Miramichi residents demand sidewalks for refurbished Centennial Bridge
About 100 demonstrators gathered June 1, 2025 in Miramichi, N.B., calling for the provincial government to include sidewalks in a plan to refurbish the Centennial Bridge. (Nick Moore/CTV Atlantic)
About 100 demonstrators gathered Sunday in Miramichi, N.B., calling for the provincial government to include sidewalks in a plan to refurbish the Centennial Bridge.
Right now, there are sidewalks on both sides of the 58-year-old span connecting Douglastown and Chatham.
In April, residents learned sidewalks were not included in the bridge's perpetually delayed rehabilitation plan, with the provincial government calling it a cost cutting measure.
Demonstrators walked and wheeled a portion of the bridge's sidewalk on Sunday through wind and rain. Sadie Rose, an organizer of the demonstration, said residents don't accept the province's cost saving explanation.
'This is not over. Removing accessibility is not an option,' said Rose. 'Accessibility is important for seniors, for young people, for everybody in our community.'
Centennial Bridge
About 100 demonstrators gathered June 1, 2025 in Miramichi, N.B., calling for the provincial government to include sidewalks in a plan to refurbish the Centennial Bridge. (Nick Moore/CTV Atlantic)
During question period in the legislature on Friday, Progressive Conservative Miramichi East MLA Michelle Conroy said removing sidewalks from the bridge's refurbishment plan would negatively impact the community.
'The people of Miramichi deserve the independence to safely walk across that bridge,' said Conroy.
'The lack of transportation is talked about in most of our departments, and all of our meetings, and instead of pushing to knock down those barriers, this government is knocking down people's independence.'
In response, Transportation Minister Chuck Chiasson said finishing the bridge's refurbishment as soon as possible was the government's top priority.
'That bridge needs to be finished, we need to complete the project,' said Chiasson. 'That being said, I would be more than willing to engage the community on transportation solutions for the community.'
Chiasson said the previous PC government did not budget for sidewalks in the bridge's refurbishment plan. Conroy disagreed, saying: 'It needs to be in there, and it was in there, and we were in the meetings to prove it.'
Miramichi Mayor Adam Lordon previously told CTV News there once was a plan for an extended suspension sidewalk off the bridge's side, at a cost of around $50 million.
An estimated 13,000 vehicles cross the Centennial Bridge daily.
For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
35 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Build, baby, build: Canada used to know how to do that
The Last Spike of the Canadian Pacific Railway was driven on Nov. 7, 1885, at Craigellachie, British Columbia. It was the fulfillment of the National Dream – we used to do things in all caps – of a ribbon of steel binding the country together, and securing our independence from the United States. It was the world's longest rail line at that time, and an exceptional engineering feat, driven across the forbidding Canadian Shield and through a wall of mountains in B.C. And building it took just three and a half years. The first spike was driven in Bonfield, Ont., 3,500 kilometres east of Craigellachie, in the spring of 1882. Three and a half years to make a National Dream. Are we still able to dream big? And make big things happen? With the nation's first ministers meeting on Monday to talk about Prime Minister Mark Carney's goal of 'build, baby, build,' it's worth remembering that, until not so long ago, Canada knew how to do that. We could build big, we could built quickly and we could build at reasonable cost. Sometimes all three. Here are a few examples. Construction on Canada's first subway began on Sept. 8, 1949. Toronto's 7.4-km, 12-station line was opened to passengers on March 30, 1954. That's four and a half years from start to finish. Even if we date the start to when the citizens of Toronto agreed to the project in a plebiscite, in January, 1946, it was just eight years from idea to execution. Fast forward to the present, and the Eglinton Crosstown. It's been under construction since 2011. It's light rail – not the heavy rail of a subway – and much of the route is on the surface, as a scaled-up streetcar. It's still not open. Or consider the creation of the Montreal Metro. In November, 1961, the city decided to build a subway system, all underground. Construction started in the spring of 1962 and three lines, with 26 stations, were fully open by the spring of 1967. That's five years from decision to completion, or four and a half years from first shovel to first passenger. And then there was Expo 67. The 1967 world's fair was originally awarded to Moscow, but late in the game it pulled out. Montreal submitted a last-minute bid and was awarded the fair on Nov. 13, 1962. Construction started on Aug. 13, 1963. Here's what that entailed: Enlarging an island in the middle of the Saint Lawrence River. Creating another from landfill. Building a three-station, 4-kilometre Metro line, running under the river. Building the Expo Express, a five-station, 7.5-km rail line – a surface subway, with rolling stock similar to the Toronto subway – which was also North America's first computer-controlled, driverless transit line. Building the Pont de la Concorde bridge. Building a 25,000-seat stadium, the Autostade. Building mass transit within the Expo site, known as the Minirail, an elevated, driverless monorail. Building 90 exposition pavilions, some of which were large and architecturally advanced, including the 20-storey tall U.S. geodesic dome, which the Minirail passed through, and Canada's giant inverted pyramid, Katimavik. And building Habitat 67, a futuristic experimental housing development. Expo 67 opened on April 27, 1967. That's four and half years from conception to completion, or just 44 months from the start of construction the big reveal. The fair expected 12 million visitors. It got 55 million. Earlier this year, researchers at the University of Toronto's School of Cities published a report on the massive cost escalation in one of the things we must build more of – public transit. Current projects in the Toronto area, which are overseen by the provincial agency Metrolinx, have a price tag seven to ten times higher per kilometre than the original Yonge subway, even after adjusting for inflation. The researchers found that, from the 1950s to the 1990s, the cost of new high-capacity transit lines in Toronto was stable at around $100-million per kilometre, after adjusting for inflation. Thereafter, costs exploded. The extension of the subway into Vaughan a decade ago cost nearly $400-million per kilometre. Planned subway extensions to Scarborough and York region are budgeted at almost $800-million a kilometre. The under-construction Ontario Line is expected to clock in at over $1-billion per kilometre. Even the Finch West LRT – it's light rail running at street level, which is supposed to be cheap and easy – is expected to cost twice as much per kilometre as a tunnelled subway did a generation ago. Many advanced countries – South Korea, Finland, France, Spain and others – build the same or better transit at lower cost, and often much lower cost. Canada tends to tie itself in knots in various ways, so that we end up spending more but getting less. It happens in transit, and beyond. Build, baby, build? It's not impossible. Others do it. We used to. The first scheduled passenger train on what was then the world's longest transcontinental railway journey left Montreal's Dalhousie Station on June 28, 1886. It arrived at Port Moody, outside Vancouver, 136 hours and one minute later. It was one minute behind schedule.
