logo
Nashville plans legal action against Trump admin — again — as cuts hit Health Department

Nashville plans legal action against Trump admin — again — as cuts hit Health Department

Yahoo28-03-2025
Metro Nashville leaders are mulling joining other cities in another round of legal action against the Trump administration. This suit would be in response to nationwide Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cuts to grants introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Metro Nashville Health Department could lose up to eight grant-funded staff positions due to the budget reductions, officials said. Last week, Nashville officials joined a Southern Environmental Law Center and the Public Rights Project lawsuit against the Trump adminstration's Inflation Reduction Act cuts.
Metro Director of Law Wally Dietz announced the looming legal action during Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell's weekly media roundtable Friday morning.
Dietz said he believes the claw-back is unconstitutional and called it a 'gigantic issue.' Dietz said Nashville is actively working with other cities that have been similarly affected and 'fully intends' on filing a lawsuit to protect those grants.
'There is a procedure for the administration to go through if they want to impound these funds,' Dietz said. 'They could invoke the procedures of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 and go to Congress and try to get these monies rescinded. That's the lawful way to do it — the way they chose is not lawful or constitutional.'
O'Connell, for his part, said he's less worried about further legal action making Nashville a bigger target for federal cuts than he is about Metro losing access to funds 'we have legal rights to.'
'Frankly, I don't know that it can get much worse,' Dietz added. 'That's not a flippant comment — that's an evaluation of where we stand with the federal government right now.'
O'Connell told reporters Friday that these cuts directly affect the Metro Health Department, where up to eight grant-funded staff positions will be lost. O'Connell said it's the first example to date of federal cuts leading directly to Metro Nashville jobs being eliminated.
O'Connell said two of those staffers, for example, were working on finding a use for more than 100 housing pods, also called pallet shelters, that Metro purchased for an estimated $1.2 million in 2021 using COVID relief funds.
'We're working to identify other Metro employees to help pick up the process and support identifying a partner to roll this out as emergency housing, but this will delay any use of those shelters,' O'Connell said.
The cuts will also affect the Health Department's measles response. While O'Connell said there's yet to be a case reported in Davidson County, cases have begun popping up in Middle Tennessee.
Joanna Shaw-KaiKai, Metro Health Department's medical services director, said Friday that the department has been preparing for a potential local increase in measles cases for several weeks. In part, that work's been running through a 'strike team' of department personnel which has been holding vaccination clinics at area middle schools.
But the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity grant funding was one of three awards rescinded Tuesday, Shaw-KaiKai said. The Health Department has worked with Metro Finance in the time since to restore that work, but Shaw-KaiKai said any disruption is a significant one when over 60% of the health department's work is funded by grants.
'The abrupt end of the funding meant several days of planned vaccine clinics were lost,' Shaw-KaiKai said. 'Disruptions like these can cause real public health issues, as any one person who is unvaccinated is more susceptible to contracting and spreading the disease they would have otherwise been protected against.'
Metro has already taken legal action against the Trump administration in the past week. Last Friday, Nashville signed on to a lawsuit led by the Southern Environmental Law Center and the Public Rights Project seeking to halt the Trump administration's federal funding freeze on Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act grants.
Nashville is one of six cities included in the suit, along with 11 nonprofits. Each of them have been awarded federal grant funds, either as direct recipients or as sub-grantees, through an act of Congress. For Nashville, the lawsuit covers about $14 million in awarded funds that are likely to be rescinded entirely.
Most recently, the two nonprofits leading the suit filed a motion for preliminary injunction, a type of temporary relief that, if granted, preserves the status quo before any ruling on a final judgment.
Dietz said he's optimistic about that motion succeeding, but also indicated that he's ready to escalate if the Trump administration ignores a judge's order — both by filing a motion of contempt and even by taking the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
'This is a critical time in our country's history — we'll see where we go,' Dietz said. 'Will the court stand up and defend the law? Will the Supreme Court make it clear that the president does not have the authority to ignore lawful orders of federal courts? There will be a clash. It is already, in my opinion, a constitutional crisis because the Trump administration has determined they are not obligated to follow orders of federal courts.'
Austin Hornbostel is the Metro reporter for The Tennessean. Have a question about local government you want an answer to? Reach him at ahornbostel@tennessean.com.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Metro Nashville considers suing Trump admin following CDC grant cuts
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investing in Public Education Will Strengthen the U.S.
Investing in Public Education Will Strengthen the U.S.

