logo
Falling birth rate in Jersey a 'ticking bomb'

Falling birth rate in Jersey a 'ticking bomb'

BBC Newsa day ago
Jersey's falling birth rate is a "ticking bomb" for the island, the housing minister says.Deputy Sam Mézec said the declining rate, combined with an ageing population, posed a huge challenge.His comments come after a Policy Centre Jersey report based on data from the Superintendent Registrar showed the number of births in Jersey between 2021 and 2024 fell by 20% compared to a 5% drop in England and Wales.The birth rate in the first half of 2025 was 4% lower than the first half of 2024, figures also showed.
Mézec said difficulty finding the right home was putting young families off having children in Jersey, and he had friends who "moved away from Jersey so they can afford to have children".He said: "They just can't find the kind of home they want to bring their children up in, a place with enough bedrooms, outdoor space, and over the last few decades that has become more and more unaffordable in Jersey.""We will have problems if we don't have a large enough working population providing the services and paying the taxes supporting the young and the retired.""We need to be planning now for policies that start to reverse that trend, and that means supporting younger people into family-sized homes."
Smaller communities 'vulnerable'
He added: "What's our working demographic going to look like in 20 or 30 years if we don't have enough young people going through our education system and going into work when they reach adulthood to provide the services that supports the whole of society including the ageing population?"This could be a ticking bomb if we don't get this right."Mark Boleat, a senior advisor at the Policy Centre Jersey, said it was concerning the local birth rate was falling faster than other places.The centre's report found the number of babies born in Jersey in 2024 had fallen by 10% compared to the year before, and the number of primary school pupils had fallen by 5.6% in the last two years.Mr Boleat said smaller communities such as Jersey were more vulnerable to falling rates.He said: "In a big country, it can fall but it doesn't have quite the effect. In Jersey, the fall... over the last few years is already having a very significant effect."So, over the last couple of years in England, the number of births has fallen 5%. In Jersey, it's fallen by 20%. We need to understand why."
Parents told the BBC the cost of living made raising children very difficult.Bobby Yordanov is 33 and has a son, but said the cost of living was making him reconsider having more children.He said: "I love Jersey, but most likely if we have another child we are going to move because it's going to be unbearable."The cost of raising children here is one of the main reasons the birth rate is so low. There is absolutely no other reason and it's getting ridiculously expensive."In a couple, one of your salaries just covers nursery."Abdul Bassit, 43, has two children and said his biggest costs were clothing and food, which cost "more and more everyday".
However, environmentalist Nigel Jones argued the declining birth rate locally was not bad.He said: "We all know that, worldwide, the biggest predictor of a lower birth rate is the level of education of the population. "The more educated young women are, the fewer children they are likely to have, and I don't see that as a problem at all."There are plenty of children being born all over the world - it's not like we have shortage worldwide. "We need to be less insular on this and we need to think, if work needs doing in the future, there will be people who can come to Jersey and do it."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guardian view on construction workers: the country needs more of them, fast
The Guardian view on construction workers: the country needs more of them, fast

The Guardian

time11 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on construction workers: the country needs more of them, fast

