Millbrook First Nation councillor acquitted of illegal tobacco charges
A prominent First Nation councillor in Nova Scotia has been acquitted of charges linked to the 2022 seizure of a large amount of illegal tobacco, after a judge ruled Thursday the evidence in court did not prove he was the owner of the small shop selling the products.
On its surface, the decision is at odds with the public advocacy of the Millbrook First Nation councillor, Chris Googoo, who has asserted the Mi'kmaq have the treaty right to sell tobacco and cannabis outside of federal and provincial regulations.
In an interview outside the provincial courtroom in Dartmouth, N.S., just minutes after he was found not guilty, Googoo openly acknowledged he owns High Grade Trading Post in Cole Harbour, N.S.
He is willing to raise constitutional challenges, he said, but the system as it's set up means he must go through a trial first and he believed it was important to test the prosecution's evidence against him.
"Yeah, I got acquitted," he said. "But that's due to the Crown and the authorities not doing their due diligence and getting their full facts in order. We have our full facts in order on our side of things."
The scenario is similar to another decision involving High Grade Trading Post from last spring in which another judge acquitted Googoo of cannabis charges after ruling the Crown had not proven the store was under his control.
Googoo is the founder of the Micmac Rights Association, a group he said now includes roughly 260 members. Its advocacy has focused on asserting the "sovereign rights" of Mi'kmaq, particularly around the sale of cannabis, both on and off reserves.
In Nova Scotia, the provincial government only allows cannabis to be sold through the Crown corporation Nova Scotia Liquor Corporation, while the sale and taxing of tobacco is regulated.
"We have a right to an economy just like any other person," Googoo said. "And it's not about selling tobacco or cannabis. In my eyes, they're both legal products, and the government sells it and we should be able to partake in those industries as well."
Revenue Act charges
In Thursday's court case, Googoo faced seven charges under Nova Scotia's Revenue Act, including possessing tobacco on which tax has not been paid and selling tobacco that didn't have the mark required by law.
In her decision, Judge Amy Sakalauskas said officers with the fuel and tobacco unit of Service Nova Scotia filled at least 10 garbage bags with cigarettes, cigars and other tobacco products they seized on Oct. 5, 2022, from the store on Millbrook reserve land in Cole Harbour.
The sign outside said "Cheap Tobacco," the judge said, and inside cartons of cigarettes were selling for $60, easily half the price of those sold in the legal market. The store, she said, was "pretty loaded with inventory."
Googoo, however, was not at the scene when the authorities raided High Grade, and the judge said a crucial part of the case hinged on whether the prosecution could prove he was the owner and operator of the shop, which at the time was housed in a trailer.
Proving identity
Googoo's lawyer, Jack Lloyd, did not call any defence evidence and Googoo chose not to testify, which meant he was not questioned in court about whether he owned High Grade Trading Post.
The prosecution tried to prove he did. One officer testified a man who identified himself as Millbrook councillor Chris Googoo called him the day after the raid and confirmed he owned High Grade.
The officer also obtained records from Nova Scotia Power that showed the electricity account for the trailer was under the name Christopher Googoo. Another officer combed Googoo's Facebook page and those of his wife and High Grade.
The judge said it was a circumstantial case, one where various pieces of evidence when put together were close to proving that Googoo was the owner of High Grade.
But she said it was "an odd investigation" because the officers failed to take the needed extra steps. The names Christopher and Googoo are not uncommon in Nova Scotia, she noted.
The photos on the Facebook pages were grainy and poorly reproduced, the judge said, and she couldn't determine if they showed the same man who was sitting in court, even though an officer who served Googoo his court papers testified it was the same person.