Scientific American

time32 minutes ago

  • Scientific American

Investing in Public Education Will Strengthen the U.S.

Public education in the U.S. is under attack. Whether at the local, state or federal level, political and religious groups have pushed for funding cuts while diverting more money to private-school vouchers, trying to alter curricula and removing books from children's reading lists. By not prioritizing free and equitable public education, the U.S. government is robbing our youths of the critical-thinking skills and knowledge that drive innovation and democracy. These efforts fall heavily on science education in our classrooms, if not directly on classwork, then on its fundamental drivers—curiosity, imagination, ingenuity and innovation. To ask the kinds of questions of our natural world that would produce such things as artificial intelligence, spacecraft, medicines, and more, children need exposure to the ideas that have shaped our progress as a society, the status quo we have bucked against to bring about great changes for humanity, the declarations we have questioned and then reshaped. The attempt to quell and control taxpayer-funded education is antithetical to a society that values evidence and knowledge. It's a concerted effort in thought control, racism, classism and sexism. It's not very democratic—or very smart. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. About 50 million children in the U.S. attend public school, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. That number was closer to 51 million in 2019, but many kids who left public school during the COVID pandemic didn't come back to public education. Children attending public school exercise a right that used to be a privilege, as schooling in the U.S. was generally tuition-based until the mid- to late 1800s. By 1870, about 78 percent of children ages five to 14 were enrolled in taxpayer-funded schools. In 2019 and 2020, between 80 and 90 percent of children who went to public school in the U.S. graduated from high school, depending on the locale. Critical thinking and exposure to different ideas are fundamentals of not only democracy but also creativity and innovation. Some of the biggest battles about the right to comprehensive knowledge have been waged in public schools. They include the fight over the ability to teach evolution at Rhea County High School in Tennessee, which was at the center of the Scopes Trial 100 years ago, and clashes over the inclusion of climate change science in textbooks that serve millions of public school students in Texas and elsewhere. School districts nationwide have removed school library books that contain information on changing bodies or that explore mental health, not to mention ones that discuss slavery, race and gender identity. Under the guise of protecting children from harm, censors instead seek to whitewash the inconvenient truths that make it harder for them to maintain their profiteering and social hegemony: Earth is warming, and humans are responsible; slavery did happen; neither race nor gender is hierarchical. Among the most egregious examples of the drive to undermine public education are school voucher programs. These efforts funnel taxpayer dollars to private and parochial schools, frequently at the expense of the long-term funding of public education. Often sold as 'school choice,' these legislative initiatives are championed as a way to help students escape poorly performing public schools or to give families of lesser means more options in education. But problems abound. Arizona is hemorrhaging money to keep its voucher program afloat. In Indiana, educational gains in voucher-eligible schools are debatable. Joseph Waddington, an education researcher at the University of Notre Dame, says his and others' examination of Indiana's program showed that when children initially transitioned to private schools, their math scores fell significantly. It took a while for them to rebound. The researchers found no difference in English scores. The idea in some corners has been that voucher programs will stimulate the development of more religious or for-profit schools, which would, of course, enrich the entities opening the schools. But in many rural areas, there are no such schools. Many Texas counties have no private option. This lack was the basis for one of the bigger criticisms of Texas's new voucher program, passed during the state's January 2025 legislative session. Such examples beg the question of why these funds shouldn't just be used for public education that everyone can benefit from. Critical thinking and exposure to different ideas are fundamentals of not only democracy but also creativity and innovation. For the U.S. to maintain its status as an economic powerhouse and driver of the global economy, we need problem-solvers, inventors, iterative thinkers and people who view failure as part of progress. This is the realm of science and mathematics, the realm of history and geography, the realm of a broad-based and well-rounded education. Diverting funds from public education while stifling certain ideas in public schools would certainly diminish our footprint in the world. And although public education in the U.S. is a local and state issue, federal support does matter. Efforts to dismantle the Department of Education, which helps students with disabilities, gives grants and funds to equalize educational opportunity, and carries out research on different aspects of education, leave students at every level in the lurch, especially in less affluent school districts. Schooling may be local, but national support is critical. What does appropriate funding for public education look like? Higher teacher salaries. Better buildings, not just stadiums. More reliable transportation. More comprehensive, influence-free textbooks. Better laboratories. More subject options. Better training in trades. More preschool. Mental health services. Physical health services. More nutritious meals. Better and free after-school programs. The idea that we can defund public education in favor of alternatives belies reality and common sense. Public education provides community, refuge and opportunity. It is a common good that we must nurture. The U.S. became a world leader thanks in no small part to universal, standard public education. We owe it to future generations to keep it that way.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey resigns to take a top FBI position

