We really did it. We just showed the whole state that the people can beat the party bosses,' Brennan said in a statement Tuesday night. 'This is what democracy looks like when it's not rigged by political machines.' The district also hosts what appears to be the roundest defeat of party-backed Assembly candidates in the state. The Associated Press has not declared a winner in that contest yet. Hoboken Public Library director Jennie Pu and Jersey City buildings director Crystal Fonseca — who were backed by Hudson Democrats — are in fifth and sixth place with 5,152 and 4,964 votes, respectively. Jersey City Councilman Yousef Saleh, who ran with Ramirez on Fulop's slate, is in fourth place with 5,165 votes. Pu, Fonseca, and Saleh face insurmountable gaps. In the 35th District, which represents parts of Bergen and Passaic counties, independent Democrat Newark Corporation Counsel Kenyatta Stewart appears to have won the nomination with 7,298 votes due to a groundswell of support in the Passaic County portions of the district. 'Thank you to every single person who showed up, supported, and believed in this movement,' Stewart said on Facebook. 'We did this together, and I am deeply humbled by your trust. Now it's time to get to work — and I promise to make you proud every step of the way.' He leads Assemblyman Al Abdelaziz (D-Passaic), who won 5,997 votes, and Passaic County Commissioner Orlando Cruz, who nabbed 5,736 votes. Romi Herrera, the district's only Fulop-backed candidate, has about half as many votes as Herrera and is well out of the running. Officials are still counting votes, and they'll continue to receive mail ballots postmarked by 8 p.m. on Election Day until Monday. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Anti-ICE protests erupt across 19 states, with 200 rioters busted in LA for ignoring newly enforced curfew
The chaos is spreading. Anti-ICE riots have erupted in Atlanta, Chicago and Seattle — as hundreds of protesters were arrested in Los Angeles Tuesday after the city imposed a curfew to curb five straight days of mayhem sparked by federal immigration raids. Thousands have stormed the streets in 35 cities across 19 states, both in solidarity with the unrest in Los Angeles and to protest the wave of mass detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 7 Anti-ICE riots have erupted across the country, with hundreds of protesters arrested in Los Angeles, California, on Tuesday. Getty Images While no other city has matched the scale of the volatile demonstrations in the City of Angels — where 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops have been deployed — clashes with police intensified Tuesday during the latest round of protests, according to local reports. About six agitators were cuffed in Atlanta after police ordered a curfew to control a rowdy crowd — which set off fireworks and hurled rocks at officers, resulting in tear gas being used to end the chaos, Fox 5 Atlanta reported. A demonstration in Chicago turned violent when thousands gathered outside the Chicago Police Department headquarters, accusing cops of helping ICE with crowd control during raids in the Windy City, something the department denies, ABC7 reported. Some members of the crowd vandalized patrol cars and others faced off with cops, as a motorist plowed through the mob of demonstrators after ignoring police orders to stop, according to Fox News. No injuries were reported in the frightening incident. In Seattle, a few dozen protesters gathered outside Seattle's Henry M. Jackson Federal Building to show support for the civil disobedience taking place in LA. 7 Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass imposed a curfew across the city to limit the civil unrest from the ongoing protests. Getty Images The action followed another, larger protest the day before in which around 300 people marched to Seattle City Hall to oppose the arrest of local labor leader David Huerta, who was arrested during the ICE raids in California. Outside the federal building, protesters chanted profanity-laced anti-ICE slogans in both Spanish and English and tried to block vehicle access to the building with e-bikes and scooters, according to KUOW. More than 200 people were arrested in Los Angeles after they failed to leave the one-square-mile section of downtown where Mayor Karen Bass enforced an 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. curfew, NBC News reported. 7 Thousands of individuals have taken to the streets across the country to protest the ICE raids. Getty Images Agitators were charged with failure to disperse, as 17 others were arrested for curfew violation. Others were taken into custody for firearm possession, assault with a deadly weapon on a police officer and discharging a laser at a police airship, the outlet reported. Two officers were also injured when a standoff erupted between protesters, the LAPD and ICE agents as the 8 p.m. curfew neared. 7 Multiple demonstrations have led to violence and dozens of arrests across the country along with members of the Marines and the National Guard being called in to maintain order. Getty Images The disruption resulted in demonstrators fleeing into the parking garage of an upscale apartment high-rise where residents were reportedly sheltering them. One protester, who was hiding out in the 17th-floor stairwell of the building, told The Post he voted for President Trump and now regrets that decision. 'I've been hiding here. I'm just trying to get out,' he said. 'I was out here protesting because both of my parents are Mexican, and I want to support my community. Actually, I voted for Trump and regretted it. It was a huge mistake, and this is kind of my way of making up for that.' 7 Tuesday marked the fifth straight day of protests in Los Angeles against the mass deportation raids conducted by ICE. Matthew Hoen/Zuma / The city has been in turmoil since Friday, when protests-turned-riots erupted as federal agents raided numerous workplaces and hauled off suspected illegal immigrants. Demonstrations quickly turned violent, with busy highways blocked, rocks being thrown at police cars, and city streets left littered with burning cars by day and looters ransacking storefronts by night. Tensions escalated into a hotbed of unrest when Trump bypassed California Gov. Gavin Newsom and ordered the large military presence to the city to restore order — an 'unnecessary' decision Bass said has caused 'drastic and chaotic escalation.' 7 Tensions unfolded when President Trump ignored California Gov. Gavin Newsom and decided to send the military to the state to limit the ongoing violence. Getty Images 'A week ago, everything was peaceful in the city of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference Wednesday. 'Things began to be difficult on Friday when raids took place, and it's important that I begin there because that is the cause of the problems that have happened in the city of Los Angeles and other cities. This was provoked by the White House.' The federal troops are largely being used to protect federal buildings and assist ICE officers. 7 Since the raids began, 330 immigrants have been taken into ICE custody. Getty Images Immigration raids in Los Angeles have since intensified, with 330 immigrants taken into custody since federal authorities entered the city last week, the White House confirmed to the Los Angeles Times. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the arrests included 113 individuals who had prior criminal convictions. ICE has targeted Home Depots and agricultural farms, including one in Ventura County early Tuesday morning, where videos posted online showed federal agents chasing after workers attempting to flee at an Oxnard farm. 'These actions are completely unjustified and harmful,' Oxnard Mayor Luis McArthur said. 'They create chaos and distress in our communities without contributing much to public safety. The individual affected by these operations, they're not criminals. They are hardworking families who make meaningful contributions to our local economy and to our greater community.'