She said the officer who received the call didn't investigate whether the number on the caller ID was actually associated with Googoo. The records from Nova Scotia Power had only a name, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
27 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Two First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire do not support new mining law
TORONTO – Two First Nations in and around the Ring of Fire that signed deals with the provincial government are speaking out against a new Ontario law. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon says his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development, particularly mining projects. The legislation passed last week allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses. Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the Ring of Fire, but Gagnon says they have never given consent to mine the region. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province as it leads the development of another proposed road to the area, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
World junior complainant created a ‘false narrative,' McLeod's lawyer says
The female complainant in the high-profile world junior sexual assault trial 'chose to abandon restraint' the night of the alleged acts, a defence lawyer for one of the players says. David Humphrey, lawyer for Michael McLeod, told Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia Monday the complainant, known as E.M. in court documents, created a 'false narrative' in the face of regret after meeting McLeod and his teammates in London, Ont., in June 2018. 'This is a case where the defence has an embarrassment of riches — a cornucopia of compelling credibility and reliability concerns in E.M.'s testimony,' Humphrey told Carroccia during his closing submissions inside a London courtroom. 'She's created a false narrative in which she bears no responsibility.' Closing submissions began Monday after the defence rested its case last week. The trial, which has been proceeding by judge alone after two juries were dismissed, began in late April. Story continues below advertisement 2:10 Crown cross-examines 1 of the 5 accused men at world junior hockey sexual assault trial McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote have pleaded not guilty to sexual assault stemming from what the Crown alleges was non-consensual group sex with the then 20-year-old woman in McLeod's hotel room. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy McLeod has also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of being a party to the offence of sexual assault. Defence lawyers said last week they would collaborate to avoid repetition during their submissions, and that they'd need two-to-three hours each. Crown prosecutors said they'd need a day for their closing submissions. 'Her communication of consent is overwhelming': Humphrey Court has heard that the team was in London for events marking its gold-medal performance at that year's championship, and that the complainant was out with friends when they met at a downtown bar on June 18, 2018. Story continues below advertisement After being with McLeod and his teammates at the bar, E.M. would go on to have consensual sex with McLeod in his room in the early morning hours of June 19. Court has heard that E.M., who testified she was drunk and not of clear mind, was in the washroom after she had sex with McLeod and came out to a group of men in the room allegedly invited for a '3 way' by McLeod in a group chat. It was then that the Crown alleges several sexual acts took place without E.M.'s consent. The 27-year-old woman, whose identity is protected under a standard publication ban, was subject to intense cross-examination during her nearly two weeks on the stand. 2:29 World junior trial hears 2018 police interviews with 2 accused Defence lawyers have suggested E.M. wasn't as drunk as she has testified she was, wanted a 'wild night' with the players and was 'egging' them on to have sex with her, and accused her of having a 'clear agenda' at the trial. Story continues below advertisement E.M. has pushed back against those claims and at points outright rejected them, saying she was coaxed into staying in the room, was disrespected and was taken advantage of by the group, who she said 'could see I was out of my mind.' Only Hart testified at the trial, while the other players' lawyers cited evidence and police interviews that were already played out in court as part of the reasons why they weren't calling evidence. Humphrey argued Monday E.M. 'made a choice to take that night in a different direction' and when her sobriety returned, 'regret emerges.' He argued when E.M.'s mother found her crying after she got home, she told her a 'white lie that snowballed into a criminal investigation' because she regretted drinking too much and cheating on her boyfriend with a group of men. Humphrey said her mother pressured her into going to the police, and with E.M. being a self-identifying people-pleaser, the pressure got to a point where she could no longer resist. After police in 2018 decided not to lay charges, E.M., 'armed' with that information, 'retools her narrative' to support her lawsuit against Hockey Canada. 'She is not an honest or reliable witness,' Humphrey said. 'Her communication of consent is overwhelming.'
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
L'nuey and Parks Canada seek board members to co-manage protected lands, historic sites
Details of how Parks Canada and Mi'kmaq will co-manage sites on P.E.I. are falling into place 3 hours ago Duration 2:04 Social Sharing The First Nations group L'nuey and Parks Canada are looking for board members to help co-manage P.E.I.'s protected lands and historic sites, taking the next step on an agreement they have spent years crafting. "The agreements were signed and negotiated over many years. I believe the negotiations started even way back in the early 2000s," said Geraldine Arsenault, the field unit superintendant for Parks Canada on Prince Edward Island. "These agreements for both the new national park reserve and for the Toquktmekl agreement, these agreements were both signed at different moments in 2024." The new boards will consist of five members, including two selected by L'nuey and two chosen by Parks Canada. The fifth, who will chair, will be appointed by the board members. "Now we're at the phase of implementation of these agreements, and the first part of that implementation is to form the boards themselves, so that they can advise on the governance of these places," said Arsenault. The boards will oversee places like Pituamkek National Park Reserve off P.E.I.'s North Shore and national historic sites such as Province House in Charlottetown, Cavendish-North Rustico and the working inn at Dalvay-by-the-Sea. Jenene Wooldridge is the executive director of L'nuey, an organization focused on Indigenous rights for the Mi'kmaq community on P.E.I. "We advance and protect Mi'kmaq rights, and we focus on the areas of governance development, all negotiations and consultations for the Mi'kmaq," she said. "L'nuey is proud to be able to support the Mi'kmaq leadership over the past number of years. They have been steadfast in making sure that these agreements come to fruition and that we are able to now get into the implementation phase." Bringing Indigenous perspectives Arsenault said reconciliation has been very important for Parks Canada. "We've been working for a very long time with the Mi'kmaq of Prince Edward Island to really bring in the Mi'kmaw perspective to how we manage our national historic sites and our national park," she said. "And now with the new national park reserve Pituamkek, it really brings a piece of Mi'kmaw traditional lands into the family, if you will, of protected sites." Wooldridge said the boards will have different priorities. "Pituamkek is a brand-new national park reserve, so it's really building it from the ground up. It's going to be looking at what the potential visitor experience could look like, where are their protected sites, that wouldn't be so good for visitors or lots of people being around," she said. "Also access will be a discussion, I'm sure, for those co-management boards, so it's really more of the operational discussions that will be happening, building from the ground up for Pituamkek." Wooldridge said that the other board will look at existing national historic sites and the national park. She said they hope to have these board positions filled by the fall. "The recruitment is open now, and we encourage Mi'kmaw community members who have interest or expertise in culture, governance, environment, you know, community engagement, to put their names forward because all of those perspectives matter."