Globe and Mail
38 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Federal officials drafted travel warnings in response to Trump executive orders
Federal officials drafted warnings about travelling to the U.S. for Canadians and permanent residents in response to executive orders issued by President Donald Trump this year but did not post them, internal documents obtained through access to information legislation show. A document – entitled 'Potential impact of EOs on Canadians travelling to the USA Draft travel advice updates' – was drawn up by Global Affairs' C Branch, which deals with emergency management as well as travel advice. One section (entitled 'Scenarios and Options for Senior Management consideration. Communications to Canadians in the United States') suggests Canadians consider returning home if they do not have proper documents to stay in the U.S. Also addressed is an executive order entitled 'Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.' The American directive, issued on January 20, aims to enhance screening and vetting of foreign nationals entering the U.S. American civil-rights groups have warned that the order may lead to the reinstatement of a ban on travellers from predominantly Muslim or Arab countries that Mr. Trump introduced during his first term as President. The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee has said it relies on the same statutory authority that was used to justify that 2017 travel ban. What are Trump's executive orders on immigration, the 'border emergency' and birthright citizenship? The internal Global Affairs document, drawn up earlier this year, contains drafts of several potential travel advisories that could be issued in response, including versions to be used if bans for particular countries are introduced. Most of them reassure Canadian citizens and permanent residents that they would not be affected. 'The Government of Canada has been informed that Canadians travelling with a Canadian passport, including dual citizens who have Canadian citizenship and citizenship from one of the following X countries: INSERT COUNTRIES, will not be affected by the Executive Order,' the document says. Another draft option reads: 'Similarly, entry requirements for Canadian permanent residents with a valid Canadian permanent resident card and a passport from one of those seven countries remain unchanged because of the Executive Order.' But another says: 'Permanent Residents of Canada from one of the above seven countries should consult Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on the Executive Order for information on entry requirements.' Federal civil servants also suggested specific updates to Ottawa's official advice after Mr. Trump signed an executive order in January declaring that the U.S. government now recognizes only two sexes: male and female. American transgender woman files asylum claim in Canada after Trump's edict on gender It suggests a 'generic update' to advice for Canadians with an X on their passport, rather than an F or M, that says 'you might face entry restrictions in countries that do not recognize the 'X" gender identifier." It adds: 'Before you leave, check with the closest foreign representative for your destination.' About 3,600 Canadians have X on their passport, according to the federal Immigration Department. The government already offers general travel advice for transgender and non-binary Canadians, including that 'foreign laws and customs related to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics can be very different from those in Canada. As a result, you could face certain barriers and risks when you travel outside Canada.' 'Transgender advocate Fae Johnstone, executive director of Queer Momentum, a Canadian LGBTQ advocacy group, said she was pleased that officials were thinking about an update, but speculated that politicians may have vetoed its publication because 'Canada is not wanting to pick new fights with Donald Trump.' 'We do need updated travel guidance for people who have X on their passport. It feels like there's a way to do this which isn't about picking a fight with America, but supporting trans folks," she said. Scores of transgender Americans seeking route to Canada, including through asylum claims The U.S. has said that its border agents will recognize Canadian passports with an X. The Global Affairs document was obtained by researcher Ken Rubin through an access to information request and shared with the Globe and Mail. It emphasizes that, 'It is too early to tell how the different EOs will impact Canadians travelling to the United States. The travel advice found in this document is subject to change and was drafted by making assumptions on the possible implications the EOs will have on Cansits' [Canadian citizens]. In March, Global Affairs updated its travel advice to make Canadians visiting the United States for periods longer than 30 days aware of a new U.S. rule requiring them to register with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. In April, it further updated its guidance, telling Canadians to 'expect scrutiny' from U.S. border guards, who may look through phones and laptops. 'Comply and be forthcoming in all interactions with border authorities. If you are denied entry, you could be detained while awaiting deportation.' In a statement on Friday, Global Affairs spokesperson Charlotte MacLeod said, 'The intent of the updates is to ensure Canadians have accurate information about travelling to the United States and that they know which U.S. Government sources to turn to for official advice.' She added that, 'Officials prepare in advance to respond to a variety of possible scenarios, based on new information, analysis of trends, and historical examples. This preparation includes developing draft templates of text that can be quickly adapted to respond to a specific situation if needed, based on the most recent information.'