time4 hours ago

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey resigns to take a top FBI position

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, a Republican who has been an ardent backer of President Donald Trump, said Monday that he is resigning to take a leadership position at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The move is the latest in a series of changes at the FBI under Director Kash Patel. Numerous senior officials, including top agents in charge of big-city field offices, have been pushed out of their jobs, and Justice Department officials have sought the names of agents who participated in investigations related to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Bailey said he is stepping down effective Sept. 8 to serve as the FBI's co-deputy director, alongside Dan Bongino. Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe is to announce a new appointee as attorney general on Tuesday. 'My life has been defined by a call to service, and I am once again answering that call, this time at the national level,' Bailey said in a statement. In a little over two-and-a-half years in the job, Bailey pursued numerous lawsuits challenging former President Joe Biden's administration on an array of policies, including immigration actions, student loan forgiveness, environmental rules, gun safety initiatives and He also threatened legal action against private gyms over bathroom policies, demanded that public schools ban drag shows and sued New York state, claiming that Trump's 2024 hush money criminal trial was 'overt meddling' in the 2024 election that limited Missouri voters' information. Most recently, Bailey's office has defended the state's anti-abortion regulations in the face of a voter-approved constitutional amendment establishing a state right to abortion. Earlier this year, Bailey's office won a $24.5 billion award against China for the COVID-19 pandemic in a case that originally was filed by his predecessor, Eric Schmitt, who won election to the U.S. Senate in 2022. Bailey was serving as general counsel to Republican Gov. Mike Parson when his boss appointed him to replace Schmitt. An Army veteran, Bailey won a full four-year term as attorney general last November.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey resigns to take a top FBI position
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey resigns to take a top FBI position

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey resigns to take a top FBI position

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, a Republican who has been an ardent backer of President Donald Trump, said Monday that he is resigning to take a leadership position at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The move is the latest in a series of changes at the FBI under Director Kash Patel. Numerous senior officials, including top agents in charge of big-city field offices, have been pushed out of their jobs, and Justice Department officials have sought the names of agents who participated in investigations related to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Bailey said he is stepping down effective Sept. 8 to serve as the FBI's co-deputy director, alongside Dan Bongino. Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe is to announce a new appointee as attorney general on Tuesday. 'My life has been defined by a call to service, and I am once again answering that call, this time at the national level,' Bailey said in a statement. In a little over two-and-a-half years in the job, Bailey pursued numerous lawsuits challenging former President Joe Biden's administration on an array of policies, including immigration actions,student loan forgiveness,environmental rules,gun safety initiatives and transgender rights measures. He also threatened legal action against private gyms over bathroom policies, demanded that public schools ban drag shows and sued New York state, claiming that Trump's 2024 hush money criminal trial was 'overt meddling' in the 2024 election that limited Missouri voters' information. Most recently, Bailey's office has defended the state's anti-abortion regulations in the face of a voter-approved constitutional amendment establishing a state right to abortion. Earlier this year, Bailey's office won a $24.5 billion award against China for the COVID-19 pandemic in a case that originally was filed by his predecessor, Eric Schmitt, who won election to the U.S. Senate in 2022. Bailey was serving as general counsel to Republican Gov. Mike Parson when his boss appointed him to replace Schmitt. An Army veteran, Bailey won a full four-year term as attorney general last November.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store