During the 1980s, the construction industry provided the backdrop to one of Britain's best-loved television comedies. Auf Wiedersehen, Pet chronicled the progress of three Geordie bricklayers as they fled a recession-hit country to seek work in Düsseldorf. That was then. A contemporary reworking would need to start from a radically different premise. Notwithstanding the contribution of a large migrant workforce, the modern construction sector is underpowered and dramatically understaffed. Annual job vacancies total about 38,000, half of which cannot be filled due to a shortage of skills. For a government committed to sustainably building 1.5m new homes and environmentally upgrading the existing housing stock – as well as renewing national infrastructure more generally – that is a serious problem. The Construction Industry Training Board has estimated that between now and 2029, about 240,000 new hires will be needed. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, hopes that some of them will be alumni of 10 'new technical excellence colleges', whose locations were unveiled this week. The government has already pledged to invest £600m in the training of 60,000 construction workers by 2029. The 10 colleges are being handed another £100m to enhance the skillsets of a future generation of bricklayers, electricians, carpenters and plumbers. 'New' is stretching it a bit. All the colleges already exist and have a track record in offering construction courses. Whether the scale of the government's intervention is adequate to the size of the challenge is, to say the least, moot. But Ms Phillipson's apparent determination to prioritise the sector is both necessary and welcome. One in eight young people are currently not in education, employment or training; making vocational career paths accessible and attractive is a social as well as an economic imperative. Sadly, there is a vast amount of lost ground to make up. Overall investment in skills has dropped calamitously since 2010, and a myopic ministerial focus on universities has seen further education colleges treated as second-class institutions. The apprenticeship levy scheme introduced by the Conservatives in 2017 was a dismal failure, as employers invested in already skilled employees rather than entry-level opportunities. Via Skills England – the new body it has created – Labour has moved to reform the levy. But comparisons with Germany's longstanding vocational education system, which enjoys high status and delivers a rounded learning environment to students, remain deeply unflattering. The construction industry also has its own issues to resolve. Cultural expectations have transformed since the days when Auf Wiedersehen, Pet was broadcast. In a recent survey, more than a third of young people did not view a job in construction as a respected career path. More than half considered the sector not welcoming to women. Many employers are failing to invest in training. And as the use of migrant labour has become increasingly prevalent, there has been concerning evidence of exploitative practices. If hugely ambitious Westminster targets are to be met, foreign workers and new native talent will both be required (a home truth that the government is depressingly reluctant to acknowledge). Rendering the construction sector fit for purpose should be viewed as a national mission. The reward would be a viable vocational path for tens of thousands of young people. Labour is at least making a start. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Ex-mayor urges Keir Starmer to stop asylum plan at Stanwell Hotel
Ex-mayor urges Keir Starmer to stop asylum plan at Stanwell Hotel

BBC News

time11 hours ago

  • BBC News

Ex-mayor urges Keir Starmer to stop asylum plan at Stanwell Hotel

A Surrey councillor has urged the prime minister to intervene and drop the government's plan to house only single males at Stanwell Buck said on Wednesday he sent a letter to No 10 on behalf of residents, calling on Sir Keir Starmer to "listen to Stanwell residents" and find a housing solution that "protects both vulnerable people and maintain community safety". Earlier this month, the Home Office halted plans to house male-only asylum seekers in the Buck said: "Residents have raised serious concerns about safety, community cohesion, and wellbeing, which he believes need immediate and careful attention." He added: "This letter is our formal request asking for urgent intervention to stop the housing of male-only asylum seekers in the Stanwell hotel."Mr Buck, former mayor of Spelthorne, also highlighted that while the community has a strong record of welcoming asylum seekers, including families currently living at the hotel, the new approach "creates unnecessary tension"."Our residents have helped asylum-seeking families settle in, supported their children at the local school, and made them feel part of the community," he added. "But concentrating only young single males in one place, without the balance of families and diversity, risks upsetting that harmony and placing pressure on local services."On 7 August, Spelthorne Borough Council passed a motion calling for the Home Office to reconsider its Wednesday, the local authority said it was working closely with Home Office regarding the future use of Stanwell Hotel, but that the government would make the final decision. Council leader Joanne Sexton said the council recognised "significant concerns expressed by residents"."However, we were also mindful that the previous government entered into a contractual arrangement with the owners of the Stanwell Hotel," she added."The agreed motion sends a clear and united message we do not support the proposed change in use of the hotel and any decisions must take full account of the impact on the community."

Northamptonshire council get £500k to buy vulnerable groups a home
Northamptonshire council get £500k to buy vulnerable groups a home

BBC News

time19 hours ago

  • BBC News

Northamptonshire council get £500k to buy vulnerable groups a home

A council has been awarded more than £500,000 from the government to help purchase homes for vulnerable Northamptonshire's executive unanimously approved plans to spend £870,800, part-funded through £528,063 from the government's Local Authority Housing Fund (LAHF).Four properties will be bought and renovated, with three to be used as temporary accommodation for homeless households and one for the housing of an Afghan refugee Griffiths, Reform UK leader of the council, said: "This brings valuable assets into the council to be used for housing." The rest of the funding was made up of £240,000 from the local authority's general fund capital and £110,000 from its Housing Revenue Account capital, the Local Democracy Reporting Service Northamptonshire Council previously benefited from two prior rounds of LAHF funding, where it received £3.2m and £1.2m from the government, this alongside council money, it was able to purchase 41 properties for homeless households and for people in the Government Resettlement Programme, which helps find a home for said: "We must be pragmatic about not refusing grant funding and understand that the benefits achieved for our residents are significant."It is anticipated that offers for suitable properties will be made in October, with tenants allocated to the homes in March 2026 after renovation works were complete. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store