Globe and Mail
38 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Morning Update: Canada's not-quite-so-fast track
Good morning. Canada's premiers might be overestimating how quickly they can build – more on that below, along with the latest on Western Canada's wildfires and a proposal for students using AI. But first: Canada's premiers arrived for their meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney yesterday bearing a wish list of nation-building projects they want to see fast-tracked. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew is looking to expand trade on Hudson Bay's western shore. Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston seeks to export offshore wind energy further inland. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith would like a pipeline. And Ontario Premier Doug Ford dreams of mining in the Ring of Fire, a 5,000-sq-km stretch north of Thunder Bay that's rich in critical minerals. They didn't quite get it. Instead of announcing a roster of projects, Carney emerged from the meeting in Saskatoon with a set of criteria. To get fast-tracked, proposals will need to grow the economy, contribute to clean growth, create autonomy and resilience, have a 'high likelihood' of execution, and represent a 'high priority' for Indigenous leaders. Ford put on a brave face, describing Carney as Santa Claus, but it couldn't have been the gift he'd hoped to unwrap. Going into the meeting, the Premier had predicted that 'we're going to make real, positive changes. No longer are we going to be waiting years and years to get shovels in the ground.' He's correct that it's been years – 18 of them, to be exact – since a junior mining company first made a promising nickel discovery in the Ring of Fire. Ford swore back in 2018 that he'd hop on a bulldozer himself to get construction started, but no actual mining has happened yet. Still, it's not just red tape holding up development. Proposals have stalled as a result of environmental concerns, infrastructure issues and Indigenous opposition. That's the challenge with building major projects quickly – you can't simply barrel over these roadblocks. Ford has other ideas. This spring, Ontario announced its own plan to fast-track resource development: the controversial Bill 5, which the government is currently speeding through Queen's Park before summer break starts on Thursday. Under the bill, the government can suspend any provincial regulation – including labour and environmental laws – in any area that it designates a 'special economic zone.' Bill 5 also guts Ontario's Endangered Species Act and is vague on its plans for Indigenous consultations. After pushback from Indigenous communities, the Premier's Office said last week it would amend the bill to affirm its obligations to consult First Nations. That duty is already established by the Constitution. Yesterday, several hundred First Nations members travelled to Queen's Park to protest Bill 5, which they say tramples on their treaty rights. Indigenous leaders, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, opposition politicians and environmentalists all called the legislation an antidemocratic power grab. Even the Toronto Zoo is asking Ford to reconsider. The Premier remains undaunted. He says mining in the Ring of Fire is necessary to shore up Ontario's economic resilience in the face of U.S. tariffs. He named Bill 5 the 'Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act,' just to underscore the point. But it's hard to put a number on just how much of the economy will be unleashed here. While Ford has claimed the Ring of Fire contains 'upwards of a trillion dollars,' there's no proof that the region has anywhere near that amount of mineral wealth. 'The Ring of Fire is essentially only one fairly small nickel mine – Eagle's Nest, which is the only project that has a chance of being put into production over the next decade,' Niall McGee, The Globe's mining reporter, told me. 'It's not the generational wealth creator that politicians and industry have maintained. It may get there eventually, but a lot more geological and feasibility studies need to be done to prove the economics.' And until someone ponies up to build the roads to Eagle's Nest, the entire project will remain in limbo. The Australian-based company that owns Eagle's Nest, Wyloo Metals, can't afford to pay for the infrastructure. Although Ontario has committed roughly $1-billion, at least twice that money is required for the work. Carney will probably choose the Ring of Fire for one of his fast-tracked proposals. The federal government might even shell out the extra $1-billion for roads. But that doesn't address the very real concerns of labour organizers, environmentalists and First Nations leaders. It's unclear if the project's return on investment will be worth the heavy cost. Wildfires in Western Canada have forced tens of thousands of people out of their homes and prompted hundreds of air quality warnings in four provinces yesterday. Read more here about the efforts to contain the fires and find rooms for evacuees. At home: Former prime minister Stephen Harper has a message for Ottawa: Mend relations with India now. Abroad: South Koreans vote for a new president today in a snap election triggered by the impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol, who declared martial law in December. Short term: Hoping it will alleviate a housing crunch, Montreal moved ahead with new rules banning short-term rentals for most of the year. Long term: University professors don't see AI going away, and some are now proposing that students learn how to use it better.
